Case Studies
Apr 19, 2023

Seismic Uplift Effect at End Spans of Long-Span Rigid-Frame Bridges Subjected to Near-Fault and Far-Fault Ground Motions

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 7

Abstract

Miaoziping Bridge, a long-span rigid-frame bridge, uplift appeared at the end spans in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Bearings and pad stones were damaged during the earthquake. In the past, the uplift mechanism and the seismic response under near-fault and far-fault ground motions were not sufficiently recognized. Here, a refined finite-element model of the Miaoziping Bridge was established considering the initial stress state and the nonlinear characteristics of the girder (e.g., cracking of concrete). The Wenchuan strong motion records and other 40 near-fault pulse-type and 40 far-fault ground motions were selected for nonlinear time history analysis. The uplift effect was realized by considering the compressive-only behavior of bearings. The results show that the seismic responses of the bridge under Wenchuan earthquake ground motions are in good agreement with the real seismic damage observed after the Wenchuan earthquake. The excitation of the near-fault pulse-type ground motion along the longitudinal direction is the dominant factor of the uplift at the end spans. When peak ground acceleration of the near-fault pulse-type ground motion is greater than 0.3g, the end spans are prone to uplift, and the maximum uplift displacement responses can reach 50 cm. There is little uplift possibility subjected to the far-fault ground motions. When the pulse period is in the range of 1–3 s, the pulse effect equals or even exceeds the full-wave effect. The end spans can hardly uplift subjected to vertical or transverse excitation individually. There is a slight difference between the uplift displacements subjected to single longitudinal ground motions and three-directional ground motions. The time of maximum uplift displacement is delayed considering the wave-passage effect. When the wave velocity is less than 1,000 m/s, the adverse effects of the wave-passage effect may be considered.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the reviewers for their professional comments that help to improve our study. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52178473 and 51778206) and the Key Research and Development Program of Hebei Province, China (No. 19275417D), which is gratefully acknowledged. Professor Xun Guo of the Institute of Disaster Prevention provided the earthquake damage pictures of the Miaoziping Bridge. Also, Professor Weilin Zhuang of Southwest Jiaotong University provided the design drawings of the Miaoziping Bridge. Their support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Baker, J. W. 2007. “Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 (5): 1486–1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
Bi, K., H. Hao, and N. Chouw. 2011. “Influence of ground motion spatial variation, site condition and SSI on the required separation distances of bridge structures to avoid seismic pounding.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (9): 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1076.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 2: Bridges. Eurocode 8. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chadwell, C. B., G. L. Fenves, and S. A. Mahin. 2003. “Near source earthquake effects on the Jilucable-stayed bridge in the 21 September 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake.” In Proc., Community Workshop on Computational Simulation and Visualization Environment for NEES. Lawrence, KS: National Science Foundation, Univ. of Kansas.
Chang, K. C., Y. L. Mo, C. C. Chen, L. A. C. Lai, and C. C. Chou. 2004. “Lessons learned from the damaged Chi-Lu cable stayed bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (4): 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(343).
Chen, L., W. Zhuang, and H. Zhao. 2012. Report on highways’ damage in the Wenchuan earthquake: Bridge. [In Chinese.] Beijing: China Communication Press.
Eröz, M., and R. DesRoches. 2013. “The influence of design parameters on the response of bridges seismically isolated with the friction pendulum system (FPS).” Eng. Struct. 56: 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.020.
Ganev, T., F. Yamazaki, H. Ishizaki, and M. Kitazawa. 1998. “Response analysis of the Higashi–Kobe Bridge and surrounding soil in the 1995 Hyogoken–Nanbu Earthquake.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27 (6): 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199806)27:6%3C557::AID-EQE742%3E3.0.CO;2-Z.
Guan, Z., J. Zhang, and J. Li. 2017. “Multilevel performance classifications of tall RC bridge columns toward postearthquake rehabilitation requirements.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (10): 04017080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001111.
Hu, M., Q. Han, X. Du, and X. Liang. 2017. “Seismic collapse analysis of RC highway bridges based on a simplified multiscale FE modeling approach.” Shock Vib. 2017: 5124767. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5124767.
Jia, H., D. Zhang, S. Zheng, W. Xie, and M. D. Pandey. 2013. “Local site effects on a high-pier railway bridge under tridirectional spatial excitations: Nonstationary stochastic analysis.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 52: 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.05.001.
Jiao, C., and A. Li. 2018. “Research on influence of compression-only behavior of bearings on seismic response of double-decks long-span cable-stayed bridges.” [In Chinese.] J. Basic Sci. Eng. 26 (2): 380–390. https://doi.org/10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2018.02.015.
Katsaras, C. P., T. B. Panagiotakos, and B. Kolias. 2009. “Effect of torsional stiffness of prestressed concrete box girders and uplift of abutment bearings on seismic performance of bridges.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 7 (2): 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9071-8.
Kawashima, K., Y. Takahashi, H. Ge, Z. Wu, and J. Zhang. 2009. “Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, earthquake.” J. Earthquake Eng. 13 (7): 965–996. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902859169.
Li, X., Z. Li, and A. J. Crewe. 2018. “Nonlinear seismic analysis of a high-pier, long-span, continuous RC frame bridge under spatially variable ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 114: 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.032.
Li, X., D. Zhang, W. Yan, Y. Chen, and W. Xie. 2015. “Shake-table test for a typical curved bridge: Wave passage and local site effects.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 04014061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000643.
Lin, Y., K. Bi, Z. Zong, H. Hao, J. Lin, and Y. Chen. 2020a. “Seismic performance of steel–concrete composite rigid-frame bridge: Shake table test and numerical simulation.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (7): 04020032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001558.
Lin, Y., Z. Zong, K. Bi, H. Hao, J. Lin, and Y. Chen. 2020b. “Experimental and numerical studies of the seismic behavior of a steel–concrete composite rigid-frame bridge subjected to the surface rupture at a thrust fault.” Eng. Struct. 205: 110105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110105.
Lin, Y., Z. Zong, K. Bi, H. Hao, J. Lin, and Y. Chen. 2020c. “Numerical study of the seismic performance and damage mitigation of steel–concrete composite rigid-frame bridge subjected to across-fault ground motions.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 18: 6687–6714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00958-1.
Liu, Y., Z. Mei, B. Wu, O. S. Bursi, K. S. Dai, B. Li, and Y. Lu. 2020. “Seismic behaviour and failure-mode-prediction method of a reinforced-concrete rigid-frame bridge with thin-walled tall piers: Investigation by model-updating hybrid test.” Eng. Struct. 208: 110302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110302.
Ma, D. 2008. “Research on construction control of long span continuous rigid frame bridge.” [In Chinese.] MA.Eng thesis, Southwest Jiaotong Univ.
Maison, B. F., and K. Kasai. 1990. “Analysis for a type of structural pounding.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (4): 957–977. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:4(957).
Mander, J. B., M. J. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Vol. 264 of OpenSees command language manual, 137–158. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ of California.
MOT (Ministry of Transport). 2020. Specifications for seismic design of highway bridges. [In Chinese.] JTG/T 2231-01-2020. Beijing: China Communications Press.
Muthukumar, S. 2003. A contact element approach with hysteresis damping for the analysis and design of pounding in bridges. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2014a. “PEER ground motion database.” Accessed February 2, 2021. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2014b. “Ground motion studies for transporation systems.” Accessed April 2, 2017. https://peer.berkeley.edu/research/transportation-systems.
Sextos, A., K. Pitilakis, and A. Kappos. 2003. “Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil–structure interaction phenomena. Part 1: Methodology and analytical tools.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (4): 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.241.
Shi, Y., J. Li, H. Qin, Z. Zhong, J. Wang, and F. Zhang. 2021. “Correlation analysis of ground motion duration indexes and nonlinear seismic responses of a long-span continuous rigid-frame bridge with high-rise piers.” J. Earthquake Eng. 2021: 1961927. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1961927.
Shrestha, B., H. Hao, and K. Bi. 2015. “Seismic response analysis of multiple-frame bridges with unseating restrainers considering ground motion spatial variation and SSI.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 18 (6): 873–892. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.18.6.873.
Stefanidou, S., A. Sextos, A. Kotsoglou, N. Lesgidis, and A. J. Kappos. 2017. “Soil–structure interaction effects in analysis of seismic fragility of bridges using an intensity-based ground motion selection procedure.” Eng. Struct. 151: 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.033.
Sun, J., R. Manzanarez, and M. Nader. 2002. “Design of looping cable anchorage system for new San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge main suspension span.” J. Bridge Eng. 7 (6): 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:6(315).
Sun, Z., D. Wang, T. Wang, S. Wu, and X. Guo. 2019. “Investigation on seismic behavior of bridge piers with thin-walled rectangular hollow section using quasi-static cyclic tests.” Eng. Struct. 200: 109708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109708.
Tong, L., R. Wang, and D. Wang. 2021. “Seismic cracking mechanism and control for pre-stressed concrete box girders of continuous rigid-frame bridges: Miaoziping Bridge in Wenchuan earthquake as an example.” Adv. Bridge Eng. 2 (17): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-021-00040-z.
Ucak, A., G. P. Mavroeidis, and P. Tsopelas. 2014. “Behavior of a seismically isolated bridge crossing a fault rupture zone.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 57: 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.10.012.
Wang, D., and L. Tong. 2021. “Seismic cracking damage analysis for the PC girders Miaoziping Bridge during 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.” In Proc., 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Wang, H. 2016. “Experimental research on seismic behavior of continuous rigid frame concrete bridge with high pier and long span.” [In Chinese.]Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry Univ.
Wang, H., C. Xie, D. Liu, and S. Qin. 2019. “Continuous reinforced concrete rigid-frame bridges in China.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 24 (2): 05019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000421.
Wilson, T., S. Chen, and H. Mahmoud. 2015. “Analytical case study on the seismic performance of a curved and skewed reinforced concrete bridge under vertical ground motion.” Eng. Struct. 100: 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.017.
Yi, J., and J. Li. 2019. “Effect of seismic-induced bearing uplift of a cable-stayed bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (3): 04018125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001342.
Yi, J., D. E. Yu, and J. Y. Zhou. 2022. “Seismic control of cable-stayed bridges with bearing uplift using tie-down rope-spring device.” J. Earthquake Eng. 26 (13): 6969–6992. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1961932.
Yi, J., J. Zhou, and X. Ye. 2020. “Seismic evaluation of cable-stayed bridges considering bearing uplift.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 133: 106102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106102.
Zeng, X., K. Deng, Y. Wang, G. Yan, and C. Zhao. 2021. “Field investigation and numerical analysis of damage to a high-pier long-span continuous rigid frame bridge in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.” J. Earthquake Eng. 2021 (6): 1868361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1868361.
Zhang, F., S. Li, J. Wang, and J. Zhang. 2020. “Effects of fault rupture on seismic responses of fault-crossing simply-supported highway bridges.” Eng. Struct. 206: 110104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110104.
Zhao, L., H. Hao, K. Bi, et al. 2018. “Numerical study of the seismic responses of precast segmental column bridge under spatially varying ground motions.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (12): 04018096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001319.
Zhong, J., J. S. Jeon, W. Yuan, and R. DesRoches. 2017. “Impact of spatial variability parameters on seismic fragilities of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to differential support motions.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (6): 04017013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001046.
Zong, Z., Z. Xia, H. Liu, Y. Li, and X. Huang. 2016. “Collapse failure of prestressed concrete continuous rigid-frame bridge under strong earthquake excitation: Testing and simulation.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (9): 04016047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000912.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 7July 2023

History

Received: Aug 25, 2022
Accepted: Feb 24, 2023
Published online: Apr 19, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei Univ. of Technology, 5340 Xiping Rd., Tianjin 300401, P. R. China; Civil Engineering Technology Research Center of Hebei Province, Tianjin 300401, P. R. China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei Univ. of Technology, 5340 Xiping Rd., Tianjin 300401, P. R. China; Civil Engineering Technology Research Center of Hebei Province, Tianjin 300401, P. R. China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7676-7767. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Building Collapse Mechanism and Disaster Prevention, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Beijing 101601, P. R. China. Email: [email protected]
Lei Chen
Ph.D. Student, School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei Univ. of Technology, Tianjin 300401, P. R. China.
Fan Shi
Ph.D. Student, School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei Univ. of Technology, Tianjin 300401, P. R. China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share