Technical Papers
Jan 20, 2023

Impact of Wind Load Characteristics on Computed Bridge Stay-Cable Forces Used for Bridge Health Monitoring

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

Monitoring the magnitude of stay-cable forces over time can play a key role in assessing the integrity and safety of a cable-stayed bridge. A variety of methodologies have been proposed to estimate stay-cable forces, with vibration-based methodologies being most widely applied in real-world applications due to their simplicity, speed, and economy. In most cases, periodically performed pluck tests are used to excite a cable, and accelerometers mounted on the cable are used to record its vibrational characteristics. Taut string theory (TST) is then applied to compute the cable forces. Because a pluck test is required to excite the cable, cable force measurements conducted in this manner are only done periodically. In this paper, we are interested in accurately computing stay-cable tensile forces on a more continuous basis using wind-induced cable vibration data collected by permanently installed structural health monitoring (SHM) systems. The specific objectives of this study are to (1) compute bridge stay-cable tensile forces over time using SHM data and use the results to establish confidence intervals (CIs) that can be applied to future cable force computations to detect “abnormal” values that might signal changes in bridge condition, and (2) define the wind characteristics (speed, gust, and direction) that lead to “acceptable” vibration records from which accurate cable forces can be computed. By fully understanding the wind load effects on cable vibrations, bridge owners will better know under what wind conditions to collect cable accelerations data. By knowing which data is useful, the amount of data collected and analyzed can be minimized, and the accuracy of the force calculations can be increased. The impact of wind load characteristics on the accuracy of cable force calculations is a key component of this work. To validate the proposed methodologies, data collected by an SHM system on the Indian River Inlet Bridge, a cable-stayed bridge in southern Delaware, was used. More specifically, the accelerations of eight cables recorded during five “storms” and one “regular” two-week ambient event (all occurring from 2014 and 2021), were evaluated. During the events, ambient weather conditions (i.e., mean wind speed, wind gust, wind direction, temperature, and perception) were collected in 5-min intervals. Cable accelerations were processed using power spectrum density to identify natural frequencies of the cables. TST was then applied to compute cable tensile forces. By doing this over an extended time window, 99% CIs for expected values of stay-cable forces were computed. These CIs can be used to monitor computed stay-cable forces over time as a means for assessing cable and overall bridge condition. While computing cable forces, it was found that some acceleration records did not yield accurate natural frequencies. Decision tree (DT) models were built to identify the wind load characteristics that correspond to cable vibrations that do yield accurate frequencies. The DT methodology was applied to establish a common set of wind load conditions for all cables for accurate frequency and cable force calculations. By establishing a set of wind load conditions for a specific bridge, those monitoring the bridge can minimize the amount of data collected, while improving the accuracy of the stay-cable force calculations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Delaware Department of Transportation for the financial support to develop and implement the structural monitoring system. They would also like to acknowledge Jason Arndt of DelDOT for time and effort working on the project.

References

Al-Khateeb, H. T., H. W. Shenton, M. J. Chajes, and C. Aloupis. 2019. “Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using regularly conducted diagnostic load tests.” Front. Built Environ. 5: 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00041.
Brincker, R., L. Zhang, and P. Andersen. 2001. “Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition.” Smart Mater. Struct. 10 (3): 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303.
Ceballos, M. A., and C. A. Prato. 2008. “Determination of the axial force on stay cables accounting for their bending stiffness and rotational end restraints by free vibration tests.” J. Sound Vib. 317 (1–2): 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.02.048.
Chen, C.-C., W.-H. Wu, C.-Y. Liu, and G. Lai. 2018. “Diagnosis of instant and long-term damages in cable-stayed bridges based on the variation of cable forces.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (5): 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1375962.
Chen, C.-C., W.-H. Wu, S.-T. Yu, and G. Lai. 2019. “Investigation of modal damping ratios for stay cables based on stochastic subspace identification with ambient vibration measurements.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 22 (16): 3444–3460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219855900.
Chen, J., H. W. Shenton, and M. J. Chajes. 2021. “Indian river inlet bridge cable tension tracking and wind load effects investigation.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure. Porto, Portugal: University of Porto.
Cho, S., J. Yim, S. W. Shin, H.-J. Jung, C.-B. Yun, and M. L. Wang. 2013. “Comparative field study of cable tension measurement for a cable-stayed bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (8): 748–757. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000421.
Dahan, H. 2014. Proactive data mining with decision trees. New York: Springer.
Dickinson, G. 1983. “Graphicacy and geography teaching. D. Boardman Croom Helm. London, 1983. No. of pages: 184. Price: £9.95. ISBN 07099 0644 7.” Earth Surface Processes Landforms 8(6): 610.
Fang, Z., and J. Wang. 2012. “Practical formula for cable tension estimation by vibration method.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000200.
Geier, R., G. De Roeck, and R. Flesch. 2006. “Accurate cable force determination using ambient vibration measurements.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2 (1): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470500253123.
Giaccu, G. F., L. Caracoglia, and B. Barbiellini. 2017. “Higher-order moments of eigenvalue and eigenvector distributions for the nonlinear stochastic dynamics of cable networks.” Procedia Eng. 199: 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.112.
Harms, T., S. Sedigh, and F. Bastianini. 2010. “Structural health monitoring of bridges using wireless sensor networks.” IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 13 (6): 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2010.5669608.
Humar, J. L. 2012. Dynamics of structures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press - Taylor Francis Group.
Kangas, S., A. Helmicki, R. Sexton, V. Hunt, and J. M. A. Swanson. 2012. “Cable-stayed bridges: Case study for ambient vibration-based cable tension estimation.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (6): 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000364.
Kim, B. H., and T. Park. 2007. “Estimation of cable tension force using the frequency-based system identification method.” J. Sound Vib. 304 (3–5): 660–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.03.012.
Li, H., F. Zhang, and Y. Jin. 2014. “Real-time identification of time-varying tension in stay cables by monitoring cable transversal acceleration.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 21 (7): 1100–1117. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1634.
Li, S., S. Wei, Y. Bao, and H. Li. 2018. “Condition assessment of cables by pattern recognition of vehicle-induced cable tension ratio.” Eng. Struct. 155: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.063.
Nancy Debora, S., R. Rosari, S. Jannet, and R. Reddy. 2018. “Assessment of cable tension using vibration based methodologies for wireless structural health monitoring.” Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 8 (2): 575–582. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdapr201867.
Ren, W.-X., G. Chen, and W.-H. Hu. 2005. “Empirical formulas to estimate cable tension by cable fundamental frequency.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 20 (3): 363–380. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.20.3.363.
Shimada, T., K. Kimoto, and S. Narui. 1989. “Study on estimating tension of tied hanger rope of suspension bridge by vibration method.” Proc. JSCE 404 (I-11): 455–458.
Stromquist-LeVoir, G., K. F. McMullen, A. E. Zaghi, R. Christenson. 2018. “Determining time variation of cable tension forces in suspended bridges using time-frequency analysis.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018: 1053232. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1053232.
Walker, J. S. 1991. Fast Fourier transforms. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Zhao, X., R. Han, Y. Ding, Y. Yu, Q. Guan, W. Hu, M. Li, and J. Ou. 2015. “Portable and convenient cable force measurement using smartphone.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 5 (4): 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0132-9.
Zui, H., T. Shinke, and Y. Namita. 1996. “Practical formulas for estimation of cable tension by vibration method.” J. Struct. Eng. 122 (6): 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:6(651).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: May 4, 2022
Accepted: Dec 3, 2022
Published online: Jan 20, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 20, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-6441. Email: [email protected]
Michael J. Chajes, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Email: [email protected]
Harry W. Shenton III, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share