Case Studies
Oct 31, 2022

An Explicit Approach for Determining the Rational Length of Steel Portion in Steel–Concrete Hybrid Girder Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 1

Abstract

The steel–concrete hybrid girder bridge structure is a combination of steel and concrete members in the direction of the bridge length. In long-span segmental concrete box girder bridges, the utilization of lightweight steel girders in the middle portion of the main span would greatly reduce the bridge self-weight while decreasing concrete creep and shrinkage effects. A critical parameter in the design of hybrid girder bridges is the rational length of the steel portion as a part of the main span (in other words, the rational location of the steel–concrete connection). Based on the concept of system equivalence, the steel–concrete hybrid system is equivalent to a full-concrete system with a reasonable span arrangement. The governing condition of the equivalence is that both systems have the same magnitude of self-weight hogging bending moments over the piers. Applying the system equivalence method, the rational length ratio of the steel portion to the main span (ξ) is explicitly solved, and its relationship with the length ratio of side span to main span (λ) is established. Finally, the proposed analytical approach is validated by five case studies, indicating that it is an effective and efficient method for the preliminary design of hybrid girder bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52178116), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20220072).

References

Ahn, J. W., K. S. Cha, and Y. S. Kim. 2001. “A case study on the life cycle cost analysis of steel box girder and prestressed concrete box girder bridge.” [In Korean.] Korean J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2 (2): 59–67.
ASBI (American Segmental Bridge Institute). 2019. Construction practices handbook for concrete segmental and cable-supported bridges. 3rd ed. Buda, TX: ASBI.
Bažant, Z. P., M. H. Hubler, and Q. Yu. 2011. “Pervasiveness of excessive segmental bridge deflections: Wake-up call for creep.” ACI Struct. J. 108 (6): 766–774.
Corven, J. 2015. Post-tensioned box girder design manual. Rep. No. FHWA-HIF-15-016. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Ding, W., and J. He. 2012. “Parameter research on the length of steel box of steel -prestressed concrete mixed continuous box girder bridges.” [In Chinese.] J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 36 (3): 554–557.
Elbadry, M., A. Ghali, and R. B. Gayed. 2014. “Deflection control of prestressed box girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (5): 04013027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000564.
Esteves, P. M., J. F. Almeida, and J. J. Oliveira Pedro. 2018. “Steel-concrete hybrid bridge decks: Rational design models for connection regions.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng. 171 (4): 252–266.
Ghali, A., R. B. Gayed, and J. Kroman. 2016. “Sustainability of concrete infrastructures.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (7): 04016033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000862.
Granata, M. F., and A. Recupero. 2015. “Serviceability and ultimate safety checks of segmental concrete bridges through N-M and M-V interaction domains.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (8): B4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000686.
Gu, Y.-W., X. Nie, Y.-F. Liu, S.-K. Duan, and J.-S. Fan. 2021. “Experimental and numerical study of steel-to-concrete joint section in hybrid cable-stayed bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 187: 106982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106982.
He, J., Y. Liu, and B. Pei. 2014. “Experimental study of the steel-concrete connection in hybrid cable-stayed bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 28 (3): 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000444.
He, Z.-Q., Y. Li, T. Xu, Z. Liu, and Z. J. Ma. 2021a. “Crack-based serviceability assessment of post-tensioned segmental concrete box-girder bridges.” Structures 31: 1097–1108.
He, Z.-Q., M. Tang, T. Xu, Z. Liu, and Z. J. Ma. 2021b. “Additional shear stresses in webs of segmental concrete bridges due to anchorage of cantilever tendons.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (7): 04021041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001750.
Ingebrigisen, T. 1999. “Stolma bridge, Norway.” Struct. Eng. Int. 9 (2): 100–102. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686699780621109.
Kim, S. E., and H. T. Nguyen. 2010. “Finite element modeling and analysis of a hybrid steel-PSC beam connection.” Eng. Struct. 32 (9): 2557–2569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.029.
Kurita, A., and A. Ohyama. 2003. “Recent steel–concrete hybrid bridges in Japan.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 3 (4): 271–279.
Liu, D., and W. Wang. 2021. “Key construction control techniques for long-span continuous rigid-frame bridge with steel-concrete hybrid girders.” [In Chinese.] Bridge Constr. 51 (1): 121–129.
Liu, G., L. Tang, H. Tan, and W. Wu. 2010. “Determination of rational steel-concrete connection position for hybrid girder cable-stayed bridge.” [In Chinese.] J. Highway Transp. Res. Dev. 27 (6): 52–57.
Pan, Z., C. C. Fu, and Y. Jiang. 2011. “Uncertainty analysis of creep and shrinkage effects in long-span continuous rigid frame of Sutong Bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (2): 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000147.
Pu, Q., S. Yang, Z. Shi, Y. Hong, and Y. Zhou. 2021. “Fatigue performance of an innovative steel-concrete joint in long-span railway hybrid box girder cable-stayed bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (2): 04020129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001680.
Qin, F., J. Di, J. Dai, W. Lu, and M. Zhao. 2013. “Study on rational position of joint section of steel-concrete hybrid girder bridge.” Adv. Mater. Res. 671–674: 1007–1011.
Raphael, W., E. Zgheib, and A. Chateauneuf. 2018. “Experimental investigations and sensitivity analysis to explain the large creep of concrete deformations in the bridge of Cheviré.” Case Stud. Constr. Mat. 9: e00176.
Rodriguez, S. 2004. “Design of long span concrete box girder bridges: Challenges and solutions.” In Proc., of the Structures Congress 2004: Building on the Past, Securing the Future. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Russell, H. G., and B. A. Graybeal. 2013. Ultra-high performance concrete: A state-of-the-art report for the bridge community. Rep. No. FHWA-HRT-13-060. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
SETRA (Service d’Etudes Techniques des Routes et Autoroutes). 2007. Design guide: Prestressed concrete bridges built using the cantilever method. Toulouse, France: SETRA.
Shao, X., R. Pan, H. Zhan, W. Fan, Z. Yang, and W. Lei. 2017. “Experimental verification of the feasibility of a novel prestressed reactive powder concrete box-girder bridge structure.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (6): 04017015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001033.
Su, Q., and F. Qin. 2013. “A new type hybrid-beam bridge structural system and its design parameters.” [In Chinese.] J. Tongji Univ. 41 (6): 799–805.
Tang, F., S. Luo, and H. Yang. 2012. “Overall design of Oujiang Bridge.” [In Chinese.] Highway 5: 127–131.
Tang, M.-C. 2010. “The new Shibanpo Bridge, Chongqing, China.” Struct. Eng. Int. 20 (2): 157–160. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686610791283533.
Virlogeux, M. 1991. “Combining prestressed concrete and steel for bridge construction.” In Proc., of the Int. Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Symp. Leningrad 1991: Bridges: Interaction Between Construction Technology and Design, 367–374. Zurich, Switzerland: IABSE.
Virlogeux, M. 1999. “Recent evolution of cable-stayed bridges.” Eng. Struct. 21 (8): 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00028-5.
Xin, H., Y. Liu, J. He, and Y. Zhang. 2014. “Experimental and analytical study on stiffened steel segment of hybrid structure.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 100: 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.002.
Xu, G., M. Zeng, and Q. Su. 2021. “Layout and optimization of the external prestressing tendons of hybrid beam rigid frame bridges.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 719 (3): 032061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/719/3/032061.
Zeng, M., G. Xu, Z. Lin, D. Chen, and Q. Su. 2020. “Mechanical calculation and rational structural system of hybrid beam rigid frame bridge.” [In Chinese.] J. Tongji Univ. 48 (12): 1687–1695.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Apr 15, 2022
Accepted: Sep 13, 2022
Published online: Oct 31, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2194-4794. Email: [email protected]
Jiatong Chen [email protected]
Research Assistant, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8246-7605. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share