Technical Papers
Oct 18, 2024

From 10% to 20%: Influence of Annual Sunlight Exposure Threshold on the Acceptability of Daylighting Performance under Different Sky Conditions

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 1

Abstract

The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) v4 daylight credit criteria were adjusted, and the Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE) threshold was increased from 10% to 20%. The ASE < 20% threshold was also implemented by the Illuminating Engineering Society in the recent lighting measurements standard in 2023. However, the implications of this change across diverse sky conditions remain unclear. Simulations for a typical office space across 32 cities (15°N to 65°N) considered various sky conditions, encompassing 360° orientations and 5%–100% window-to-wall ratios (WWRs). Implementing the ASE < 20% threshold increased accepted daylighting cases from 21% to 52%. Spaces with WWRs between 85% and 100% and oriented between 140°S and 230°S now consistently achieve acceptable daylighting performance in all tested cities, compared to those oriented between 150°S and 210°S, when ASE is ≤10%. The new threshold resulted in greater sensitivity to the sky conditions, aligning more closely with the city’s latitude. Applying both the old and new thresholds shows that spaces with WWRs less than 20% do not achieve acceptable daylighting, regardless of orientation or location. The ASE < 20% appears to favor cities at lower latitudes, with a 168%–260% increase in accepted cases for cities closer to the equator (latitude 15°N to 35°N), compared to a 125%–150% increase for cities further north (latitude 45°N to 65°N). This is related to the spatial Daylight Autonomy limitations imposed by the sky conditions of the northern locations. This disparity suggests that the LEED daylight credit criteria may be more difficult to achieve in higher latitude locations. It is suggested that the LEED credit criteria could be reconsidered in the future for those locations so that they become more sensitive to the differentiated sky conditions in various latitudes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research work was financially supported by MAVEN Developments, Grant No. 0801075001002, as part of a study conducted to provide sustainability and accessibility recommendations for the Baymount Sokhna development project.

References

Abboushi, B. 2020. “The case for multicriteria annual sunlight exposure guidelines.” In Proc., of Building Performance Analysis Conf. and SimBuild co-organized by ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA, 358–365. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL).
Andersen, M., J. Mardaljevic, and S. W. Lockley. 2012. “A framework for predicting the non-visual effects of daylight-part I: Photobiology-based model.” Light. Res. Technol. 44: 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153511435961.
Bodart, M., S. Kleindienst, and M. Andersen. 2008. “Graphical representation of climate-based daylight performance to support architectural design.” J. Illum. Eng. Soc. North Am. 5: 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2008.10747628.
Bueno, B., J. Wienold, A. Katsifaraki, and T. E. Kuhn. 2015. “Fener: A radiance-based modelling approach to assess the thermal and daylighting performance of complex fenestration systems in office spaces.” Energy Build. 94: 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.02.038.
De Carli, M., and V. De Giuli. 2009. “Optimization of daylight in buildings to save energy and to improve visual comfort: Analysis in different latitudes.” Int. Build. Perform. Simul. Assoc. 1797–1805. https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2009.1797-180.
Harrison, A. W. 1991. “Directional sky luminance versus cloud cover and solar position.” Sol. Energy 46: 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(91)90102-3.
Heschong, L., et. al. 2012. Daylight metrics report. San Francisco, CA: CEC Pier Daylighting Plus Research Program.
IES (Illuminating Engineering Society). 2012. Approved method: IES spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). ANSI/IES LM-83-12. New York: IES.
IES (Illuminating Engineering Society). 2022. Approved method: IES spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). ANSI/IES LM-83-23. New York: IES.
Jakubiec, J. A. 2018. “Validation of simplified visual discomfort calculations.” In Proc., IBPSA Building Simulation and Optimization 2018, 17–23. Cambridge, UK: BSO.
Liu, B. Y. H., and R. C. Jordan. 1960. “The interrelationship and characteristic distribution of direct, diffuse and total solar radiation.” Sol. Energy 4 (3): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092x(60)90062-1.
Mardaljevic, J., L. Heschong, and E. Lee. 2009. “Daylight metrics and energy savings.” Light. Res. Technol. 41: 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153509339703.
Mashaly, I., V. Garcia-Hansen, I. Gillian, and M. Cholette. 2021. “CFStrace: An evaluation method to include complex fenestration systems in the façade design process.” Sol. Energy 217: 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.073.
Munoz, C. M., P. M. Esquivias, D. Moreno, I. Acosta, and J. Navarro. 2014. “Climate-based daylighting analysis for the effects of location, orientation, and obstruction.” Light. Res. Technol. 46: 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153513487005.
Nicol, F., M. Wilson, and C. Chiancarella. 2006. “Using field measurements of desktop illuminance in European offices to investigate its dependence on outdoor conditions and its effect on occupant satisfaction, and the use of lights and blinds.” Energy Build. 38: 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.014.
Reinhart, C. 2015. “Opinion: Climate-based daylighting metrics in LEEDv4—A fragile progress.” Light. Res. Technol. 47: 388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153515587613.
Reinhart, C. F., J. A. Jakubiec, and D. Ibarra. 2013. “Definition of a reference office for standardized evaluations of dynamic façade and lighting technologies.” In Proc., BS 2013: 13th Conf. of the Int. Building Performance Simulation Association, 3645–3652. London, UK: International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA).
Solemma. 2023. “Why is ClimateStudio so fast?.” Accessed February 15, 2024. https://www.solemma.com/blog/why-is-climatestudio-so-fast
Soneye, O. O. 2020. “Evaluation of clearness index and cloudiness index using measured global solar radiation data: A case study for a tropical climatic region of Nigeria.” Atmósfera 34: 25–39. https://doi.org/10.20937/atm.52796.
Stanislav, D., and K. Richard. 2015. “Classification of daylight conditions in cloud cover situations.” Light Eng. 23: 4–14.
Tregenza, P. R. 1987. “Cloud cover and daylight illuminance.” Build. Environ. 22: 163–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(87)90004-7.
Trudeau, M. C., Li, and A. Frisque. 2016. “Modelling for daylight autonomy for leed V4 – implications for cities in northern latitudes.” eSIM Build. Performance Simulation Conf. 715–721.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2013. “LEED BD_C: New Construction. v4 – LEED v4 – Daylight.” Accessed February 15, 2024. https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction-schools-new-construction-retail-new-construction-data-centers-new-11.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2017. “LEED Interpretation ID# 100002149 for EQ121—Daylight. US Green Building Council.” Accessed July 11, 2024. https://www.usgbc.org/leedaddenda/100002149.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2019. “LEED BD_C: New Construction. v4.1 – LEED v4.1 – Daylight.” Accessed February 15, 2024. https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction-schools-new-construction-retail-new-construction-data-centers-new-9?return=/credits/New%20Construction/v4.1.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 31Issue 1March 2025

History

Received: Mar 4, 2024
Accepted: Aug 16, 2024
Published online: Oct 18, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2025
Discussion open until: Mar 18, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor of Architecture, Dept. of Architecture, American Univ. in Cairo, AUC Ave., P.O. Box 74, New Cairo 11835, Egypt. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5795-0267. Email: [email protected]
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Dept. of Architecture, American Univ. in Cairo, AUC Ave., P.O. Box 74, New Cairo 11835, Egypt (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4021-4308. Email: [email protected]
Mariam El-Hussainy [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Architecture, American Univ. in Cairo, AUC Ave., P.O. Box 74, New Cairo 11835, Egypt. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share