Exergy-Based Greenhouse Gas Metric of Buildings
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 4
Abstract
To effectively reduce the greenhouse gas emissions in buildings, there is a need for a robust basis for measuring greenhouse gas emissions associated with the built environment. The conventional method to measure greenhouse gas emissions is based on global warming potential. However, global warming potential depends on erratic factors such as timeframe, location, and absorption rate, which, in turn, leads to unreliable metrics for greenhouse gas emissions.This study proposed an exergy-based metric to measure greenhouse gas emissions to eliminate the weakness. The proposed metric was developed using the cumulative exergy demand method based on standard chemical exergy of substances and is applied to a case study building. The major findings indicated that the exergy-based greenhouse gas metric is more robust and consistent than the conventional global warming potential (GWP)-based metric by eliminating the erratic factors, providing absolute values, obtaining a single objective function for environmental impact potential, and enabling indexing of values to assess environmental sustainability.
Practical Applications
This research explored the development of a metric based on analysis of energy quality for a robust, consistent, and comparative measurement of the environmental impacts of greenhouse gases emitted during an assumed life cycle (75 years) of a building. The results showed that an objective comparative value of the environmental impact of a building and/or its products can be obtained by unit mass/weight value if the energy demand data are unknown and by absolute mass/weight if the energy demand data are known. In any case, the environmental impacts between buildings or building products can objectively be compared. Practitioners can utilize the method or its results in indexing or benchmarking buildings for building environmental sustainability ratings using units such as per life span, area, and occupants. Standardized indices can be developed into a computer-aided tool for policy making and regulation of both existing and new buildings in terms of their environmental sustainability. The current global awareness about climate change and the environmental impact of human activities on the ecosystem makes this study even more relevant.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the UF’s Planning, Design, and Construction for providing the energy source and demand data for the case study building. The authors also acknowledge the Center for Advanced Construction Information Modeling (CACIM) for enabling access to the building information models used for the case study building.
References
AZOCleanTech. 2013. “An introduction to exergy.” Interview Conducted by Professor Ibrahim Dincer on July 22, 2013. Accessed April 9, 2022. https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=426.
Cassetti, G., and E. Colombo. 2013. “Minimization of local impact of energy systems through exergy analysis.” Energy Convers. Manage. 76: 874–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.044.
De Wolf, C., E. Hoxha, A. Hollberg, C. Fivet, and J. Ochsendorf. 2020. “Database of embodied quantity outputs: Lowering material impacts through engineering.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (3): 04020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000408.
Dewulf, J., H. Van Langenhove, B. Muys, S. Bruers, B. R. Bakshi, G. F. Grubb, D. M. Paulus, and E. Sciubba. 2008. “Exergy: Its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 42: 2221–2232. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071719a.
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2021. “Greenhouse gas emissions understanding global warming potentials.” Accessed August 28, 2023. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions.
Fenner, A. E., C. J. Kibert, J. Woo, S. Morque, M. Razkenari, H. Hakim, and X. Lu. 2018. “The carbon footprint of buildings: A review of methodologies and applications.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 94: 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.012.
Gardner, H. M., V. Hasik, A. Banawi, M. Olinzock, and M. M. Bilec. 2020. “Whole building life cycle assessment of a living building.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (4): 04020039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000436.
Hong, S. J., J. H. Arehart, and W. V. Srubar III. 2020. “Embodied and operational energy analysis of passive house–inspired high-performance residential building envelopes.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (2): 04020010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000405.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2021. “Climate change 2021: The physical science basis.” In Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, edited by V. Masson-Delmotte, et al., 3–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koroneos, C., and M. Tsarouhis. 2012. “Exergy analysis and life cycle assessment of solar heating and cooling systems in the building environment.” J. Cleaner Prod. 32: 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.012.
Memarian, S., B. M. Kari, S. Asadi, and R. Fayaz. 2020. “Building envelope thermal mass and its effect on spring and the autumn seasonal transition period.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (2): 04020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000391.
Najjar, M. K., K. Figueiredo, A. C. J. Evangelista, A. W. Hammad, V. W. Tam, and A. Haddad. 2019. “Life cycle assessment methodology integrated with BIM as a decision-making tool at early-stages of building design.” Int. J. Constr. Manag. 22 (4): 1–15.
Nwodo, M., and C. J. Anumba. 2021. “Exergy-based life cycle assessment of buildings: Case studies.” Sustainability 13 (21): 11682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111682.
Nwodo, M. N., and C. J. Anumba. 2020. “Exergetic life cycle assessment: A review.” Energies 13 (11): 2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112684.
Poulsen Rydborg, M., and C. Brunsgaard. 2021. “Potentials for adapting Danish sustainable houses to climate change: Simulation study on the effects of climate change in low-rise sustainable houses.” J. Archit. Eng. 27 (3): 04021030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000484.
Romero, J. C., and P. Linares. 2014. “Exergy as a global energy sustainability indicator. A review of the state of the art.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 33: 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.012.
Sangi, R., and D. Müller. 2016. “Exergy-based approaches for performance evaluation of building energy systems.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 25: 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.002.
Shine, K. P. 2009. “The global warming potential—The need for an interdisciplinary retrial.” Clim. Change 96 (4): 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6.
Simonen, K., M. Huang, B. X. Rodriguez, and L. Todaro. 2018. Life cycle assessment of buildings: A practice guide. Seattle: Univ. of Washington, The Carbon Leadership Forum.
Srinivasan, R. S., W. Ingwersen, C. Trucco, R. Ries, and D. Campbell. 2014. “Comparison of energy-based indicators used in life cycle assessment tools for buildings.” Build. Environ. 79: 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.006.
Szargut, J. 1980. “International progress in second law analysis.” Energy 5: 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(80)90090-0.
Szargut, J., and D. R. Morris. 1987. “Cumulative exergy consumption and cumulative degree of perfection of chemical processes.” Int. J. Energy Res. 11: 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4440110207.
Szargut, J., D. R. Morris, and F. R. Steward. 1988. Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical, and metallurgical processes. New York: Hemisphere.
Tam, V. W., K. N. Le, C. N. Tran, and I. C. S. Illankoon. 2021. “A review on international ecological legislation on energy consumption: Greenhouse gas emission management.” Int. J. Constr. Manag. 21 (6): 631–647.
Tanaka, K., O. Boucher, P. Ciais, D. J. A. Johansson, and J. Morfeldt. 2021. “Cost-effective implementation of the Paris Agreement using flexible greenhouse gas metrics.” Sci. Adv. 7 (22): eabf9020. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf9020.
Wang, W., R. Zmeureanu, and H. Rivard. 2005. “Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization.” Build. Environ. 40: 1512–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.017.
Zhang, M. 1995. “Analysis of energy conversion systems, including material and global warming aspects.” Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State Univ.
Zmeureanu, R. 2013. “Exergy-based index for assessing building sustainability.” Build. Environ. 60: 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.019.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29 • Issue 4 • December 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 7, 2022
Accepted: Aug 9, 2023
Published online: Sep 15, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 15, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.