Dynamic Stall Alleviation of a Helicopter Blade Section in Forward Flight Condition Using an Optimized Combination of Active Nose Droop and Active Gurney Flap
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 5
Abstract
This study investigates the potential of an optimized combination of active nose droop and active Gurney flap (CADAG) in a new flow control strategy to manage dynamic stall over a pitching blade section under variable Mach number flow. The optimization method employs the genetic algorithm coupled with a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) solver and artificial neural network. The base blade section belongs to a section positioned at of the rotor blade of the UH-60A helicopter in forward flight condition. A high relative angle of attack on the retreating side makes the flow susceptible to dynamic stall. A nose droop is employed to control the dynamic stall of the blade section, and a Gurney flap is used to maintain the balance of the generated lift of the blade during 360° of rotation. A comprehensive investigation is performed to determine the most significant parameters affecting the performance of the present combined active flow control. The ratio of the total generated lift to the drag is chosen as the objective function of the optimization. Results show that this ratio and the total generated lift in one rotation cycle increase by 193% and 13%, respectively, at the optimum condition of the present combined active flow control, while the ratio of the generated lift over the advancing side to the retreating side is equal to that of the base blade section. In addition, the dynamic stall hysteresis loop reduces significantly, and the maximum value of the drag coefficient and the negative aerodynamic damping decrease up to 87% and 83% compared to the base blade section, respectively. In general, the proposed innovative combined active flow control is an adjustable method to alleviate dynamic stall and improve the aerodynamic performance of rotary wings in different operation conditions.
Practical Applications
The rotary blades are extensively used in rotorcraft, turbo engines, and wind turbines. Despite their massive use, they suffer from some essential issues, of which the most important one is the so-called dynamic stall. Dynamic stall is a complex phenomenon that limits the performance of the rotary blades. Due to the physics governing a rotary wing, such as a helicopter rotor blade, dynamic stall and flow separation are very common. Understanding dynamic stall physics and providing solutions to prevent it is still one of the main challenges of aerodynamic scientists. The present study introduces a novel adjustable method for practically alleviating the dynamic stall on helicopter blade section in forward flight conditions to improve its aerodynamic performance in different operational conditions. A comprehensive investigation is carried out to determine the key parameters affecting the proposed method. These findings can serve as a valuable tool for other researchers to develop various active flow control strategies. This article applies an optimization process using artificial neural networks, genetic algorithms, and CFD tools, which forms a comprehensive framework that can be easily extended to other applications.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Bashir, M., S. Longtin-Martel, N. Zonzini, R. Botez, A. Ceruti, and T. Wong. 2022. “Optimization and design of a flexible droop nose leading edge morphing wing based on a novel black widow optimization (B.W.O.) algorithm Part II.” Designs 6 (6): 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6060102.
Bousman, W. G. 2002. “Airfoil design and rotorcraft performance.” In Proc., 58th Annual Forum, American Helicopter Society, 11–13. Montreal: American Helicopter Society.
Bowles, P., D. Coleman, T. Corke, F. Thomas, and M. Wasikowski. 2012. “Compressibility effects on aerodynamic damping during dynamic stall events.” In Proc., AHS 68th Annual Forum. Forth Worth, TX: The Vertical Flight Society.
Chandrasekhara, M. 2010. “Optimum Gurney flap height determination for ‘lost-lift’ recovery in compressible dynamic stall control.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 14 (8): 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2010.04.010.
Chandrasekhara, M., P. Martin, and C. Tung. 2004. “Compressible dynamic stall control using a variable droop leading-edge airfoil.” J. Aircr. 41 (4): 862–869. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.472.
Chandrasekhara, M., M. Wilder, and L. Carr. 1998. “Unsteady stall control using dynamically deforming airfoils.” AIAA J 36 (10): 1792–1800. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.294.
Geissler, W., and M. Trenker. 2002. “Numerical investigation of dynamic stall control by a nose-drooping device.” In American helicopter society aerodynamics, acoustics, and test and evaluation technical specialist meeting. San Francisco: American Helicopter Society.
Gharali, K., and D. Johnson. 2013. “Dynamic stall simulation of a pitching airfoil under unsteady freestream velocity.” J. Fluids Struct. 42 (May): 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.005.
Hird, K., M. W. Frankhouser, J. W. Gregory, and J. P. Bons. 2014. “Compressible dynamic stall of an SSC-A09 airfoil subjected to coupled pitch and Freestream Mach oscillations.” In Proc., American Helicopter Society 70th Annual Forum. Montréal: American Helicopter Society.
Hird, K., M. W. Frankhouser, S. Naigle, J. W. Gregory, and J. P. Bons. 2015. “Study of an SSC-A09 airfoil in compressible dynamic stall with Freestream Mach oscillations.” In Proc., American Helicopter Society 71st Annual Forum, 110. Virginia Beach, VA: American Helicopter Society International.
Jaworski, J. 2012. “Thrust and aerodynamic forces from an oscillating leading edge flap.” AIAA J. 50 (12): 2928–2931. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051579.
Karimian, S. M. H., S. V. Aramian, and A. Abdolahifar. 2021. “Numerical investigation of dynamic stall reduction on helicopter blade section in forward flight by an airfoil deformation method.” J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43 (Apr): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02822-y.
Kentfield, J. 1993. “The potential of Gurney flaps for improving the aerodynamic performance of helicopter rotors.” In Proc., AIAA Int. Powered Lift Conf., AIAA Paper, 4883. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-4883.
Kerho, M. 2007. “Adaptive airfoil dynamic stall control.” J. Aircr. 44 (4): 1350–1360. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.27050.
Kinzel, M., M. Maughmer, and E. Duque. 2010. “Numerical investigation on the aerodynamics of oscillating airfoils with deployable Gurney flaps.” AIAA J. 48 (7): 1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050070.
Lee, B., and K. Yee. 2005. “Passive control of dynamic stall via nose droop with gurney flap.” In Vol. 1364 of Proc., 43 rd AIAA Paper. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-1364.
Lee, S., Y. Yu, and K. W. McAlister. 1995. “Dynamic stall control for advanced rotorcraft application.” AIAA J. 33 (2): 370–373. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12374.
Lee, T., and P. Gerontakos. 2004. “Investigation of flow over an oscillating airfoil.” J. Fluid Mech. 512 (Feb): 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112004009851.
Leishman, J. 2006. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics: Cambridge Aerospace series. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liebeck, R. 1978. “Design of subsonic airfoils for high lift.” J. Aircr. 15 (9): 547–561. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58406.
Ma, Y., Q. Zhao, and G. Zhao. 2020. “New combinational active control strategy for improving aerodynamic characteristics of airfoil and rotor.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 234 (4): 977–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410019893193.
Maughmer, M., and G. Bramesfeld. 2008. “Experimental investigation of Gurney flaps.” J. Aircr. 45 (6): 2062–2067. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.37050.
McCroskey, W. 1981. The phenomenon of dynamic stall. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Memorandum.
McCroskey, W., L. Carr, and K. McAlister. 1976. “Dynamic stall experiments on oscillating airfoils.” AIAA J 14 (1): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.61332.
McCroskey, W., K. McAlister, L. Carr, and S. Pucci. 1982. An experimental study of dynamic stall on advanced airfoil section Volume 1: Summary of the experiment. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Pastrikakis, V., R. Steijl, and G. Barakos. 2016. “Effect of active gurney flaps on overall helicopter flight envelope.” Aeronaut. J. 120 (1230): 1230–1261. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.57.
Pastrikakis, V., R. Steijl, and G. Barakos. 2017. “Alleviation of retreating side stall using active gurney flaps.” In Recent progress in flow control for practical flows, 69–86. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50568-8_4.
Perry, M., and T. Mueller. 1987. “Leading- and trailing-edge flaps on a low Reynolds number airfoil.” J Aircr. 24 (Apr): 653–659. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45491.
Simeng, J., Z. Qijun, and Z. Guoqing. 2023. “Multi-objective airfoil optimization under unsteady-freestream dynamic stall conditions.” J. Aircr. 60 (2): 293–309. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C036708.
Stalewski, W. 2018. “Flow control on Helicopter-Rotor blades via active gurney flap.” Trans. Aerosp. Res. 2018 (1): 98–118. https://doi.org/10.2478/tar-2018-0007.
Wang, S., D. Ingham, L. Ma, M. Pourkashanian, and Z. Tao. 2012. “Turbulence modeling of deep dynamic stall at relatively low Reynolds number.” J. Fluid Struct. 33 (Sep): 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.04.011.
Xiangyang, D., Q. Zhan, L. Gaohua, and W. Fuxin. 2022. “Research on dynamic stall active control of two-dimensional airfoil with combination of droop leading edge and trailing edge flap.” Aerosp. Syst. 5 (4): 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-022-00159-5.
Zanotti, A., and G. Gibertini. 2018. “Experimental assessment of an active L-shaped tab for dynamic stall control.” J. Fluids Struct. 77 (Sep): 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.11.010.
Zhao, G.-q., and Q.-j. Zhao. 2015. “Dynamic stall control optimization of rotor airfoil via variable droop leading-edge.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 43 (Apr): 406–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.03.022.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 19, 2023
Accepted: Feb 21, 2024
Published online: May 21, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 21, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Active control
- Aerodynamics
- Aerospace engineering
- Aircraft and spacecraft
- Computational fluid dynamics technique
- Continuum mechanics
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering mechanics
- Flight
- Flow (fluid dynamics)
- Flow control
- Fluid dynamics
- Fluid mechanics
- Hydrologic engineering
- Solid mechanics
- Structural control
- Structural engineering
- Structural health monitoring
- Water and water resources
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.