Experimental Exploration of Bioinspired Planar Wingtip Devices for a Flat-Plate Wing in the Low Reynolds Number Regime
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 6
Abstract
This study investigates the use of planar wingtip attachments to improve the lift generating performance of low aspect ratio (AR) flat-plate wings in the low Reynolds number (Re) range (). Inspired by nature’s solutions, the slotted wingtip feathers of high lift wings as seen in eagles, we tested different configurations of wingtip attachments, ranging from a base plate with no attachments to plates with one, two, or four attachments for . The lift-to-drag (L/D) ratio, a commonly used metric for gauging the aerodynamic performance, shows that the configuration with four attachments (4A) has the superior performance. In the case of ARs of 1.0 and 1.5, the 4A configuration returns an average improvement of 20% and 7% over the base plate, respectively. The Oswald’s efficiency factor (e), calculated for the experimental cases, is varied from a low 0.24 to more typical values of 0.86. The force per unit volume parameter is used to compare the performances of the modified wings and to take into account the weight added by the attachments. The results obtained demonstrate that the 4A configuration offers superior performance compared to the weight gained because of the addition of the attachments.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
Ailinger, K. 1997. “Micro air vehicle (MAV) development at NRL.” In Proc., Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems Int. Conf. AUVSI’97. Arlington, VA: Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems.
Albertani, R. 2005. “Experimental aerodynamics of elastic deformation characterisation of low aspect ratio finite wings applied to micro air vehicles.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville.
Albertani, R., B. Stanford, J. P. Hubner, and P. G. Ifju. 2007. “Aerodynamic characterisation and deformation measurements of a flexible wing micro air vehicle.” Exp. Mech. 47 (5): 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-006-9025-5.
Ananda, G. K., P. P. Sukumar, and M. S. Selig. 2012. “Low-to-moderate aspect ratio wings tested at low Reynolds numbers.” In Proc., 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf. New Orleans, LA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-3026.
Ananda, G. K., P. P. Sukumar, and M. S. Selig. 2015. “Measured aerodynamic characteristics of wings at low Reynolds numbers.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 42 (Apr–May): 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.11.016.
Bardera, R., A. A. Rodriguez-Sevillano, E. Barroso, and J. C. Matias. 2023. “Numerical analysis of a biomimetic UAV with variable length grids wingtips.” Results Eng. 18 (Jun): 101087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101087.
Barlow, J. B., W. H. Rae, and A. Pope. 1999. Low-speed wind tunnel testing. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Chambers, J. R. 2003. Concept to reality: Contributions of the Langley research center to U.S. civil aircraft of the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Chen, T. Y., and L. R. Liou. 2011. “Blockage corrections in wind tunnel tests of small horizontal-axis wind turbines.” Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 35 (3): 565–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.12.005.
Epple, P., M. Steppert, and M. Florschuetz. 2022. “Effect of winglets on wing tip vortices.” ASME J. Fluids Eng. 144 (4): 040906. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053573.
Fluck, M., and C. Crawford. 2014. “A lifting line model to investigate the influence of tip feathers on wing performance.” Bioinspiration Biomimetics 9 (4): 046017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/9/4/046017.
Giguère, P., and M. S. Selig. 1997. “Low Reynolds number airfoils for small horizontal axis wind turbines.” Wind Eng. 21 (6): 367–380.
Gopalarathnam, A., B. A. Broughton, B. D. McGranahan, and M. S. Selig. 2001. “Design of low Reynolds number airfoils with trips.” In Proc., 19th AIAA Appl. Aerodyn. Conf. Anaheim, CA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-2463.
Grasmeyer, J. M., and M. T. Keennon. 2001. “Development of the black widow micro air vehicle.” In Proc., 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-127.
Hossain, A., A. Rahman, A. K. M. P. Iqbal, M. Ariffin, and M. Mazian. 2011. “Drag analysis of an aircraft wing model with and without bird feather like winglet.” Int. J. Aerosp. Mech. Eng. 5 (9): 1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1061336.
Ifju, P. G., D. A. Jenkins, Y. Lian, W. Shyy, and M. R. Waszak. 2002. “Flexible-wing-based micro air vehicles.” In Proc., 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. Reno, NV: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-705.
Jana, S., S. Shivkumar, M. Shewale, H. Kandath, M. Ramesh, S. Balasubramaniam, E. Khanapuri, and M. S. Bhat. 2022. “Autonomous flight test of a novel nonconventional biplane micro air vehicle.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 35 (5): 04022059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001452.
Jeong, H., S. Lee, and S. Kwon. 2018. “Blockage corrections for wind tunnel tests conducted on a Darrieus wind turbine.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 179 (Aug): 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.06.002.
Jupp, J. 2001. “Wing aerodynamics and the science of compromise.” Aeronaut. J. 105 (1053): 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000012653.
Kellogg, J., et al. 2002. “The NRL micro tactical expendable (MITE) air vehicle.” Aeronaut. J. 106 (1062): 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000192400009223X.
Kroo, I. 2001. “Drag due to lift: Concepts for prediction.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33 (1): 587–617. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.33.1.587.
Kroo, I. 2005. “Nonplanar wing concepts for increased aircraft efficiency.” VKI Lecture Series on Innovative Configurations and Advanced Concepts for Future Civil Aircraft. Accessed June 10, 2005. https://lf5422.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/vki_nonplanar_kroo-1.pdf.
Lanchester, F. W. 1907. Aerodynamics: Constituting the first volume of a complete work on aerial flight. London: Archibald Constable.
La Roche, U., and S. Palffy. 1996. “Wing-grid, a novel device for reduction of induced drag on wings.” In Proc., 20th Int. Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS) Congress Naples, 2303–2309. Bonn, Germany: International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences.
Lian, Y., and W. Shyy. 2003. “Three dimensional fluid structure interactions of a membrane wing for MAV applications.” In Proc., 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf. Reno, NV: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-1726.
Lin, J. C. 2002. “Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38 (4–5): 389–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00010-6.
Lynch, M., B. Mandadzhiev, and A. Wissa. 2018. “Bioinspired wingtip devices: A pathway to improve aerodynamic performance during low Reynolds number flight.” Bioinspiration Biomimetics 13 (3): 036003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aaac53.
McCormick, B. W. 1995. Aerodynamics, aeronautics, and flight mechanics. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
McMasters, J. H., and M. L. Henderson. 1979. “Low-speed single-element airfoil synthesis.” Tech. Soar. 6 (2): 1–21.
Mizoguchi, M., and H. Itoh. 2013. “Effect of aspect ratio on aerodynamic characteristics at low Reynolds numbers.” AIAA J. 51 (7): 1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051915.
Mizoguchi, M., Y. Kajikawa, and H. Itoh. 2016. “Aerodynamic characteristics of low-aspect-ratio wings with various aspect ratios in low Reynolds number flows.” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 59 (2): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.59.56.
Moreira dos Santos, L., G. F. Gomes, and R. F. Coimbra. 2021. “An experimental parametric study on planar sheared wings tip devices for low-to-moderate aspect ratio wings.” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 93 (1): 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-07-2020-0143.
Moschetta, J. M., and C. Thipyopas. 2007. “Aerodynamic performance of a biplane micro air vehicle.” J. Aircr. 44 (1): 291–299. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.23286.
Mueller, T. J. 1999. “Aerodynamic measurements at low Reynolds numbers for fixed wing micro-air vehicles.” RTO AVT Course, Rhode-Saint-Genýse, Belgium, RTO EN-9. Accessed September 17, 1999. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADP010760.
Mueller, T. J., and J. D. DeLaurier. 2003. “Aerodynamics of small vehicles.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35 (1): 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161102.
Narayan, G., and B. John. 2016. “Effect of winglets induced tip vortex structure on the performance of subsonic wings.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 58 (Nov): 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.031.
Null, W., A. Noseck, and S. Shkarayev. 2005. “Effects of camber on the aerodynamics of adaptive-wing micro air vehicles.” J. Aircr. 42 (6): 1537–1542. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.12401.
Okamoto, M., and A. Azuma. 2011. “Aerodynamic characteristics at low Reynolds numbers for wings of various planforms.” AIAA J. 49 (6): 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050071.
Pelletier, A., and T. J. Mueller. 2000. “Low Reynolds number aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio, thin/flat/cambered-plate wings.” J. Aircr. 37 (5): 825–832. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2676.
Roskam, J., and C. E. Lan. 1987. Airplane aerodynamics and performance. 3rd ed. Lawrence, KS: DAR Corporation.
Sachs, G. 2016. “Comparison of power requirements: Flapping vs. fixed wing vehicles.” Aerospace 3 (4): 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace3040031.
Savile, D. B. O. 1957. “Adaptive evolution in the avian wing.” Evolution 11 (2): 212–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406051.
Selig, M. S., J. F. Donovan, and D. B. Fraser. 1989. Airfoils at low speeds. Virginia Beach, VA: H. A. Stokely.
Shields, M., and K. Mohseni. 2012. “Effects of sideslip on the aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio low-Reynolds-number wings.” AIAA J. 50 (1): 85–99. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051151.
Shkarayev, S., J. M. Moschetta, and B. Bataille. 2008. “Aerodynamic design of micro air vehicles for vertical flight.” J. Aircr. 45 (5): 1715–1724. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.35573.
Siddiqui, N. A., M. Aldeeb, W. Asrar, and E. Sulaeman. 2018. “Experimental investigation of a new spiral wingtip.” Int. J. Aviat. Aeronaut. Aerosp. 5 (2): 6. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2018.1213.
Smith, M. J., N. Komerath, R. Ames, O. Wong, and J. Pearson. 2001. “Performance analysis of a wing with multiple winglets.” In Proc., 19th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf. Reno, NV: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-2407.
Spedding, G. E., and J. McArthur. 2010. “Span efficiencies of wings at low Reynolds numbers.” J. Aircr. 47 (1): 120–128. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.44247.
Spillman, J. J., and J. E. Allen. 1978. “The use of wing tip sails to reduce vortex drag.” Aeronaut. J. 82 (813): 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000091168.
Tucker, V. A. 1995. “Drag reduction by wing tip slots in a gliding Harris’ hawk, Parabuteo unicinctus.” J. Exp. Biol. 198 (3): 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.198.3.775.
Whitcomb, R. T. 1976. A design approach and selected wind tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Winslow, J., H. Otsuka, B. Govindarajan, and I. Chopra. 2018. “Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105).” J. Aircr. 55 (3): 1050–1061. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034415.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 37 • Issue 6 • November 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 12, 2023
Accepted: May 8, 2024
Published online: Aug 2, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 2, 2025
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Aerodynamics
- Aerospace engineering
- Air transportation
- Aircraft and spacecraft
- Aircraft wings
- Case studies
- Continuum mechanics
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Fluid dynamics
- Fluid mechanics
- Hydraulic engineering
- Hydrologic engineering
- Infrastructure
- Mathematics
- Measurement (by type)
- Methodology (by type)
- Metric systems
- Parameters (statistics)
- Plates
- Research methods (by type)
- Reynolds number
- Solid mechanics
- Statistics
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Transportation engineering
- Water and water resources
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.