Technical Papers
Sep 20, 2023

Aerodynamic Assessment of a Control Strategy Based on Twist Morphing Wing in a Flying Wing Aircraft

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 1

Abstract

Wing smarting and eliminating conventional control surfaces are fundamental parameters for improving aircraft aerodynamic performance in future aviation. Twist is a well-known tool that, along with the development of morphing technology, can play a crucial role in controlling next-generation aircraft. However, wing twisting with a control approach requires many aerodynamic studies, particularly at the high aft-swept angle; this is more noticeable in the flying wing configuration. In this paper, a control strategy based on twist morphing has been evaluated aerodynamically at the Swing, a flying wing configuration. Extraction of aerodynamic coefficients and flow field on the wing have been performed using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method in an incompressible flight regime. To comprehensively cover the control needs, two control concepts have been introduced, called independent and nonindependent twist. Within the concept of independent twist, a co-oriented twist arrangement (Co-OTA) and counteroriented twist arrangement (Cun-OTA) are applied to the wings, which are used to produce pitching and rolling moments, respectively. The results show these control arrangements have high efficiency at low angles of attack (AoAs), but as the AOA increases, their aerodynamic performance will gradually decrease. In this regard, a significant challenge for Cun-OTA is producing the yawing moment during roll maneuvering. Attempts to solve this problem have led to the idea of a compound twist arrangement (CTA). The existence of a control arrangement to generate yawing moment is beyond the capacity of the independent twist concept. The nonindependent twist has been introduced as a solution to this issue.

Practical Applications

Conventional control surfaces have various weaknesses, one of the most important of which is the unfavorable effects on aerodynamic efficiency; the reduction of aerodynamic efficiency leads to a drop in flight endurance and an increase in fuel consumption. At a step forward, with the approach of wing smarting and morphing technology, the tasks of conventional control surfaces can be delegated to the wing itself. Therefore, it will be possible to remove the control surfaces and integrate the wing. In this article, according to the mentioned approach, an attempt was made to introduce a control strategy based on the geometric twist. In this strategy, the value and direction of the twist applied to each wing produces a specific control arrangement. Control arrangements (three types of arrangements) are involved in producing longitudinal and lateral and modified lateral moments. The results indicate that the use of twisting in aircraft control is efficient for a wide range of flight conditions, and this capability exists to be used in the next generation of aircraft. In this way of control, challenges are deliberately related to the design of the operating mechanism, safety issues, and weight.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abdulrahim, M., H. Garcia, and R. Lind. 2005. “Flight characteristics of shaping the membrane wing of a micro air vehicle.” J. Aircr. 42 (1): 131–137. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4782.
Ajaj, R. M., M. Bourchak, and W. Harasani. 2015. “Twist morphing using the variable cross section spar: Feasibility study.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 28 (6): 04014146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000478.
Barnard, R. H., and D. R. Philpott. 2010. Aircraft flight: A description of the physical principles of aircraft flight. London: Pearson Education.
Bolsunovsky, A. L., N. P. Buzoverya, B. I. Gurevich, V. E. Denisov, A. I. Dunaevsky, L. M. Shkadov, O. V. Sonin, A. J. Udzhuhu, and J. P. Zhurihin. 2001. “Flying wing—Problems and decisions.” Aircr. Des. 4 (4): 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8869(01)00005-2.
Brett, J., and A. Ooi. 2014. “Effect of sweep angle on the vortical flow over delta wings at an angle of attack of 10.” J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 9 (6): 768–781.
Colgren, R., and R. Loschke. 2008. “Effective design of highly maneuverable tailless aircraft.” J. Aircr. 45 (4): 1441–1449. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.32083.
Dehghan Menshadi, M., M. Eilbeigi, and M. A. Vaziry. 2016. “Experimental investigation on aerodynamic coefficients of a flying wing aircraft with different leading edge sweep angle.” [In Persian.] Modares Mech. Eng. 16 (5): 303–311.
Dehpanah, P., and A. Nejat. 2015. “The aerodynamic design evaluation of a blended-wing-body configuration.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 43 (Jun): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.02.015.
Dempster, J. B., and J. I. Arnold. 1969. “Flight test evaluation of an advanced stability augmentation system for B-52 aircraft.” J. Aircr. 6 (4): 343–348. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44062.
Elijah, T., R. S. Jamisola, Z. Tjiparuro, and M. Namoshe. 2021. “A review on control and maneuvering of cooperative fixed-wing drones.” Int. J. Dyn. Control 9 (3): 1332–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-020-00710-2.
Esteban, S. 2001. “Static and dynamic analysis of an unconventional plane-flying wing.” In Proc., AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conf. and Exhibit, 4010. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Ganglin, W. 2009. “Key parameters and conceptual configuration of unmanned combat aerial vehicle concept.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 22 (4): 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60116-8.
Han, M., J. Li, Z. Niu, H. Liang, G. Zhao, and W. Hua. 2015. “Aerodynamic performance enhancement of a flying wing using nanosecond pulsed DBD plasma actuator.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 28 (2): 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2015.02.006.
Karimi Kelayeh, R., and M. H. Djavareshkian. 2020. “Aerodynamic investigation of twist angle variation based on wing smarting for a flying wing.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34 (2): 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.06.022.
Kaygan, E., and C. Ulusoy. 2018. “Effectiveness of twist morphing wing on aerodynamic performance and control of an aircraft.” J. Aviat. 2 (2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.482507.
Khot, N., F. Eastep, R. Kolonay, N. Khot, F. Eastep, and R. Kolonay. 1997. “Wing twist and camber for the rolling maneuver of a flexible wing without aileron.” In Proc., 38th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., 1268. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-1268.
Kundu, A. K. 2010. Aircraft design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Li, D., et al. 2018. “A review of modelling and analysis of morphing wings.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 100 (Jun): 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.06.002.
Liebeck, R. H. 2004. “Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport.” J. Aircr. 41 (1): 10–25. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9084.
Lobo do Vale, J., J. Raffaelli, and A. Suleman. 2021. “Experimental validation and evaluation of a coupled twist-camber morphing wing concept.” Appl. Sci. 11 (22): 10631. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210631.
Menter, F. R. 1992. Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. Mountain View, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
Menter, F. R. 1994. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA J. 32 (8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.
Menter, F. R., M. Kuntz, and R. Langtry. 2003. “Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model.” Turbul. Heat Mass Transfer 4 (1): 625–632.
Mohammad, H. S. 2012. Aircraft design: A systems engineering approach. New York: Wiley.
Nelson, R. C. 1989. Airplane stability and automatic control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nickel, K., and M. Wohlfahrt. 1994. Tailless aircraft in theory and practice. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Nicolai, L. M., and G. E. Carichner. 2010. Fundamentals of aircraft and airship design: Volume 1—Aircraft Design. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Nugroho, B., J. Brett, B. T. Bleckly, and R. C. Chin. 2021. “Numerical study of geometric morphing wings of the 1303 UCAV.” Aeronaut. J. 125 (1289): 1192–1208. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.15.
Paul, M., and M. Rein. 2017. “Transonic numerical and experimental evaluation of unconventional lambda wing control surfaces.” J. Aircr. 54 (3): 1139–1149. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034080.
Paul, M., M. Rütten, and M. Rein. 2015. Low speed experimental and numerical investigations on unconvenional control concepts for agile and highly swept aircraft configurations. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt-Lilienthal-Oberth eV.
Pecora, R. 2021. “Morphing wing flaps for large civil aircraft: Evolution of a smart technology across the Clean Sky program.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34 (7): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.004.
Phillips, W. F., D. F. Hunsaker, and R. J. Niewoehner. 2008. “Estimating the subsonic aerodynamic center and moment components for swept wings.” J. Aircr. 45 (3): 1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.33445.
Prisacariu, V., and I. Cîrciu. 2013. “The analysis of the flying wing in morphing concept.” INCAS Bull. 5 (2): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2013.5.2.6.
Sanders, B., D. Cowan, and L. Scherer. 2004. “Aerodynamic performance of the smart wing control effectors.” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 15 (4): 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X04042799.
Schlup, A., et al. 2021. “MataMorph 2: A new experimental UAV with twist-morphing wings and camber-morphing tail stabilizers.” In Proc., AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, 584. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Song, L., H. Yang, J. Xie, C. Ma, and J. Huang. 2016. “Method for improving the natural lateral-directional stability of flying wings.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 29 (5): 06016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000625.
Stenfelt, G., and U. Ringertz. 2009. “Lateral stability and control of a tailless aircraft configuration.” J. Aircr. 46 (6): 2161–2164. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.41092.
Stenfelt, G., and U. Ringertz. 2010. “Yaw control of a tailless aircraft configuration.” J. Aircr. 47 (5): 1807–1811. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031017.
Tomac, M., and G. Stenfelt. 2014. “Predictions of stability and control for a flying wing.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 39 (Dec): 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.09.007.
Vos, R., Z. Gürdal, and M. Abdalla. 2010. “Mechanism for warp-controlled twist of a morphing wing.” J. Aircr. 47 (2): 450–457. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39328.
Wick, A. T., J. R. Hooker, C. M. Clark, R. Plumley, and C. Zeune. 2017. “Powered low speed testing of the hybrid wing body.” In Proc., 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 100. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Zadeh, P. M., and M. Sayadi. 2018. “An efficient aerodynamic shape optimization of blended wing body UAV using multi-fidelity models.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 31 (6): 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2018.04.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 37Issue 1January 2024

History

Received: Jan 20, 2023
Accepted: Jun 5, 2023
Published online: Sep 20, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 20, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ruhollah Karimi Kelayeh [email protected]
Postgraduate Researcher, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi Univ. of Mashhad, Azadi Square, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi Univ. of Mashhad, Azadi Square, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-1190. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share