Technical Papers
Jun 7, 2023

Lift and Tip Vortices Generated by Tapered Backward-Swept and Forward-Swept Wings under Stationary Ground Proximity

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 5

Abstract

An experimental investigation of the aerodynamics and near-field tip-vortex flow field behind tapered backward- and forward-swept wings with a stationary ground effect was conducted at Reynolds number (Re)=1.81×105. The results showed a large lift increase of 26.7% and 12.3% for the backward-swept wing (BSW) and forward-swept wing (FSW), respectively, with reduced ground clearance, along with a significant drag reduction of 45% and 30% for the BSW and FSW. For the BSW, a multiple-vortex system appeared in close ground proximity, consisting of a tip vortex, a corotating ground vortex, and a counterrotating secondary vortex. The ground vortex strengthens the tip vortex, whereas the secondary vortex negates its vorticity. For the FSW, the multiple-vortex system was not readily identifiable due to its unique geometry, which always keeps the inboard region of the wing at a close ground effect while leaving the tip region less affected by the ground effect. The root stall of the FSW also produced a continuously strengthening tip vortex with the increasing angle of attack. In contrast, the tip stall of the BSW led to a monotonically increasing vortex strength only up to the static-stall angle. Regardless of the wing model, the weak tip vortex also translates into a small lift-induced drag compared with the total drag. Finally, the lift force computed through the integration of the spanwise circulation distribution, inferred from the cross-flow measurements, at selected ground distances was also found to be in good agreement with the direct wind-tunnel force-balance data, with 101% and 98% consistency for BSW and FSW, respectively. The aerodynamics and tip-vortex measurements of both wing models outside the ground effect were also acquired to serve as a comparison.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Natural Science and Engineering Council (NSERC) of Canada.

References

Black, J. 1956. “Flow studies of the leading edge stall on a sweptback wing at high incidence.” Aeronaut. J. 60 (541): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0368393100132390.
Breitsamter, C., and B. Laschka. 2001. “Vortical flow field structure at forward swept wing configurations.” J. Aircraft 38 (2): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2758.
Coe, P., and J. Thomas. 1979. Theoretical and experimental investigation of ground-induced effects for a low-aspect-ratio highly swept arrow-wing configuration. NASA TP 1508. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Curry, R., B. Moulton, and J. Kresse. 1990. An in-flight investigation of ground effect on a forward-swept wing airplane. NASA TM 101708. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Deng, N., and R. Agarwal. 2022. “Numerical simulation of DLR-F6 wing-body flow field in ground effect.” Comput. Fluids 245 (Sep): 105576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compufluid.2022.105576.
El-Ramly, Z., W. J. Rainbird, and D. G. Earl. 1976. “Wind tunnel measurement of rolling moment in a swept-wing vortex wake.” J. Aircr. 13 (12): 962–967. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.58736.
Gerontakos, P., and T. Lee. 2006. “Near-field tip vortex behind a swept wing model.” Exp. Fluids 40 (Jan): 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-005-0056-y.
Gold, N., and K. Visser. 2002. “Aerodynamic effects of local dihedral on a raked wingtip.” In Proc., AIAA Paper 2002-0831, Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Griffin, K. 1982. Measurement of wake interactions of a canard and a forward swept wing. USAFA-TN-82-4. Colorado Springs, CO: US Air Force Academy.
Harper, C. W., and R. L. Maki. 1964. A review of the stall characteristics of swept wings. NASA TN D-2373. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Harvey, J., and F. Perry. 1971. “Flowfield produced by trailing vortices in the vicinity of the ground.” AIAA J. 9 (8): 1659–1660. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.6415.
Kusunose, K. 1997. “Development of a universal wake survey data analysis code.” In Proc., AIAA Paper 1997-2294. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Lee, T., and L. Ko. 2009. “Vortex wake generated behind a forward swept wing.” J. Aircr. 46 (2): 717–721. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39352.
Lee, T., and G. Lin. 2022. “Review of experimental investigations of wings in ground effect at low Reynolds numbers.” Front. Aerosp. Eng. 1 (Nov): 975158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpace.2022.975158.
Loebert, G. 1981. “Spanwise lift distribution of forward-and aft-swept wings in comparison to the optimum distribution form.” J. Aircr. 18 (6): 496–498. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44717.
Lu, A., T. Lee, and V. Tremblay-Dionne. 2019. “Experimental study of aerodynamics and wingtip vortex of a rectangular wing in flat ground effect.” J. Fluids Eng. 141 (11): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043593.
Manchester, Z., J. Lipton, R. Wood, and S. Kuindersma. 2017. “A variable forward-sweep wing design for enhanced perching in micro aerial vehicles.” In Proc., AIAA paper 2017-001. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Maskell, E. 1973. Progress towards a method for the measurement of the components of the drag of a wing of finite span. Delft, Netherlands: Procurement Executive, Ministry of Defence, Royal Aircraft Establishment, RAE Farnborough.
Naik, D., and C. Ostowari. 1990. “Effects of nonplanar outboard wing forms on a wing.” J. Aircr. 27 (2): 117–122. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45906.
Nangia, R. K. 1982. “Aspects of forward swept wing research at the University of Bristol.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Forward Swept Wing Aircraft, 1–24. Bristol, UK: Univ. of Bristol.
Pate, D., and B. German. 2014. “Superposition of spanwise circulation distributions: Accuracy assessment and application in wing design.” J. Aircr. 51 (5): 1439–1454. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032313.
Paulson, D., and S. Kjelgaard. 1982. An experimental and theoretical investigation of thick wings at various sweep angles in and out of ground effect. NASA-TP-2068. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Saltzman, E., J. Hicks, and S. Luke. 1995. In-flight lift-drag characteristics for a forward-swept wing aircraft (and comparisons with contemporary aircraft). NASA-TP-3413. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Setoguchi, N., and M. Kanazaki. 2020. Low-speed and high angle of attack aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic business jet with forward swept wing. AIAA Paper 2020-0534. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Skinner, S., R. Green, and H. Zare-Behtash. 2020. “Wingtip vortex structure in the near-field of swept-tapered wings.” Phys. Fluids 32 (9): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0016353.
Smith, S. C. 1996. A computational and experimental study of nonlinear aspects of induced drag. NASA TP-3598. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Tasci, M. O., S. Tumse, and B. Sahin. 2022. “Vortical flow characteristics of a slender delta wing in ground effect.” Ocean Eng. 261 (1): 112120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112120.
Thomas, A., and G. Taylor. 2001. “Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight.” J. Theor. Biol. 212 (3): 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2387.
Traub, L., and J. Lawrence. 2009. “Aerodynamic characteristics of forward and aft swept arrow wings.” J. Aircr. 46 (4): 1454–1457. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.43098.
Tumse, S., I. Karasu, and B. Sahin. 2022. “Experimental investigation of ground effect on the vortical flow structure of a 40° swept delta wing.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 35 (6): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001441.
Uhuad, G., and R. Large. 1983. “Wind tunnel investigation of the transonic aerodynamic characteristics of forward swept wings.” J. Aircr. 20 (3): 195–202. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44853.
Zhang, K., S. Hayostek, M. Amitay, A. Burtsev, V. Theofilis, and K. Taira. 2020. “Laminar separated flows over finite-aspect-ratio swept wings.” J. Fluid Mech. 905 (Dec): R1. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.778.
Zhang, K., and K. Taira. 2022. “Laminar vortex dynamics around forward-swept wings.” Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 (2): 024704. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.024704.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36Issue 5September 2023

History

Received: Jan 10, 2023
Accepted: Apr 5, 2023
Published online: Jun 7, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, McGill Univ., 817 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2K6 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, McGill Univ., 817 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2K6. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share