Analytical and Experimental Studies on Modified Wing Configurations of Cessna 172-R Aircraft to Improve Performance
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 3
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of wing design on the performance of the Cessna 172-R aircraft, focusing on modifications to its wing geometry. The study proposes two alternate configurations: one with increasing the span length and retaining the existing chord length, and the other with increasing the chord length retaining the existing span length. Experimental and analytical studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of these two configurations. The study found that the modified wingspan configuration significantly enhanced the aircraft’s performance, with an increase in lift coefficient, range, and endurance by 13.2%, 26.15%, and 29.26%, respectively. Additionally, the drag coefficient was decreased by 8.12%, indicating the potential for reduced fuel consumption and operational costs. In contrast, the modified wing chord configuration did not improve the performance output. These findings underscore the critical role of wing design in aircraft performance and highlight the potential for modifications to wing geometry to provide significant improvements in efficiency and operational cost. The results of this study indicate the scope for further research in this area, with efforts to optimize aircraft performance and reduce environmental impact.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Abbas, A., J. De Vicente, and E. Valero. 2013. “Aerodynamic technologies to improve aircraft performance.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 28 (1): 100–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2012.10.008.
Airborne Aviation. 2016. Cessna 172-R quick reference handbook. Lihue, HI: Airborne Aviation.
Ali, N., M. R. Komol, and M. T. Saki. 2018. “Study on thin airfoil theory & performance test of elliptical wing as compared to model mosquito wing and NACA 64A012 mod airfoil.” Eur. J. Eng. Technol. Res. 3 (4): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2018.3.4.665.
Anderson, J. 2019. Fundamentals of aerodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Badis, A. 2017. “Subsonic aircraft wing conceptual design synthesis and analysis.” Int. J. Sci.: Basic Appl. Res. 35 (1): 64–108.
Bharath, H. P., H. K. Narahari, and A. T. Sriram. 2016. “Design of an aircraft wing for given flight conditions and planform area.” In Innovative design and development practices in aerospace and automotive engineering, 271–279. Singapore: Springer.
Boelens, O. J. 2012. “CFD analysis of the flow around the X-31 aircraft at high angle of attack.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 20 (1): 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2012.03.003.
Bui, T. 2019. “Blended wing-body aircraft: The future of sustainable aviation.” J. Adv. Transp. 11: 1–12.
Davari, A. R., M. R. Soltani, F. Askari, and H. R. Pajuhande. 2011. “Effects of wing geometry on wing-body-tail interference in subsonic flow.” Sci. Iran. 18 (3): 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.05.031.
Fedotov, V. S., A. V. Gomzin, and I. I. Salavatov. 2018. “Design of dynamic scale model of long endurance unmanned aerial vehicle.” In Proc., Scientific-Practical Conf. Research and Development, edited by K. V. Anisimov, A. V. Dub, S. K. Kolpakov, A. V. Lisitsa, A. N. Petrov, V. P. Polukarov, O. S. Popel, and V. A. Vinokurov. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
GUNT Hamburg. 1997. HM 170 educational wind tunnel manual. Barsbűttel, Germany: GUNT Gerätebau.
Hull, D. G. 2007. Fundamentals of aeroplane flight mechanics. Berlin: Springer.
Jo, B. W., and T. Majid. 2023. “Enhanced range and endurance evaluation of a camber morphing wing aircraft.” Biomimetics 8 (1): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010034.
Jones, R. 2017. “The influence of wingspan on aircraft performance.” J. Aeronaut. 23: 45–56.
Jordan, T., W. Langford, C. Belcastro, J. Foster, G. Shah, G. Howland, and R. Kidd. 2004. Development of a dynamically scaled generic transport model testbed for flight research experiments. Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
Kawai, R. 2019. Evaluation of fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of blended wing body aircraft. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Kim, H. 2018. “Noise reduction technology of the blended wing body aircraft.” Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 5: 1–11.
Krüger, W. R., T. Klimmek, R. Liepelt, H. Schmidt, S. Waitz, and S. Cumnuantip. 2014. “Design and aeroelastic assessment of a forward-swept wing aircraft.” CEAS Aeronaut. J. 5 (4): 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-014-0117-0.
La Mantia, M., and P. Dabnichki. 2011. “Effect of the wing shape on the thrust of flapping wing.” Appl. Math. Modell. 35 (10): 4979–4990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.04.003.
Ören, T. 2014. “The richness of modeling and simulation and an index of its body of knowledge.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications, SIMULTECH 2012, edited by M. S. Obaidat, J. Filipe, J. Kacprzyk, and N. Pina. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Raymer, D. 2018. Aircraft design: A conceptual approach. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Ren, H., X. Wang, X. Li, and Y. Chen. 2013. “Effects of dragonfly wing structure on the dynamic performances.” J. Bionic Eng. 10 (1): 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(13)60196-1.
Sadraey, M. H. 2013. Aircraft design: A systems engineering approach. New York: Wiley.
Spence, A., and R. Jones. 2020. “The practical limitations of increasing aircraft wingspan.” Aerosp. Eng. 29: 88–97.
Whitcomb, R. 2021. “The impact of wing aspect ratio on aircraft efficiency.” J. Aeronaut. Sci. Technol. 34: 123–134.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 37 • Issue 3 • May 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 11, 2022
Accepted: Nov 1, 2023
Published online: Jan 19, 2024
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Aerospace engineering
- Aircraft and spacecraft
- Benefit cost ratios
- Business management
- Design (by type)
- Drag (fluid dynamics)
- Energy consumption
- Energy engineering
- Engineering fundamentals
- Financial management
- Fluid mechanics
- Geometrics
- Highway and road design
- Hydrologic engineering
- Practice and Profession
- Structural engineering
- Water and water resources
- Wind engineering
- Wind tunnel
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.