Technical Papers
Feb 28, 2023

Aerodynamic Performance of Morphing and Periodic Trailing-Edge Morphing Airfoils in Ground Effect

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 3

Abstract

Applying fish bone active camber morphing to the wing-in-ground effect to improve the aerodynamic efficiency was investigated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) at a Reynolds number of 320,000. Steady-static morphing was first carried out with Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations in two dimensions for morphing start locations off (60%, 80%, and 90% chord), ground clearances (h/c=0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1), and angles of attack (AoAs) 0°, 2°, 3°, 4°, and 12°. A morphing displacement (wte) of 0.5% increased the efficiency by 2.8% (compared to non-morphing in the ground effect) for the 3° AoA and 90% start location, and by 62% in comparison to the baseline unmorphed airfoil in freestream. Reducing h/c=1 to 0.1 increased the lift between 10% and 17%; the larger gain was with the highest morphing deflection. A key finding was that morphing the airfoil reduced the distance between the trailing edge and ground, enhancing the ground effect. Also, morphing at an earlier start location in the chord direction resulted in a smaller area beneath the airfoil, reducing the total pressure, which reduced the overall lift compared to a later morphing start location. Dynamic morphing at 1 Hz using URANS K-Omega-SST showed a similar amount of lift as static morphing but a slightly higher amount of drag. Reducing the period caused an initial overshoot in drag before settling. The dynamic ground effect showed higher efficiency at low AoAs compared to dynamic morphing in freestream, which is beneficial for aircraft to fly with less pitch. Finally, periodic morphing for h/c=0.1 using sinusoidal motion with morphing starting at 25% along the chord and 4° AoA was investigated between 0.05% to 0.15% wte and 0.5 to 3.5 Strouhal number. Periodically morphing at 0.125% wte and Strouhal number of 0.9 using DES simulations increased the efficiency by 5.4%; however, it reduced the lift by 0.7%, the drag reduced by 5.8%, and it showed Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at 9.8 Strouhal number.

Practical Applications

The use of UAVs is increasing in popularity for many missions, which include observation, surveys, and the delivery of supplies, including medical. The use of UAVs typically has lower aircraft and operational costs as well as allowing the craft to carry out dangerous missions without putting the crew in danger. A wing-in-ground effect (WIG) craft typically operates on water due to the large fuel consumption savings as well as allowing the craft to travel at higher speed compared to conventional marine craft. The study focused on applying morphing wings to a UAV WIG effect craft to improve the aerodynamic performance of the craft and allow further fuel efficiency savings compared to a marine craft. The improved performance of the WIG craft and applying morphing translates to improvements in flight time and increased range. Morphing wings also allow the wing to adapt to different flight conditions allowing for optimized aerodynamic performance depending on factors such as cargo weight and weather conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. The authors acknowledge the use of the IRIDIS High Performance Computing Facility, and associated support services at the University of Southampton, in the completion of this work.

References

Abdessemed, C., A. Bouferrouk, and Y. Yao. 2021. “Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic analysis of a harmonically morphing airfoil using dynamic meshing.” Acoustics 3 (1): 177–199. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics3010013.
Abdessemed, C., A. Bouferrouk, and Y. Yao. 2022. “Effects of an unsteady morphing wing with seamless side-edge transition on aerodynamic performance.” Energies 15 (3): 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031093.
Abdessemed, C., Y. Yao, A. Bouferrouk, and P. Narayan. 2018. “Morphing airfoils analysis using dynamic meshing.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 28 (5): 1117–1133. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-06-2017-0261.
Abdessemed, C., Y. Yao, A. Bouferrouk, and P. Narayan. 2019. “Flow response to rapid morphing flap deflection.” In Proc., 54th 3AF Int. Conf. on Applied Aerodynamics. Paris: La Société Savante de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace.
Abdessemed, C., Y. Yao, P. Narayan, and A. Bouferrouk. 2017. “Unsteady parametrisation of a morphing wing design for improved aerodynamic performance.” In Proc., 52nd 3AF Int. Conf. on Applied Aerodynamics. Paris: La Société Savante de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace.
Coleman, H., and C. Members. 2009. ASME V&V 20-2009 standard for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer (V&V20 committee chair and principal author). New York: ASME.
Jodin, G., V. Motta, J. Scheller, E. Duhayon, C. Döll, J. F. Rouchon, and M. Braza. 2017. “Dynamics of a hybrid morphing wing with active open loop vibrating trailing edge by time-resolved PIV and force measures.” J. Fluids Struct. 74 (Oct): 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.06.015.
Kan, Z., D. Li, J. Xiang, and C. Cheng. 2020. “Delaying stall of morphing wing by periodic trailing-edge deflection.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 33 (2): 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.028.
Lee, T., and P. Gerontakos. 2004. “Investigation of flow over an oscillating airfoil.” J. Fluid Mech. 512 (Aug): 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112004009851.
Lim, J. W., K. W. McAlister, and W. Johnson. 2009. “Hover performance correlation for Full-Scale and model-scale coaxial rotors.” J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 54 (3): 32005. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.54.032005.
Lissaman, P. B. S. 1983. “Low-Reynolds-number airfoils.” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15 (1): 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.001255.
Menter, F. R. 1994. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA J. 32 (8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.
Moore, N., P. A. Wilson, and A. J. Peters. 2002. An investigation into wing in ground effect airfoil geometry. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), Research and Technology Organisation (RTO).
Nirooei, M. 2018. “Aerodynamic and static stability characteristics of airfoils in extreme ground effect.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 232 (6): 1134–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017708212.
Ockfen, A. E., and K. I. Matveev. 2009. “Aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 4412 airfoil section with flap in extreme ground effect.” Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 1 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0001.
Parameswaran, R., G. E. P. Box, W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter. 1979. “Statistics for experimenters: An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building.” J. Marketing Res. 16 (2): 291. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150696.
Qu, Q., X. Jia, W. Wang, P. Liu, and R. K. Agarwal. 2014. “Numerical study of the aerodynamics of a NACA 4412 airfoil in dynamic ground effect.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 38 (Oct): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.07.016.
Ravindra, K. 2018. “Do mesh still play a critical role in CFD.” Accessed April 20, 2022. https://blog.gridpro.com/do-mesh-still-play-a-critical-role-in-cfd/.
Rozhdestvensky, K. V. 2006. “Wing-in-ground effect vehicles.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 42 (3): 211–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2006.10.001.
Selig, M. S., J. F. Donovan, and D. B. Fraser. 1989. Airfoils at low speeds. Virginia Beach, VA: H. A. Stokely.
Siemens. 2016. “Siemens to acquire simulation software supplier CD-adapco.” Accessed July 21, 2022. https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/en/our-story/newsroom/siemens-press-release/43811.
Siemens. 2019. User manual star CCM+ 854 14.04.013: Vol. 14.04.013 (p. transient term). Munich, Germany: Siemens.
Thakor, M., G. Kumar, D. Das, and A. De. 2020. “Investigation of asymmetrically pitching airfoil at high reduced frequency.” Phys. Fluids (1994) 32 (5): 053607. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006659.
Wang, J. J., Y. C. Li, and K. S. Choi. 2008. “Gurney flap-lift enhancement, mechanisms and applications.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 44 (1): 22–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.10.001.
Watkins, J., and A. Bouferrouk. 2022. “The effects of a morphed trailing-edge flap on the aeroacoustic and aerodynamic performance of a 30P30N aerofoil.” Acoustics 4 (1): 248–267. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4010015.
Weaver-Rosen, J. M., P. B. C. Leal, D. J. Hartl, and R. J. Malak. 2020. “Parametric optimisation for morphing structures design: Application to morphing wings adapting to changing flight conditions.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 62 (6): 2995–3007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02643-y.
Wilcox, D. C. 2008. “Formulation of the k-ω turbulence model revisited.” AIAA J. 46 (11): 2823–2838. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36541.
Winslow, J., H. Otsuka, B. Govindarajan, and I. Chopra. 2018. “Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105).” J. Aircr. 55 (3): 1050–1061. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034415.
Wolff, T., B. Ernst, and J. R. Seume. 2014. “Aerodynamic behavior of an airfoil with morphing trailing edge for wind turbine applications.” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 524 (1): 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012018.
Woods, B. K. S., J. H. S. Fincham, and M. I. Friswell. 2014. Aerodynamic modelling of the fish bone active camber morphing concept. Bristol, UK: Royal Aeronautical Society Conference on Advanced Aero Concepts, Designs and Operations.
Woods, B. K. S., and M. I. Friswell. 2012. “Preliminary investigation of a fishbone active camber concept.” In Vol. 45103 of Smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems, 555–563. New York: ASME.
Xiang, J., K. Liu, D. Li, C. Cheng, and E. Sha. 2019. “Unsteady aerodynamic characteristics of a morphing wing.” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 91 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-04-2017-0101.
Yun, L., A. Bliault, and J. Doo. 2010. WIG craft and Ekranoplan: Ground effect craft technology. New York: Springer.
Zarim, M. A., A. Maimun, and M. R. Saad. 2016. “Wing in ground effect craft: A review of the state of current stability knowledge.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Ocean Mechanical and Aerospace for Scientists and Engineer. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia.
Zhang, X., W. Toet, and J. Zerihan. 2006. Ground effect aerodynamics of race cars. Southampton, UK: Univ. of Southampton.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36Issue 3May 2023

History

Received: Jun 7, 2022
Accepted: Dec 12, 2022
Published online: Feb 28, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Computational Engineering and Design, Univ. of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-7733. Email: [email protected]
Kamal Djidjeli, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, Univ. of Southampton, Boldrewood Campus, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share