Technical Papers
Jul 17, 2024

Effects of Soil Nonlinearity on the Seismic Behavior of Pile Foundations Reinforced with Micropiles

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 10

Abstract

Seismic retrofitting of existing bridges has been in practice for years to meet the stringent seismic requirements set forward by revised design codes. For retrofitting, however, bridge piers are often prioritized while less attention is given to the bridge foundations, which are equally prone to damage under seismic loadings. The current work presents a series of experimental studies in assessing the performance of 2 × 2 pile groups reinforced with micropiles in terms of head-level stiffness and damping under low-to-high levels of static and dynamic loadings, encompassing the influence of loading-induced soil nonlinearity. Practical micropiles inclinations of 0°, 5°, and 10° with respect to the vertical are studied. Experimental results reveal that the head-level stiffnesses of pile groups reinforced with micropiles, contrary to the general expectations, become smaller than the pile group without micropiles at higher levels of applied loading. To elucidate the governing mechanism for such experimentally obtained results, three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element analyses were carried out. Results from the numerical analyses support the experimental results, suggesting that the presence of micropiles may not always increase the head-level stiffness of soil–foundation systems, particularly at higher levels of applied loading where the soil nonlinearity generated at the vicinity of piles and micropiles governs the overall head-level stiffnesses.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 22K04280 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. The authors would also like to thank Yuji Maruyama and Tosifumi Hikima of Saitama University for their support during the experiments.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Chh
imaginary part of horizontal impedance functions;
Cu
coefficient of uniformity;
chh
coefficient of equivalent viscous damping;
Dmax,60,30,10
particle size parameters of soil;
dmp, dp
diameter of micropiles, piles;
Es, Emp, Ep
Young’s modulus of soil, micropiles, piles;
emax,min
maximum, minimum void ratio;
Gs
specific gravity;
g
acceleration due to gravity;
H
depth of soil layer;
i
imaginary unit (=1);
Khh
horizontal impedance functions;
khh
real part of horizontal impedance functions;
Lmp, Lp
length of micropiles, piles;
u
applied static displacement;
Vs
shear wave velocity of soil;
γm, γp
dynamic strain in the model, prototype;
η
density scaling ratio of model to prototype;
λ
geometric scaling ratio of model to prototype;
ρs, ρmp, ρp
density of soil, micropiles, piles;
ϕ
internal frictional angle of soil;
ω
cyclic loading frequency; and
ωm, ωp
cyclic frequency of model, prototype.

References

Abbas, Q., G. Kim, I. Kim, D. Kyung, and J. Lee. 2021. “Lateral load behavior of inclined micropiles installed in soil and rock layers.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (6): 04021078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002021.
Alfach, M. T. 2020. “Reinforcement the seismic interaction of soil-damaged piles-bridge by using micropiles.” In Vol. 1199 of Proc., 2nd Int. Workshop, SimScience 2019, edited by N. Gunkelmann and M. Baum, 179–195. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Anoyatis, G., and A. Lemnitzer. 2017. “Dynamic pile impedances for laterally-loaded piles using improved Tajimi and Winkler formulations.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92: 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.020.
Cakir, F., and J. Mohammadi. 2013. “Micropiles applications for seismic retrofitting of historical bridges.” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 5 (2): 1–8.
Capatti, M. C., F. Dezi, S. Carbonari, and F. Gara. 2020. “Dynamic performance of a full-scale micropile group: Relevance of nonlinear behaviour of the soil adjacent to micropiles.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 128: 105858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105858.
Firoj, M., and B. K. Maheshwari. 2023. “A new nonlinear spring-dashpot model of CPRF of NPP structure based on coupled BEM-FEM approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 52: 932–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3794.
Fukui, J., M. Ishida, and M. Takeguchi. 2005. “Seismic retrofitting sites for existing foundations.” In Proc., 37th Joint Meeting of US-Japan Panel on Wind & Seismic Effects. Tsukuba, Japan: Public Works Research Institute.
Gazetas, G. 1984. “Seismic response of end-bearing single piles.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 3 (2): 82–93.
Gazetas, G., and G. Mylonakis. 1998. “Seismic soil–structure interaction: New evidence and emerging issues.” Geotech. Spec. Publ. 75 (2): 1119–1174.
Goit, C. S., and M. Saitoh. 2013. “Model tests and numerical analyses on horizontal impedance functions of inclined single piles embedded in cohesionless soil.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 12 (1): 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0158-0.
Goit, C. S., and M. Saitoh. 2014. “Model tests on horizontal impedance functions of fixed-head inclined pile groups under soil nonlinearity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (6): 04014023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001127.
Goit, C. S., and M. Saitoh. 2016. “Experimental approach on the pile-to-pile interaction factors and impedance functions of inclined piles.” Géotechnique 66 (11): 888–901. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.192.
Goit, C. S., M. Saitoh, H. Oikawa, and H. Kawakami. 2014. “Effects of soil nonlinearity on the active length of piles embedded in cohesionless soil: Model studies.” Acta Geotech. 9: 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-013-0257-0.
Haddad, E. D., and A. J. Choobbasti. 2019. “Response of micropiles in different seismic conditions.” Innovative Infrastruct. Solutions 4: 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0226-z.
Ishida, T., H. Watanabe, H. Ito, Y. Kitahara, and M. Matsumoto. 1981. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of sandy materials for model test of slope failure under the condition of low confined stress. Research Rep. No. 380045. Tokyo: Electrical Power Center Research Institute.
Kawashima, K. 2012. “Damage of Bridges due to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake.” In Proc., of Int. Symp. on Engineering Lessons Learned From the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Kaynia, A. M., and E. Kausel. 1982. Dynamic stiffness and seismic response of pile groups. Research Rep. No. R82-03. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Kokusho, T., and T. Iwatate. 1979. “Scaled model tests and numerical analyses on nonlinear dynamic response of soft grounds.” Proc. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. 285: 57–67. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej1969.1979.285_57.
Maheshwari, B. K., and H. Watanabe. 2005. “Dynamic analysis of pile foundations: Effects of material nonlinearity of soil.” Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 10 (E). https://www.ejge.net/2005/JourTOC10E.htm.
Makris, N., G. Gazetas, and E. Delis. 1996. “Dynamic soil—Pile—Foundation—Structure interaction: Records and predictions.” Géotechnique 46 (1): 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.1.33.
Miura, K., A. M. Kaynia, K. Masuda, E. Kitamura, and Y. Seto. 1994. “Dynamic behaviour of pile foundations in homogeneous and non-homogeneous media.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23: 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230206.
Mylonakis, G., and G. Gazetas. 1999. “Lateral vibration and internal forces of grouped piles in layered soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1(16).
Padrón, L. A., J. J. Aznárez, and O. Maeso. 2008. “Dynamic analysis of piled foundations in stratified soils by a BEM–FEM model.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 28 (5): 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.005.
Panah, A. K., H. J. Mashhoud, J.-H. Yin, and Y. F. Leung. 2018. “Shaking table investigation of effects of inclination angle on seismic performance of micropiles.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (11): 04018142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001236.
Pitilakis, D., M. Dietz, D. M. Wood, D. Clouteau, and A. Modaressi. 2008. “Numerical simulation of dynamic soil–structure interaction in shaking table testing.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 28 (6): 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.011.
Poulos, H. G., and E. H. Davis. 1980. Pile foundation analysis and design. New York: Wiley.
Saitoh, M. 2022. “On the modeling of frequency- and intensity-dependent impedance functions at the head of horizontally loaded single piles.” Soils Found. 62 (2): 101107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101107.
Sharma, B., S. Zaheer, and Z. Hussain. 2014. “Experimental model for studying the performance of vertical and batter micropiles.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers: Geo-Characterization and Modeling for Sustainability, Geotechnical Special Publication 234, edited by M. Abu-Farsakh, X. Yu, and L. R. Hoyos. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Shrestha, N. R., M. Saitoh, C. S. Goit, and A. K. Saha. 2021a. “Experimental and numerical analysis on the rate-dependent cyclic lateral load on single pile in sand.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 4: 9–15.
Shrestha, N. R., M. Saitoh, A. K. Saha, and C. S. Goit. 2021b. “Frequency- and intensity-dependent impedance functions of laterally loaded single piles in cohesionless soil.” Soils Found. 61 (1): 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.11.004.
Tahghighi, H., and K. Konagai. 2007. “Numerical analysis of nonlinear soil-pile group interaction under lateral loads.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (5): 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.09.005.
Ullah, M. S., H. Yamamoto, C. S. Goit, and M. Saitoh. 2018. “On the verification of superposition method of kinematic interaction and inertial interaction in dynamic response analysis of soil-pile-structure systems.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113: 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.06.023.
Yang, Y., T. Masuda, E. Yoshida, S. Horiuchi, and T. Kiriyama. 2020. “Effect of pile arrangement on the bending performance of an existing bridge footing under lateral seismic loading.” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 17 (2): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78255913.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Aug 29, 2023
Accepted: Mar 28, 2024
Published online: Jul 17, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 17, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chandra Shekhar Goit [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama Univ., 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Shogo Honma [email protected]
Graduate Student, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama Univ., 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Masato Saitoh [email protected]
Professor, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama Univ., 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Former Graduate Student, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama Univ., 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share