Technical Papers
Jun 28, 2024

Role of Tangential Displacement Amplitude in 3D Cyclic Simple Shear Behavior of Gravel–Steel Interface

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 9

Abstract

The tangential displacement amplitude determines the mobilization of shear strength and the deforming and sliding displacements of soil–structure interfaces, and therefore plays a crucial role in the interface behavior. A series of three-dimensional (3D) simple-shear interface tests were conducted between gravel and steel to investigate the influence of tangential displacement amplitude on the tangential deformation, volumetric change, and shear strength. Test results show that deforming and sliding displacements are distinctly induced by shearing. The deforming displacement migrates toward the initial shear direction, caused by the shear orientation effect, and the migration becomes magnified and then stabilizes with cyclic shearing. The shear strength would not be mobilized when the tangential displacement amplitude is relatively small. It behaves in an anisotropic manner if mobilized and gradually degrades as cyclic shearing continues, attributed to the dominant particle crushing over the shear densification effect. Two critical tangential displacement amplitudes are found for the mobilization of shear strength, and determine whether the shear strength could be mobilized during cyclic shearing and whether it is immediately mobilized at initial shearing, respectively. The tangential displacement amplitude primarily affects deforming and sliding amplitudes and their migration, shear stiffness, irreversible and peak reversible normal displacements, peak and residual cyclic shear strength, and anisotropy extent, instead of their relationship patterns. An increased tangential displacement amplitude results in magnified sliding amplitude, decreased deforming weight, accelerated degradation of deforming amplitude, and magnified migration of deforming and sliding displacements. Additionally, large tangential displacement amplitude leads to large irreversible and peak reversible normal displacements, small shear stiffness, and small peak and residual cyclic shear strength. The peak reversible normal displacement is determined by and has a linear relationship with the deforming displacement, and the irreversible normal displacement presents perfect consistency behavior against shear work density, regardless of tangential displacement amplitude. The consistency behavior could be well described using a hyperbolic model, which significantly simplifies the 3D constitutive modeling of the interface.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data and models generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52079126) and the Tiptop Young Talent Program of Central Plains (No. ZYQR201912156). Both these sources are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Afzali-Nejad, A., A. Lashkari, and A. Martinez. 2021. “Stress–displacement response of sand–geosynthetic interfaces under different volume change boundary conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (8): 04021062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002544.
DeJong, J. T., and Z. J. Westgate. 2009. “Role of initial state, material properties, and confinement condition on local and global soil–structure interface behavior.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (1): 1646–1660. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:11(1646).
Desai, C. S., S. K. Pradhan, and D. Cohen. 2005. “Cyclic testing and constitutive modeling of saturated sand–concrete interfaces using the disturbed state concept.” Int. J. Geomech. 5 (4): 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(286).
Desai, C. S., and D. B. Rigby. 1997. “Cyclic interface and joint shear device including pore pressure effects.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (6): 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:6(568).
Evgin, E., and K. Fakharian. 1998. “Cyclic rotational simple-shear behaviour of sand–steel interfaces.” Soils Found. 38 (2): 191–199. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.2_191.
Fakharian, K. 1996. “Three-dimensional monotonic and cyclic behavior of sand–steel interfaces, testing and modeling.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa.
Fakharian, K., and E. Evgin. 1997. “Cyclic simple-shear behavior of sand–steel interfaces under constant normal stiffness condition.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (12): 1096–1105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:12(1096).
Fakharian, K., and N. Vafaei. 2021. “Effect of density on skin friction response of piles embedded in sand by simple shear interface tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 58 (5): 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0243.
Feng D.-K., J.-M. Zhang, and W.-J. Hou. 2021a. “Three-dimensional behaviors of a gravel–steel interface considering initial shear stress.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (2): 04020158. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002435.
Feng D.-K., J.-M. Zhang, and W.-J. Hou. 2021b. “Three-dimensional stress-controlled cyclic behavior of the interface between gravel and steel.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 151: 106988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106988.
Feng D.-K., and J.-M. Zhang. 2023. “Consistency behavior and mechanism of the irreversible dilatancy of gravel–structure interface subjected to 3D loadings.” Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-02137-3.
Feng D.-K., J.-M. Zhang, and L.-J. Deng. 2018a. “Three-dimensional monotonic and cyclic behavior of a gravel–steel interface from large-scale simple-shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 55 (11): 1657–1667. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0065.
Feng, D.-K., J.-M. Zhang, and W.-J. Hou. 2018b. “Three-dimensional direct-shear behaviors of a gravel–structure interface.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (12): 04018095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001968.
Ho, T. Y. K., R. J. Jardine, and N. Anh-minh. 2011. “Large-displacement interface shear between steel and granular media.” Géotechnique 61 (3): 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.086.
Huck, P. J., and S. K. Saxena. 1981. “Response of soil–concrete interface at high pressure.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 141–144. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Jitsangiam, P., S. Pra-ai, M. Boulon, O. Jenck, X. B. Chen, and S. Techavorasinsakul. 2022. “Characterization of a soil–rough structure interface using direct shear tests with varying cyclic amplitude and loading sequences under a large cyclic testing cycle condition.” Acta Geotech. 17: 1829–1845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01289-4.
Kishida, H., and M. Uesugi. 1987. “Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus.” Géotechnique 37 (1): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.45.
Lashkari, A., and V. Jamali. 2021. “Global and local sand–geosynthetic interface behaviour.” Géotechnique 71 (4): 346–367. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.109.
Lemos, L. J. L., and P. R. Vaughan. 2000. “Clay-interface shear resistance.” Géotechnique 50 (1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.55.
Martinez, A., S. Palumbo, and B. D. Todd. 2019. “Bioinspiration for anisotropic load transfer at soil–structure interfaces.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10): 04019074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002138.
Oumarou, T. A., and E. Evgin. 2005. “Cyclic behaviour of a sand–steel plate interface.” Can. Geotech. J. 42 (6): 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-083.
Potyondy, J. G. 1961. “Skin friction between various soils and construction materials.” Géotechnique 11 (4): 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1961.11.4.339.
Rui, S.-J., L.-Z. Wang, Z. Guo, W.-J. Zhou, and Y.-J. Li. 2021. “Cyclic behavior of interface shear between carbonate sand and steel.” Acta Geotech. 16: 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01002-x.
Shakir, R. R., and J.-G. Zhu. 2010. “An examination of the mechanical interaction of drilling slurries at the soil–concrete contact.” J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 11 (4): 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0900456.
Sim, Y. L., and C. Y. Lee. 2013. “Behaviour of palm biodiesel contaminated sand–concrete interface.” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 4 (1): 88–96.
Tsubakihara, Y., and H. Kishida. 1993. “Frictional behaviour between normally consolidated clay and steel by two direct shear type apparatuses.” Soils Found. 33 (2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.2_1.
Tsubakihara, Y., H. Kishida, and T. Nishiyama. 1993. “Friction between cohesive soils and steel.” Soils Found. 33 (2): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.2_145.
Uesugi, M., and H. Kishida. 1986. “Influential factors of friction between steel and dry sands.” Soils Found. 26 (2): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.2_33.
Vieira, C. S., M. D. L. Lopes, and L. Caldeira. 2015. “Sand–nonwoven geotextile interfaces shear strength by direct shear and simple shear tests.” Geomech. Eng. 9 (5): 601–618. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.5.601.
Yin, Z.-Z., H. Zhu, and G.-H. Xu. 1995. “A study of deformation in the interface between soil and concrete.” Comput. Geotech. 17: 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-352X(95)91303-L.
Yoshimi, Y., and T. Kishida. 1981. “A ring torsion apparatus for evaluating friction between soil and metal surfaces.” Geotech. Test. J. 4 (4): 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10783J.
Zhang, G., and J.-M. Zhang. 2006. “Monotonic and cyclic tests of interface between structure and gravelly soil.” Soils Found. 46 (4): 505–518. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.505.
Zhang, J.-M., D.-K. Feng, and W.-J. Hou. 2018. “An automated large-scale apparatus for 3-D cyclic testing of soil–structure interfaces.” Geotech. Test. J. 41 (3): 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170129.
Zhang, P., S.-J. Ding, and K. Fei. 2021. “Research on shear behavior of sand–structure interface based on monotonic and cyclic tests.” Appl. Sci. 11: 11837. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411837.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24Issue 9September 2024

History

Received: Aug 21, 2023
Accepted: Mar 4, 2024
Published online: Jun 28, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Chengfu Rd., Beijing 100084, China; School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou Univ., 100 Science Ave., Zhengzhou, He’Nan 450001, China; China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Co. Ltd., Jingkai 15th St., Zhengzhou, He’Nan 450004, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-2331. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Jianmin Zhang, Ph.D.
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Chengfu Rd., Beijing 100084, China; Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Chengfu Rd., Beijing 100084, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share