Slurry Support Mechanism for Shield Tunneling Considering Slurry Infiltration and Cutter-Disk Cutting Effect
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 10
Abstract
This study aims to clarify the mechanism of slurry support and its effect at different stages of slurry infiltration in shield construction. The analysis of various expressions of slurry support throughout the entire excavation cycle is based on the theories of slurry infiltration effects and the cutting action of the cutters. Furthermore, the limit support pressure calculation method at the tunnel face is modified considering the slurry support mechanism observed during different slurry infiltration stages. Some of the main conclusions drawn are as follows. (1) When slurry deep infiltration occurs, the main form of slurry support is the seepage force acting on the soil skeleton. At this stage, the limit support pressure from the filter cake model will not be sufficient to meet the tunnel face stability requirements. (2) The effectiveness of slurry support is influenced by both the slurry infiltration state and the cutting action of the cutterhead. Slurry infiltration and shield tunneling together create a quasi-static equilibrium state, in which slurry support is effective only when the infiltration velocity corresponding to this state is greater than the critical velocity. (3) And the influence of shield tunneling parameters on the slurry support mechanism is significant. Compared with the cutter’s penetration degree, the cutter’s rotational speed has a more pronounced effect on the conversion rate of slurry support pressure at the shield tunnel face.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for valuable and constructive comments and suggestions. The first author acknowledges the financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N2201017) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2023M730524).
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- A
- cross-sectional area of the elementary volume;
- a
- empirical coefficient obtained from the test;
- C
- slurry concentration;
- Cr
- stagnation rate of slurry particles within the elementary volume, i.e., the volume of slurry particles stagnated in a unit slurry volume;
- Cs
- volume fraction of slurry particles in the slurry suspension inside the elementary volume of porous media;
- Cw
- slurry suspension volume fraction inside the elementary volume;
- C0
- initial slurry particles volume fraction;
- dx
- elementary thickness;
- d10
- effective particle size of soil mass;
- Fi,j
- triangular surface element;
- fsg
- slurry stagnation gradient;
- g
- gravity acceleration;
- k
- soil permeability coefficient;
- kG
- slurry pressure gradient coefficient;
- kw
- soil permeability coefficient to water;
- L
- length of the soil skeleton;
- Lf
- slip failure zone width;
- l
- slurry infiltration distance;
- lmax
- maximum penetration distance of the slurry;
- Msr
- stagnated slurry particles mass in soil pores;
- Msu
- stagnated slurry particles mass in suspension state in the soil;
- Mw
- mass of the slurry carrier fluid flowing in from the left boundary of the elementary volume;
- Ms
- slurry particle mass flowing in from the left side of the elementary volume;
- slurry particle mass flowing out from the right side of the elementary volume;
- mass of the slurry carrier fluid flowing in from the right boundary of the elementary volume;
- Mwp
- water mass change due to the pore-water pressure change within the elementary volume;
- Mwr
- water mass change in the elementary volume of porous media;
- ΔMs
- mass difference between the inflow and outflow of bentonite slurry particles;
- ΔMw
- mass difference between the inflow and outflow of the slurry carrier fluid on both sides of the elementary volume;
- dimensionless parameter reflecting the soil gravity;
- Nc
- dimensionless parameter reflecting the soil cohesion;
- n
- soil porosity in the infiltration zone;
- n0
- initial soil porosity before the slurry infiltration;
- p
- pore-water pressure within the elementary volume;
- pA
- constant slurry overpressure;
- px
- seepage force;
- p0
- original pore-water pressure in the layers;
- Δp
- slurry pressure difference between the slurry chamber and the layers;
- Ri,j
- pole diameter corresponding to the triangular surface element Fi,j at the center of gravity on the slip surface (Fig. 14);
- S
- cutter's penetration degree;
- tcut
- time interval of cutter cycle cutting;
- tf
- specific time;
- tfil
- time used for slurry film formation and development;
- tpen
- time used for deep penetration in each cutting time interval tcut;
- v
- slurry macroscopic penetration velocity inside the elementary volume;
- vcr
- critical tunneling speed;
- vf
- corresponding slurry penetration speed;
- WD
- internal dissipation work of the slip system;
- WP
- power generated by the slurry seepage force generated by the pore-water pressure gradient applied to the slip damage zone in front of the tunnel working face;
- gravity power of the slip system in the slip region below the water table when considering groundwater action;
- WσvH
- equivalent load power of the possible additional load on the ground surface;
- α
- compression coefficient of the soil skeleton;
- β
- compression coefficient of the water;
- βi,j
- angle between the motion velocity of the slip system and the horizontal direction;
- γw
- unit weight of water;
- γ′
- soil buoyant unit weight;
- ɛi,j
- angle between the velocity and the vertical direction;
- λ
- filtration coefficient of the stratum;
- μ
- dynamic viscosity coefficient of slurry;
- μs
- water storage coefficient of the porous medium;
- μw
- dynamic viscosity coefficient of water;
- ρw
- slurry carrier fluid (water) density;
- σA
- limit slurry support pressure;
- σE
- equivalent load that integrates the surface additional load and soil arch effect;
- τs
- slurry static yield strength; and
- ω
- rotational angular velocity of the slip system.
References
Anagnostou, G., and K. Kovári. 1994. “The face stability of slurry-shield-driven tunnels.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 9 (2): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(94)90028-0.
Anagnostou, G., and K. Kovári. 1996. “Face stability conditions with earth-pressure-balanced shields.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 11 (2): 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(96)00017-X.
Bezuijen, A., S. P. Steeneken, and J. A. T. Ruigrok. 2016. “Monitoring and analysing pressures around a TBM.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 13th Int. Con. Underground Construction, 1–9. Ghent, Belgium: UGent Publication.
Broere, W. 2003. “Influence of excess pore pressures on tunnel face stabiity.” In Proc., Claiming the Underground Space, 759–765. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Broere, W., and F. Van Tol. 2001. “Time-dependent infiltration and groundwater flow in a face stability analysis.” In Modern tunneling science and technology, edited by T. Adachi, K. Tateyama, and M. Kimura, 629–634. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto Univ.
Broere, W., and F. Van Tol. 2001. “Time-dependent infiltration and groundwater flow in a face stability analysis.” In Modern tunneling sci-ence and technology, edited by T. Adachi, K. Tateyama, and M. Kimura, 629–634. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University.
Ding, W., K. Liu, P. Shi, M. Li, and M. Hou. 2019. “Face stability analysis of shallow circular tunnels driven by a pressurized shield in purely cohesive soils under undrained conditions.” Comput. Geotech. 107 (93): 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.11.025.
Fang, J., H. Song, J. Xu, L. Yang, and Z. Li. 2019. “Storage coefficient calculation model of coal mine underground reservoir considering effect of effective stress.” J. China Coal Soc. 44 (12): 3750–3759. https://doi.org/10.13225/i.cnki.jccs.SH19.1147.
Feng, Y., Y. Yang, C. Zhang, and D. Yang. 2000. “Study on filtration coefficient λ of deep-bed filtration under constant pressure.” Filter Separator 10 (4): 19–21. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8265.2000.04.005.
Jin, D., Y. Dajun, and M. Jiahua. 2022. “Face failure analysis of a shield tunnel with slurry penetration into the ground.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 126: 104554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104554.
Kilchert, M., and J. Karstedt. 1984. Schlitzwande als Trag-und DICHTUNGWANDE, band 2. Berlin: Standsicherheitberechnung von Schlitwanden.
Küpferle, J., Z. Zizka, B. Schoesser, A. Röttger, M. Alber, M. Thewes, and W. Theisen. 2018. “Influence of the slurry-stabilized tunnel face on shield TBM tool wear regarding the soil mechanical changes—Experimental evidence of changes in the tribiological system.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 74: 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.011.
Li, E., and Y. Fan. 2004. “Methods of determination of filtration coefficient of filtering bed.” Ind. Water Wastewater 35 (5): 9–11.
Li, S., X. Feng, R. Liu, L. Zhang, W. Han, and Z. Zheng. 2017. “Diffusion of grouting cement in sandy soil considering filtration effect.” Rock Soil Mech. 38 (4): 925–933. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2017.04.001.
Lin, Y., Y. Fang, and C. He. 2022. “Numerical study on clogging mechanism of slurry infiltration in porous media based on coupled CFD‒DEM method.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 128: 104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104622.
Liu, C., Y. Lu, W. H. Lyu, and L. Liu. 2018. “Effects of coarse-particle materials in slurry on filter-cake formation effectiveness in sandy strata.” Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China J. Highway Transp. 31: 104–111.
Liu, K., D. Dias, W. Ding, and R. Chen. 2021. “Influence of soil-arching effect on tunnel face stability.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (7): 04021107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002060.
Liu, K., W. Ding, and C. Qu. 2022. “A mesoscopic viewpoint on slurry penetration and pressure transfer mechanisms for slurry shield tunneling.” Buildings-Basel 12 (10): 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101744.
Lu, Z., W. Zhou, Z. Yin, and J. Yang. 2022. “Numerical modeling of viscous slurry infiltration in sand.” Comput. Geotech. 146: 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104745.
Mao, J., D. Yuan, J. Yang, and B. Zhang. 2020. “A theoretical study of porosity characteristics on the excavation face of slurry shield in sand stratum.” Rock Soil Mech. 41 (7): 2283–2292. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1620.
Min, F., W. Zhu, and X. Han. 2013. “Filter cake formation for slurry shield tunneling in highly permeable sand.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 38: 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.07.024.
Qin, S., Y. Cheng, H. Huang, and W. Zhou. 2024. “Pressure infiltration behavior and fluid loss of bentonite slurry: A comparative study of two bentonite slurries.” Can. Geotech. J. 61 (5): 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0103.
Qin, S., T. Xu, Z. Cheng, and W. Zhou. 2023. “Analysis of spatiotemporal variations of excess pore water pressure during mechanized tunneling using genetic programming.” Acta Geotech. 18 (4): 1721–1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01728-w.
Ruan, K., and X. Fu. 2022. “A modified Kozeny–Carman equation for predicting saturated hydraulic conductivity of compacted bentonite in confined condition.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 14 (3): 984–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.08.010.
Sun, M., Q. Yan, J. Zhang, E. Wang, C. Yao, and X. Wang. 2022. “A practical method for considering soil strain softening effect in the tunnel face stability analysis by numerical modeling.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 81 (11): 486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02985-5.
Talmon, A. M., D. Mastbergen, and M. Huisman. 2013. “Invasion of pressurized clay suspensions into granular soil.” J. Porous Media 16 (4): 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1615/JPorMedia.v16.i4.70.
Vipulanandan, C., and A. Mohammed. 2020. “Effect of drilling mud bentonite contents on the fluid loss and filter cake formation on a field clay soil formation compared to the API fluid loss method and characterized using Vipulanandan models.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 189: 107029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107029.
Wei, D., W. Zhu, and F. Min. 2014. “Experimental study of forming time of filter cake and conversion rate of slurry pressure in slurry shield in sand stratum.” Rock Soil Mech. 35 (2): 423–428.
Wu, W., X. Liu, J. Guo, F. Sun, X. Huang, and Z. Zhu. 2021. “Upper limit analysis of stability of the water-resistant rock mass of a Karst tunnel face considering the seepage force.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 80 (7): 5813–5830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02283-6.
Xu, T., and A. Bezuijen. 2018. “Analytical methods in predicting excess pore water pressure in front of slurry shield in saturated sandy ground.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 73: 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.12.011.
Xu, T., and A. Bezuijen. 2019. “Pressure infiltration characteristics of bentonite slurry.” Géotechnique 69 (4): 364–368. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.T.026.
Zhang, X., S. Tang, Q. Liu, X. Tu, P. Chen, and F. Li. 2021. “An experimental study on cutting tool hardness optimization for shield TBMs during dense fine silty sand ground tunneling.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 80 (9): 6813–6826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02327-x.
Zhang, Y., G. Gong, H. Yang, W. Li, and J. Liu. 2020. “Precision versus intelligence: Autonomous supporting pressure balance control for slurry shield tunnel boring machines.” Autom. Constr. 114: 103173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103173.
Zizka, Z. 2019. “Stability of slurry supported tunnel face considering the transient support mechanism during excavation in non-cohesive soil.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bochum Univ.
Zizka, Z., B. Schoesser, M. Thewes, and T. Schanz. 2019. “Slurry shield tunneling: New methodology for simplified prediction of increased pore pressures resulting from slurry infiltration at the tunnel face under cyclic excavation processes.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 17 (1): 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0303-2.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 14, 2023
Accepted: Apr 15, 2024
Published online: Jul 29, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Construction methods
- Engineering fundamentals
- Environmental engineering
- Excavation
- Filters
- Filtration
- Geotechnical engineering
- Hydrologic engineering
- Hydrology
- Infiltration
- Mathematics
- Parameters (statistics)
- Statistics
- Tunneling
- Tunnels
- Water and water resources
- Water treatment
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.