Technical Papers
Feb 19, 2024

Seismic Stability of Circular Tunnels in Anisotropic Granular Soil with Surcharge Loading Based on the Modified Pseudodynamic Approach

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 5

Abstract

This study evaluated the stability of circular tunnels constructed in anisotropic granular soil in the presence of surcharges on the ground surface and seismic loads. The stability problem was solved using the lower bound limit analysis method in conjunction with the finite-element technique. In addition, the modified pseudodynamic technique was employed, which permits seismic accelerations to vary with depth and time, including the impact of amplitude and phase differences between shear and primary waves. The forces exerted by the soil on the tunnel lining vary over the perimeter. Therefore, the ultimate support pressure should at least be equal to the maximum normal stress from the earth surrounding the tunnel. It was discovered that parameters such as the tunnel cover depth, tunnel diameter, magnitude of surcharge, soil friction angle and its degree of anisotropy, seismic acceleration coefficients, period, and frequency of seismic waves determine the support pressure’s magnitude and location. The influence of surcharge diminished beyond a certain cover depth and diameter ratio for given soil and seismic wave parameter magnitudes. This study showed that the maximum normal stress was 8.5 times greater than the uniform stress distribution. Furthermore, the support pressure was found to be a maximum of about 45.5% higher for a tunnel cover depth-to-diameter ratio of 3 than for 1%, 34% higher for anisotropy than for isotropic case, 25% higher in the presence of ground surcharge than its absence, and 60% higher for the horizontal acceleration coefficient of 0.3 compared to the static case.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the High-Performance Computing (HPC) facility available at the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur for obtaining the numerical solutions.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
ah (z, t)
horizontal acceleration as a function of depth z and time t;
av (z, t)
vertical acceleration as a function of depth z and time t;
C
cover depth of the tunnel;
ca
adhesion at the soil-lining interface;
D
diameter of the tunnel;
E
Young’s modulus of the tunnel lining material;
fah
acceleration ratio for shear wave;
fav
acceleration ratio for primary wave;
G
shear modulus at any strain level;
G0
small strain shear modulus;
g
acceleration due to gravity;
H
depth from the ground surface to the bedrock;
kh
horizontal acceleration coefficient;
kv
vertical acceleration coefficient;
m
anisotropy coefficient;
q
magnitude of surcharge;
T
period of shaking of the seismic wave;
t
time;
tl
thickness of tunnel lining;
Vs
wave propagation velocity of the shear wave;
Vp
wave propagation velocity of the primary wave;
z
depth from the ground surface;
δc
allowable change in the thickness of tunnel lining;
γ
unit weight of soil;
γs
shear strain;
νl
Poisson’s ratio of the tunnel lining material;
ξs
damping ratio for shear wave;
ξp
damping ratios for primary wave;
σn
normal stress;
σs
support pressure based on the nonuniform distribution of stresses;
σu
support pressure based on the uniform distribution of stresses;
τ
shear stress;
ϕ
equivalent friction angle;
ϕ1
maximum friction angle;
ωs
circular frequency of shear wave; and
ωp
circular frequencies of the primary wave.

References

Annapareddy, V. S. R., and A. Pain. 2020. “Influence of foundation soil on the seismic factor of safety of geosynthetic-lined solid-waste landfills: Equivalent linear approach.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 21 (3): 04020027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000398.
Annapareddy, V. S. R., A. Pain, and S. Sarkar. 2017. “Seismic translational failure analysis of MSW landfills using modified pseudo-dynamic approach.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (10): 04017086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000990.
Assadi, A., and S. W. Sloan. 1991. “Undrained stability of shallow square tunnel.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (8): 1152–1173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:8(1152).
Atkinson, J. H., and D. M. Potts. 1977. “Stability of a shallow circular tunnel in cohesionless soil.” Géotechnique 27 (2): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1977.27.2.203.
Bellezza, I. 2014. “A new pseudo-dynamic approach for seismic active soil thrust.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 32 (2): 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9734-y.
Bellezza, I. 2015. “Seismic active earth pressure on walls using a new pseudo-dynamic approach.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 33 (4): 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9860-1.
Biswas, S., and D. Choudhury. 2020. “Caissons in cohesionless soils considering 3D wedge under earthquake loading.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (12): 04020221. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001862.
Bouaré, H., A. Mesgouez, and G. Lefeuve-Mesgouez. 2022. “Stress and displacement fields around an arbitrary shape tunnel surrounded by a multilayered elastic medium subjected to harmonic waves under plane strain conditions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 154: 107158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107158.
Casagrande, A., and N. Carrillo. 1944. “Shear failure of anisotropic materials.” Proc. Boston Soc. Civ. Eng. 31: 74–87.
Chen, G.-H., J.-F. Zou, Y.-M. Sheng, J.-Y. Chen, and T. Yang. 2022. “Three-dimensional seismic bearing capacity assessment of heterogeneous and anisotropic slopes.” Int. J. Geomech. 22 (9): 04022148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002493.
Choudhury, D., and S. Nimbalkar. 2005. “Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method.” Géotechnique 55 (9): 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.9.699.
Choudhury, D., and S. Nimbalkar. 2007. “Seismic rotational displacement of gravity walls by pseudo-dynamic method: Passive case.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (3): 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.06.009.
Choudhury, D., and S. S. Nimbalkar. 2008. “Seismic rotational displacement of gravity walls by pseudodynamic method.” Int. J. Geomech. 8 (3): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE1532-364120088:3169.
Cilingir, U., and S. P. G. Madabhushi. 2011. “Effect of depth on the seismic response of square tunnels.” Soils Found. 51 (3): 449–457. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.51.449.
Croll, J. G. A. 2001. “Buckling of cylindrical tunnel liners.” J. Eng. Mech. 127 (4): 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:4(333).
Drescher, A., and E. Detournay. 1993. “Limit load in translational failure mechanisms for associative and non-associative materials.” Géotechnique 43 (3): 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.443.
Drucker, D. C. 1953. “Limit analysis of two and three dimensional soil mechanics problems.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1: 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(53)90001-5.
Fathipour, H., M. Payan, R. J. Chenari, and K. Senetakis. 2021a. “Lower bound analysis of modified pseudo-dynamic lateral earth pressures for retaining wall-backfill system with depth-varying damping using FEM-second order cone programming.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 45: 2371–2387. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3269.
Fathipour, H., A. S. Siahmazgi, M. Payan, M. Veiskarami, and R. Jamshidi Chenari. 2021b. “Limit analysis of modified pseudodynamic lateral earth pressure in anisotropic frictional medium using finite-element and second-order cone programming.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (2): 04020258. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001924.
Ganesh, R., S. Khuntia, and J. P. Sahoo. 2018. “Seismic uplift capacity of shallow strip anchors: A new pseudo-dynamic upper bound limit analysis.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 109: 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.004.
Hashash, Y. M. A., J. J. Hook, B. Schmidt, and J. I-Chiang Yao. 2001. “Seismic design and analysis of underground structures.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 16: 247–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7.
ITA (International Tunnelling Association). 2000. “Guidelines for the design of shield tunnel lining.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 15 (3): 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00058-4.
Kawashima, K. 2006. “Seismic analysis of underground structures.” J. Disaster Res. 1 (3): 378–389. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2006.p0378.
Kokane, A. K., V. A. Sawant, and J. P. Sahoo. 2021. “Nail forces and locus of maximum tension of nailed cut subjected to seismic excitations: A calculus approach with log-spiral failure surface.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (11): 04021225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002213.
Koyama, Y. 2003. “Present status and technology of shield tunneling method in Japan.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 18 (2–3): 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00040-3.
Kramer, S. L. 2007. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. New Delhi, India: Pearson Education.
Kumar, B., and J. P. Sahoo. 2020. “Support pressure for circular tunnels advanced below water bodies.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 97: 103214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103214.
Luo, W., J. Li, G. Tang, J. Chen, and C. Dai. 2021. “Upper-bound limit analysis for slope stability based on modified Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion with tensile cutoff.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (10): 04021184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002154.
Makrodimopoulos, A., and C. M. Martin. 2006. “Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive-frictional materials using second-order cone programming.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 66 (4): 604–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1567.
Melo, C., and S. Sharma. 2004. “Seismic coefficients for pseudostatic slope analysis.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Meyerhof, G. G. 1978. “Bearing capacity of anisotropic cohesionless soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 15: 592–595. https://doi.org/10.1139/t78-063.
Ngan Vu, M., W. Broere, and J. W. Bosch. 2017. “Structural analysis for shallow tunnels in soft soils.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (8): 04017038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000866.
Nimbalkar, S., and D. Choudhury. 2007. “Sliding stability and seismic design of retaining wall by pseudo-dynamic method for passive case.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (6): 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.11.006.
Okamoto, S., and C. Tamura. 1972. “Behaviour of subaqueous tunnels during earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1 (3): 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/EQE.4290010306.
Pain, A., D. Choudhury, and S. K. Bhattacharyya. 2015. “Seismic stability of retaining wall–soil sliding interaction using modified pseudo-dynamic method.” Géotechnique Lett. 5: 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.14.00116.
Pain, A., D. Choudhury, and S. K. Bhattacharyya. 2016. “Seismic uplift capacity of horizontal strip anchors using a modified pseudodynamic approach.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (1): 04015025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943.
Pain, A., D. Choudhury, and S. K. Bhattacharyya. 2017a. “Seismic rotational stability of gravity retaining walls by modified pseudo-dynamic method.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 94: 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.016.
Pain, A., D. Choudhury, and S. K. Bhattacharyya. 2017b. “Effect of dynamic soil properties and frequency content of harmonic excitation on the internal stability of reinforced soil retaining structure.” Geotext. Geomembr. 45 (5): 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.07.003.
Pakbaz, M. C., and A. Yareevand. 2005. “2-D analysis of circular tunnel against earthquake loading.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 20 (5): 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.01.006.
Qin, C., and S. C. Chian. 2019. “Impact of earthquake characteristics on seismic slope stability using modified pseudodynamic method.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (9): 04019106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943.
Rajesh, B. G., and D. Choudhury. 2017. “Generalized seismic active thrust on a retaining wall with submerged backfill using a modified pseudodynamic method.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (3): 06016023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000750.
Rajesh, B. G., and D. Choudhury. 2018. “Seismic stability of seawalls under earthquake and tsunami forces using a modified pseudodynamic method.” Nat Hazards Rev 19 (3): 04018005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE).
Ranjbarnia, M., P. Oreste, A. Fahimifar, and A. Arya. 2016. “Analytical-numerical solution for stress distribution around tunnel reinforced by radial fully grouted rockbolts.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 40 (13): 1844–1862. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2517.
Rathje, E. M., N. A. Abrahamson, and J. D. Bray. 1998. “Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (2): 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150).
Sahoo, J. P., and G. Gowtham. 2023. “Stability evaluation of circular tunnels in cohesive frictional soil under earthquake loading using the modified pseudo-dynamic approach.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 166: 107740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107740.
Sahoo, J. P., and J. Kumar. 2014. “Stability of a circular tunnel in presence of pseudostatic seismic body forces.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 42: 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.03.003.
Seed, B. H., and I. M. Idriss. 1970. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Sharma, S., and W. R. Judd. 1991. “Underground opening damage from earthquakes.” Eng. Geol. 30: 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(91)90063-Q.
Sloan, S. W. 1988. “Lower bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 12 (1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610120105.
Srikar, G., and S. Mittal. 2020. “Seismic analysis of retaining wall subjected to surcharge: A modified pseudodynamic approach.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (9): 06020022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001780.
Steedman, R. S., and X. Zeng. 1990. “The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall.” Géotechnique 40 (1): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.1.103.
St John, C. M., and T. F. Zahrah. 1987. “A seismic design of underground structures.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 2 (2): 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(87)90011-3.
Sun, Q. Q., and D. Dias. 2019. “Assessment of stress relief during excavation on the seismic tunnel response by the pseudo-static method.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 117: 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2018.09.019.
Tamura, T., and Y. Hayashi. 2005. “Buckling analysis of tunnel lining considering interaction with ground.” J. JSCE 792 (III–71): 199–210.
Tsinidis, G., K. Pitilakis, and G. Madabhushi. 2016. “On the dynamic response of square tunnels in sand.” Eng. Struct. 125: 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.014.
Wang, H. N., G. S. Zeng, and M. J. Jiang. 2018. “Analytical stress and displacement around non-circular tunnels in semi-infinite ground.” Appl. Math. Modell. 63: 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.043.
Wang, J. H., and A. Koizumi. 2010. “Buckling of cylindrical shells with longitudinal joints under external pressure.” Thin-Walled Struct. 48 (12): 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2010.05.004.
Wang, J. H., W. J. Zhang, X. Guo, A. Koizumi, and H. Tanaka. 2015. “Mechanism for buckling of shield tunnel linings under hydrostatic pressure.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 49: 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.04.012.
Wang, J.-N. 1993. Seismic design of tunnels—A simple state-of-the-art design approach. New York: Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc.
Wang, J.-N., and G. Munfakh. 2001. “Seismic design of tunnels.” Trans. Built Environ. 57: 499–598.
Wilson, D. W., A. J. Abbo, S. W. Sloan, and A. V. Lyamin. 2011. “Undrained stability of a circular tunnel where the shear strength increases linearly with depth.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (9): 1328–1342. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-041.
Wood, A. M. M. 1975. “The circular tunnel in elastic ground.” Géotechnique 25 (1): 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.115.
Wu, B. R., and C. J. Lee. 2003. “Ground movements and collapse mechanisms induced by tunneling in clayey soil.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 3 (4): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2003.030402.
Xiao, Y., M. Zhao, R. Zhang, H. Zhao, and G. Wu. 2019. “Stability of dual square tunnels in rock masses subjected to surcharge loading.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 92: 103037. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TUST.2019.103037.
Xiong, H., L. Guo, Y. Cai, and Z. Yang. 2016. “Experimental study of drained anisotropy of granular soils involving rotation of principal stress direction.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1039662.
Yamada, Y., and K. Ishihara. 1979. “Anisotropic deformation characteristics of sand under three dimensional stress conditions.” Soils Found. 19 (2): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.3208/SANDF1972.19.2_79.
Yamamoto, K., A. V. Lyamin, D. W. Wilson, S. W. Sloan, and A. J. Abbo. 2011. “Stability of a circular tunnel in cohesive-frictional soil subjected to surcharge loading.” Comput. Geotech. 38 (4): 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.02.014.
Yamamoto, K., A. V. Lyamin, D. W. Wilson, S. W. Sloan, and A. J. Abbo. 2013. “Stability of dual circular tunnels in cohesive-frictional soil subjected to surcharge loading.” Comput. Geotech. 50: 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.12.008.
Yang, F., X. Zheng, J. Zhang, and J. Yang. 2017. “Upper bound analysis of stability of dual circular tunnels subjected to surcharge loading in cohesive-frictional soils.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 61: 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TUST.2016.10.006.
Yasuda, N., K. Tsukada, and T. Asakura. 2019. “Three-dimensional seismic response of a cylindrical tunnel with voids behind the lining.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 84: 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TUST.2018.11.026.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24Issue 5May 2024

History

Received: Jun 7, 2023
Accepted: Oct 21, 2023
Published online: Feb 19, 2024
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jul 19, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-6503. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Jagdish Prasad Sahoo, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share