Technical Papers
Jun 23, 2023

Seismic Response of High-Rise Frame–Shear Wall Buildings under the Influence of Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 9

Abstract

Frame–shear wall buildings with multiple basements are the most commonly used structural form of high-rise buildings in the world today. In the traditional design method, structures are usually assumed as rigid base structures without considering soil–structure interaction (SSI), since incorporating the dynamic SSI tends to prolong natural periods and increase the damping of the system, which are considered beneficial for the seismic response of structures. However, recent studies exposed a potentially harmful aspect of SSI. In this study, a soil–foundation–structure model developed in finite-element software and verified by shaking table tests is used to critically investigate the influence of SSI on high-rise frame–shear wall structures with a series of superstructure and substructure parameters. The beneficial and detrimental impacts of SSI are identified and discussed. Numerical simulation results indicate the rise in the stiffness of subsoil can dramatically amplify the base shear of structures. As the foundation rotation increases, interstory drifts are increased and base shears are reduced. In general, SSI amplifies the interstory drifts showing detrimental effects of SSI. However, as for the base shear, SSI exerts detrimental effects on most piled foundation cases as well as classical compensated foundation structures founded on Ce soil, whereas for classical compensated foundation structures founded on soil types De and Ee, effects of SSI are beneficial since the base shear is reduced. Moreover, regarding structures with different foundation types, minimum base shear ratios considering the SSI reduction effect are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Akbari, A., A. Eslami, and M. Nikookar. 2021. “Influence of soil stiffness on the response of piled raft foundations under earthquake loading.” Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 8 (4): 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-021-00157-8.
Al Agha, W., W. Alozzo Almorad, N. Umamaheswari, and A. Alhelwani. 2021. “Study the seismic response of reinforced concrete high-rise building with dual framed-shear wall system considering the effect of soil structure interaction.” Mater. Today:. Proc. 43: 2182–2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.111.
Anand, V., and S. R. Satish Kumar. 2018. “Seismic soil-structure interaction: A state-of-the-art review.” Structures 16: 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.009.
Ansari, M., M. Nazari, and A. K. Panah. 2021. “Influence of foundation flexibility on seismic fragility of reinforced concrete high-rise buildings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 142: 106521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106521.
AS (Australian Standards). 2007. Structural design actions: Part 4: Earthquake actions in Australia. AS1170.4. Sydney, Australia: AS.
AS (Australian Standards). 2018. Concrete structures. AS3600. Sydney, Australia: AS.
Ayala, F., E. Sáez, and C. Magna-Verdugo. 2022. “Computational modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction in shear wall buildings with basements in medium stiffness sandy soils using a subdomain spectral element approach calibrated by micro-vibrations.” Eng. Struct. 252: 113668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113668.
Bagheri, M., M. E. Jamkhaneh, and B. Samali. 2018. “Effect of seismic soil–pile–structure interaction on Mid- and high-rise steel buildings resting on a group of pile foundations.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (9): 04018103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001222.
Balkaya, C., S. B. Yuksel, and O. Derinoz. 2012. “Soil-structure interaction effects on the fundamental periods of the shear-wall dominant buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 21 (6): 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.611.
Borja, R. I., W.-H. Wu, A. P. Amies, and H. A. Smith. 1994. “Nonlinear lateral, rocking and torsional vibration of rigid foundations.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (3): 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:3(491).
Carbonari, S., F. Dezi, and G. Leoni. 2011. “Linear soil-structure interaction of coupled wall-frame structures on pile foundations.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (9): 1296–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.008.
Carbonari, S., F. Dezi, and G. Leoni. 2012. “Nonlinear seismic behaviour of wall-frame dual systems accounting for soil-structure interaction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (12): 1651–1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1195.
Choinière, M., P. Paultre, and P. Léger. 2019. “Influence of soil-structure interaction on seismic demands in shear wall building gravity load frames.” Eng. Struct. 198: 109259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.100.
Darendeli, M. B. 2001. “Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA. 2012. Abaqus analysis user’s manual. Minneapolis: Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA Corporation.
El Ganainy, H., and M. H. El Naggar. 2009. “Seismic performance of three-dimensional frame structures with underground stories.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 29: 1249–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.02.003.
Far, C., and H. Far. 2019. “Improving energy efficiency of existing residential buildings using effective thermal retrofit of building envelope.” Indoor Built Environ. 28 (6): 744–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X18794010.
Far, H. 2019. “Dynamic behaviour of unbraced steel frames resting on soft ground.” Steel Constr. 12 (2): 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201800003.
Far, H., and D. Flint. 2017. “Significance of using isolated footing technique for residential construction on expansive soils.” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 11 (1): 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0372-8.
Fatahi, B., and S. H. R. Tabatabaiefar. 2014. “Effects of soil plasticity on seismic performance of mid-rise building frames resting on soft soils.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 17 (10): 1387–1402. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.10.1387.
Fatahi, B., H. R. Tabatabaiefar, and B. Samali. 2011. “Performance based assessment of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects on seismic response of building frame.” In Proc., of Georisk 2011 - Geotechnical Risk Assessment & Management, Geotechnical Special Publication 224, edited by C. H. Juang, K. K. Phoon, A. J. Puppala, R. A. Green, and G. A. Fenton, 344–351. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Galal, K., and M. Naimi. 2008. “Effect of soil conditions on the response of reinforced concrete tall structures to near-fault earthquakes.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 17 (3): 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.365.
Gao, L., E. Fang, and J. Qian. 2005. Conceptual design of high-rise building structure. Beijing: China Planning Press.
Gazetas, G. 1983. “Analysis of machine foundation vibrations: State of the art.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 2 (1): 2–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(87)90008-X.
Ghandil, M., and F. Behnamfar. 2017. “Ductility demands of MRF structures on soft soils considering soil-structure interaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92: 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.051.
Gu, Y., J. B. Liu, and Y. X. Du. 2007. “3D consistent viscous-spring artificial boundary and viscous-spring boundary element.” Eng. Mech. 24 (12): 31–37.
Hokmabadi, A. S., B. Fatahi, and B. Samali. 2012. “Recording inter-storey drifts of structures in time-history approach for seismic design of building frames.” Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 13 (2): 175–179. https://doi.org/10.7158/S11-118.2012.13.2.
Hradilek, P. J., and J. E. Luco. 1970. Dynamic soil-structure interaction. IDIEM Technical Rep. No. 14. Santiago, Chile: Univ. of Chile.
Kamal, M., M. Inel, and B. T. Cayci. 2022. “Seismic behavior of mid-rise reinforced concrete adjacent buildings considering soil-structure interaction.” J. Build. Eng. 51: 104296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104296.
Kausel, E. 2010. “Early history of soil-structure interaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (9): 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.11.001.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Liu, J., Y. Du, X. Du, Z. Wang, and J. Wu. 2006. “3D viscous-spring artificial boundary in time domain.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 5 (1): 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-006-0585-2.
Lu, Y. 2005. “Inelastic behaviour of RC wall-frame with a rocking wall and its analysis incorporating 3-D effect.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 14 (1): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.254.
Ma, S. J., M. J. Chi, H. J. Chen, and S. Chen. 2020. “Implementation of viscous-spring boundary in ABAQUS and comparative study on seismic motion input methods.” Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 39 (7): 1445–1457.
Meymand, P. J. 1998. Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile superstructure interaction in soft clay. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Mittal, V., and M. Samanta. 2021. “A critical review on design philosophies of different design standards on seismic soil-structure interaction.” In Proc., Seismic Design and Performance, edited by T. G. Sitharam, R. R. Pallepati, and S. Kolathayar. Singapore, Springer.
Park, D., and Y. M. A. Hashash. 2004. “Soil damping formulation in nonlinear time domain site response analysis.” J. Earthquake Eng. 8 (2): 249–274.
Qaftan, O. S., T. Toma-Sabbagh, L. Weekes, and L. Augusthus-Nelson. 2020. “Validation of a finite element modelling approach on soil-foundation-structure interaction of a multi-storey wall-frame structure under dynamic loadings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 131: 106041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106041.
Radkia, S., R. Rahnavard, H. Tuwair, F. A. Gandomkar, and R. Napolitano. 2020. “Investigating the effects of seismic isolators on steel asymmetric structures considering soil-structure interaction.” Structures 27: 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.019.
Rayhani, M. H., and M. H. El Naggar. 2008. “Numerical modelling of seismic response of rigid foundation on soft soil.” Int. J. Geomech. 8 (6): 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:6(336).
Renzi, S., C. Madiai, and G. Vannucchi. 2013. “A simplified empirical method for assessing seismic soil-structure interaction effects on ordinary shear-type buildings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 55: 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.012.
Saleh, A., H. Far, and L. Mok. 2018. “Effects of different support conditions on experimental bending strength of thin walled cold formed steel storage upright frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 150: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.07.031.
Scarfone, R., M. Morigi, and R. Conti. 2020. “Assessment of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects for tall buildings: A 3D numerical approach.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 128: 105864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105864.
Seed, H. B., R. Wong, I. M. Idriss, and K. Tokimatsu. 1986. “Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 112 (11): 1016–1032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:11(1016).
Segaline, H., E. Sáez, and J. Ubilla. 2022. “Evaluation of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects in buildings with underground stories using 1 g physical experimentation in a transparent shear laminar box.” Eng. Struct. 266: 114645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114645.
Shabani, M. J., M. Shamsi, and A. Ghanbari. 2021. “Slope topography effect on the seismic response of mid-rise buildings considering topography-soil-structure interaction.” Earthquakes Struct. 20 (2): 187–200.
Sharma, N., K. Dasgupta, and A. Dey. 2018. “A state-of-the-art review on seismic SSI studies on building structures.” Innovative Infrastruct. Solutions 3 (22): 1–16.
Shirzadi, M., F. Behnamfar, and P. Asadi. 2020. “Effects of soil-structure interaction on inelastic response of torsionally-coupled structures.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 18 (4): 1213–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00747-5.
Son, H., J. Park, H. Kim, Y. H. Lee, and D.-J. Kim. 2017. “Generalized finite element analysis of high-rise wall-frame structural systems.” Eng. Comput. 34 (1): 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-07-2016-0266.
Sun, J. I., R. Golesorkhi, and B. Seed. 1998. Dynamic module and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Rep. No. UCB/EERC-88/15. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Tabatabaiefar, H. R. 2016. “Detail design and construction procedure of laminar soil containers for experimental shaking table tests.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 10 (4): 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1145419.
Tabatabaiefar, H. R., and T. Clifton. 2016. “Significance of considering soil-structure interaction effects on seismic design of unbraced building frames resting on soft soils.” Aust. Geomech. J. 51 (1): 55–64.
Tabatabaiefar, H. R., and B. Fatahi. 2014. “Idealisation of soil-structure system to determine inelastic seismic response of mid-rise building frames.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 66: 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.007.
Tabatabaiefar, H. R., B. Fatahi, K. Ghabraie, and W.-H. Zhou. 2015. “Evaluation of numerical procedures to determine seismic response of structures under influence of soil-structure interaction.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 56 (1): 27–47. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.1.027.
Tabatabaiefar, S. H. R., B. Fatahi, and B. Samali. 2012. “Finite difference modelling of soil-structure interaction for seismic design of moment resisting building frames.” Aust. Geomech. J. 47 (3): 113–120.
Tabatabaiefar, S. H. R., B. Fatahi, and B. Samali. 2013. “Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction.” Int. J. Geomech. 13 (4): 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000231.
Tabatabaiefar, S. H. R., B. Fatahi, and B. Samali. 2014a. “Numerical and experimental investigations on seismic response of building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 17 (1): 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.1.109.
Tabatabaiefar, S. H. R., B. Fatahi, and B. Samali. 2014b. “An empirical relationship to determine lateral seismic response of mid-rise building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 23 (7): 526–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1058.
Tabatabaiefar, H. R., and B. Mansoury. 2016. “Detail design, building and commissioning of tall building structural models for experimental shaking table tests.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 25 (8): 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1262.
Van Nguyen, Q., B. Fatahi, and A. S. Hokmabadi. 2017. “Influence of size and load-bearing mechanism of piles on seismic performance of buildings considering soil-pile-structure interaction.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (7): 04017007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000869.
Veletsos, A. S., and J. W. Meek. 1974. “Dynamic behaviour of building-foundation systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 3: 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290030203.
Wolf, J. P. 1985. Dynamic soil-structure interaction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wolf, J. P. 1998. Soil-structure interaction analysis in time domain. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Co.
Yang, J., Z. Lu, and P. Li. 2020. “Large-scale shaking table test on tall buildings with viscous dampers considering pile-soil-structure interaction.” Eng. Struct. 220: 110960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110960.
Zhang, W., S. Liu, M. Shokrabadi, A. Dehghanpoor, and E. Taciroglu. 2022. “Nonlinear seismic fragility assessment of tall buildings equipped with tuned mass damper (TMD) and considering soil-structure interaction effects.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 20 (7): 3469–3483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01363-6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: Sep 27, 2022
Accepted: Mar 24, 2023
Published online: Jun 23, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xiaofeng Zhang [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Univ. of Technology Sydney (UTS), Building 11, Level 11, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007 (PO Box 123), Australia (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, Univ. of Technology Sydney (UTS), Building 11, Level 11, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007 (PO Box 123), Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-6582. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share