Reduction of Earth Pressures on Rigid Retaining Walls with Narrow Backfill Width Using Compressible Geofoam Inclusions
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 12
Abstract
Installing geofoam inclusions between the rigid retaining wall and backfill can reduce the earth pressure against the retaining wall. However, there is currently a lack of research on the earth-pressure reduction effect of geofoam inclusions on rigid retaining walls with narrow backfill width. In this study, the compression from geofoam inclusions was equated to the displacement of the narrow backfill. An iterative method was introduced based on the displacement-dependent earth-pressure model. A calculation method was obtained to determine the earth pressure for rigid retaining walls with narrow backfill width using geofoam inclusions. Moreover, simplified formulae for at-rest, active, and passive earth-pressure coefficients of retaining walls with narrow backfill width were achieved based on the soil arching effect and horizontal differential element method. A series of laboratory model tests were performed to verify the calculated formulae, demonstrating a high level of formula accuracy. In addition, the parameter analysis results showed that the earth-pressure reduction effect of geofoam inclusions was directly proportional to the interface friction angle between the backfill and geofoam inclusions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data sets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant Numbers 52008285, 52178341, and 52278360). The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- c
- cohesion of the backfill (kPa);
- d
- width of the backfill (m);
- da1
- width of the differential element between the retaining wall and rock in the active state (m);
- da2
- width of the differential element between the retaining wall and slip surface in the active state (m);
- dp1
- width of the differential element between the retaining wall and rock in the passive state (m);
- dp2
- width of the differential element between the retaining wall and slip surface in the passive state (m);
- E
- Young's modulus of EPS (MPa);
- H
- backfill height (m);
- K
- EPS stiffness;
- K0
- at-rest earth-pressure coefficient by Jaky (dimensionless);
- Ka
- lateral active stress ratio (dimensionless);
- Kp
- lateral passive stress ratio (dimensionless);
- k0
- at-rest earth-pressure coefficient (dimensionless);
- ka
- active earth-pressure coefficient (dimensionless);
- kp
- passive earth-pressure coefficient (dimensionless);
- p
- earth pressure on the retaining wall (kPa);
- p0
- at-rest earth pressure (kPa);
- paw
- lateral stress of the differentiation element at the wall back in the active state (kPa);
- paz
- vertical stress of any point in the differential element in the active state (kPa);
- mean value of vertical stress on the differential element in the active state (kPa);
- ppw
- lateral stress of the differentiation element at the wall back in the passive state (kPa);
- ppz
- vertical stress of any point in the differential element in the passive state (kPa);
- mean value of vertical stress on the differential element in the passive state (kPa);
- q
- surcharge load on the backfill surface (kPa);
- Ra
- radius of the trajectory of minor principal stress (m);
- Rp
- radius of the trajectory of major principal stress (m);
- t
- thickness of EPS (m);
- z
- distance between the top surface of the differential element and backfill surface;
- αa
- principal stress rotation angle corresponding to any point in the differential element in the active state (rad);
- αar
- principal stress rotation angle corresponding to the point at the rock surface in the active state (rad);
- αas
- principal stress rotation angle corresponding to the point at the slip surface in the active state (rad);
- αaw
- principal stress rotation angle corresponding to the point at the wall back in the active state (rad);
- αp
- principal stress rotation angle corresponding to any point in the differential element in the passive state (rad);
- αpr
- principal stress rotation angle corresponding to the point at the rock surface in the passive state (rad);
- αps
- principal stress rotation angle corresponding to the point at the slip surface in the passive state (rad);
- αpw
- principal stress rotation angle corresponding to the point at the wall back in the passive state (rad);
- Δ
- compression from geofoam inclusion (m);
- δE
- interface friction angle between the backfill and geofoam inclusion (°);
- δr
- interfacial friction angle between the backfill and rock (°);
- δw
- interface friction angle between the backfill and retaining wall (°);
- φ
- internal friction angle of the retained soil (°);
- θa
- inclination angle of the slip line in the active state (°); and
- θp
- inclination angle of the slip line in the passive state (°).
References
AbdelSalam, S. S., and S. A. Azzam. 2016. “Reduction of lateral pressures on retaining walls using geofoam inclusion.” Geosynth. Int. 23 (6): 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.16.00005.
AbdelSalam, S. S., S. A. Azzam, and B. M. Fakhry. 2017. “Reliability and 3D modeling of flexible walls with EPS inclusion.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (7): 04016153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000853.
Bathurst, R. J., A. Keshavarz, S. Zarnani, and W. A. Take. 2007. “A simple displacement model for response analysis of EPS geofoam seismic buffers.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (4): 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.07.004.
Burugupelly, N. K., and S. M. Dasaka. 2022. “Effect of EPS geofoam on lateral earth pressure reduction—A numerical study.” In Vol. 186 of Dynamics of soil and modelling of geotechnical problems. lecture notes in civil engineering, edited by C. N. V. Satyanarayana Reddy, A. M. Krishna, and N. Satyam. Singapore: Springer.
Dave, T. N., and S. M. Dasaka. 2013. “In-house calibration of pressure transducers and effect of material thickness.” Geomech. Eng. 5 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2013.5.1.001.
Ertugrul, O. L., and A. C. Trandafir. 2011. “Reduction of lateral earth forces acting on rigid nonyielding retaining walls by EPS geofoam inclusions.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 (12): 1711–1718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000348.
Fan, K., J. Yan, W. Zou, Z. Han, and Z. Lai. 2022. “Active earth pressure on non-yielding retaining walls with geofoam blocks and granular backfills.” Transp. Geotech. 33: 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100712.
Frydman, S., and I. Keissar. 1987. “Earth pressure on retaining walls near rock faces.” J. Geotech. Eng. 113 (6): 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:6(586).
Gade, V. K., and S. M. Dasaka. 2018. “Calibration of earth pressure sensors.” Indian Geotech. J. 48: 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0223-0.
Greco, V. 2013. “Active thrust on retaining walls of narrow backfill width.” Comput. Geotech. 50: 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.12.007.
Handy, R. L. 1985. “The arch in soil arching.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (3): 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(302).
Hazarika, H. 2006. “Stress–strain modeling of EPS geofoam for large-strain applications.” Geotext. Geomembr. 24 (2): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.11.003.
Horvath, J. S. 1997. “The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam.” Geotext. Geomembr. 15 (1–3): 77–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00008-3.
Ikizler, S. B., M. Aytekin, and E. Nas. 2008. “Laboratory study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam used with expansive soils.” Geotext. Geomembr. 26 (2): 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.05.005.
Janssen, H. A. 1895. “Versuche über getreidedruck in silozellen. Zeitschrift.” Verein Deutscher Ingenieure 39: 1045–1049. partial English translation in Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 1986, 553.
Kim, H., A. F. Witthoeft, and D. Kim. 2018. “Numerical study of earth pressure reduction on rigid walls using EPS geofoam inclusions.” Geosynth. Int. 25 (2): 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.18.00001.
Lin, Y. J., F. Q. Chen, and Y. P. Lv. 2021. “Analytical solutions for the earth pressure of narrow cohesive backfill with retaining walls rotating about the top.” Acta Geotech. 16 (9): 2975–2995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01187-9.
Mei, G., Q. Chen, and L. Song. 2009. “Model for predicting displacement-dependent lateral earth pressure.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (8): 969–975. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-040.
Ni, P., G. Mei, and Y. Zhao. 2017. “Displacement-dependent earth pressures on rigid retaining walls with compressible geofoam inclusions: Physical modeling and analytical solutions.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (6): 04016132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000838.
Paik, K. H., and R. Salgado. 2003. “Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects.” Geotechnique 53 (7): 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.7.643.
Patil, V., M. Junagade, and D. S. Murty. 2022. “Development of a full-scale retaining wall model to evaluate lateral earth pressure reduction using EPS geofoam.” In Vol. 186 of Dynamics of soil and modelling of geotechnical problems. lecture notes in civil engineering, edited by C. N. V. Satyanarayana Reddy, A. M. Krishna, and N. Satyam. Singapore: Springer.
USACE. 1994. Design of sheet pile walls. Engineer manual. EM 1110-2-2504. Washington, DC: USACE, Department of the Army.
Woodruff, R. 2003. “Centrifuge modeling for MSE-shoring composite walls.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Colorado.
Xie, M., J. Zheng, A. Shao, C. Miao, and J. Zhang. 2020a. “Study of lateral earth pressures on nonyielding retaining walls with deformable geofoam inclusions.” Geotext. Geomembr. 48 (5): 684–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.05.003.
Xie, M., J. Zheng, R. Zhang, L. Cui, and C. Miao. 2020b. “Active earth pressure on rigid retaining walls built near rock faces.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (6): 04020061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001675.
Xie, M., J. Zheng, R. Zhang, L. Cui, and C. Miao. 2020c. “Performance of a combined retaining wall structure supporting a high embankment on a steep slope: Case study.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (6): 05020002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001644.
Xu, L., Y. B. Zhang, F. Q. Chen, and Y. J. Lin. 2021. “Active earth pressure of narrow backfill on inverted T-type retaining walls under translation mode.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (11): 04021222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002176.
Yang, M., X. Tang, and Z. Wu. 2020. “Slip surface and active earth pressure of cohesionless narrow backfill behind rigid retaining walls under translation movement mode.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (8): 04020115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001746.
Zarnani, S., and R. J. Bathurst. 2007. “Experimental investigation of EPS geofoam seismic buffers using shaking table tests.” Geosynth. Int. 14 (3): 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.3.165.
Zarnani, S., and R. J. Bathurst. 2009. “Numerical parametric study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam seismic buffers.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (3): 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-128.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 7, 2022
Accepted: May 28, 2023
Published online: Sep 29, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 29, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.