Case Studies
Jul 7, 2023

Bayesian Approaches for Probabilistic Prediction of Debris-Flow Runout Using Limited Site-Specific Data Sets

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 9

Abstract

Accurate and reliable predictions of debris-flow runout are essential for debris-flow hazard assessment. Debris-flow runout distances are commonly estimated by empirical relationships for their simplicity. However, existing empirical models have been developed by traditional regression analysis, which generally require a large amount of data to guarantee their accuracy and predictability. Owing to the unpredictability of debris flows and lack of data referencing historic events, the amount of debris-flow data is usually very limited and associated with measurement errors. How to develop a reliable runout prediction model and simultaneously quantify the uncertainties still remains a difficult task. This paper proposed Bayesian approaches to develop the runout model of site-specific debris flow in basin-based limited investigation data and prior information. The proposed approaches can select the most suitable model of debris-flow runout among various alternatives based on field data and prior information, and simultaneously characterize the predictive uncertainty of runout distance. To overcome the limitation of the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm in inefficient sampling, a multichain method, specifically the DREAM(ZS) algorithm, is used to obtain the posterior distribution to solve the sampling problem on complex and high-dimensional target distributions. Copula theory is applied to calculate the model evidence based on the random samples of model parameters generated from the DREAM(ZS) algorithm, providing a promising tool for calculating the model evidence in Bayesian inference. The proposed approaches are illustrated using the debris-flow data in the Wenchuan area. Results show that the proposed approaches accurately estimate the runout distances in the study area, and reasonably consider the measurement noise and modeling errors in the empirical relationship. Based on the limited site-specific data sets, the Bayesian approaches perform better than the preexisting empirical relationship and favor a simple model in terms of balance between data fitting and model complexity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 52009037), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (Project No. 2020CFB291), and the Wuhan Knowledge Innovation Special Project (Project No. 2022020801020268). The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and advice.

References

Beck, J. L., and S. K. Au. 2002. “Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 128: 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:4(380).
Beck, J. L., and L. S. Katafygiotis. 1998. “Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (4): 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455).
Beck, J. L., and K. V. Yuen. 2004. “Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (2): 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(192).
Berti, M., and A. Simoni. 2007. “Prediction of debris flow inundation areas using empirical mobility relationships.” Geomorphology 90: 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.01.014.
Cao, Z. J., Y. Wang, and D. Q. Li. 2016. “Quantification of prior knowledge in geotechnical site characterization.” Eng. Geol. 203: 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.018.
Crosta, G. B., and P. Frattini. 2004. “Controls on modern alluvial fan processes in the Central Alps, Northern Italy.” Earth. Surf. Processes Landforms 29 (3): 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1009.
Cui, P., X. Q. Chen, Y. Y. Zhu, F. H. Su, F. Q. Wei, Y. S. Han, H. J. Liu, and J. Q. Zhuang. 2011. “The Wenchuan earthquake (May 12, 2008), Sichuan province, China, and resulting geohazards.” Nat. Hazard. 56 (1): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9392-1.
D’Agostino, V., M. Cesca, and L. Marchi. 2010. “Field and laboratory investigations of runout distances of debris flows in the Dolomites (Eastern Italian Alps).” Geomorphology 115 (3): 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.032.
Dai, F. C., C. F. Lee, and Y. Y. Ngai. 2002. “Landslide risk assessment and management: An overview.” Eng. Geol. 64: 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00093-X.
Fannin, R. J., and M. P. Wise. 2001. “An empirical-statistical model for debris flow travel distance.” Can. Geotech. J. 38: 982–994. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-030.
Franzi, L., and G. Bianco. 2001. “A statistical method to predict debris flow deposited volumes on a debris fan.” Phys. Chem. Earth Part C 26 (9): 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1917(01)00067-8.
García-Ruiz, J. M., S. Beguería, A. Lorente, and C. Martí. 2002. Comparing debris flow relationships in the Alps and in the Pyrenees. Zaragoza, Spain: Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología.
Huang, X., and C. Tang. 2014. “Formation and activation of catastrophic debris flows in Baishui River basin, Sichuan Province, China.” Landslides 11 (6): 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0465-1.
Hungr, O. 1995. “A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches.” Can. Geotech. J. 32: 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1139/t95-063.
Hungr, O., G. C. Morgan, and R. Kellerhals. 1984. “Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazard for design of remedial measures.” Can. Geotech. J. 21 (4): 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1139/t84-073.
Hürlimann, M., D. Rickenmann, V. Medina, and A. Bateman. 2008. “Evaluation of approaches to calculate debris-flow parameters for hazard assessment.” Eng. Geol. 102: 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.012.
Ikeya, H. 1989. “Debris flow and its countermeasures in Japan.” Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 40: 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02590339.
Iverson, R. M. 1997. “The physics of debris flows.” Rev. Geophys. 35: 245–296. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00426.
Jakob, M., and O. Hungr. 2005. Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Berlin: Springer.
Jakob, M., D. Stein, and M. Ulmi. 2012. “Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact.” Nat. Hazard. 60: 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0007-2.
Li, X. Y., and J. D. Zhao. 2018. “A unified CFD-DEM approach for modeling of debris flow impacts on flexible barriers.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 42 (14): 1643–1670. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2806.
Mathworks. 2019. “MATLAB - the language of technical computing.” Accessed June, 25, 2023. http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/.
McDougall, S. 2017. “2014 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Landslide runout analysis-current practice and challenges.” Can. Geotech. J. 54 (5): 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0104.
Medina, V., M. Hürlimann, and A. Bateman. 2008. “Application of FLATModel, a 2D finite volume code, to debris flows in the northeastern part of the Iberian Peninsula.” Landslides 5: 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0102-3.
Nelsen, R. B. 2006. An introduction to copulas. New York: Springer.
Owen, A. B., and S. D. Tribble. 2005. “A quasi-Monte Carlo metropolis algorithm.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 8844–8849. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409596102.
Phoon, K. K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999a. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-36-4-612.
Phoon, K. K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999b. “Evaluation of geotechnical property variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-36-4-625.
Prochaska, A. B., P. M. Santia, J. D. Higgins, and S. H. Cannon. 2008. “Debris-flow runout predictions based on the average channel slope (ACS).” Eng. Geol. 98: 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.011.
Rickenmann, D. 1999. “Empirical relationships for debris flows.” Nat. Hazard. 19 (1): 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008064220727.
Rickenmann, D. 2005. “Runout prediction methods.” In Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena, edited by M. Jakob and O. Hungr, 305–324. Chichester, UK: Praxis.
Scheidl, C., and D. Rickenmann. 2010. “Empirical prediction of debris-flow mobility and deposition on fans.” Earth. Surf. Processes Landforms 35: 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1897.
Tang, C., J. Zhu, M. Chang, J. Ding, and X. Qi. 2012. “An empirical-statistical model for predicting debris-flow runout zones in the Wenchuan earthquake area.” Quat. Int. 250: 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2010.11.020.
Tian, M., D. Q. Li, Z. J. Cao, K. K. Phoon, and Y. Wang. 2016. “Bayesian identification of random field model using indirect test data.” Eng. Geol. 210: 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.05.013.
Tian, M., L. H. Li, and Z. M. Xiong. 2022. “A data-driven method for predicting debris-flow runout zones by integrating multivariate adaptive regression splines and Akaike information criterion.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 81: 222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02701-3.
Tian, M., and X. T. Sheng. 2022. “Copula-based probabilistic approaches for predicting debris-flow runout distances in the Wenchuan earthquake zone.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 8 (1): 04021070. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001197.
Vagnon, F., M. Pirulli, A. Yague, and M. Pastor. 2019. “Comparison of two depth-averaged numerical models for debris flow runout estimation.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (1): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0455.
van Westen, C. J., T. W. J. van Asch, and R. Soeters. 2006. “Landslide hazard and risk zonation-why is it still so difficult?” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 65: 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-005-0023-0.
Vrugt, J. A. 2016. “Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation.” Environ. Modell. Software 75: 273–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013.
Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, C. G. H. Diks, D. Higdon, B. A. Robinson, and J. M. Hyman. 2009. “Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling.” Int. J. Non-Linear Sci. Numer. Simul. 10 (3): 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273.
Wang, L., Z. J. Cao, D. Q. Li, K. K. Phoon, and K. K. Au. 2018. “Determination of site-specific soil-water characteristic curve from a limited number of test data - A Bayesian perspective.” Geosci. Front. 9: 1665–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.10.014.
Wang, Y., and Z. J. Cao. 2013. “Probabilistic characterization of young's modulus of soil using equivalent samples.” Eng. Geol. 159: 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.017.
Yan, W. M., K. V. Yuen, and G. L. Yoon. 2009. “Bayesian probabilistic approach for the correlations of compression index for marine clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135: 1932–1940. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000374.
Yuen, K. V. 2010. “Recent developments of Bayesian model class selection and applications in civil engineering.” Struct. Saf. 32: 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.03.011.
Zhang, J., L. M. Zhang, and W. H. Tang. 2009. “Bayesian framework for characterizing geotechnical model uncertainty.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (7): 932–940. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000018.
Zhang, S., L. M. Zhang, H. X. Chen, Y. Quan, and P. Hua. 2013. “Changes in runout distances of debris flows over time in the Wenchuan earthquake zone.” J. Mountain Sci. 10 (2): 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2506-y.
Zhou, W., J. Y. Fang, C. Tang, and G. Y. Yang. 2019. “Empirical relationships for the estimation of debris flow runout distances on depositional fans in the Wenchuan earthquake zone.” J. Hydrol. 577: 123932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123932.
Zhuang, J. Q., P. Cui, K. H. Hu, and C. Y. Ge. 2010. “Characteristics of earthquake-triggered landslides and post-earthquake debris flows in Beichuan County.” J. Mountain Sci. 7 (3): 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-010-2016-0.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 9September 2023

History

Received: Aug 30, 2022
Accepted: Apr 18, 2023
Published online: Jul 7, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mi Tian, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei Univ. of Technology, 28 Nanli Rd., Wuhan 430068, P.R. China; Innovation Demonstration Base of Ecological Environment Geotechnical and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Wuhan 430068, P.R. China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Postgraduate, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei Univ. of Technology, 28 Nanli Rd., Wuhan 430068, P.R. China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei Univ. of Technology, 28 Nanli Rd., Wuhan 430068, P.R. China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share