Technical Papers
Jan 19, 2023

Nonlinear Dynamic Soil–Foundation–Superstructure Interaction Analysis for a Reactor Building Supported on a Combined Piled–Raft System

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 4

Abstract

There has been a rapid development of the nuclear industry on account of climatic change caused by global warming. The most favorable rocky sites for nuclear power plants are exhausted worldwide, and now nuclear facilities are proposed on soil sites. In a soil site, a combined piled raft foundation (CPRF) system can provide the desired level of performance for a nuclear structure under seismic loading conditions. The combined system of the nuclear structure with the CPRF involves complex dynamic interactions between the pile, soil, raft, and the superstructure. In the existing literature, the dynamic behavior of the CPRF system supporting massive and stiff structures is not well studied and investigated. Due to the highly nonlinear dynamic characteristic of the CPRF system supporting massive and stiff reactor buildings, this paper adopts interface nonlinearities (separation and sliding) through the master and slave concept, concrete and reinforcement material nonlinearities through the concrete damage plasticity model for piles and superstructures, and an equivalent linear approach considering soil degradation and damping with Mohr–Coulomb postyielding hardening behavior for the soil. After the successful validation of the modeling approach with the results of the experimental testing, the different aspects of the CPRF of reactor building are investigated, such as amplification, pile and raft behavior, pile–raft coefficient, separation and sliding, contact pressure, nonlinearity in the piles, and the response of the superstructure. This study indicates that the peripheral piles of the CPRF system could prevent the separation of the raft from the soil. The numerical result shows that damage in the CPRF system occurs near the top portion of the pile. The presented procedure to develop the combined model for the seismic analysis in the time domain could help to formulate guidelines for safety-related nuclear structures resting on the CPRF system.

Practical Applications

Several countries are planning and building new nuclear reactors to meet their increasing demand for clean electricity. The most favorable rocky sites to construct nuclear power plants are exhausted worldwide; therefore, some upcoming nuclear reactors are supported on a soil site. The seismic safety of nuclear power plants is paramount because their failure may cause disasters. Hence, the problem of soil–structure interaction becomes vital for nuclear power plants (NPPs) due to the building of nuclear structures under unfavorable ground conditions. The present study describes the methodology to assess piled raft–supported NPP behavior under extreme earthquake events. The presented approach will be helpful to consultants and designers working in the nuclear field. The present study will help to formulate guidelines for the seismic safety of NPPs that rest on soil sites.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abaqus. 2019. ABAQUS/standard: User’s manual. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia.
AERB (Atomic Energy Regulatory Board). 2009. Seismic qualification of structures, systems, and components of pressurised heavy water reactors. AERB/NPP-PHWR/SG/D-23. Mumbai, India: AERB.
ASCE. 1998. Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures. ASCE 4-98. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2017. Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures. ASCE/SEI 4-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Badry, P., and N. Satyam. 2017. “Seismic soil structure interaction analysis for asymmetrical buildings supported on piled raft for the 2015 Nepal earthquake.” J. Asian Earth Sci. 133: 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.03.014.
Bagheri, M., M. E. Jamkhaneh, and B. Samali. 2018. “Effect of seismic soil–pile–structure interaction on mid-and high-rise steel buildings resting on a group of pile foundations.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (9): 04018103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001222.
Banerjee, S. 2009. “Centrifuge and numerical modelling of soft clay–pile–raft foundations subjected to seismic shaking.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Univ. of Singapore.
Bazaz, H. B., A. Akhtarpour, and A. Karamodin. 2021. “A study on the effects of piled–raft foundations on the seismic response of a high rise building resting on clayey soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 145: 106712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106712.
Baziar, M. H., F. Rafiee, A. S. Azizkandi, and C. J. Lee. 2018. “Effect of super-structure frequency on the seismic behavior of pile–raft foundation using physical modeling.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 104: 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.028.
Bhaduri, A., and D. Choudhury. 2020. “Serviceability-based finite-element approach on analyzing combined pile–raft foundation.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (2): 04019178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001580.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016. Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures (part 1): General provisions and buildings. BIS/IS 1893: Part 1. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2017. Criteria for structural safety of tall concrete building. IS16700. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Burland, J. B., B. B. Broms, and V. F. De Mello. 1977. “Behaviour of foundations and structures.” In Proc., 9th ICSMFE, 495–546. Tokyo: BRE UK Press.
Chaudhuri, C. H., D. Chanda, R. Saha, and S. Haldar. 2022. “Three-dimensional numerical analysis on seismic behavior of soil–piled raft–structure system.” Structures 28: 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.024.
Chopra, A. K. 2017. Dynamics of structures. theory and applications to earthquake engineering. London: Pearson.
Datta, T. K. 2010. Seismic analysis of structures. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Dulinska, J. M., and I. J. Murzyn. 2016. “Dynamic behaviour of a concrete building under a mainshock–aftershock seismic sequence with a concrete damage plasticity material model.” Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 7 (suppl. 1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1181341.
El-Attar, A. 2021. “Dynamic analysis of combined piled raft system (CPRS).” Ain Shams Eng. J. 12 (3): 2533–2547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.12.014.
Eslami, M. M., A. Aminikhah, and M. M. Ahmadi. 2011. “A comparative study on pile group and piled raft foundations (PRF) behavior under seismic loading.” Comput. Methods Civ. Eng. 2 (2): 185–199.
Fatahi, B., Q. Van Nguyen, R. Xu, and W.-j. Sun. 2018. “Three-dimensional response of neighboring buildings sitting on pile foundations to seismic pounding.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (4): 04018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001093.
Firoj, M., and B. K. Maheshwari. 2022. “Effect of CPRF on nonlinear seismic response of an NPP structure considering raft-pile–soil–structure-interaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 158: 107295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107295.
Ghandil, M., F. Behnamfar, and M. Vafaeian. 2016. “Dynamic responses of structure–soil–structure systems with an extension of the equivalent linear soil modeling.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 80: 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.014.
Goh, S. H., and L. Zhang. 2017. “Estimation of peak acceleration and bending moment for pile–raft systems embedded in soft clay subjected to far-field seismic excitation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (11): 04017082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001779.
Hashash, Y. M. A., M. I. Musgrove, J. A. Harmon, O. Ilhan, G. Xing, O. Numanoglu, D. R. Groholski, C. A. Phillips, and D. Park. 2020. DEEPSOIL 7, user manual. Urbana, IL: Board of Trustees of Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Hashemi, A., T. Elkhoraibi, and F. Ostadan. 2015. “Effects of structural nonlinearity and foundation sliding on probabilistic response of a nuclear structure.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 295: 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.08.028.
Horikoshi, K., T. Matsumoto, Y. Hashizume, and T. Watanabe. 2003. “Performance of piled raft foundations subjected to dynamic loading.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 3 (2): 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2003.030205.
Horikoshi, K., and M. F. Randolph. 1998. “A contribution to optimum design of piled rafts.” Geotechnique 48 (3): 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1998.48.3.301.
Ilyas, T., C. F. Leung, Y. K. Chow, and S. S. Budi. 2004. “Centrifuge model study of laterally loaded pile groups in clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (3): 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:3(274).
Jankowiak, T., and T. Lodygowski. 2005. “Identification of parameters of concrete damage plasticity constitutive model.” Found. Civ. Environ. Eng. 6 (1): 53–69.
Johari, A., and A. Talebi. 2021. “Stochastic analysis of piled–raft foundations using the random finite-element method.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (4): 04021020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001966.
Katzenbach, R., and D. Choudhury. 2013. “ISSMGE combined pile–raft foundation guideline.” In Proc., Deep Foundation, Int. Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 1–23. Darmstadt, Germany: Institute and Laboratory of Geotechnics. Technische Universität Darmstadt.
Katzenbach, R., S. Leppla, and D. Choudhury. 2016. Foundation systems for high-rise structures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kontoe, S., L. Zdravkovic, D. M. Potts, and C. O. Menkiti. 2011. “On the relative merits of simple and advanced constitutive models in dynamic analysis of tunnels.” Géotechnique 61 (10): 815–829. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.141.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. London: Pearson.
Kumar, A., and D. Choudhury. 2018. “Development of new prediction model for capacity of combined pile–raft foundations.” Comput. Geotech. 97: 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.12.008.
Kumar, A., D. Choudhury, and R. Katzenbach. 2016. “Effect of earthquake on combined pile–raft foundation.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (5): 04016013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000637.
Luo, C., X. Yang, C. Zhan, X. Jin, and Z. Ding. 2016. “Nonlinear 3D finite element analysis of soil–pile–structure interaction system subjected to horizontal earthquake excitation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 84: 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.02.005.
Mandolini, A., R. Di Laora, and Y. Mascarucci. 2013. “Rational design of piled raft.” Procedia Eng. 57: 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.008.
Matsumoto, T., K. Fukumura, K. Horikoshi, and A. Oki. 2004. “Shaking table tests on model piled rafts in sand considering influence of superstructures.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 4 (3): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2004.040302.
Mattsson, N., A. Menoret, C. Simon, and M. Ray. 2013. “Case study of a full-scale load test of a piled raft with an interposed layer for a nuclear storage facility.” Géotechnique 63 (11): 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.166.
O’Brien, A. S., J. B. Burland, and T. Chapman. 2012. “Chapter 56 Rafts and piled rafts.” In ICE manual of geotechnical engineering, edited by J. Burland, T. Chapman, H. Skinner, and M. Brown, 853–886. London: Thomas Telford.
Patil, G., D. Choudhury, and A. Mondal. 2022. “Estimation of the response of piled raft using nonlinear soil and interface model.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 16 (5): 540–557.
Patil, G., D. Choudhury, and A. Mondal. 2021. “Three-dimensional soil–foundation–superstructure interaction analysis of nuclear building supported by combined piled–raft system.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (4): 04021029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001956.
Poulos, H. G. 2016. “Tall building foundations: Design methods and applications.” Innovative Infrastruct. Solutions 1 (1): 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-016-0010-2.
Prakoso, W. A., and F. H. Kulhawy. 2001. “Contribution to piled raft foundation design.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (1): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:1(17).
Rao, V. D., and D. Choudhury. 2020. “Estimation of shear wave velocity and seismic site characterization for new nuclear power plant region, India.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 21 (4): 06020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000391.
Rao, V. D., and D. Choudhury. 2021. “Deterministic seismic hazard analysis for the northwestern part of Haryana state, India, considering various seismicity levels.” Pure Appl. Geophys. 178 (2): 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02669-3.
Reul, O. 2004. “Numerical study of the bearing behavior of piled rafts.” Int. J. Geomech. 4 (2): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2004)4:2(59).
Roy, J., A. Kumar, and D. Choudhury. 2020. “Pseudostatic approach to analyze combined pile–raft foundation.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (10): 06020028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001806.
Saxena, N., and D. K. Paul. 2012. “Effects of embedment including slip and separation on seismic SSI response of a nuclear reactor building.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 247: 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.02.010.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1970. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Rep. No. EERC 70-10. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Sinha, A., and A. M. Hanna. 2017. “3D numerical model for piled raft foundation.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (2): 04016055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000674.
Sundaram, R., S. Gupta, and S. Gupa. 2019. “Foundations for tall buildings on alluvial deposits—Geotechnical aspects.” In Frontiers in geotechnical engineering, edited by E. G. M. Latha, 369–393. Singapore: Springer.
Varghese, R., A. Boominathan, and S. Banerjee. 2020. “Stiffness and load sharing characteristics of piled raft foundations subjected to dynamic loads.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 133: 106117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106117.
Vesic, A. S. 1977. Design of pile foundations, 1–80. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 42. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
Xiaohui, W., L. Xiaojun, L. Aiwen, H. Qiumei, and H. Chunlin. 2020. “Seismic analysis of soil–structure system of nuclear power plant on non-rock site via shaking table test.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 136: 106209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106209.
Yamashita, K., J. Hamada, S. Onimaru, and M. Higashino. 2012. “Seismic behavior of piled raft with ground improvement supporting a base-isolated building on soft ground in Tokyo.” Soils Found. 52 (5): 1000–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.017.
Yamashita, K., T. Yamada, and J. Hamada. 2011. “Investigation of settlement and load sharing on piled rafts by monitoring full-scale structures.” Soils Found. 51 (3): 513–532. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.51.513.
Zhang, L., and H. Liu. 2017. “Seismic response of clay–pile–raft–superstructure systems subjected to far-field ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 101: 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.004.
Zhang, Q.-q., S.-C. Li, and L.-P. Li. 2014. “Field study on the behavior of destructive and non-destructive piles under compression.” Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 32 (1): 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2012.710715.
Zou, D., Y. Sui, and K. Chen. 2020. “Plastic damage analysis of pile foundation of nuclear power plants under beyond-design basis earthquake excitation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 136: 106179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106179.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: Jun 10, 2022
Accepted: Nov 11, 2022
Published online: Jan 19, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Girish Patil [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India; Additional Chief Engineer, Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited, Mumbai 400094, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Prof. T. Kant Chair Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-7049. Email: [email protected]
Apurba Mondal [email protected]
Additional Chief Engineer, Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited, Mumbai 400094, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share