Technical Papers
Dec 21, 2022

Laboratory Measurement of Permeability in Postseismic Flow

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 3

Abstract

Permeability is a critical parameter that reflects the physical and mechanical states of soil. The variation in permeability through the liquefaction and postliquefaction phases is important in evaluating dynamic soil behavior and establishing adequate numerical models. This aspect has been addressed by several empirical methods. Conversely, in this study, the postseismic behavior of soil was investigated experimentally. Several undrained cyclic strain-controlled and permeability tests on Ottawa C-109 sand, 1–1.3 mm calibrated beads, and blank samples were performed. An experimental strategy is proposed after highlighting the major committed mistakes and factors affecting the permeability variation in a triaxial cell, i.e., the sample’s diameter-to-height ratio, stone porosity, flow trajectory, tube diameter, and flow rate. This paper provides suggestions on the experimental setup signature, which frequently results in unreliable measurements. The permeability variation in the postseismic phase was measured during the time history of the excess pore pressure dissipation by following the falling head test rule. Permeability increased, reaching a peak of 2.5–3 times the initial value, and then decreased after a 50% regain of effective stress. The test results were verified by performing permeability tests before cyclic loading and after the dissipation process in triaxial conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Amer, M. I., W. D. Kovacs, and M. S. Aggour. 1987. “Cyclic simple shear size effects.” J. Geotech. Eng. 113 (7): 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:7(693).
Arulanandan, K., and J. Sybico. 1992. “Post-liquefaction settlement of sand-mechanism and in situ evaluation.” In Proc., 4th Japan–US Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction, 239–253. Honolulu, Hawaii: Tokai University Pacific Center.
ASTM. 2011a. Permeability of granular soils (constant head). ASTM D2434. ASTM annual CDs of standards, vol 04.08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011b. —Measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM D5084. ASTM annual CDs of standards, vol 04.08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Balakrishnan, A., and B. L. Kutter. 1999. “Settlement, sliding, and liquefaction remediation of layered soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125 (11): 968–978. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:11(968).
Bandini, P., and S. Sathiskumar. 2009. “Effects of silt content and void ratio on the saturated hydraulic conductivity and compressibility of sand-silt mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (12): 1976–1980. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000177.
Bayoumi, A., M. Karray, M. Hussein, and M. Chekired. 2017. “Use of TxSS test for assessment of post seismic behavior of soil.” In Proc., 70th Canadian Geotechnical Conf.-GeoOttawa 2017. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Bayoumi, A., A. Mhenni, M. Chekired, and M. Karray. 2022. “Porous stones in permeability measurement: Drawbacks and solution.” Can. Geotech. J. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0400.
Bowles, J. E. 1992. Engineering properties of soils and their measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Budhu, M. 1984. “Nonuniformities imposed by simple shear apparatus.” Can. Geotech. J. 21 (1): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1139/t84-010.
Carpenter, G. W., and R. W. Stephenson. 1986. “Permeability testing in the triaxial cell.” Geotech. Test. J. 9 (1): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10605J.
Chapuis, R. P. 2012. “Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils: A review.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 71 (3): 401–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-012-0418-7.
Chapuis, R. P., K. Baass, and L. Davenne. 1989. “Granular soils in rigid-wall permeameters: Method for determining the degree of saturation.” Can. Geotech. J. 26 (1): 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1139/t89-008.
Chehat, A., M. N. Hussien, M. Abdellaziz, M. Chekired, Z. Harichane, and M. Karray. 2019. “Stiffness– and damping–strain curves of sensitive Champlain clays through experimental and analytical approaches.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (3): 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0732.
Chekired, M., R. Lemire, M. Karray, and M. N. Hussien. 2015. “Experiment setup for simple shear tests in a triaxial cell: TxSS.” In Proc., 68th Canadian Geotechnical Int. Conf. Quebec: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Dobry, R., R. Ladd, F. Y. Yokel, R. M. Chung, and D. Powell. 1982. Vol. 138 of Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.
Duhaime, F., R. P. Chapuis, and S. Weber. 2015. “Parasitic head losses during laboratory permeability tests.” Geotech. Test. J. 38 (2): 20130175. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20130175.
Ghassemi, A., and A. Pak. 2011. “Pore scale study of permeability and tortuosity for flow through particulate media using lattice Boltzmann method.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 35 (8): 886–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.932.
Gonzalez, L., T. Abdoun, and M. K. Sharp. 2002. “Modelling of seismically induced liquefaction under high confining stress.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 2 (3): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2002.020301.
Green, R., J. Mitchell, and C. Polito. 2000. “An energy-based excess pore pressure generation model for cohesionless soils.” In Proc., John Booker Memorial Symp., Sydney, Australia. Rotterdam, Netherlands: AA Balkema.
Ha, I. S., Y. H. Park, and M. M. Kim. 2003. “Dissipation pattern of excess pore pressure after liquefaction in saturated sand deposits.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1821 (1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/1821-07.
Haigh, S. K., J. Eadington, and S. P. G. Madabhushi. 2012. “Permeability and stiffness of sands at very low effective stresses.” Géotechnique 62 (1): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.035.
Hussien, M., M. Karray, and M. Chekired. 2015. “Evaluation of DSS test results on granular soils based on TxSS results.” In Proc., 68th Canadian Geotechnical Int. Conf. Quebec: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Itasca Consulting Group. 2008. FLAC—fast Lagrangian analysis of continua, version 6.0, user’s manual. Minneapolis: Itasca Consulting Group.
Karray, M., and M. Chekired. 2019. “Triaxial simple shear test: TxSS.” In In Proc., 7th Int. Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials Conf. IS-Glasgow 2019, Glasgow, U.K. 11 Vol. 92 of E3S Web of Conf., EDP Sciences, 02014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199202014.
Khashila, M., M. N. Hussien, M. Karray, and M. Chekired. 2015. “Evaluation of equivalent cycle liquefaction concept based on TxSS test results.” In Proc., 68th Canadian Geotechnical Conf. GeoQuebec 2015, Quebec: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Koerner, G. R. 2004. “Comparing GCL performance using rigid versus flexible wall permeameters.” In Proc., 2nd Symp. on Advances in Geosynthetic Clay Liner Technology. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Kovacs, W. D., and E. Leo. 1981. “Cyclic simple shear of large scale sand samples: Effects of diameter to height ratio.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Nazari, S., M. Hassanlourad, E. Chavoshi, and A. Mirzaii. 2018. “Experimental investigation of unsaturated silt-sand soil permeability.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018: 4946956. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4946956.
Park, S.-S., and S. W. Jeong. 2015. “Effect of specimen size on undrained and drained shear strength of sand.” Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 33 (4): 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2013.879627.
Patiño, H., E. Martínez, J. González, and A. Soriano. 2019. “Permeability of mine tailings measured in triaxial cell.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (4): 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0293.
Rahmani, A., and A. Pak. 2012. “Dynamic behavior of pile foundations under cyclic loading in liquefiable soils.” Comput. Geotech. 40: 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.09.002.
Rosine Larissa, T., and T. Toma-Sabbagh. 2015. “The impact of the diameter to height ratio on the compressibility parameters of saturated fine-grained soils.” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 4 (6): 8–19. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2015.0406002.
Samingan, A. S., E.-C. Leong, and H. Rahardjo. 2003. “A flexible wall permeameter for measurements of water and air coefficients of permeability of residual soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 40 (3): 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-015.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (9): 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
Shahir, H., and A. Pak. 2010. “Estimating liquefaction-induced settlement of shallow foundations by numerical approach.” Comput. Geotech. 37 (3): 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.10.001.
Shahir, H., A. Pak, M. Taiebat, and B. Jeremić. 2012. “Evaluation of variation of permeability in liquefiable soil under earthquake loading.” Comput. Geotech. 40: 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.10.003.
Sibley, E. L., S. M. Olson, and C. P. Polito. 2017. “A framework for evaluating the effects of drained cyclic preshearing on the liquefaction resistance of Ottawa sand.” Geotech. Front. 2017: 131–140.
Taiebat, M., H. Shahir, and A. Pak. 2007. “Study of pore pressure variation during liquefaction using two constitutive models for sand.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (1): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.03.004.
Ueng, T.-S., Z.-F. Wang, M.-C. Chu, and L. Ge. 2017. “Laboratory tests for permeability of sand during liquefaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 100: 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.037.
Wang, B., K. Zen, G. Q. Chen, Y. B. Zhang, and K. Kasama. 2013. “Excess pore pressure dissipation and solidification after liquefaction of saturated sand deposits.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 49: 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.02.018.
Yoshimi, Y., F. Kuwabara, and K. Tokimatsu. 1975. “One-dimensional volume change characteristics of sands under very low confining stresses.” Soils Found. 15 (3): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.15.3_51.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 3March 2023

History

Received: Feb 6, 2022
Accepted: Sep 6, 2022
Published online: Dec 21, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 21, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Aya Bayoumi [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Mohamed Chekired [email protected]
Researcher, Institut de Recherche d’Hydro-Québec, Varennes, Québec J3X 1S1, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Mourad Karray [email protected]
Full Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1K 2R1, Canada (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share