Technical Papers
Feb 16, 2023

Upheaval Buckling Resistance of Pipelines Buried in Unsaturated Clay Backfills

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23, Issue 5

Abstract

High pressure and high temperature (HPHT) oil and gas pipelines, the burial depths of which are determined by the mitigation requirement of upheaval buckling deformation or legislation requirement, are commonly buried below the ground surface. Uplift resistance of soils surrounding the buried pipeline should be considered into the design of upheaval buckling behavior. Conventional design guidelines and current analytical models based on either dry soil or fully saturated soil are generally applied to predict the soil uplift resistance behavior. Therefore, the HPHT pipelines are mostly buried in unsaturated onshore soils. This paper presents a series of small pipe–soil interaction experiments for measuring the reaction that is acted on the buried pipelines in unsaturated backfill soils, and its purpose is studied to evaluate the impacts of soil moisture content, pipeline burial depths, and tension loading levels on the soil uplift resistance behavior. A new simplified formula based on the uplift experiment results is specially established to predict the uplift resistance of soils. Further, the uplift failure mechanism and pipe–soil interaction behavior are effectively applied to predict the upheaval buckling behavior of the pipelines buried in unsaturated soils.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFC0809605 and 2018YFC0809600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51668055), the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering of China (Grant No. SKLFSE201708), and the First Division Aral Science and Technology Project of China (Grant No. 2019GJJ02).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
C
constant parameter;
c
cohesive of unsaturated clay backfills;
ceq
equivalent cohesion of unsaturated soil;
D
pipe diameter;
d10
effect grain size;
dV
representative elemental volume;
e
void ratio;
H
burial depth from the soil surface to the pipe axis;
h
total height of unsaturated clay backfills;
Hc
height of soil cover;
hc
height of capillary water;
K0
coefficient of earth pressure at rest;
L
length of a buried pipeline;
Lc
length of a test chamber;
Nvu
dimensionless load;
Pbot
soil capacity per unit length of a buried pipeline;
S
ultimate shear stress along a failure surface;
Sv
vertical component of the ultimate shear stress along the failure surface;
Tvu
net reaction force;
t
pipe thickness;
ua
pore-air pressure of unsaturated clay backfills;
uw
pore-water pressure of unsaturated clay backfills;
Wc
weight of soil cover per unit length of a buried pipeline;
Wp
pipe weight per unit length of a buried pipeline;
w
water content of unsaturated clay backfills;
χ
effective stress parameter;
δz
displacement of upward pipe movement;
δz-peak
peak value of uplift resistance;
γ
soil unit weight;
γw
saturated unit weight;
μ
roughness coefficient of a glass surface;
φ
internal friction angle of unsaturated clay backfills;
φd
loading angle;
ϕgs
friction angle at the glass–soil interface;
θ
inclination angle of a failure surface;
θr
residual volumetric water content of unsaturated clay backfills;
θs
saturated volumetric water content of unsaturated clay backfills;
θw
volumetric water content of unsaturated clay backfills;
ρ
density of unsaturated clay backfills;
ρdry
dry density of unsaturated clay backfills;
σ
total stress;
σ
effective stress;
σeq
equivalent normal stress of unsaturated clay backfills;
σy
horizontal stress; and
σz
vertical stress.

References

Adams, J. I., and D. C. Hayes. 1967. “The uplift capacity of shallow foundations.” Ontario Hydro Res. Q. 19 (1): 1–13.
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. Washington, DC: ALA.
Al-Khazaali, M., and S. K. Vanapalli. 2019. “Axial force–displacement behaviour of a buried pipeline in saturated and unsaturated sand.” Géotechnique 69 (11): 986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.116.
Ansari, Y., G. Kouretzis, and S. W. Sloan. 2018. “Development of a prototype for modelling soil–pipe interaction and its application for predicting uplift resistance to buried pipe movements in sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 55 (10): 1451–1474. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0559.
Ansari, Y., G. Kouretzis, and S. W. Sloan. 2021. “Physical modelling of lateral sand–pipe interaction.” Géotechnique 71 (1): 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.119.
ASCE. 1984. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems. New York: ASCE.
ASTM. 2002. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM D854. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Benoit, L. 2012. Current and future state of oil and gas pipeline and refining capacity in Canada. Ottawa: Report of the Standing Committee on the Natural Resources, Parliament of Canada.
Bishop, A. W. 1959. “The principle of effective stress.” Teknik Ukeblad 106 (39): 859–863.
Brennan, A. J., M. Ghahremani, and M. J. Brown. 2017. “Strength reduction for upheaval buckling of buried pipes in blocky clay backfill.” Ocean Eng. 130: 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.12.006.
Calvetti, F., C. di Prisco, and R. Nova. 2004. “Experimental and numerical analysis of soil–pipe interaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (12): 1292–1299. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1292).
Chaudhuri, C. H., and D. Choudhury. 2020a. “Buried pipeline subjected to seismic landslide: A simplified analytical solution.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 134: 106155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106155.
Chaudhuri, C. H., and D. Choudhury. 2020b. “Effect of earthquake induced transverse permanent ground deformation on buried continuous pipeline using Winkler approach.” In Geo-Congress 2020: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Special Topics, Geotechnical Special Publication 318, edited by J. P. Hambleton, R. Makhnenko, and A. S. Budge, 274–283. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chaudhuri, C. H., and D. Choudhury. 2021a. “Buried pipeline subjected to static pipe bursting underneath: A closed-form analytical solution.” Géotechnique 72 (11): 974–983.
Chaudhuri, C. H., and D. Choudhury. 2021b. “Semianalytical solution for buried pipeline subjected to horizontal transverse ground deformation.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (4): 04021038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000541.
Chaudhuri, C. H., and D. Choudhury. 2022. “Buried pipeline subjected to underground blast load: Closed-form analytical solution.” Int. J. Geomech. 22 (9): 6022024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002460.
Davie, J. R., and H. B. Sutherland. 1977. “Uplift resistance of cohesive soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (9): 935–952. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000491.
Jung, J. K., T. D. O’Rourke, and C. Argyrou. 2016. “Multi-directional force–displacement response of underground pipe in sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (11): 1763–1781.
Kouretzis, G. P., K. Krabbenhøft, D. Sheng, and S. W. Sloan. 2014. “Soil-buried pipeline interaction for vertical downwards relative offset.” Can. Geotech. J. 51 (10): 1087–1094. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0029.
Kouretzis, G. P., D. Sheng, and S. W. Sloan. 2013. “Sand–pipeline–trench lateral interaction effects for shallow buried pipelines.” Comput. Geotech. 54: 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.05.008.
Li, G. X., B. Y. Zhang, and Y. Z. Yu. 2013. Soil mechanics. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
Li, H., Y. Lai, and L. Li. 2020. “Impact of hydro-thermal behaviour around a buried pipeline in cold regions.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 171: 102961.
Li, H., Y. Lai, L. Wang, X. Yang, N. Jiang, L. Li, C. Wang, and B. Yang. 2019. “Review of the state of the art: Interactions between a buried pipeline and frozen soil.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 157: 171–186.
Lu, N., and W. J. Likos. 2004. Unsaturated soil mechanics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
MoC (Ministry of Construction). 1999. Standard for soil test methods. GB/T 50123-1999. Beijing: Chinese Plan Publishing House.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2014a. Code for design of oil transportation pipeline engineering. GB 50253-2014. Beijing: Chinese Plan Publishing House.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2014b. Code for construction and acceptance of oil and gas long-distance transmission pipeline engineering. GB 50369-2014. Beijing: Chinese Plan Publishing House.
Oliphant, J., and A. Maconochie. 2006. “Axial pipeline–soil interaction.” In Proc., Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf. Richardson, TX: OnePetro.
Robert, D. J., K. Soga, and T. D. O’Rourke. 2016. “Pipelines subjected to fault movement in dry and unsaturated soils.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (5): C4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000548.
Robert, D. J., and N. I. Thusyanthan. 2018. “Uplift resistance of buried pipelines in partially saturated sands.” Comput. Geotech. 97: 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.12.010.
Roy, K., B. Hawlader, S. Kenny, and I. Moore. 2018. “Uplift failure mechanisms of pipes buried in dense sand.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (8): 04018087.
Sutherland, H. B. 1988. “Uplift resistance of soils.” Géotechnique 38 (4): 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1988.38.4.493.
Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Trautmann, C. H., T. D. O’Rourfce, and F. H. Kulhawy. 1985. “Uplift force–displacement response of buried pipe.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (9): 1061–1076.
Trautmann, C. H., and T. D. O’Rourke. 1985. “Lateral force–displacement response of buried pipe.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (9): 1077–1092.
Wang, J., S. K. Haigh, and N. I. Thusyanthan. 2009. “Uplift resistance of buried pipelines in blocky clay backfill.” In Proc., Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., 480–487. Richardson, TX: OnePetro.
Wang, Z. L., M. X. Zheng, and Y. C. Li. 2005. “Research on mathematic model method for calculating pre-consolidation pressure and its application.” Yantu Lixue/Rock Soil Mech. 26 (10): 1587–1590.
White, D. J., C. Y. Cheuk, and M. D. Bolton. 2008. “The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand.” Géotechnique 58 (10): 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.3692.
Wijewickreme, D., and L. Weerasekara. 2015. “Analytical modeling of field axial pullout tests performed on buried extensible pipes.” Int. J. Geomech. 15 (2): 04014044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000388.
Wu, J., G. Kouretzis, L. Suwal, Y. Ansari, and S. W. Sloan. 2020. “Shallow and deep failure mechanisms during uplift and lateral dragging of buried pipes in sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (10): 1472–1483. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0281.
Wu, Y., Q. Yang, D. Li, Y. Zhang, and T. Wang. 2021. “Resistance of caisson tip with internal bevels for suction caissons penetrating into clay.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (6): 04021091.
Xu, C., C. Xia, and S. Du. 2021. “Simplified solution for viscoelastic–plastic interaction between tunnel support and surrounding rock based on MC and GZZ strength criteria.” Comput. Geotech. 139: 104393.
Zhang, C., J. Zhu, M. Huang, and J. Yu. 2019. “Winkler load–transfer analysis for pipelines subjected to surface load.” Comput. Geotech. 111: 147–156.
Zhang, L., X. Zhao, X. Yan, and X. Yang. 2017. “Elastoplastic analysis of mechanical response of buried pipelines under strike-slip faults.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (4): 04016109.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 23Issue 5May 2023

History

Received: Dec 6, 2021
Accepted: Dec 5, 2022
Published online: Feb 16, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 16, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Doctoral Candidate, College of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou Univ., Lanzhou 730000, P.R. China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-3482. Email: [email protected]
Yuanming Lai, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, P.R. China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Yanyan Chen [email protected]
Doctoral Candidate, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, P.R. China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Research Center of Southern Xinjiang Geotechnical Engineering, Tarim Univ., Aral 843300, P.R. China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share