Component and System Reliability Assessment of Landfill Cover Systems Using Pseudostatic and Pseudodynamic Methods
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 11
Abstract
This paper assesses the reliability of landfill veneer cover systems against direct-sliding failure (DSF) and uplifted-floating failure (UFF) modes using the second-order reliability method (SORM). Variability in stability number due to cohesion, interface cohesion, friction angle, horizontal seismic acceleration coefficient, and phase changes are considered. Formulations for the first-order reliability method (FORM), SORM, and Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) are presented, with emphasis on the precision of SORM over FORM. A novel framework for system reliability–based design optimization (SRBDO) is introduced, addressing interdependencies between DSF and UFF modes. The results highlight the significant influence of the lowest component reliability index on system reliability. For the given design conditions, the system reliability index is obtained as 1.55, significantly influenced by the component reliability indices of 1.55 and 9.29. In addition, this study provides a comparative analysis of reliability indices obtained using SORM for static, pseudostatic (PS), and pseudodynamic (PD) methods. Moreover, system reliability–based design charts are generated to estimate allowable cover soil thickness to ensure concurrent reliability in DSF and UFF modes. It is noted that an increase in the value of the horizontal seismic acceleration coefficient from 0 to 0.30 results in a 77.27% increase in the allowable thickness of cover soil.
Practical Applications
The computational framework of Monte Carlo simulations, first-order reliability method, and second-order reliability method proposed in this study can be utilized to develop an optimum and reliability-based design of municipal solid waste landfill slopes, geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes, retaining walls, embankments, and other geotechnical structures. Considering the variability associated with the design parameters enables the practitioners to make well-informed decisions regarding the selection and specification of materials. The system reliability framework presented in this study allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the interdependency between the different modes of failure of a system. The insights of this study can be utilized to develop more robust designs of structures equipped to withstand various failure modes. The comparison of reliability indices obtained using the static, pseudostatic, and pseudodynamic methods enables the practitioners to adapt design approaches to varying environmental and loading conditions, ensuring the long-term stability of the structures. The generation of system reliability–based design charts offers practical tools for estimating the allowable thickness of cover soil while ensuring reliability against both DSF and UFF modes simultaneously. Moreover, the findings of this research contribute to the establishment of global design standards for ensuring seismic stability in veneer cover systems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Ministry of Education (Formerly known as Ministry of Human Resource and Development), Government of India.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- AAct, APass
- area of active and passive wedges (m2);
- ah(y, t), av(y, t)
- horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration at any depth, y, and time, t (m/s2);
- Bf, Baf
- failure and mass above failure blocks;
- c
- cohesion of veneer cover soil (kPa);
- c0
- interface cohesion between the drainage layer and the overlying cover soil (kPa);
- EA, EP
- interwedge forces acting on active and passive wedges (kN/m);
- FJR, FPJ
- normal forces acting on the sliding planes JR and PJ (kN/m);
- normal forces acting on the faces IJ, PP', and P'J of failure block (kN/m);
- FSds
- factor of safety against DSF (dimensionless);
- FSuf
- factor of safety against UFF (dimensionless);
- fa
- soil amplification factor (dimensionless);
- G
- shear modulus of cover soil (dimensionless);
- g
- acceleration due to gravity (m/s2);
- g(x)
- performance function;
- gds(x)
- performance function for DSF;
- guf(x)
- performance function for UFF;
- H
- height of landfill (m);
- h
- thickness of cover soil (m);
- hw
- height of the seepage level measured from the bottom of the drainage layer (m);
- Ir
- immersion ratio (dimensionless);
- kh, kv
- horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration coefficients (dimensionless);
- lJR, lPJ
- lengths of the faces JR and PJ of sliding plane PJR (m);
- length of uplifted block (m);
- L
- length of veneer cover slope (m);
- Lg
- Lagrange multiplier;
- NS
- number of simulations;
- probability of failure for DSF and UFF;
- probability of failure for DSF and UFF computed using FORM;
- probability of failure for DSF and UFF computed using MCS;
- probability of failure for DSF and UFF computed using SORM;
- Pfij
- joint probability of failure between the failure modes;
- lower and upper bounds of system probability of failure for DSF and UFF modes;
- probability of failure computed using the MCS approach;
- series system probability of failure;
- P(Ei)
- component probabilities of failure;
- PDds, PDuf
- percentage differences between the probabilities of failure, computed with and without considering the correlation between the random variables for DSF and UFF;
- PDds1, PDuf1
- percentage difference between the probabilities of failure computed using FORM and MCS methods for DSF and UFF modes;
- PDds2, PDuf2
- percentage difference between the probabilities of failure computed using SORM and MCS methods for DSF and UFF modes;
- rcϕ
- Correlation coefficient between “c” and “ϕ” of cover soil;
- SJR, SPJ
- shear resisting forces against sliding failure acting on the sliding planes JR and PJ (kN/m);
- shear resisting forces acting on the faces IJ and PP′ of the failure block (kN/m);
- Tb
- basis matrix;
- Tr
- transformation matrix;
- t, T
- time and period of lateral shaking (s);
- hydrostatic forces acting on the sliding planes JR and PJ for the case number x (kN/m);
- hydrodynamic forces acting on the sliding planes JR and PJ for the case number x (kN/m);
- hydrostatic forces acting on the faces IJ, PP', and P'J of the failure block for the case number z (kN/m);
- hydrodynamic forces acting on the faces IJ, PP’, and P'J of the failure block for the case number z (kN/m);
- ui
- reduced variables;
- Vp, Vs
- primary and shear-wave velocities propagating through landfill final cover (m/s);
- WAct, WPass
- weight of active and passive wedges (kN/m);
- Wf, Waf
- weight of failure and mass above the failure blocks (kN/m);
- X
- vector of original random variables;
- αds, αuf
- directional cosines of DSF and UFF modes;
- βds, βuf
- reliability indices against DSF and UFF modes;
- βds,uf, βuf,ds
- joint reliability indices of DSF and UFF modes;
- βFORM, βSORM
- First-order and second-order reliability indicies;
- reliability indices against DSF and UFF computed using FORM;
- reliability indices against DSF and UFF computed using SORM;
- βHL
- Hasofer–Lind reliability index;
- βlb, βub
- lower and upper bound system reliability indices;
- βMCS
- reliability index computed using the MCS approach;
- βseries
- series system reliability index;
- γ
- bulk density of soil (kN/m3);
- γd
- dry density of soil (kN/m3);
- γsat
- saturated unit weight of cover soil (kN/m3);
- γw
- unit weight of water (kN/m3);
- δ
- interface friction angle between the drainage layer and the overlying cover soil (°);
- CDF error;
- percentile–percentile error;
- quantile–quantile error;
- η, λ
- wavelengths of vertically propagating primary and shear waves through landfill final cover (m);
- θ
- slope angle of veneer cover (°);
- κi
- principal curvatures of LSF;
- μi
- mean of random variables;
- ρc
- density of cover soil (kg/m3);
- ρds,uf
- correlation coefficient between DSF and UFF modes;
- ρij
- correlation coefficient matrix;
- ρs
- density of soil (kg/m3);
- ρsat
- saturated density of cover soil (kg/m3);
- ρw
- density of water (kg/m3);
- σi
- standard deviation of random variables;
- Φ
- standard normal distribution function;
- ϕ
- angle of internal friction of veneer cover soil (°);
- ψ
- angle of sliding plane “PJ” (°); and
- ω
- angular frequency of lateral shaking (rad/s).
References
Baker, R., R. Shukha, V. Operstein, and S. Frydman. 2006. “Stability charts for pseudo-static slope stability analysis.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (9): 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.01.023.
Basha, B. M., S. Mahapatra, and B. Manna. 2015. “Allowable design strength of geosynthetic reinforcement for veneer stability of MSW landfills: A reliability based approach.” In Proc., International Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo, edited by M. Iskander, M. T. Suleiman, J. B. Anderson, and D. F. Laefer, 1806–1815. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Basha, B. M., and G. L. S. Babu. 2010. “Optimum design for external seismic stability of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls: Reliability based approach.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (6): 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000289.
Basha,B. M., and G. L. S. Babu. 2011. “Strain localization effect on system reliability based design of bridge abutments under earthquake loading.” In Proc., Geo-Risk 2011: Risk Assessment and Management, 744–753. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Basha, B. M., and A. S. S. Raghuram. 2024. “First-and second-order reliability analysis of rainfall-induced Kotropi slope failure.” Indian Geotech. J. 54: 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00700-5.
Bauer, J., and W. Pula. 2000. “Reliability with respect to settlement limit-states of shallow foundations on linearly-deformable subsoil.” Comput. Geotech. 26 (3–4): 281–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(99)00043-9.
Belghali, M., Z. Saada, D. Garnier, and S. Maghous. 2017. “Pseudo-static stability analysis of rock slopes reinforced by passive bolts using the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 9 (4): 659–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.12.007.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016. Indian Standard Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Indian Standard, IS 1893:2016 (Part-1), Amendment 2, 6th ed. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Bonaparte, R., B. A. Gross, D. E. Daniel, R. M. Koerner, and S. Dwyer. 2004. Technical guidance for RCRA/CERCLA final covers. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Breitung, K. 1984. “Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals.” J. Eng. Mech. 110 (3): 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:3(357).
Breitung, K., and M. Hohenbichler. 1989. “Asymptotic approximations for multivariate integrals with an application to multinormal probabilities.” J. Multivar. Anal. 30 (1): 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-259X(89)90089-4.
Chan, C. L., and B. K. Low. 2012. “Probabilistic analysis of laterally loaded piles using response surface and neural network approaches.” Comput. Geotech. 43: 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.03.001.
Chen, J.-F., C.-C. Du, M. Peng, R. Sun, F. Zhao, and Z.-M. Shi. 2023. “System reliability analysis of a slope stabilized with anchor cables and piles under seismic loading.” Acta Geotech. 18 (8): 4493–4514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01812-9.
Cho, S. E. 2009. “Probabilistic stability analyses of slopes using the ANN-based response surface.” Comput. Geotech. 36 (5): 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.01.003.
Choudhury, D., and S. M. Ahmad. 2008. “Stability of water front retaining wall subjected to pseudo-dynamic earthquake forces.” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 134 (4): 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2008)134:4(252).
Choudhury, D., and P. Savoikar. 2009. “Simplified method to characterize municipal solid waste properties under seismic conditions.” Waste Manage 29 (2): 924–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.05.008.
Chowdhury, R. N., and D. W. Xu. 1995. “Geotechnical system reliability of slopes.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 47 (3): 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(94)00063-T.
Cortellazzo, G., L. E. Russo, S. Busana, L. Carbone, M. Favaretti, and H. Hangen. 2022. “Field trail of a reinforced landfill cover system: Performance and failure.” Geotext. Geomembr. 50: 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.03.007.
Dadashzadeh, N., H. S. B. Duzgun, and S. Gheibi. 2015. “A second-order reliability analysis of rock slope stability in Amasya, Turkey.” In Proc., 13th Int. Symp. on Rock Mechanics Congress, 13. Montreal, Canada: ISRM.
Ditlevsen, O. 1979. “Narrow reliability bounds for structural systems.” J. Struct. Mech. 7 (4): 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601217908905329.
Greco, V. R. 2016. “Variability and correlation of strength parameters inferred from direct shear tests.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 34 (2): 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9968-3.
Huang, X., Y. Li, Y. Zhang, and X. Zhang. 2018. “A new direct second-order reliability analysis method.” Appl. Math. Modell. 55: 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.026.
Kar, S. S., and L. B. Roy. 2022. “Probabilistic based reliability slope stability analysis using FOSM, FORM, and MCS.” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 12 (2): 8236–8240. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4689.
Li, D., M. Sun, E. Yan, and T. Yang. 2021. “The effects of seismic coefficient uncertainty on pseudo-static slope stability: A probabilistic sensitivity analysis.” Sustainability 13 (15): 8647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158647.
Liu, X., D.-Q. Li, Z.-J. Cao, and Y. Wang. 2020. “Adaptive Monte Carlo simulation method for system reliability analysis of slope stability based on limit equilibrium methods.” Eng. Geol. 264: 105384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105384.
Low, B. K. 2014. “FORM, SORM, and spatial modeling in geotechnical engineering.” Struct. Saf. 49: 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.08.008.
Low, B. K., J. Zhang, and W. H. Tang. 2011. “Efficient system reliability analysis illustrated for a retaining wall and a soil slope.” Comput. Geotech. 38 (2): 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.11.005.
Luo, Z., A. Karki, E. Pan, A. R. Abbas, M. S. Arefin, and B. Hu. 2018. “Effect of uncertain material property on system reliability in mechanistic-empirical pavement design.” Constr. Build. Mater. 172: 488–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.236.
Mahapatra, S., B. M. Basha, and B. Manna. 2021. ““System reliability framework for design of MSE walls for vertical expansion of MSW landfills.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 25 (1): 04020060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000559.
Mustafa, R., P. Samui, and S. Kumari. 2022. “Reliability analysis of gravity retaining wall using hybrid ANFIS.” Infrastructures 7 (9): 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7090121.
Peddinti, P. R., B. Munwar Basha, and S. Saride. 2020. “System reliability framework for design of flexible pavements.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B. Pavements 146 (3): 04020043. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000186.
Phoon, K.-K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038.
Raghuram, A. S. S., and B. M. Basha. 2021. “Second-order reliability-based design of unsaturated infinite soil slopes.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (4): 04021024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001954.
Raghuram, A. S., B. M. Basha, and K. V. Raviteja. 2021. “Variability characterization of SWCC for clay and silt and its application to infinite slope reliability.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 33 (8): 04021180. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003809.
Song, J., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2003. “Bounds on system reliability by linear programming.” J. Eng. Mech. 129 (6): 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:6(627).
Soujanya, D., and B. Munwar Basha. 2023a. “Effect of hydrostatic and hydrodynamic pressures on the stability of landfill veneer covers with an internal seeper.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 27 (3): 04023013. https://doi 1176.org/10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1194.
Soujanya, D., and B. Munwar Basha. 2023b. “Pseudodynamic stability analysis of landfill veneer cover systems with clogged drainage layer.” Int. J. Geomech. 24 (2): 04023275. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8606.
Soujanya, D., and B. Munwar Basha. 2023c. “Quantification of variability of shear and interface shear parameters of soils and its application to stability of veneer cover slopes.” Environ. Earth Sci. 82 (19): 453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11143-3.
Sujith, M., D. Menon, and G. Dodagoudar. 2011. “Reliability analysis and design of cantilever RC retaining walls against sliding failure.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 5 (2): 131–141. https://doi.org/10.3328/IJGE.2011.05.02.131-141.
Sundararajan, C. R. 1995. Probabilistic structural mechanics handbook: Theory and industrial applications. 1st ed. New York: Springer.
US Army Corps of Engineers. 1999. “Risk-based analysis in geotechnical engineering for support of planning studies, engineering and design.” Rep. No. 20314-1000. Washington, DC: Dept. of Army.
Wang, Y., and O. V. Akeju. 2016. “Quantifying the cross-correlation between effective cohesion and friction angle of soil from limited site-specific data.” Soils Found. 56 (6): 1055–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.11.009.
Zevgolis, I. E., and P. L. Bourdeau. 2010. “System reliability analysis of the external stability of reinforced soil structures.” Georisk 4 (3): 148–156.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 26, 2024
Accepted: Jun 5, 2024
Published online: Sep 12, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 12, 2025
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Analysis (by type)
- Continuum mechanics
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Environmental engineering
- Failure analysis
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Laminating
- Landfills
- Materials engineering
- Materials processing
- Pseudodynamic methods
- Seismic tests
- Soil dynamics
- Soil mechanics
- Solid mechanics
- Structural dynamics
- Structural engineering
- Structural response
- System reliability
- Systems engineering
- Systems management
- Tests (by type)
- Uplifting behavior
- Waste management
- Waste sites
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.