Technical Papers
Aug 29, 2024

Efficacy of Crustacean and Protein-Based Biopolymer Inclusion on the Strength Characteristics of Organic Soil

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 11

Abstract

The current study evaluated the potential of crustacean polysaccharide and protein-based biopolymers, namely, chitosan and casein, in ameliorating a low organic soil. The inclusion of these biopolymers will ensure the reusability and recyclability of waste materials derived from the marine industry and dairy industry, respectively. The unconfined compressive strength and consolidated undrained shear parameters were investigated at varying dosages of chitosan and casein (0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%) and curing periods (up to 90 days). The compressive strength increased with an increase in the curing period and dosage and led to maximum values of 4.39 and 3.13 MPa for chitosan- and casein-treated soils, respectively, for 4% dosage and 90 days of curing. The effective cohesion (c′) and friction angle (ϕ′) improved after including chitosan and casein. The scanning electron microscopy images revealed that the filler characteristics of chitosan led to strength improvement up to 60 days and developed bond strength via fiber bridging after 60 days of curing at higher dosages. In contrast, the casein–soil mix revealed a higher fibrous structure after a curing period of 28 days, which resulted in strength improvement. This contributed to the highest effective friction angle of 21.57° for the 2% and 60-day-cured casein–soil mix. Casein outperformed chitosan in imparting higher effective shear parameters at 1% and 2% dosages. Fourier transform infrared analysis validated the absence of any new compounds within the soil structure. The research findings on chitosan and casein from the current study recommend the application of these materials for addressing the issues of unstable slopes and pavement subgrade.

Practical Applications

The ground improvement industry must shift from environmentally harmful materials to sustainable and nontoxic materials to reduce carbon footprint. Biopolymers are innovative materials derived from various bacteria, plants, and other animals and can impart the required properties for the soils tested ( Fatehi et al. 2021). Chitosan and casein are two biopolymers that satisfy the sustainability requirement by being environmentally safe products of waste materials ( Chang et al. 2018; Kannan and Sujatha 2023). Applying casein and chitosan has imparted significant improvement in strength to the studied soil. The compressive strength achieved for the fine-grained soils treated with chitosan and casein lies in the range of 0.75–4.39 MPa. Thus, the strength obtained for the treated soils affirms the suitability of these biopolymers in pavement subgrade. The significant improvement in the effective cohesion (c′: 72–179 kPa) and friction angle (ϕ′: 10.57°–21.57°) of amended soils renders the chitosan- and casein-amended samples as excellent shallow foundation materials. Additionally, based on the higher undrained shear strength (125–400 kPa) obtained from consolidated undrained tests, the biopolymers can be recommended for unstable slopes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Institute of Technology Warangal and TKM College of Engineering Kollam for supporting this research work with all the required facilities. The authors thank the reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped improving the manuscript.

References

AASHTO. 2022. Standard method of test for determination of organic content in soils by loss on ignition. AASHTO T267. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Adamczuk, A., M. Kercheva, M. Hristova, and G. Jozefaciuk. 2021. “Impact of chitosan on water stability and wettability of soils.” Materials 14 (24): 7724. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247724.
Aguilar, R., J. Nakamatsu, E. Ramírez, M. Elgegren, J. Ayarza, S. Kim, M. A. Pando, and L. Ortega-San-Martin. 2016. “The potential use of chitosan as a biopolymer additive for enhanced mechanical properties and water resistance of earthen construction.” Constr. Build. Mater. 114: 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.218.
Almajed, A., H. Khodadadi Tirkolaei, and E. Kavazanjian Jr. 2018. “Baseline investigation on enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (11): 04018081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001973.
Arab, M. G., R. A. Mousa, A. R. Gabr, A. M. Azam, S. M. El-Badawy, and A. F. Hassan. 2019. “Resilient behavior of sodium alginate–treated cohesive soils for pavement applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (1): 04018361. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002565.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for UCS of cohesive soil. ASTM D2166-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods for pH of soils. ASTM D4972-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020a. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020b. Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM D4767-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021a. Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis. ASTM D7928-21e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021b. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12400 ft-lbf = ft3 (600 kN-m = m3)). ASTM D698-12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2023. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by the water displacement method. ASTM D854-23. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Ayeldeen, M. K., A. M. Negm, and M. A. El Sawwaf. 2016. “Evaluating the physical characteristics of biopolymer/soil mixtures.” Arabian J. Geosci. 9 (5): 371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2366-1.
Bagheri, P., I. Gratchev, and M. Rybachuk. 2023. “Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on soil mechanical properties.” Appl. Sci. 13 (2): 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020887.
Cabalar, A. F., M. H. Awraheem, and M. M. Khalaf. 2018. “Geotechnical properties of a low-plasticity clay with biopolymer.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (8): 04018170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002380.
Chang, I., J. Im, M.-K. Chung, and G.-C. Cho. 2018. “Bovine casein as a new soil strengthening binder from diary wastes.” Constr. Build. Mater. 160: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.009.
Chang, I., J. Im, A. K. Prasidhi, and G.-C. Cho. 2015. “Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening.” Constr. Build. Mater. 74: 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.026.
Chang, I., M. Lee, A. T. P. Tran, S. Lee, Y.-M. Kwon, J. Im, and G.-C. Cho. 2020. “Review on biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) technology in geotechnical engineering practices.” Transp. Geotech. 24: 100385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100385.
Chen, R., L. Zhang, and M. Budhu. 2013. “Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (10): 1802–1807. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000902.
De Queiroz Antonino, R., B. Lia Fook, V. De Oliveira Lima, R. De Farias Rached, E. Lima, R. Da Silva Lima, C. Peniche Covas, and M. Lia Fook. 2017. “Preparation and characterization of chitosan obtained from shells of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone).” Mar. Drugs 15 (5): 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/md15050141.
Fatehi, H., S. M. Abtahi, H. Hashemolhosseini, and S. M. Hejazi. 2018. “A novel study on using protein based biopolymers in soil strengthening.” Constr. Build. Mater. 167: 813–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.028.
Fatehi, H., D. E. L. Ong, J. Yu, and I. Chang. 2021. “Biopolymers as green binders for soil improvement in geotechnical applications: A review.” Geosciences 11 (7): 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070291.
Federico, A., C. Vitone, and A. Murianni. 2015. “On the mechanical behaviour of dredged submarine clayey sediments stabilized with lime or cement.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (12): 2030–2040. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0086.
Ghasemzadeh, H., F. Modiri, and E. Darvishan. 2022. “A novel clean biopolymer-based additive to improve mechanical and microstructural properties of clayey soil.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 24 (3): 969–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02234-5.
Gu, B., and H. E. Doner. 1992. “The interaction of polysaccharides with silver hill illite.” Clays Clay Miner. 40 (2): 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1346/Ccmn.1992.0400203.
Hataf, N., P. Ghadir, and N. Ranjbar. 2018. “Investigation of soil stabilization using chitosan biopolymer.” J. Cleaner Prod. 170: 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.256.
Hermansson, A. M. 1975. “Functional properties of proteins for foods-flow properties.” J. Texture Stud. 5 (4): 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1975.tb01109.x.
Huang, J., R. B. Kogbara, N. Hariharan, E. A. Masad, and D. N. Little. 2021. “A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization.” Constr. Build. Mater. 305: 124685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685.
Ivanov, V., and J. Chu. 2008. “Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ.” Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 7 (2): 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-007-9126-3.
Kannan, G., and E. R. Sujatha. 2023. “Crustacean polysaccharides for the geotechnical enhancement of organic silt: A clean and green alternative.” Carbohydr. Polym. 299: 120227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120227.
Kumar, R. S., and P. Rajkumar. 2014. “Characterization of minerals in air dust particles in the state of Tamilnadu, India through FTIR, XRD and SEM analyses.” Infrared Phys. Technol. 67: 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2014.06.002.
Latifi, N., S. Horpibulsuk, C. L. Meehan, M. Z. A. Majid, M. M. Tahir, and E. T. Mohamad. 2017. “Improvement of problematic soils with biopolymer—An environmentally friendly soil stabilizer.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (2): 04016204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001706.
MacLaren, D. C., and M. A. White. 2003. “Cement: Its chemistry and properties.” J. Chem. Educ. 80 (6): 623. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p623.
Mitchell, J. K., and K. Soga. 2005. Fundamentals of soil behavior. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Moghal, A. A. B., M. A. Lateef, S. A. S. Mohammed, K. Lemboye, B. C. S. Chittoori, and A. Almajed. 2020a. “Efficacy of enzymatically induced calcium carbonate precipitation in the retention of heavy metal ions.” Sustainability 12 (17): 7019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177019.
Moghal, A. A. B., and K. V. Vydehi. 2021. “State-of-the-art review on efficacy of xanthan gum and guar gum inclusion on the engineering behavior of soils.” Innovative Infrastruct. Solutions 6 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00462-8.
Moghal, A. A. B., K. Vydehi, M. B. Moghal, R. Almatrudi, A. Almajed, and M. A. Al-Shamrani. 2020b. “Effect of calcium-based derivatives on consolidation, strength, and lime-leachability behavior of expansive soil.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (4): 04020048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003088.
Moghal, A. A. B., R. M. Rasheed, and S. A. S. Mohammed. 2023. “Sorptive and desorptive response of divalent heavy metal ions from EICP-treated plastic fines.” Indian Geotech. J. 53 (2): 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00638-8.
Moslemi, A., A. Tabarsa, S. Y. Mousavi, and M. H. A. Monfared. 2022. “Shear strength and microstructure characteristics of soil reinforced with lignocellulosic fibers-sustainable materials for construction.” Constr. Build. Mater. 356: 129246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129246.
Mudgil, D., S. Barak, and B. S. Khatkar. 2012. “X-ray diffraction, IR spectroscopy and thermal characterization of partially hydrolyzed guar gum.” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 50 (4): 1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.02.031.
Ni, J., S.-S. Li, and X.-Y. Geng. 2022. “Mechanical and biodeterioration behaviours of a clayey soil strengthened with combined carrageenan and casein.” Acta Geotech. 17 (12): 5411–5427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01588-4.
Paul, M. A., and B. F. Barras. 1999. “Role of organic material in the plasticity of Bothkennar clay.” Géotechnique 49 (4): 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.4.529.
Pellis, A., G. M. Guebitz, and G. S. Nyanhongo. 2022. “Chitosan: Sources, processing and modification techniques.” Gels 8 (7): 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8070393.
Ptiček Siročić, A., L. Kratofil Krehula, Z. Katančić, and Z. Hrnjak-Murgić. 2017. “Characterization of casein fractions—Comparison of commercial casein and casein extracted from cow’s milk.” Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. J. 30 (4): 501–509. https://doi.org/10.15255/CABEQ.2015.2311.
Rao, S. M., A. Sridharan, and S. Chandrakaran. 1989. “Influence of drying on the liquid limit behaviour of a marine clay.” Géotechnique 39 (4): 715–719. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1989.39.4.715.
Rasheed, R. M., and A. A. B. Moghal. 2022. “Critical appraisal of the behavioral geo-mechanisms of peats/organic soils.” Arabian J. Geosci. 15 (12): 1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10396-9.
Rasheed, R. M., and A. A. B. Moghal. 2024a. “Compressibility and durability characteristics of protein-based biopolymer amended organic soil.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 36 (7). https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17285.
Rasheed, R. M., and A. A. B. Moghal. 2024b. “Primary and secondary consolidation characteristics of chitosan-treated low organic clay.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2024: Soil Improvement, Sustainability, Geoenvironmental, and Cold Regions Engineering, Geotechnical Special Publication 351, edited by T. Matthew Evan, N. Stark, and S. Chang, 228–237. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rasheed, R. M., A. A. B. Moghal, S. S. R. Jannepally, A. U. Rehman, and B. C. S. Chittoori. 2023a. “Shrinkage and consolidation characteristics of chitosan-amended soft soil—A sustainable alternate landfill liner material.” Buildings 13 (9): 2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092230.
Rasheed, R. M., A. A. B. Moghal, S. Rambabu, and A. Almajed. 2023b. “Sustainable assessment and carbon footprint analysis of polysaccharide biopolymer-amended soft soil as an alternate material to canal lining.” Front. Environ. Sci. 11: 1214988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1214988.
Roberts, K., J. Kowalewska, and S. Friberg. 1974. “The influence of interactions between hydrolyzed aluminum ions and polyacrylamides on the sedimentation of kaolin suspensions.” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 48 (3): 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(74)90178-7.
Safdar, M. U., M. Mavroulidou, M. J. Gunn, D. Purchase, C. Gray, I. Payne, and J. Garelick. 2022. “Towards the development of sustainable ground improvement techniques—Biocementation study of an organic soil.” Circ. Econ. Sustainability 2 (4): 1589–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00071-8.
Saride, S., A. J. Puppala, and S. R. Chikyala. 2013. “Swell-shrink and strength behaviors of lime and cement stabilized expansive organic clays.” Appl. Clay Sci. 85: 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.09.008.
Shen, Y.-s., Y. Tang, J. Yin, M.-p. Li, and T. Wen. 2021. “An experimental investigation on strength characteristics of fiber-reinforced clayey soil treated with lime or cement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 294: 123537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123537.
Shillaber, C. M., J. K. Mitchell, and J. E. Dove. 2016. “Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works. II: Working model and example.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (3): 04015084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001411.
Tastan, E. O., T. B. Edil, C. H. Benson, and A. H. Aydilek. 2011. “Stabilization of organic soils with flyash.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (9): 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.19435606.0000502.
Theng, B. K. G. 1982. “Clay–polymer interactions: Summary and perspectives.” Clays Clay Miner. 30 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1346/ccmn.1982.0300101.
Theyab, A. F., F. M. Muhauwiss, and W. M. Alabdraba. 2022. “Enhancing gypseous soil behavior using casein from milk wastes.” J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 31 (1): 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0041.
Vishweshwaran, M., and E. R. Sujatha. 2023. “Geotechnical investigation of gelatin biopolymer on cohesive soils.” Sustainability 15 (3): 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032041.
Vydehi, K. V., and A. A. B. Moghal. 2022. “Effect of biopolymeric stabilization on the strength and compressibility characteristics of cohesive soil.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 34 (2): 04021428. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004068.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24Issue 11November 2024

History

Received: Nov 29, 2023
Accepted: May 22, 2024
Published online: Aug 29, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 29, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Romana Mariyam Rasheed, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, TKM College of Engineering, Kollam 691005, India. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal 506004, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8623-7102. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share