Technical Papers
Dec 28, 2022

Time-Dependent Damage Evolution of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers: Implications for Multihazard Analysis

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 9, Issue 1

Abstract

Explicit multihazard analysis of structures, especially bridges, has attracted significant attention from researchers and practitioners. Depending on the number of hazards considered and the length of the time interval, such analysis can be time-consuming and cumbersome for practical purposes. Therefore it would be beneficial to determine under what conditions such analysis is necessary. This paper explored the damage scenarios and performance criteria under which typical overpass bridges in the US require an explicit multihazard analysis. The paper concentrated on three common hazards (in addition to gravity loads): seismic, scour, and corrosion. Throughout the analysis, seismic hazard was assumed to be dominant. To explore this question, the paper used a probabilistic methodology to model time-dependent damage processes in RC. The dominant uncertainties in the modeling process are those associated with earthquake occurrence and intensity, corrosion initiation time and rate, and stream flow intensity. To quantify structural damage, a Park–Ang damage index is used. The damage index evolves with the age of the simulated structure and the combined effect of multiple hazards. It was found after examining several realistic bridge designs that the combined effect of multiple hazards throughout the life of the structure becomes important when evaluating low-probability damage events (such as collapse).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This includes the structural models (OpenSees) and hazard modeling codes (MATLAB).

References

Akiyama, M., and D. M. Frangopol. 2014. “Long-term seismic performance of RC structures in an aggressive environment: Emphasis on bridge piers.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (7): 865–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.761246.
Alipour, A., B. Shafei, and M. Shinozuka. 2011. “Performance evaluation of deteriorating highway bridges located in high seismic areas.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (5): 597–611. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000197.
Andrade, C., A. Muñoz, and A. Torres-Acosta. 2010. Relation between crack width and corrosion degree in corroding elements exposed to the natural atmosphere. Beijing: Korea Concrete Institute.
API (American Petroleum Institute). 1989. Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms. Washington, DC: API.
Argyroudis, S. A., and S. A. Mitoulis. 2021. “Vulnerability of bridges to individual and multiple hazards- floods and earthquakes.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 210 (4): 107564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107564.
Badroddin, M. 2020. “Multi-hazard resilience assessment of river-crossing bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City.
Biondini, F., E. Camnasio, and A. Palermo. 2014. “Lifetime seismic performance of concrete bridges exposed to corrosion.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (7): 880–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.761248.
Briaud, J.-L., L. Brandimarte, J. Wang, and P. D’Odorico. 2007. “Probability of scour depth exceedance owing to hydrologic uncertainty.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 1 (2): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499510701398844.
Briaud, J.-L., F. C. K. Ting, H. C. Chen, R. Gudavalli, S. Perugu, and G. Wei. 1999. “SRICOS: Prediction of scour rate in cohesive soils at bridge piers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125 (4): 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:4(237).
Cairns, J., G. A. Plizzari, Y. Du, D. W. Law, and C. Franzoni. 2005. “Mechanical properties of corrosion-damaged reinforcement.” ACI Mater. J. 102 (4): 256.
Choe, D.-E., P. Gardoni, D. Rosowsky, and T. Haukaas. 2008. “Probabilistic capacity models and seismic fragility estimates for RC columns subject to corrosion.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (3): 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.015.
Choe, D.-E., P. Gardoni, D. Rosowsky, and T. Haukaas. 2009. “Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion.” Struct. Saf. 31 (4): 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.10.001.
Coronelli, D., and P. Gambarova. 2004. “Structural assessment of corroded reinforced concrete beams: Modeling guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (8): 1214–1224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:8(1214).
Cui, Z., A. Alipour, and B. Shafei. 2019. “Structural performance of deteriorating reinforced concrete columns under multiple earthquake events.” Eng. Struct. 191 (4): 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.073.
Decò, A., and D. M. Frangopol. 2011. “Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards.” J. Risk Res. 14 (9): 1057–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.571789.
Dizaj, E. A., R. Madandoust, and M. M. Kashani. 2018. “Exploring the impact of chloride-induced corrosion on seismic damage limit states and residual capacity of reinforced concrete structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (6): 714–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1359631.
DuraCrete. 2000. Probabilistic performance based durability design of concrete structures. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Centre for Civil Engineering Research and Codes.
FHWA. 2010. “NBI ASCII files 2010.” Accessed October 1, 2021. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii2010.cfm.
FHWA. 2020. “National bridge inventory (NBI).” Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.cfm.
Ghosh, J., and J. E. Padgett. 2010. “Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (12): 1497–1511. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000260.
Ghosh, J., J. E. Padgett, and M. Sánchez-Silva. 2015. “Seismic damage accumulation in highway bridges in earthquake-prone regions.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1193/120812EQS347M.
Ghosn, M., and F. Moses. 2003. Design of highway bridges for extreme events. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Giordano, P. F., L. J. Prendergast, and M. P. Limongelli. 2020. “A framework for assessing the value of information for health monitoring of scoured bridges.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 10 (3): 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00398-0.
Guo, X., Y. Wu, and Y. Guo. 2016. “Time-dependent seismic fragility analysis of bridge systems under scour hazard and earthquake loads.” Eng. Struct. 121 (Apr): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.038.
HEC (Hydraulic Engineering Centre). 1986. Accuracy of computed water surface profiles. Davis, CA: HEC.
Jia, G., and P. Gardoni. 2018. “State-dependent stochastic models: A general stochastic framework for modeling deteriorating engineering systems considering multiple deterioration processes and their interactions.” Struct. Saf. 72 (Jan): 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.01.001.
Jia, G., P. Gardoni, D. Trejo, and V. Mazarei. 2021. “Stochastic modeling of deterioration and time-variant performance of reinforced concrete structures under joint effects of earthquakes, corrosion, and ASR.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (2): 04020314. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002884.
Kameshwar, S., and J. E. Padgett. 2018. “Response and fragility assessment of bridge columns subjected to barge-bridge collision and scour.” Eng. Struct. 168 (May): 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.082.
Khandel, O., and M. Soliman. 2019. “Integrated framework for quantifying the effect of climate change on the risk of bridge failure due to floods and flood-induced scour.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (9): 04019090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001473.
Kwak, K. 2000. “Prediction of scour depth versus time for bridge piers in cohesive soils in the case of multi-flood and multi-layer soil systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Li, C., H. Hao, H. Li, and K. Bi. 2016. “Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete bridges with chloride induced corrosion subjected to spatially varying ground motions.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 16 (5): 1550010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455415500108.
Li, T., J. Lin, and J. Liu. 2020. “Analysis of time-dependent seismic fragility of the offshore bridge under the action of scour and chloride ion corrosion.” Structures 28 (4): 1785–1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.045.
Lu, C., W. Jin, and R. Liu. 2011. “Reinforcement corrosion-induced cover cracking and its time prediction for reinforced concrete structures.” Corros. Sci. 53 (4): 1337–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2010.12.026.
Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Mazzoni, S., et al. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Berkeley.
Nakano, Y., M. Maeda, H. Kuramoto, and M. Murakami. 2004. “Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation of RC buildings in Japan.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Nielson, B. G. 2005. “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007. “Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern united states.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (3): 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2756815.
Otieno, M., H. Beushausen, and M. Alexander. 2016a. “Chloride-induced corrosion of steel in cracked concrete—Part I: Experimental studies under accelerated and natural marine environments.” Cem. Concr. Res. 79 (Aug): 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.009.
Otieno, M., H. Beushausen, and M. Alexander. 2016b. “Chloride-induced corrosion of steel in cracked concrete—Part II: Corrosion rate prediction models.” Cem. Concr. Res. 79 (4): 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.008.
Panchireddi, B., and J. Ghosh. 2019. “Cumulative vulnerability assessment of highway bridges considering corrosion deterioration and repeated earthquake events.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (3): 1603–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0509-3.
Panchireddi, B., and J. Ghosh. 2020. “Probabilistic seismic loss estimation of aging highway bridges subjected to multiple earthquake events.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (Apr): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1801765.
Park, Y. J., A. H.-S. Ang, and Y. K. Wen. 1987. “Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 3 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585416.
Park, Y.-J., and A. H.-S. Ang. 1985. “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (4): 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722).
Park, Y.-J., A. H.-S. Ang, and Y. K. Wen. 1985. “Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (4): 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(740).
Paulay, T., and M. Priestley. 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: Wiley.
Prasad, G. G., and S. Banerjee. 2013. “The impact of flood-induced scour on seismic fragility characteristics of bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 17 (6): 803–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.771593.
Ren, J., J. Song, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2021. “Reliability assessment framework of deteriorating reinforced concrete bridges subjected to earthquake and pier scour.” Eng. Struct. 239 (11): 112363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112363.
Roy, T., and V. Matsagar. 2021. “Multi-hazard analysis and design of structures: Status and research trends.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 21 (10): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1987481.
Schanack, F., G. Valdebenito, and J. Alvial. 2012. “Seismic damage to bridges during the 27 February 2010 magnitude 8.8 Chile earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra 28 (1): 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3672424.
Shekhar, S., J. Ghosh, and J. E. Padgett. 2018. “Seismic life-cycle cost analysis of ageing highway bridges under chloride exposure conditions: Modelling and recommendations.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (7): 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1437639.
Stewart, M. G., and D. V. Rosowsky. 1998. “Time-dependent reliability of deteriorating reinforced concrete bridge decks.” Struct. Saf. 20 (1): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(97)00021-0.
USGS. 2021. “USGS water data for the nation.” Accessed September 1, 2021. https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis.
Vecchio, F. J., and M. P. Collins. 1986. “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI J. 83 (2): 219–231.
Vu, K. A. T., and M. G. Stewart. 2000. “Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion models.” Struct. Saf. 22 (4): 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(00)00018-7.
Wang, Z., L. Dueñas-Osorio, and J. E. Padgett. 2014. “Influence of scour effects on the seismic response of reinforced concrete bridges.” Eng. Struct. 76 (Sep): 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.026.
Xu, J.-G., G. Wu, D.-C. Feng, D. M. Cotsovos, and Y. Lu. 2020. “Seismic fragility analysis of shear-critical concrete columns considering corrosion induced deterioration effects.” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 134 (2): 106165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106165.
Yanweerasak, T., W. Pansuk, M. Akiyama, and D. M. Frangopol. 2018. “Life-cycle reliability assessment of reinforced concrete bridges under multiple hazards.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (7): 1011–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1437640.
Zhong, J., P. Gardoni, and D. Rosowsky. 2012. “Seismic fragility estimates for corroding reinforced concrete bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (1): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470903241881.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 9Issue 1March 2023

History

Received: Jun 3, 2022
Accepted: Oct 11, 2022
Published online: Dec 28, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Reza Filizadeh, S.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9580-5121
Perkins Hall, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Vermont, Burlington, VT. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9580-5121
Eric Hernandez, M.ASCE [email protected]
Votey Hall, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Vermont, Burlington, VT (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
David Rosowsky, F.ASCE
Office of the Vice President for Research, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-0500.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Optimized Wavelet and Wavelet Packet Transform Techniques for Assessing Crack Behavior in Curved Segments of Arched Beam Bridges Spanning Rivers, Water, 10.3390/w15223977, 15, 22, (3977), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share