Technical Papers
May 21, 2024

Comprehensive Risk System Analysis and Factor Coupling in Underground Railway Space

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 3

Abstract

The rapid expansion and intensification of urbanization have led to increased growth and utilization of underground spaces. This trend has raised safety concerns, necessitating additional preventive and mitigation measures. This study presents a comprehensive and systematic assessment of safety risks in urban underground railway spaces. Various research techniques were employed, including literature review, case study, risk matrix, Borda ordinal, and Bayesian network methods. The ISO 31000:2018 risk management standard served as the framework for risk management. Based on existing knowledge, three main risk categories, consisting of 17 constituent risk factors, were identified: rail system; passenger behavior; and environmental hazards. This study critically analyzed the interrelationships and couplings of risks among these categories. A Bayesian network is constructed based on the collected accident information, and the probability that the level of risk is located at low, medium, and high levels is calculated to be 42%, 39%, and 20%, respectively. This finding is verified with a real case of an in-operation subway. Inverse reasoning and sensitivity analyses were conducted using Genie software to predict the occurrence probability and severity of high-risk factors. The findings highlighted significant risks to underground railway spaces, such as arson and accidental fires. In response, authorities proposed measures to enhance risk management strategies. The results provide a theoretical foundation, diverse analytical approaches, and practical guidelines to improve risk management capabilities in urban underground spaces, thus facilitating the development of informed risk management strategies.

Practical Applications

Urbanization has intensified the use of underground spaces to accentuate safety concerns, which demand improved predictive, preventive, and mitigating strategies. Planners and managers of such heavily used venues need guidance in risk management based firmly on theories and research findings. Due to multiple and interrelating factors, approaches relying on analyzing individual factors and ignoring factor interactions may not offer desirable solutions. This study assessed safety risks in the factor-coupling mode in urban underground railways by applying a combination of judiciously chosen analytical tools. Three main risk categories, with 17 constituent factors, were identified: rail system; passenger behavior; and environmental hazards. Interrelationships and couplings of risks were analyzed to deepen understanding of the complex associations. A Bayesian network calculated probabilities of low, medium, and high-risk levels at 42%, 39%, and 20%, respectively. Acute risks like arson and accidental fire were highlighted. Practical coping strategies were proposed to tackle the risks. The findings can help the management to establish measures to enhance risk management and reduce impacts. The results offer theoretical foundations, analytical approaches, and practical guidelines for informed risk abatement design, planning, and management in urban underground spaces.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by general projects of the China National Social Science Foundation (Grant No. 22BGL237).

References

Admiraal, H., and A. Cornaro. 2020. “Future cities, resilient cities: The role of underground space in achieving urban resilience.” Underground Space 5 (3): 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001.
Bobylev, N. 2016. “Underground space as an urban indicator: Measuring use of subsurface.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 55 (Mar): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.024.
Bruyelle, J.-L., C. O’Neill, E.-M. El-Koursi, F. Hamelin, N. Sartori, and L. Khoudour. 2014. “Improving the resilience of metro vehicle and passengers for an effective emergency response to terrorist attacks.” Saf. Sci. 62 (May): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.022.
Chen, Y., Z. Chen, D. Guo, and Z. Zhao. 2022. “Simulating spatiotemporal dynamics of urban underground space development using multi-agent system: A case study in Changzhou City, China.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 124 (Jun): 104482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104482.
Chen, Y., S. Hu, H. Mao, W. Deng, and X. Gao. 2020. “Application of the best evacuation model of deep learning in the design of public structures.” Image Vis. Comput. 102 (Jun): 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2020.103975.
Chen, Z., J. Dong, and R. Ren. 2017. “Urban underground logistics system in China: Opportunities or challenges?” Underground Space 2 (3): 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2017.08.002.
Dong, L., J. Cao, and X. Liu. 2022. “Risk control method and practice in the whole construction process of a shield tunneling pipe gallery in complex surrounding underground environment.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 8 (3): 04022033. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001260.
El-Adaway, I. H., and R. H. Assaad. 2022. “State-of-the-art research in the area of artificial intelligence with specific consideration to civil infrastructure, construction engineering and management, and safety.” In Leveraging artificial intelligence in engineering, management, and safety of infrastructure, 140–160. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Esposito Amideo, A., S. Starita, and M. P. Scaparra. 2019. “Assessing protection strategies for urban rail transit systems: A case-study on the Central London Underground.” Sustainability 11 (22): 6322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226322.
Fang, W., J. Wu, Y. Bai, L. Zhang, and G. Reniers. 2019. “Quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline in an underground utility tunnel.” Process Saf. Prog. 38 (4): e12051. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12051.
Feng, J. R., W.-M Gai, and Y.-B Yan. 2021. “Emergency evacuation risk assessment and mitigation strategy for a toxic gas leak in an underground space: The case of a subway station in Guangzhou, China.” Saf. Sci. 134 (Jun): 105039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105039.
Geng, Y., X. Zheng, Z. Wang, and Z. Wang. 2020. “Flood risk assessment in Quzhou City (China) using a coupled hydrodynamic model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE).” Nat. Hazards 100 (Mar): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03803-0.
Han, J., and K. Park. 2019. “Development of a pedestrian safety assessment framework for underground parking facilities and its application.” J. Ergon. Soc. Korea 38 (3): 203–218. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2019.38.3.203.
Huang, X., X. Wu, X. Zhang, and A. Usmani. 2022. “Smart tunnel fire safety management by sensor network and artificial intelligence.” In Leveraging artificial intelligence in engineering, management, and safety of infrastructure, 423–443. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lee, C.-Y., H.-Y. Chong, P.-C. Liao, and X. Wang. 2018. “Critical review of social network analysis applications in complex project management.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (2): 04017061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000579.
Li, M., T. Zheng, J. Zhang, Y. Fang, J. Liu, X. Zheng, and H. Peng. 2019. “A new risk assessment system based on set pair analysis–variable fuzzy sets for underground reservoirs.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (May): 4997–5014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02390-w.
Li, W., J. Yuan, G. Zhang, S. Wei, B. Zhang, and M. J. Skibniewski. 2023. “Agent-based simulation modeling for the evaluation and dynamic adjustment of project benefits in urban rail transit PPPs.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (2): 04022074. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-4682.
Li, X., F. Liao, C. Wang, and A. Alashwal. 2022. “Managing safety hazards in metro subway projects under complex environmental conditions.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 8 (1): 04021079. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001212.
Lin, Y.-C., and W.-F. Cheung. 2020. “Developing WSN/BIM-based environmental monitoring management system for parking garages in smart cities.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 04020012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000760.
Liu, S.-C., F.-L. Peng, Y.-K. Qiao, and J.-B. Zhang. 2021. “Evaluating disaster prevention benefits of underground space from the perspective of urban resilience.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 58 (Jun): 102206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102206.
Lyu, H.-M., W.-J. Sun, S.-L. Shen, and A. Arulrajah. 2018. “Flood risk assessment in metro systems of megacities using a GIS-based modeling approach.” Sci. Total Environ. 626 (Mar): 1012–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138.
Ma, F., F. Ren, K. F. Yuen, Y. Guo, C. Zhao, and D. Guo. 2019. “The spatial coupling effect between urban public transport and commercial complexes: A network centrality perspective.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 50 (Mar): 101645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101645.
Ntzeremes, P., and K. Kirytopoulos. 2018. “Applying a stochastic-based approach for developing a quantitative risk assessment method on the fire safety of underground road tunnels.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 81 (Feb): 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.020.
Qiao, W. 2021. “Analysis and measurement of multifactor risk in underground coal mine accidents based on coupling theory.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 208 (Mar): 107433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107433.
Qiao, Y.-K., F.-L. Peng, S. Sabri, and A. Rajabifard. 2019. “Socio-environmental costs of underground space use for urban sustainability.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 51 (Mar): 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101757.
Sahoo, S. K., and S. S. Goswami. 2023. “A comprehensive review of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: Advancements, applications, and future directions.” Decis. Making Adv. 1 (1): 25–48. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120237.
Standards Press of China. 2017. Emergency classification and coding. GB/T 35561−2017. Beijing: Standards Press of China.
Syed, Z., and Y. Lawryshyn. 2020. “Risk analysis of an underground gas storage facility using a physics-based system performance model and Monte Carlo simulation.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 199 (Mar): 106792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106792.
Takiya, H., I. Negreiros, C. L. K. Yamamura, J. A. Quintanilha, C. A. S. Machado, A. Abiko, C. I. de Campos, M. S. D. P. Pessoa, and F. T. Berssaneti. 2022. “Application of open government data to sustainable city indicators: A megacity case study.” Sustainability 14 (14): 8802. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148802.
Ullah, I., M. Fayaz, and D. Kim. 2018. “Analytical modeling for underground risk assessment in smart cities.” Appl. Sci. 8 (6): 921. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060921.
Wang, D., T. Zhou, and X. Li. 2021. “Impacts of environment and individual factors on human premovement time in underground commercial buildings in China: A virtual reality-based study.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 7 (1): 04020056. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001112.
Wang, J., Y. Huang, Y. Bo, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang. 2023. “Air pollution characteristics and human health risk assessment of underground parking garages in Xi’an, China.” Indoor Built Environ. 32 (4): 632–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X221131951.
Wang, Y. 2019. “Risk assessment and governance strategy of production safety accidents in Jinwan District of Zhuhai City: Based on integrated application of risk matrix and Borda count methods.” Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manage. 9 (4): 886–897. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.94060.
Wu, H.-W., J. Zhen, and J. Zhang. 2020. “Urban rail transit operation safety evaluation based on an improved CRITIC method and cloud model.” J. Rail Transp. Plann. Manage. 16 (Mar): 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2020.100206.
Wu, J., Z. Hu, J. Chen, and Z. Li. 2018. “Risk assessment of underground subway stations to fire disasters using Bayesian network.” Sustainability 10 (10): 3810. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103810.
Xie, R., Y. Pan, T. Zhou, and W. Ye. 2020. “Smart safety design for fire stairways in underground space based on the ascending evacuation speed and BMI.” Saf. Sci. 125 (Jun): 104619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104619.
Xu, H., and B. Xue. 2017. “Key indicators for the resilience of complex urban public spaces.” J. Build. Eng. 12 (May): 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.06.018.
Yang, X., Z. Xu, and J. Xu. 2023. “Large-scale group Delphi method with heterogeneous decision information and dynamic weights.” Expert Syst. Appl. 213 (Jun): 118782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118782.
Yin, B., B. Li, G. Liu, Z. Wang, and B. Sun. 2021. “Quantitative risk analysis of offshore well blowout using Bayesian network.” Saf. Sci. 135 (Feb): 105080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105080.
Yuan, H., Y. He, J. Zhou, Y. Li, X. Cui, and Z. Shen. 2020. “Research on compactness ratio model of urban underground space and compact development mechanism of rail transit station affected area.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 55 (Apr): 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102043.
Zhang, L., M. J. Skibniewski, X. Wu, Y. Chen, and Q. Deng. 2014. “A probabilistic approach for safety risk analysis in metro construction.” Saf. Sci. 63 (Mar): 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.016.
Zhang, L., X. Wu, Y. Qin, M. J. Skibniewski, and W. Liu. 2016. “Towards a fuzzy Bayesian network based approach for safety risk analysis of tunnel-induced pipeline damage.” Risk Anal. 36 (2): 278–301.
Zhang, X., X. Zhang, and Y. Bai. 2017. “Risk management method based on Bayesian network-risk matrix–dynamic risk management of excavation project of existing buildings.” Saf. Environ. Eng. 24 (6): 176–183.
Zhao, J.-W., F.-L. Peng, T.-Q. Wang, X.-Y. Zhang, and B.-N. Jiang. 2016. “Advances in master planning of urban underground space (UUS) in China.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 55 (Mar): 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.011.
Zhou, R., W. Fang, and J. Wu. 2020. “A risk assessment model of a sewer pipeline in an underground utility tunnel based on a Bayesian network.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 103 (Sep): 103473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103473.
Zhu, H., X. Luo, F. Peng, X. Li, and C. Liu. 2018. “Development strategy on urban underground space planning in China.” Strategic Study Chin. Acad. Eng. 19 (6): 12–17. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2017.06.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10Issue 3September 2024

History

Received: Sep 10, 2023
Accepted: Mar 1, 2024
Published online: May 21, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 21, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Xiaojuan Li [email protected]
Professor, College of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry Univ., Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350108, China. Email: [email protected]
Research Student, College of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry Univ., Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350108, China. Email: [email protected]
Research Student, College of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry Univ., Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350108, China. Email: [email protected]
Research Chair Professor, Dept. of Social Sciences and Policy Studies, Education Univ. of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-8363. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share