Technical Papers
Jan 27, 2022

Proposed Empirical Approach to Measuring Traffic String Stability

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 8, Issue 2

Abstract

This study originated with the intent of qualifying traffic string stability from empirical observations. A new responsiveness angle measure was developed to assess driver instincts under vehicle-following conditions. In this measure, the degree of the follower vehicle’s attention towards its leader vehicle’s actions is quantified. In understanding string stability in the traffic stream and assessing the propagation of disturbances, the newly conceptualized measure was used along with a discrete Fourier transform to measure the frequencies associated with responsiveness angle sequences. In this transform, a higher frequency of the angle depicts unstable conditions and vice versa. In assessing string stability from the empirical observations, vehicular trajectory data were developed from three study sections. Two study sections tended to have homogeneous lane-wise traffic, whereas the third section had mixed (heterogeneous) traffic. The results of the string stability analysis over the study sections showed that string stability varied with the change in traffic flow conditions, road geometries, and traffic flow type. In the case of free-flow conditions, the traffic streams were found to be stable with marginal disturbances in the responsiveness angle. From the analysis, it was observed that, in the case of study Section 3, around 26 instances of the stream were extremely unstable conditions (frequency equal to 10). For study Sections 1 and 2, the traffic stream was unsteady for 4 and 13 instances, respectively. However, as the traffic flow level rose, string stability deteriorated. This study demonstrated a novel approach to analyzing string stability based on actual traffic conditions that can be implemented in real time for traffic stream monitoring.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This includes:
Trajectory data.
Python codes for computing the angle of responsiveness and Fourier transforms.

Acknowledgments

This research work is an outcome of MITACS Global Research Award. Application Ref IT16143.

References

Bando, M., K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata, and Y. Sugiyama. 1995. “Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation.” Phys. Rev. E 51 (2): 1035. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.1035.
Chevalier, A., K. Coxon, A. J. Chevalier, E. Clarke, K. Rogers, J. Brown, S. Boufous, R. Ivers, and L. Keay. 2017. “Predictors of older drivers’ involvement in rapid deceleration events.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 98 (1): 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.010.
Guo, G., P. Li, and L. Y. Hao. 2020. “Adaptive fault-tolerant control of platoons with guaranteed traffic flow stability.” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 69 (7): 6916–6927. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2020.2990279.
Hao, L. Y., P. Li, and G. Guo. 2020. “String stability and flow stability for nonlinear vehicular platoons with actuator faults based on an improved quadratic spacing policy.” Nonlinear Dyn. 102 (4): 2725–2738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-06094-4.
Herman, R., E. W. Montroll, R. B. Potts, and R. W. Rothery. 1959. “Traffic dynamics: Analysis of stability in car following.” Oper. Res. 7 (1): 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.7.1.86.
Kesting, A., and M. Treiber. 2008. “How reaction time, update time, and adaptation time influence the stability of traffic flow.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 23 (2): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00529.x.
Kuang, Y., X. Qu, and S. Wang. 2015. “A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 77 (4): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.007.
Li, F., and Y. Wang. 2017. “Cooperative adaptive cruise control for string stable mixed traffic: Benchmark and human-centered design.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18 (12): 3473–3485. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2760805.
Li, Y., H. Wang, W. Wang, L. Xing, S. Liu, and X. Wei. 2017. “Evaluation of the impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on reducing rear-end collision risks on freeways.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 98 (1): 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.015.
Makridis, M., K. Mattas, B. Ciuffo, F. Re, A. Kriston, F. Minarini, and G. Rognelund. 2020. “Empirical study on the properties of adaptive cruise control systems and their impact on traffic flow and string stability.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (4): 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120911047.
Meng, Q., and X. Qu. 2012. “Estimation of rear-end vehicle crash frequencies in urban road tunnels.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 48 (9): 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.025.
Milanés, V., and S. E. Shladover. 2014. “Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 48 (11): 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001.
Montanino, M., J. Monteil, and V. Punzo. 2021. “From homogeneous to heterogeneous traffic flows: Lp string stability under uncertain model parameters.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 146 (4): 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.009.
Montanino, M., and V. Punzo. 2021. “On string stability of a mixed and heterogeneous traffic flow: A unifying modelling framework.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 144 (2): 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.11.009.
Papadoulis, A., M. Quddus, and M. Imprialou. 2019. “Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 124 (3): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.019.
Pereira, J. L., and R. J. Rossetti. 2012. “An integrated architecture for autonomous vehicles simulation.” In Proc., 27th Annual ACM Symp. on Applied Computing, 286–292. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Plonka, G., D. Potts, G. Steidl, and M. Tasche. 2018. “Fourier transforms.” In Numerical Fourier analysis, 61–106. Cham, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
Qin, Y., and S. Li. 2020. “String stability analysis of mixed CACC vehicular flow with vehicle-to-vehicle communication.” IEEE Access 8 (9): 174132–174141. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3026205.
Qin, Y. Y., H. Wang, W. Wang, and Q. Wan. 2017. “Mixed traffic flow string stability analysis for different CACC penetration ranges.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 17 (4): 63–69. https://doi.org/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2017.04.010.
Ruan, T., L. Zhou, and H. Wang. 2021. “Stability of heterogeneous traffic considering impacts of platoon management with multiple time delays.” Phys. A 583 (1): 126294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126294.
Stern, R. E., et al. 2018. “Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experiments.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 89 (Apr): 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.005.
Sun, J., Z. Zheng, and J. Sun. 2018. “Stability analysis methods and their applicability to car-following models in conventional and connected environments.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 109 (Mar): 212–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.01.013.
Talebpour, A., and H. S. Mahmassani. 2016. “Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 71 (10): 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007.
Tordeux, A., S. Lassarre, and M. Roussignol. 2010. “An adaptive time gap car-following model.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 44 (8–9): 1115–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.018.
Van Arem, B., C. J. Van Driel, and R. Visser. 2006. “The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics.” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 7 (4): 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2006.884615.
Van der Horst, A. R. A., and J. H. Hogema. 1994. Time-to-collision and collision avoidance systems. Leidschendam, Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research.
Vicraman, V., C. Ronald, T. Mathew, and K. V. Rao. 2014. “Traffic data extractor.” Accessed March 11, 2018. http://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/tvm/tde2.
Yang, D., P. Jin, Y. Pu, and B. Ran. 2013. “Safe distance car-following model including backward-looking and its stability analysis.” Eur. Phys. J. B 86 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2012-30688-6.
Yao, Z., T. Xu, Y. Jiang, and R. Hu. 2021. “Linear stability analysis of heterogeneous traffic flow considering degradations of connected automated vehicles and reaction time.” Phys. A 561 (1): 125218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125218.
Ye, L., and T. Yamamoto. 2018. “Modeling connected and autonomous vehicles in heterogeneous traffic flow.” Phys. A 490 (1): 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.015.
Zhang, G., Y. Zhang, D. B. Pan, and R. J. Huang. 2019. “Study on the continuous delayed optimal flow on traffic stability in a new macro traffic model.” Phys. A 534 (11): 122029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122029.
Zhang, X., and D. F. Jarrett. 1997. “Stability analysis of the classical car-following model.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 31 (6): 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(97)00006-4.
Zhang, Y., Y. Bai, J. Hu, and M. Wang. 2020. “Control design, stability analysis, and traffic flow implications for cooperative adaptive cruise control systems with compensation of communication delay.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (8): 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120918873.
Zhao, H., D. Xia, S. Yang, and G. Peng. 2020. “The delayed-time effect of traffic flux on traffic stability for two-lane freeway.” Phys. A 540 (2): 123066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123066.
Zheng, Z. 2021. “Reasons, challenges, and some tools for doing reproducible transportation research.” Commun. Transp. Res. 1 (1): 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2021.100004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 8Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Sep 18, 2021
Accepted: Dec 16, 2021
Published online: Jan 27, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jun 27, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Civiele Techniek en Geowetenschappen, Delft Univ. of Technology (TU Delft), Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, Netherlands (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3561-5676. Email: [email protected]
Research Intern, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1324-5678. Email: [email protected]
Shriniwas S. Arkatkar [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India. Email: [email protected]
Said Easa, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ryerson Univ., 350 Victoria St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Vehicle-following behaviour in mixed traffic – role of lane position and adjacent vehicle, Transportation Letters, 10.1080/19427867.2023.2205723, (1-14), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share