Technical Papers
Jul 28, 2021

The Effect of In-Span Hinges and Span Numbers on the Seismic Vulnerability of Curved Box-Girder Highway Bridges Considering Material and Geometric Uncertainties

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 4

Abstract

Around 15% of seismically designed Californian box-girder bridges incorporate at least one in-span hinge. This class of bridges can be further divided into two subclasses (i.e., single-frame and multiframe subclasses) according to the number of bridge spans in each bay of the bridge. The number of spans has a considerable influence on the dynamic response of box-girder bridges and, accordingly, on their seismic vulnerability. In this study, 420 analytical models for horizontally curved and straight highway bridges are developed using finite element OpenSEES software, considering geometric and mechanical uncertainties. Effects of in-span hinges, the number of spans, and the radius of the deck curvature on the seismic fragility of seismically designed concrete box-girder bridges with integral multicolumn bents and seat type abutments are investigated. Nonlinear time history analyses (NTHAs) are utilized to develop the fragility models for the bridge components and corresponding systems. Results show that the presence of in-span hinges and the number of spans have a considerable influence on the seismic vulnerability of box-girder bridges (for example, the median fragility of the straight bridges decreases by 26% when single-frame bridges change to multiframe at the moderate damage state). However, these effects can be quite variable for different deck radius at different damage states of the corresponding fragility functions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Except the main MATLAB code, all models and their results are available.

References

Abbasi, M., B. Zakeri, and G. H. Ghodrati Amiri. 2015. “Probabilistic seismic assessment of multiframe concrete box-girder bridges with unequal-height piers.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000753.
ATC/MCEER. 2002. Comprehensive specification for the seismic design of bridges. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Attarchian, N., A. Kalantari, and S. Moghadam. 2016. “Seismic performance of single pier skewed bridges with different pier-deck connections.” J. Earthquakes Struct. 10 (6): 1467–1486. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1467.
Ayyub, B. M., and K. L. Lai. 1989. “Structural reliability assessment using latin hypercube sampling.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR). Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bavirisetty, R., M. Vinayagamoorthy, and L. Duan. 2000. “Dynamic analysis.” In Bridge engineering handbook, edited by W.-F. Chen and L. Duan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
CALTRANS. 2007. Reinforced concrete bridge capacity assessment training manual. Sacramento, CA: California DOT.
Chang, G. A., and J. B. Mander. 1994. Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns. Part 1—Evaluation of seismic capacity. Buffalo, NY: State Univ. of New York.
Chen, L., and S. Chen. 2016. “Seismic fragility performance of skewed and curved bridges in low-to-moderate seismic region.” J. Earthquakes Struct. 10 (4): 789–810. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.789.
Choi, E. 2002. “Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Dutta, A. 1999. “Energy based seismic analysis and design of highway bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, State Univ. of New York.
Ellingwood, B., and H. Hwang. 1985. “Probabilistic descriptions of resistance of safety related structures in nuclear plants.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 88 (2): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(85)90059-7.
FEMA. 2012. Hazus-MH—MH 4.0 earthquake model technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Ghalami Sfahani, M., and H. Guan. 2018. “An extended cloud analysis method for seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges.” J. Earthquakes Struct. 15 (6): 605–616. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.6.605.
Hwang, H., J. B. Liu, and Y.-H. Chiu. 2000. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges. Memphis, TN: Univ. of Memphis.
Jeon, J. S., R. DesRoches, T. Kim, and E. Choi. 2016. “Geometric parameters affecting seismic fragilities of curved multi-frame concrete box-girder bridges with integral abutments.” Eng. Struct. 122 (Sep): 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.037.
Kehila, F., A. Kibboua, H. Bechtoula, and M. Remki. 2018. “Seismic performance assessment of R.C. bridge piers designed with the Algerian seismic bridges regulation.” J. Earthquakes Struct. 15 (6): 701–713. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.6.701.
Khanmohammadi, M., A. Abbasloo, and E. Valadi. 2016. “Enhancing shear strength of cap beam–column joints in existing multicolumn bent bridges using an innovative method.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000949.
Krawinkler, H., R. Medina, and B. Alavi. 2003. “Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions.” Eng. Struct. 25 (5): 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00174-8.
Mackie, K. R., and B. G. Nielson. 2009. “Uncertainty quantification in analytical bridge fragility curves.” In Proc., Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mackie, K. R., and B. Stojadinovic. 2001. “Probabilistic seismic demand model for California bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(468).
Mackie, K. R., and B. Stojadinovic. 2004. “Fragility curves for reinforced concrete highway overpass bridges.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Mander, J. B., D. K. Kim, S. S. Chen, and G. J. Premus. 1996. Response of steel bridge bearings to the reversed cyclic loading. Taipei, Taiwan: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Matias, H., and M. Khalid. 2010. “Experimental evaluation of in-span hinge details in reinforced concrete box girder bridges.” J. Transp. Res. Rec. 2200 (1): 127–134. https://doi.org/10.3141/2200-15.
McKenna, F., M. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2010. “Nonlinear finite element analysis software architecture using object composition.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002.
Megally, S. H., P. F. Silva, and F. Seible. 2001. Seismic response of sacrificial shear keys in bridge abutments. San Diego: Univ. of California at San Diego.
Menegotto, M., and P. E. Pinto. 1973. “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending.” In Proc., IABSE Symp. on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, 15–22. Zürich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Mosleh, A., S. Razzaghi, J. Jara, and H. Varum. 2016. “Development of fragility curves for RC bridges subjected to reverse and strike-slip seismic sources.” J. Earthquakes Struct. 11 (3): 517–538. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.517.
Muthukumar, S., and R. A. DesRoches. 2006. “Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (7): 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.557.
NBI (National Bridge Inventory). 2010. National bridge inventory data. Washington, DC: NBI.
Nielson, B. 2005. “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Padgett, J. E. 2007. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted bridges using probabilistic methods.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Padgett, J. E., and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (8): 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.801.
Pahlavan, H., B. Zakeri, and G. G. Amir. 2017. “Probabilistic performance assessment of retrofitted horizontally curved multi-frame RC box-girder bridges.” J. Earthquake Tsunami 11 (4): 1750010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431117500105.
Pahlavan, H., B. Zakeri, G. G. Amir, and M. A. Shayanfar. 2015. “Probalistic vulnerability assessment of horizontally curved multiframe RC box girder highway bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000780.
Ramanathan, N. K. 2012. “Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Ramos, C. E. P. 2011. “Three dimensional dynamic response of reinforced concrete bridges under spatially varying seismic ground motions.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Arizona.
SAC Steel Project. 1997. “Suites of earthquake ground motions for analysis of steel moment frame structures.” Accessed September 22, 2009. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/data/strong_motion/sacsteel/ground_motions.Html.
Shafieezadeh, A., K. Ramanathan, J. E. Padgett, and R. DesRoches. 2012. “Fractional order intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling applied to highway bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (3): 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1135.
Shamsabadi, A., P. Khalili-Tehrani, J. P. Stewart, and E. Taciroglu. 2010. “Validated simulation models for lateral response of bridge abutments with typical backfills.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000058.
Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, H. Kim, T. Uzawa, and T. Ueda. 2003. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Tondini, N., and B. Stojadinovic. 2012. “Probabilistic seismic demand model for curved reinforced concrete bridges.” J. Bull Earthquake Eng. 10 (5): 1455–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9362-y.
Wang, J., A. J. Carr, N. Cooke, and P. J. Moos. 2009. “The response of a 344 m long bridge to non-uniform earthquake ground motions.” J. Eng. Struct. 31 (11): 2554–2567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.05.022.
Yilmaz, M. F., B. O. Caglayan, and K. Ozakgul. 2019. “Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of simply supported steel railway bridges.” J. Earthquakes Struct. 17 (1): 91–99.
Zakeri, B. 2013. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted skewed concrete bridges using probabilistic methods.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology.
Zhong, J., J. S. Jeon, and W. Ren. 2018. “Risk assessment for a long-span cable-stayed bridge subjected to multiple support excitations.” J. Eng. Str. 176 (Dec): 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.107.
Zhong, J., J. S. Jeon, W. Yuan, and R. Desroches. 2017. “Impact of spatial variability parameters on seismic fragilities of a cable-stayed bridge subjected to differential support motions.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (6): 04017013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001046.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 4December 2021

History

Received: Aug 12, 2020
Accepted: Apr 26, 2021
Published online: Jul 28, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 28, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar at the Center for Technology and Systems Management, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; Associated Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran. (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6358-2771. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Bilal M. Ayyub, Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2692-241X
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2692-241X
Asad-Allah Abbasloo
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Iran Univ. of Science and Technology, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran.
Hossein Pahlavan
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Shahrood Univ. of Technology, Shahrood 3619995161, Iran.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Numerical Analysis and Vulnerability Assessment of Horizontally Curved Multiframe RC Box-Girder and CFRP Retrofitting of Existing Bridges, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001236, 8, 3, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share