Free access
Back Matter
Sep 6, 2024

Back Matter for User's Manual for GeogridBridge 3.0

Publication: User's Manual for GeogridBridge 3.0: A Guide to the Load Displacement Compatibility Method (LDC) for Design of Column-Supported Embankments

Abstract

Back matter pages come after the papers or chapters in a published work. This back matter contains an index.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Note: Page numbers followed by f refer to figures; page numbers followed by t refer to tables.
α-method
1
β-method
1
Acceptable output values
22
ASTM D6637
18
Bilinear Adapted Terzaghi (BAT) model
11, 34, 48
Coefficients of consolidation
14
Column geometry
17, 17f
Combined stiffness
18
Complex worked example (GGB3)
41–55
arching mobilization
48, 48f
batch analysis
50–55
number of trials
50, 50f
parameters to vary
51–53, 52f–53f
results analysis
54–55, 54f–55f
run
54
serviceability limits, define
50, 51f
of cross section
41f
geosynthetic reinforcement stiffness
48, 48f
input column geometry
47, 47f
material properties
42t
material properties for each layer
43–46, 43f
clay 1
44–45
clay 2
46
general embankment
43
load transfer platform
44
sand 1
44
sand 2
45
postconstruction embankment profile
42–43
problem statement
41–42, 41f
results analysis
49–50, 49f
spreadsheet, run
49
surface loading conditions
47, 47f
Compression of embankment material
13–14
clays
time rate of consolidation analysis, properties for
14
ultimate consolidation analysis, material properties for
13–14
; columns
14
sands
13
Critical height
27
Distribution
22–23, 23f
GeogridBridge 1 (GGB1)
5
functionality of
5t–6t
vs. GGB2 vs. GGB3
5t–6t
GeogridBridge 2 (GGB2)
5
functionality of
5t–6t
vs. GGB1 vs. GGB3
5t–6t
GeogridBridge 3 (GGB3)
complex worked example
41–55
functionality of
5t–6t
vs. GGB1 vs. GGB2
5t–6t
inputs
2f, 9–15
column geometry
17, 17f
compression, material properties for
13–14
embankment soil properties
11
geosynthetic reinforcement
17–18
loading conditions
16
mobilization of arching
11–12, 12f
negative skin friction, material properties for
12–13
post-construction profile
10, 10f
stress adjust
14–15, 16t
layer in
9–11, 9t, 10f
manual
1–2
MCS and
21–25
acceptable output values
22
distribution type
22–23, 23f
number of trials
21–22
soil parameter variability
23–25, 24t
outputs
27–28
profile
9–11, 9t, 10f
simple worked example
29–40
spreadsheet
5–8
Batch Output tab
6
conditional formatting in
7
Constr Analysis tab
6
Definition Sketches tab
6
Load transfer plot tab
7
MCS Histograms tab
6
Post-constr Analysis tab
6
Revision History tab
7
tabs
6–7
time rate of consol
6
units
7, 8t
stratigraphy
9–11, 10f
Geosynthetic reinforcement
17–18
LDC
. See load displacement compatibility
Length of column
17
Load displacement compatibility (LDC)
1
calculations
9
GGB3 for
5–8
Load transfer platform (LTP)
10
Long-term stiffness
18
LTP
. See load transfer platform
Maximum differential settlement
27
MCS
. See Monte Carlo simulation
Monte Carlo simulation (MCS)
21–25
acceptable output values
22
distribution type
22–23, 23f
number of trials
21–22
soil parameter variability
23–25, 24t
Negative skin friction, material properties for
12–13
Neutral plane
27
OCM
. See overconsolidation margin
OCR
. See overconsolidation ratio
Overconsolidation margin (OCM)
13–14
Overconsolidation ratio (OCR)
13–14
Poisson's ratio
44–45, 47–48
of arching soil
34
for column
14
for concrete columns
33
COV of
24
of sand layer
13
Post-construction settlement at embankment surface
28
Probability of serviceability failure
22
Simple worked example (GGB3)
29–40
arching mobilization
34, 34f
batch analysis
36–40
parameters to vary
37–38, 38f–39f
results analysis
39–40, 39f–40f
run
39
select number of trials
36, 36f
serviceability limits, define
36, 37f
cross section
29f
geosynthetic reinforcement stiffness
33–34, 34f
input column geometry
32–33
array geometry
32, 33f
cap shape and geometry
32
column shape and geometry
33, 33f
inputs for soil profile in
32f
material properties for each layer
30–31, 30t–31t
postconstruction embankment profile
30
problem statement
29–30
results analysis
35–36, 35f
spreadsheet, run
35
surface loading conditions
32, 32f
Simplified Ground Reaction Curve-Concentric Arches model (SGRC-ACA)
11
Simplified Ground Reaction Curve-Hewlett and Randolph model (SGRC-AHR)
11
Simplified Ground Reaction Curve (SGRC)
11
Soil arching
embankment soil properties
11
mobilization of
11–12, 12f
Soil parameter variability
23–25, 24t
SRR
. See stress reduction ratio
Strain
27–28
Stress
14–15, 16t
Stress reduction ratio (SRR)
27
Tabs, GGB3 spreadsheet
6–7
Batch Output tab
6
Constr Analysis tab
6
Definition Sketches tab
6
Load transfer plot tab
7
MCS Histograms tab
6
Post-constr Analysis tab
6
Revision History tab
7
time rate of consol
6
Tensile stiffness
18
Tension
27–28
Total uniform settlement of embankment surface
28
UGRC
. See User-Defined Ground Reaction Curve
Units, GGB3 spreadsheet
7, 8t
User-Defined Ground Reaction Curve (UGRC)
11–12
Variability, soil parameter
23–25, 24t
Young's modulus
33–34, 42t, 44–45
for cohesionless soils
30t
concrete columns and caps
47
for embankment material
48
for sands
31t

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to User's Manual for GeogridBridge 3.0
User's Manual for GeogridBridge 3.0: A Guide to the Load Displacement Compatibility Method (LDC) for Design of Column-Supported Embankments
Pages: 57 - 60
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8564-4

History

Published online: Sep 6, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michael P. McGuire, Ph.D., P.E.
Joel A. Sloan, Ph.D., P.E.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share