Critical Review of Axial Resistance in Buried Pipelines Subjected to Transient and Permanent Ground Deformations
Publication: Pipelines 2024
ABSTRACT
Understanding the pipe–soil interaction effects at the pipe–soil interface of a buried pipeline is needed to estimate the stresses and strains on the pipeline subjected to longitudinal transient and permanent ground displacements during a seismic event. In general, pipe–soil interaction effects would be dependent on the actual displacement pattern, pipe–soil interface behavior, configuration of the pipe segments as well as joints, and available axial flexibility within pipe joints. In buried pipelines with uniform pipe barrels, such as in most continuous pipeline situations, axial resistance is primarily contributed by frictional and adhesive behaviors of the pipe–soil interface. However, in certain situations of continuous pipelines (e.g., flanged joints) and in segmented pipelines (e.g., bell- and spigot-type configurations), pipeline cross sections are typically larger than the regular pipeline barrel cross sections. Due to these configurations, the axial resistance in a pipe barrel does not develop solely from pure axial frictional and/or adhesive resistance on the pipe–soil interface. A bearing type resistance (e.g., passive resistance at the enlarged joints) would also be contributing to the axial resistance of the pipe. It should be noted that the maximum passive resistance that could be developed on the pipeline joint is also a function of the relative movement at the pipe–soil interface. While underestimating axial resistance for traditional non-seismic situations mostly yield conservative designs, such is not the case for seismic design conditions. Especially important is the axial resistance contribution in estimating the connection force demand arising from potential seismic hazards acting on a pipeline. Recognizing the importance of accurate estimation of the axial force connection demand on a buried pipeline from a design seismic hazard, a critical review of the approaches to estimate the axial resistance on a pipeline has been completed. This paper presents a summary of the current practice to estimate maximum axial resistance in a buried pipeline, critical review of the resistance components contributing to the axial resistance, and a proposed analytical approach to estimate the maximum axial resistance on a continuous or segmented pipeline with enlarged joints.
Get full access to this chapter
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). (2005). “Guidelines for the Design of Buried Steel Pipe”, 2001 with addenda through February 2005.
ASCE. (1984). Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, New York.
ASCE Task Committee on Thrust Restraint Design of Pipelines. (2014a). “Soil Parameters for Assessing Axial and Transverse Behavior of Restrained Pipelines Part 1: Axial Behavior.” Proceedings of the 2014 ASCE Pipeline Division Specialty Conference “From Underground to the Forefront of Innovation and Sustainability”, ASCE, Portland, Oregon, August.
ASCE Task Committee on Thrust Restraint Design of Pipelines. (2014b). “Soil Parameters for Assessing Axial and Transverse Behavior of Restrained Pipelines Part 2: Transverse Behavior.” Proceedings of the 2014 ASCE Pipeline Division Specialty Conference “From Underground to the Forefront of Innovation and Sustainability”, ASCE, Portland, Oregon, August.
Audibert, J. M. E., and Nyman, K. J. (1977). “Soil restraint against horizontal motion of pipes”, Journal of Geotechnical Eng Div V103, GT10.
Choudhary, A. K., and Dash, S. K. (2017). “Load-Carrying Mechanism of Vertical Plate Anchors in Sand”, International Journal of Geomechanics, 17(5), 04016116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000813.
Coulomb, C. A. (1776). “Essai sur une application des regles de maximis et minimis quelques problemes de statique, relatits a l’architecture.”, Memoires de Mathematique de l’Academie Royale de Science 7, Paris (in French).
Das, B. M. (1975). “Pullout resistance of vertical anchors”, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 101(1), 87–91.
Hansen, J. B. (1961). “The ultimate resistance of rigid piles against transversal forces”, Bulletin 12, Danish Geotechnical Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hetenyi, M. (1946). Beams on Elastic Foundation – Theory with Applications in the fields of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Kubota Corporation. (2021). Kubota Earthquake Resistant Ductile Iron Pipe (GENEX).
Meyerhof, G. G. (1951). “The Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Foundations”. Geotechnique, V2, N4.
O’Rourke, M. J., and Liu, X. (2012). Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines. MCEER Monograph MCEER-12-MN04, 380, Torrance, CA.
Rajah, S. “Soil-Pipe Interaction Characterization for Seismically-induced Longitudinal Permanent Ground Displacements”, In Proceedings of the 2019 ASCE Pipeline Division Specialty Conference “Pipeline Engineering — Concepts in Harmony”, ASCE, Nashville, Tennessee, July 2019.
Rankine, W. (1857). “On the stability of loose earth”, Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 147.
Rose, H.-R., Wham, B. P., Dashti, S., and Liel, A. B. (2022). “Seismic-Resistant Pipeline Design: Parametric Study of Axial Connection Force Capacity”, In Proceedings of the ‘Lifelines 2022: 1971 San Fernando Earthquake and Lifeline Infrastructure’ conference, ASCE, pp. 500:514.
Rose, H.-R. (2023). Geotechnical Demands for Characterizing Performance of Pipeline Systems with Enlarged Components, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder, June.
Roy, K., Hawlader, B., Kenny, S., and Moore, I. (2018). “Lateral resistance of pipes and strip anchors buried in dense sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55(12), 1812–1823, https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0492.
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical Soil Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Wham, B. P., Berger, B. A., Pariya-Ekkasut, C., and O’Rourke, T. D. (2018). “Hazard-resilient Pipeline Joint Soil-structure Interaction under Large Axial Displacement”. Proceedings: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V (Vol. 2018-June, pp. 276–285). Austin, TX: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Aug 30, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Buried pipes
- Continuum mechanics
- Design (by type)
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Earthquake engineering
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Fluid dynamics
- Fluid mechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Hydraulic engineering
- Hydrologic engineering
- Infrastructure
- Joints
- Load and resistance factor design
- Load factors
- Pipe joints
- Pipeline systems
- Pipes
- Seismic design
- Seismic effects
- Seismic tests
- Solid mechanics
- Structural design
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Tests (by type)
- Transient response
- Water and water resources
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.