Chapter
Jun 13, 2024

Using Advanced Modeling Techniques for Improving the Existing Airfield Pavement Management System Considering Structural and Functional Condition Indices

Publication: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024

ABSTRACT

Airport authorities constantly collect pavement condition data and utilize life-cycle cost analysis to select construction and maintenance alternatives. The current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular 150/5380-7B recommends using pavement condition index (PCI) to assess airfield pavement condition for planning of maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) treatments. However, structural and functional distresses initiate different pavement deterioration behavior that might not be fairly represented by one indicator, the PCI. The latter might mask the root cause of the airfield pavement deterioration by limiting the ability to focus on one failure type over the other. This results in inadequate M&R recommendations. Furthermore, the regression nature of the existing airfield pavement assessment models is not adequate for pavement performance prediction as a function of multitude features. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the airfield pavement condition of key airport components (runway, taxiway, and apron) using three indices; PCI, structural condition index (SCI), and foreign object debris/damage (FOD). To achieve this objective, three machine learning algorithms, namely, ensemble-learning method, CatBoost, and LightGBM, were used to predict the SCI and FOD based on the corresponding PCI value and key project conditions such as pavement age, branch use, pavement surface type, inspection year, aircraft average operation per day, air traffic composition (%General, %Transient, %Military, and %Air Taxi aviation), mean annual temperature, annual cumulative rainfall, annual cumulative rainfall days, and annual cumulative snowfall. A total of 2,505 pavement sections obtained from 89 airport networks in seven states were included in the analysis. Based on the collected data, two models were trained (for each algorithm) and validated to predict the SCI and FOD of airport sections from the existing PCI database and other key inputs. Results indicated that the CatBoost algorithm yielded the highest accuracy; therefore, the CatBoost-based models were considered in the proposed decision-making framework. This framework is expected to advance the existing FAA PCI-based approach and expand the current airfield performance models beyond pavement age using robust techniques.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

AirNav: Airport information. (n.d.). Retrieved January 4, 2023, from https://www.airnav.com/airports/.
Ashtiani, A. Z., Murrell, S., Speir, R., and Brill, D. R. (2022). Machine Leaning Solutions for Development of Performance Deterioration Models of Flexible Airfield Pavements. Eleventh International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Volume 3.
ASTM. ASTM D5340-20. (2020). Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
Babashamsi, P., Khahro, S. H., Omar, H. A., Al-Sabaeei, A. M., Memon, A. M., Milad, A., Khan, M. I., Sutanto, M. H., and Yusoff, N. I. M. Perspective of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis and Risk Assessment for Airport Pavement in Delaying Preventive Maintenance. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2905.
Bolón-Canedo, V., Sánchez-Maroño, N., and Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2013). A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data. Knowl Inf Syst 34, 483–519.
Brownlee, J. (2020). How to Use StandardScaler and MinMaxScaler Transforms in Python. Data Preparation.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). (2019). Airport Improvement Program Handbook. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/aip_handbook/.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). (2022). National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/npias/current.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation. (2021). FAA advisory circular 150/5320-6G. Washington, DC: FAA, USDOT.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), Airport Pavement Management Program. (2014). FAA advisory circular 150/5380-7B. Washington, DC: FAA, USDOT.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). (2019). Airport Improvement Program Handbook. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/aip_handbook/.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). (2019). Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program, Airport Pavement Evaluation Report. FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office.
Garg, N., Guo, E., and McQueen, R. (2004). Operational Life of Airport Pavements. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Association, USDOT.
Greene, J., Shahin, M. Y., and Alexander, D. R. (2004). Airfield Pavement Condition Assessment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1889: 63–70.
Guo, L., Wang, H., and Gagnon, J. (2021). Comparison Analysis of Airfield Pavement Life Estimated from Different Pavement Condition Indexes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements. 147 (2): 04021002.
Hajek, J., Hall, J. W., and Hein, A. K. (2011). Common Airport Pavement Maintenance Practices. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hilburn, B. G., and Pesmen, B. S. (2023). Foreign Object Debris Detection System Cost-Benefit Analysis. DOT/FAA/TC-22/47.
Insight SRI. (2008). The Economic Cost of FOD to Airlines. No 400, 456–458 The Strand, London, WC2R 0DZ, United Kingdom.
Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis. Second Edition. Springer-Verlag.
Khadka, N. (2023). LightGBM Algorithm: the Key to Winning Machine Learning Competitions. Retrieved from https://dataaspirant.com/lightgbm-algorithm/#t-1679668681655.
Koehrsen, W. (2018). Hyperparameter Tuning the Random Forest in Python. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/hyperparameter-tuning-the-random-forest-in-python-using-scikit-learn-28d2aa77dd74.
Lee, D. H., and Kang, D. H. (2016). The Application of the Artificial Neural Network Ensemble Model for Stimulating Streamflow. Procedia Engineering 154,1217–1224.
Li, X., Keegan, K., and Yazdani, A. (2010). Index of Foreign Object Damage in Airfield Pavement Management. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2153, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 81–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2153-09
Louisiana. (2021). IDEA (2021). Statewide Pavement Management System Update. https://idea.appliedpavement.com/hosting/louisiana/airport-details/airport-details.html.
Moez, A. (2023). Handling Machine Learning Categorical Data with Python Tutorial. Accessed on June 15, 2023. from https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/categorical-data.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (n.d.). Retrieved March 1, 2023, from https://www.weather.gov/wrh/climate?wfo=sto.
Nevada. (2018). IDEA (2018). Airport Pavement Evaluations. https://www.dot.nv.gov/mobility/aviation/airport-pavement-evaluations.
Noroozi, M., and Shah, A. (2023). Towards Optimal Foreign Object Debris Detection in an Airport Environment. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 213, Part A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118829.
Rahman, M. M., and Tarefder, R. A. (2015). PCI and non-PCI Based Pavement Evaluation. Journal of Airport Management, 9(2), 185–196.
Sagi, O., and Rokach, L. (2018). Ensemble Learning: A survey, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1249.
Shah, A., Tighe, S., and Steward, A. (2004). Development of a Unique Deterioration Index, Prioritization Methodology, and Foreign Object Damage Evaluation Models for Canadian Airfield Pavement Management. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 31:608–618
Tarefder, R. A., and Rahman, M. M. (2016). Development of System Dynamic Approaches to Airport Pavements Maintenance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 04016027-1.
Wang, H., and Guo, L. (2019). Airfield Pavement Management Framework using a Multi-Objective Decision Making Process. CAIT-UTC-REG 6.
Witten, I., Frank, E., Hall, M., and Pal, C. (2016). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Fourth Edition.
Yu, T., Pei, L.-L., Li, W., Sun, Z., and Huyan, J. (2021). Pavement Surface Condition Index Prediction Based on Random Forest Algorithm. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, Vol. 15, No. 4.
Zhang, H., Si, S., and Hsieh, C. J. (2018). GPU-Acceleration for Large-Scale Tree Boosting. SysML Conference.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024
Pages: 45 - 58

History

Published online: Jun 13, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Elise Mansour [email protected]
1Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Construction Management, Louisiana State Univ. Email: [email protected]
Heena Dhasmana, Ph.D. [email protected]
2Assistant Professor of Research, College of Engineering, Louisiana State Univ. Email: [email protected]
Marwa Hassan, Ph.D., P.E. [email protected]
3Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Louisiana State Univ. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$116.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$116.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share