Scooting towards Equity: A Comprehensive Study of Shared E-Scooter Impact in Chicago
Publication: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024
ABSTRACT
This study explores the adoption of e-scooters as a transportation mode in Chicago and examines various aspects of the mode, including trip patterns, temporal analysis, and the influence of sociodemographic factors on equity. The analysis reveals a diverse user base, with both men and women participating in e-scooter trips, and a mean trip duration of around 19 min. Temporal analysis highlights peak usage during mid-weekdays, especially Tuesdays to Thursdays, and on weekends, particularly Sundays, emphasizing their role in addressing commuting needs. Furthermore, the hour-level analysis identified 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. as the peak usage period, emphasizing the role of e-scooters in addressing commuting needs during rush hours. A Poisson regression model indicates a significant negative relationship between socioeconomically disadvantaged areas and the starting points of scooter trips, suggesting potential disparities in access. This study contributes valuable insight into the evolving understanding of e-scooter usage, emphasizing the importance of collaboration between city planners and policymakers for an equitable e-scooter system.
Get full access to this chapter
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Aarhaug, J., N. Fearnley, and E. Johnsson. 2023. “E-Scooters and Public Transport – Complement or Competition?” Research in Transportation Economics 98 (May): 101279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101279.
Abouelela, M., E. Chaniotakis, and C. Antoniou. 2023. “Understanding the Landscape of Shared-e-Scooters in North America; Spatiotemporal Analysis and Policy Insights.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 169 (March): 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103602.
Almannaa, M. H., H. I. Ashqar, M. Elhenawy, M. Masoud, A. Rakotonirainy, and H. Rakha. 2021. “A Comparative Analysis of E-Scooter and e-Bike Usage Patterns: Findings from the City of Austin, TX.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 15 (7): 571–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1833117.
Bai, S., and J. Jiao. 2020. “Dockless E-Scooter Usage Patterns and Urban Built Environments: A Comparison Study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN.” Travel Behaviour and Society 20 (July): 264–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.005.
Bai, S., J. Jiao, Y. Chen, and J. Guo. 2021. “The Relationship between E-Scooter Travels and Daily Leisure Activities in Austin, Texas.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 95 (June): 102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102844.
Bieliński, T., and A. Ważna. 2020. “Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics.” Sustainability 12 (22): 9640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229640.
Chicco, A., and M. Diana. 2022. “Understanding Micro-Mobility Usage Patterns: A Preliminary Comparison between Dockless Bike Sharing and e-Scooters in the City of Turin (Italy).” Transportation Research Procedia, 24th Euro Working Group on Transportation Meeting, 62 (January): 459–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.057.
“City of Chicago.” 2023. City of Chicago :: About Chicago. 2023. https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/about.html.
“City of Chicago Data Portal.” 2023. E-Scooter Trips - Census Tract Summary - 2020 | City of Chicago | Data Portal. 2023. https://data.cityofchicago.org/Transportation/E-Scooter-Trips-Census-Tract-Summary-2020/3srm-twg4.
Cubells, J., C. Miralles-Guasch, and O. Marquet. 2023. “Gendered Travel Behaviour in Micromobility? Travel Speed and Route Choice through the Lens of Intersecting Identities.” Journal of Transport Geography 106 (January): 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103502.
DOT. 2021. “ITS Deployment Evaluation Executive Briefing: Micromobility Services and Equity.” Digital/other. 01870375. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/65712.
Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (3): 265–94.
Félix, R., M. Orozco-Fontalvo, and F. Moura. 2023. “Socio-Economic Assessment of Shared e-Scooters: Do the Benefits Overcome the Externalities?” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 118 (May): 103714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103714.
Handy, S., X. Cao, and P. Mokhtarian. 2005. “Correlation or Causality between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior? Evidence from Northern California.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10 (6): 427–44.
Javid, R., and E. Sadeghvaziri. 2023a. “Assessing Gender Gaps in Citi Bike Ridership in New York City.” Available at SSRN 4358660.
Javid, R., and E. Sadeghvaziri. 2023b. “Equity Analysis of Bikeshare Access: A Case Study of New York City.” Findings.
Jiao, J., and S. Bai. 2020. “Understanding the Shared E-Scooter Travels in Austin, TX.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020135.
Liu, M., S. Seeder, and H. Li. 2019. “Analysis of E-Scooter Trips and Their Temporal Usage Patterns.” Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal 89 (6): 44–49.
McQueen, M., and K. J. Clifton. 2022. “Assessing the Perception of E-Scooters as a Practical and Equitable First-Mile/Last-Mile Solution.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 165 (November): 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.021.
Qian, X., and M. Jaller. 2021. “Bikeshare Destination Choices and Accessibility among Disadvantaged Communities.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 91 (February): 102686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102686.
Sadeghvaziri, E., R. Javid, and M. Jeihani. 2023. “Active Transportation for Underrepresented Populations in the United States: A Systematic Review of Literature.” Transportation Research Record, 03611981231197659.
Sadeghvaziri, E., R. Javid, M. Jeihani, and Equity Center. 2023a. “Investigating Walking and Biking Activities Among Low-Income African Americans.”
Sadeghvaziri, E., R. Javid, M. Jeihani, and Equity Center. 2023b. “Investigating Walking and Biking Activities Among Low-Income African Americans.”
“Scooter Sharing in Chicago.” 2023. City of Chicago :: Scooter Sharing in Chicago. 2023. https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/cdot/supp_info/escooter-share-pilot-project.html.
Shaheen, S., C. Bell, A. Cohen, B. Yelchuru, and B. Allen Hamilton. 2017. “Travel Behavior: Shared Mobility and Transportation Equity.” United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Policy …. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/63186.
Sorkou, T., P. G. Tzouras, K. Koliou, L. Mitropoulos, C. Karolemeas, and K. Kepaptsoglou. 2022. “An Approach to Model the Willingness to Use of E-Scooter Sharing Services in Different Urban Road Environments.” Sustainability 14 (23): 15680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315680.
“STAT.” 2018. 12.3 - Poisson Regression | STAT 462. 2018. https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat462/node/209/.
Tokey, A. I., S. A. Shioma, and S. Jamal. 2022. “Analysis of Spatiotemporal Dynamics of E-Scooter Usage in Minneapolis: Effects of the Built and Social Environment.” Multimodal Transportation 1 (4): 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2022.100037.
“U.S. Census Bureau.” 2022. U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: Chicago City, Illinois. 2022. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/chicagocityillinois/PST045222.
Yan, X., W. Yang, X. Zhang, Y. Xu, I. Bejleri, and X. Zhao. 2021. “A Spatiotemporal Analysis of E-Scooters’ Relationships with Transit and Station-Based Bikeshare.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 101 (December): 103088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103088.
Younes, H., R. B. Noland, and C. J. Andrews. 2023. “Gender Split and Safety Behavior of Cyclists and E-Scooter Users in Asbury Park, NJ.” Case Studies on Transport Policy 14 (December): 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101073.
Yu, W., C. Chen, B. Jiao, Z. Zafari, and P. Muennig. 2018. “The Cost-Effectiveness of Bike Share Expansion to Low-Income Communities in New York City.” Journal of Urban Health 95 (6): 888–98.
Zarif, R., D. Pankratz, and B. Kelman. 2018. “Small Is Beautiful.” Making Micromobility Work for Citizens, Cities and Service Providers. The Deloitte Center for Integrated Research.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024
Pages: 284 - 292
History
Published online: Jun 13, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.