Chapter
Jun 13, 2024

Machine Learning Strategies for Optimizing Urban Parking: A Comparative Evaluation

Publication: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024

ABSTRACT

Parking management presents a complex challenge in urban cities, as a scarcity of parking spaces and the ever-increasing vehicular traffic have led to congestion, environmental pollution, and overall reduced urban productivity. Addressing the problem requires predicting the exact number of available parking spaces and categorizing parking occupancy levels. This study aims to achieve these tasks by employing machine learning models to accurately predict occupancy, thus optimizing parking resource allocation and enhancing the urban parking experience. A dataset derived from a college campus garage for a period spanning from January 2022 to June 2023 was used to analyze the performance of various predictive models, including random forest, decision tree, linear regression, and support vector machine. The models were compared using multiple evaluation metrics, and the results revealed that the random forest model was the most reliable. Its strong performance in regression analysis translated into precise estimations of available parking spaces. Similarly, its capability in classification analysis proved essential for categorizing parking occupancy into distinct levels, enhancing communication and streamlining decision-making processes. These findings are significant for improving parking management systems and contributing to the development of efficient and sustainable parking solutions in urban environments.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Anwar, T., Asadullah, S., Azzam, M., and Abbas, K. 2019. Comparison of different machine learning models for parking occupancy prediction. In 2019 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT) (pp. 59–64). IEEE.
Caicedo, F., Blazquez, C., and Miranda, P. 2012. Prediction of parking space availability in real time. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 7281–7290.
Caicedo, F., Robuste, F., and Lopez-Pita, A. 2006. Parking management and modeling of car park patron behavior in underground facilities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1956(1), 60–67.
Channamallu, S. S., Kermanshachi, S., and Pamidimukkala, A. 2023. Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Traffic Crashes in Comparison with Conventional Vehicles. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023 (pp. 39–50).
Channamallu, S. S., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., and Pamidimukkala, A. 2023a. A review of smart parking systems. Transportation Research Procedia, 73, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.920.
Channamallu, S. S., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., and Pamidimukkala, A. 2023b. Parking occupancy prediction and analysis - a comprehensive study. Transportation Research Procedia, 73, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.921.
Channamallu, S. S., Padavala, V. K., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., and Pamidimukkala, A. 2023c. Examining parking occupancy prediction models: a comparative analysis. Transportation Research Procedia, 73, 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.919.
Dey, K., and Nath, B. 2019. Prediction of parking occupancy using decision tree and support vector machine. In 2019 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) (pp. 131–134). IEEE.
Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Hladik, G., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., Arif Khan, M., and Foss, A. 2022. Exploring shared travel behavior of university students. Transportation planning and technology, 46(1), 22–44.
Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., and Foss, A. 2023. Exploring motivating factors and constraints of using and adoption of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs). Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 18, 100794.
Farooq, S., Khaksar, W., Ullah, M. A., and Yaqoob, I. 2019. Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for parking occupancy prediction. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(4), 1343–1355.
He, Q., Li, Z., Huang, C., Zhang, M., and Li, D. 2020. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for parking occupancy prediction in urban areas. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 1–12.
Huang, H., Gartner, G., Krisp, J., Raubal, M., and Van De Weghe, N. 2018. “Location Based Services: Ongoing Evolution and Research Agenda.” Journal of Location Based Services 12 (2): 63–93. doi:10.1080/ 17489725.2018.1508763.
INRIX Research. 2017. Searching for parking costs Americans $73 Billion a year. Retrieved from http://inrix.com/press-releases/parking-pain-us.
Khan, M. A., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., Pan, Q., and Foss, A. 2022a. Do ridesharing transportation services alleviate traffic crashes? A time series analysis. Traffic injury prevention, 23(6), 333–338.
Khan, M., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., and Foss, A. 2022b. Identifying Usage of Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs): Early Findings from a Pilot Project. In Transportation Research Board 101st Annual Meeting Washington, DC.
Khan, M. A., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Shahmoradi, A., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., and Foss, A. 2022c. Integrating shared autonomous vehicles into existing transportation services: evidence from a paratransit service in Arlington, Texas. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(6), 601–618.
Khan, M. A., Patel, R. K., Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., Hladik, G., and Foss, A. 2023a. Factors that determine a university community’s satisfaction levels with public transit services. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1125149.
Khan, M. A., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., Pan, Q., and Foss, A. 2023b. Understanding Students’ Satisfaction with University Transportation. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023 (pp. 522–532).
Kim, J. H., and Kim, J. Y. 2021. A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for parking occupancy prediction: Focusing on different time horizons. Sustainability, 13(10), 5557.
Kotb, A., Shen, Y., and Huang, Y. 2017. Smart parking guidance, monitoring and reservations: a review IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 9(2) pp. 6–16, 2017.
Lin, T., Rivano, H., and Le Mouel, F. 2017. A survey of smart parking solutions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(12), 3229–3253.
Liu, Z., Li, Y., Liu, Y., and Cai, H. 2019. Parking occupancy prediction based on gradient boosting decision tree. In 2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education (ICISCAE) (pp. 358–362). IEEE.
Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., and Patel, R. 2023. An Exploratory Analysis of Crashes Involving Autonomous Vehicles. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023 (pp. 343–350).
Patel, R. K., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., and Foss, A. 2022a. Exploring willingness to use shared autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 12(3), 765–778.
Patel, R. K., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J., and Foss, A. 2022b. How Riders Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles. In Automated People Movers and Automated Transit Systems, ASCE International Conference on Transportation & Development, pp. 81–93.
Patel, R. K., Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., and Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R. 2023a. Disaster preparedness and awareness among university students: a structural equation analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(5), 4447.
Patel, R. K., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Michael Rosenberger, J., and Foss, A. 2023b. Exploring Factors Affecting Shared Autonomous Vehicles Adoption: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis, Transportation Research Board 102 Annual Meeting (pp. 23–00216).
Patel, R. K., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Michael Rosenberger, J., and Foss, A. 2023c. Users’ and Nonusers’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Case Study in Arlington, Texas. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023 (pp. 241–252).
Sester, M. 2020. “Analysis of Mobility Data – A Focus on Mobile Mapping Systems.” Geo-spatial Information Science 23 (1): 68–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2020.1730713.
Shi, W., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Guo, R., and Xiong, Y. 2021. Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for parking occupancy prediction in smart city. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 5551553.
Shoup, D. C. 2006. Cruising for parking. Transport Policy, 13(6), 479–486.
Srinivasan, S., Soundararajan, R., Venkata Chalapathy, K., and Balasubramanian, R. 2021. Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for parking occupancy prediction. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(5), 5789–5804.
Subramanya, K., Kermanshachi, S., and Patel, R. K. 2022. The Future of Highway and Bridge Construction: Digital Project Delivery Using Integrated Advanced Technologies. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2022 (pp. 14–25).
Sun, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, L., and Gao, Y. 2019. Short-term parking occupancy prediction based on decision tree and random forest. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering (pp. 135–139). ACM.
Wu, F., Du, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, S., and Wang, Y. 2017. Parking occupancy prediction based on decision tree and random forest. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR) (pp. 234–238). IEEE.
Wu, J., Yang, B., and Zhu, D. 2020. A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for parking occupancy prediction. IEEE Access, 8, 104431–104439.
Yalcin, M. E., and Zeydan, M. 2016. Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for parking occupancy prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 63, 249–259.
Yang, Y., Sun, S., Qiao, Z., and Zhu, H. 2019. Parking Services in Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access, 7, 64271–64292.
Yang, S., Ma, W., Pi, X., and Qian, S. 2019a. A deep learning approach to real-time parking occupancy prediction in transportation networks incorporating multiple spatiotemporal data sources. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 107, 248–265.
Zhang, K., Zheng, S., Zhao, S., and Li, P. 2021. Comparative study of machine learning algorithms for parking occupancy prediction: A case study in Beijing. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103287.
Zheng, Y., Rajasegarar, S., and Leckie, C. 2015. Parking availability prediction for sensor-enabled car parks in smart cities, in: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2024
Pages: 678 - 689

History

Published online: Jun 13, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sai Sneha Channamallu [email protected]
1Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]
Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D., P.E. [email protected]
2Associate Vice Chancellor and Associate Dean of Research, Pennsylvania State Univ., State College, PA. Email: [email protected]
Jay Michael Rosenberger, Ph.D. [email protected]
3Professor, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]
Apurva Pamidimukkala, Ph.D. [email protected]
4Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy-E-book
$156.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy-E-book
$156.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share