Chapter
May 16, 2024

Modeling through the Murky Water: An Investigation of Reoccurring Turbidity Impairments in Oklahoma, 2002–2020

Publication: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

The Clean Water Act of 1972 mandates that states must maintain a water quality standard to ensure fishable and swimmable surface waters. Waterbodies exceeding physical, biological, or chemical water quality standards must be reported semiannually to the USEPA per section 303(d) as threatened or impaired. States must then develop and implement a watershed plan for the listed waterbodies with the intent to reduce pollution, return to acceptable water quality parameters, and delist the waterbody. This research analyzed Oklahoma’s 303(d) lists from 2002 to 2020 and determined that 408 individual surface waterbodies were impaired for turbidity. Turbidity management is commonly accomplished with best management practices (BMPs) due to its nonpoint source nature. BMPs can require large upfront costs or increased maintenance and often need coordination from multiple stakeholders; thus, it is imperative that BMPs are effectively implemented and maintained for continued pollution reduction. Further analyses of Oklahoma’s 303(d) list identified 82 waterbodies that had been listed, delisted, and relisted for turbidity impairments within the study period. Three of these watersheds were modeled for the 18-year period using the hydrologic and water quality system (HAWQS). Three watersheds, Wewoka, Turkey, and Stillwater, were selected based on size, ecoregion, and documented management efforts. A baseline model was run to analyze historic sediment contributions in each watershed. Five of the most common landuses were then assessed individually to find their impacts on total sediment loss as well as variations in erosivity between watersheds. This research aimed to assess where sediment loading was highest, the potential impact of BMPs on sediment loading, and the adequacy of current design standards in a changing climate.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Anand, S., Mankin, K. R., McVay, K. A., Janssen, K. A., Barnes, P. L., and Pierzynski, G. M. (2007). Calibration and Validation of ADAPT and SWAT for Field-Scale Runoff Prediction1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(4), 899–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00061.x.
Arabi, M., Frankenberger, J. R., Engel, B. A., and Arnold, J. G. (2008). Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT. Hydrological Processes, 22(16), 3042–3055. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6890.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part I: Model Development1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x.
EPA. (2021). Factsheet on Water Quality Parameters [Fact sheet].
Grudzinski, B., Fritz, K., and Dodds, W. (2020). Does Riparian Fencing Protect Stream Water Quality in Cattle-Grazed Lands? Environmental Management, 66(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01297-2.
HAWQS 2.0. (2023). HAWQS System 2.0 and Data to model the lower 48 conterminous U.S using the SWAT model (Version 2) [dataset]. Texas Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/GDOPBA.
Keiser, D. A., and Shapiro, J. S. (2019). Consequences of the Clean Water Act and the Demand for Water Quality*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(1), 349–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy019.
Kemp, P., Sear, D., Collins, A., Naden, P., and Jones, I. (2011). The impacts of fine sediment on riverine fish. Hydrological Processes, 25(11), 1800–1821. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7940.
Kjelland, M. E., Woodley, C. M., Swannack, T. M., and Smith, D. L. (2015). A review of the potential effects of suspended sediment on fishes: Potential dredging-related physiological, behavioral, and transgenerational implications. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(3), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-015-9557-2.
Liu, Y., Wang, R., Guo, T., Engel, B. A., Flanagan, D. C., Lee, J. G., Li, S., Pijanowski, B. C., Collingsworth, P. D., and Wallace, C. W. (2019). Evaluating efficiencies and cost-effectiveness of best management practices in improving agricultural water quality using integrated SWAT and cost evaluation tool. Journal of Hydrology, 577, 123965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123965.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R. (2011). Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 (406; p. 647). Texas Water Resources Institute.
Osteen, C., Gottlieb, J., and Vasavada, U. (2012). Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2012 Edition. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2141408.
Pulley, S., and Collins, A. L. (2019). Field-based determination of controls on runoff and fine sediment generation from lowland grazing livestock fields. Journal of Environmental Management, 249, 109365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109365.
Quinton, J. N., Govers, G., Van Oost, K., and Bardgett, R. D. (2010). The impact of agricultural soil erosion on biogeochemical cycling. Nature Geoscience, 3(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo838.
Ritter, W. F., and Shirmohammadi, A., eds. (2001). Agricultural nonpoint source pollution: Watershed management and hydrology. Lewis Publishers.
Shahady, T. (2024). Chapter 9—Mitigating strategies for agricultural water pollution exacerbated by climate change. In T. M. Letcher (Ed.), Living with Climate Change (pp. 173–195). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18515-1.00025-3.
Tomczyk, N., Naslund, L., Cummins, C., Bell, E. V., Bumpers, P., and Rosemond, A. D. (2023). Nonpoint source pollution measures in the Clean Water Act have no detectable impact on decadal trends in nutrient concentrations in U.S. inland waters. Ambio, 52(9), 1475–1487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01869-6.
Tucker, C. S., and Robinson, E. H. (1990). Water Quality Management in Ponds. In C. S. Tucker and E. H. Robinson (Eds.), Channel Catfish Farming Handbook (pp. 217–290). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1376-3_10.
USEPA. (2017). National Water Quality Inventory:.
Venishetty, V., and Parajuli, P. B. (2022). Assessment of BMPs by Estimating Hydrologic and Water Quality Outputs Using SWAT in Yazoo River Watershed. Agriculture, 12(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040477.
Yen, H., Daggupati, P., White, M. J., Srinivasan, R., Gossel, A., Wells, D., and Arnold, J. G. (2016). Application of Large-Scale, Multi-Resolution Watershed Modeling Framework Using the Hydrologic and Water Quality System (HAWQS). Water, 8(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040164.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024
Pages: 1583 - 1594

History

Published online: May 16, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Abigail Winrich
1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK
Jaime Schussler, Ph.D.
2Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$286.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$286.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share