Comparison of Urban Flood Susceptibility Maps of MIKE+ and AHP with GIS Integration: A Case Study of Rohtak City, India
Publication: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024
ABSTRACT
Rohtak city, India, lies in foothill of the Himalayas which makes this area a flood risk zone due to its varied topographical condition, design capacity of stormwater drains, and extreme precipitation. Flood susceptibility mapping is an essential tool for the assessment of performance of urban storm drainage network. In this study, MIKE+ model is used for identification of flood susceptible zones for the existing storm drainage network which are compared with analytical hierarchy process (AHP) mapping using GIS techniques. MIKE+ model uses hydrodynamic and rainfall-runoff modelling technique for the determination of flood prone areas based on precipitation and population (urbanisation) factors. Flood susceptibility map was also generated using AHP webOS using the parameters namely land use and land cover, drainage density, topographic wetness index, slope, elevation, NDVI, soil type, and rainfall. Eight thematic layers were generated from the geographical database. All of the thematic layers and the resulting flood frequency map were combined to create the flood susceptibility map using a GIS platform. The compared result shows that prediction accuracy of AHP was close to flood susceptible zones of MIKE+. The application of the AHP and MIKE+ models assists in determining flood vulnerable zones and estimating potential risk areas. The results of the study will be useful to planners in design and updating of storm drainage network.
Get full access to this chapter
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Achilleos, G. A. (2011). The Inverse Distance Weighted interpolation method and error propagation mechanism - creating a DEM from an analogue topographical map. Journal of Spatial Science, 56(2), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2011.623348.
Bansal, N., Mukherjee, M., and Gairola, A. (2023). GIS ‑ based multi ‑ criteria decision analysis for mapping flood ‑ prone areas in Dehradun city, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11605-9.
Decision, R., and Made, M. (2014). BPMSG AHP Online System BPMSG ’ s AHP Online System. 53357427, 1–16.
DHI. (2020). MIKE URBAN + Collection System User Guide.
Gandhi, G. M., Parthiban, S., Thummalu, N., and Christy, A. (2015). Ndvi: Vegetation Change Detection Using Remote Sensing and Gis - A Case Study of Vellore District. Procedia Computer Science, 57(August), 1199–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.415.
Haghnazari, F., Shahgholi, H., and Feizi, M. (2015). Factors affecting the infiltration of agricultural soils: review. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR), 6(5), 21–35. http://www.innspub.net.
Goepel, K. D. 2018. (n.d.). AHP_Cal_GIS (p. 2018).
Goepel, K. D. (2018). Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). Submitted for consideration in International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process © 2018, Singapore Aug 2018.
Malczewski, J. (2000). On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: Common and best practice approaches. Transactions in GIS, 4(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00035.
Nsangou, D., Kpoumié, A., Mfonka, Z., Ngouh, A. N., Fossi, D. H., Jourdan, C., Mbele, H. Z., Mouncherou, O. F., Vandervaere, J. P., and Ndam Ngoupayou, J. R. (2022). Urban flood susceptibility modelling using AHP and GIS approach: case of the Mfoundi watershed at Yaoundé in the South-Cameroon plateau. Scientific African, 15, e01043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01043.
Oumaima, B., Yves, T., El Mehdi, S. M., Simon, G., and Frederic, L. (2019). Flood Hazard Mapping Using Two Digital Elevation Models: Application in a Semi-Arid Environment of Morocco. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 15(33), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n33p338.
Rajalakshmi, K., Murugan, D., Manish, T. I., Kumar, T. G., and Divya, C. S. (2013). Supervised Methods for Land Use Classification. International Journal of Research in Information Technology, 1(7), 64–73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320272021_Supervised_methods_for_land_use_classification.
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Saaty, T. L., and Hall, M. (2012). The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 175(July 2011), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6_2.
Thorndahl, S., and Schaarup-Jensen, K. (2007). Comparative analysis of uncertainties in urban surface runoff modelling. 6th International Conference on Sustainable Techniques and Strategies in Urban Water Management, June 25-28 2007, 1631–1638. http://vbn.aau.dk/files/44971436/Comparative_Analysis_of_Uncertainties_in_Urban_Surface_Runoff_Modelling_Abstract.pdf.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024
Pages: 659 - 672
History
Published online: May 16, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Business management
- Climates
- Comparative studies
- Decision making
- Engineering fundamentals
- Environmental engineering
- Floods
- Geomatics
- Hydraulic engineering
- Hydraulic structures
- Infrastructure
- Mapping
- Meteorology
- Methodology (by type)
- Practice and Profession
- Precipitation
- Research methods (by type)
- Storms
- Surveying methods
- Urban and regional development
- Urban areas
- Water and water resources
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.