Chapter
May 16, 2024

Assessing Flood Risk through GIS-Based Weighted Overlay and 1D Flood Simulation in Critical Sub-Catchment

Publication: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024

ABSTRACT

Urban flooding is the result of the increase in impervious areas and changes in rainfall patterns. The study can be based on flood simulation and mapping of the creeks to prevent urban floods. Flooding in a small area and catchment is not given high significance and is understudied. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the framework for the comparison of flood extent generated using the Personal Computer Storm Stormwater Management Model (PCSWMM), geographic information system (GIS)-based weighted overlay method, and compromise programming method (CPM) for identifying the potential flood risk zone. The primary comparison is among the flood risk extent from hydraulic modeling in PCSWMM and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) by applying nine flood conditioning factors in the GIS-based weighted overlay method. Later, the prioritized list developed from CPM is overlaid in the flood risk extent to identify the critical sub-catchments. As a result, the flood extent from the PCSWMM-based and GIS-based methods showed similarity in flood risk zones in the upstream and the mid-portion of the watershed. CPM identified the upstream and downstream as a high-risk zone of the watershed. The overlapped flood risk extents in the watershed and prioritized sub-catchments show the high and moderate flood risk zone with their similarities and differences, which are crucial for planning flood-resilient urban infrastructure since the limitation of one model could be overcome by the other.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Aryal, A., Acharya, A., and Kalra, A. (2022). Assessing the Implication of Climate Change to Forecast Future Flood Using CMIP6 Climate Projections and HEC-RAS Modeling. Forecasting, 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast4030032.
Aryal, A., Bhusal, A., and Kalra, A. (2023). Evaluating Dry and Wet Season Precipitation from Remotely Sensed Data Using Artificial Neural Networks for Floodplain Mapping in an Ungauged Watershed. Environmental Protection Research, 150–165. https://doi.org/10.37256/epr.3120232255.
Aydin, M. C., and Sevgi Birincioğlu, E. (2022). Flood risk analysis using gis-based analytical hierarchy process: A case study of Bitlis Province. Applied Water Science, 12(6), 122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01655-x.
Babaei, S., Ghazavi, R., and Erfanian, M. (2018). Urban flood simulation and prioritization of critical urban sub-catchments using SWMM model and PROMETHEE II approach. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 105, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2018.02.002.
Ben Khalfallah, C., and Saidi, S. (2018). Spatiotemporal floodplain mapping and prediction using HEC-RAS - GIS tools: Case of the Mejerda river, Tunisia. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 142, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.03.004.
Bhandari, R., Parajuli, R., Lamichhane, G. R., Alyami, A., Kalra, A., Ahmad, S., and Gupta, R. (2018). Utilizing Civil Geo-HECRAS Capabilities for Floodplain Mapping of Colorado River in Texas during Hurricane Harvey. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018, 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481400.036.
Bhandari, S., Jobe, A., Thakur, B., Kalra, A., and Ahmad, S. (2018). Flood Damage Reduction in Urban Areas with Use of Low Impact Development Designs. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481431.006.
Bhusal, A., Ghimire, A. B., Thakur, B., and Kalra, A. (2023). Evaluating the hydrological performance of integrating PCSWMM and NEXRAD precipitation product at different spatial scales of watersheds. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01741-2.
Bhusal, A., Parajuli, U., Regmi, S., and Kalra, A. (2022). Application of Machine Learning and Process-Based Models for Rainfall-Runoff Simulation in DuPage River Basin, Illinois. Hydrology, 9(7), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9070117.
Bisht, D. S., Chatterjee, C., Kalakoti, S., Upadhyay, P., Sahoo, M., and Panda, A. (2016). Modeling urban floods and drainage using SWMM and MIKE URBAN: A case study. Natural Hazards, 84(2), 749–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2455-1.
Bojovic, N., and Milenkovic, M. (2008). The best rail fleet mix problem. Operational Research, 8(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-008-0012-8.
Cook, A., and Merwade, V. (2009). Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. Journal of Hydrology, 377(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.015.
Duan, H.-F., Li, F., and Tao, T. (2016). Multi-objective Optimal Design of Detention Tanks in the Urban Stormwater Drainage System: Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis. Water Resources Management, 30(7), 2213–2226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1282-1.
Ekmekcioğlu, Ö., Koc, K., and Özger, M. (2021). District based flood risk assessment in Istanbul using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35(3), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01924-8.
Elkhrachy, I. (2015). Flash Flood Hazard Mapping Using Satellite Images and GIS Tools: A case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.06.007.
Feng, B., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Hall, B., and Zeng, C. (2020). Urban flood hazard mapping using a hydraulic–GIS combined model. Natural Hazards, 100(3), 1089–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03850-7.
Ghimire, A. B., Banjara, M., Bhusal, A., and Kalra, A. (2023). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices against Climate Induced Extreme Floods. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(8), 288–303.
Güneralp, B., Güneralp, İ., and Liu, Y. (2015). Changing global patterns of urban exposure to flood and drought hazards. Global Environmental Change, 31, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.002.
Joshi, N., Kalra, A., and Lamb, K. W. (2020). Land–Ocean–Atmosphere Influences on Groundwater Variability in the South Atlantic–Gulf Region. Hydrology, 7(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7040071.
Kalra, A., Joshi, N., Pokhrel, I., Nhuchhen Pradhan, S., Adhikari, P., Xia, C., and Gupta, R. (2021). Assessment of Floodplain Inundation Mapping of Davenport City in Iowa Using Civil Geo-HECRAS. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2021, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483466.017.
Kia, M. B., Pirasteh, S., Pradhan, B., Mahmud, A. R., Sulaiman, W. N. A., and Moradi, A. (2012). An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(1), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z.
Kron, W. (2005). Flood Risk = Hazard • Values • Vulnerability. Water International, 30(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060508691837.
Lager, J. A., Pyatt, E. E., and Shubinski, R. P. (1971). Storm water management model. Environmental Protection Agency.
Manchikatla, S. K., and Umamahesh, N. V. (2022). Simulation of flood hazard, prioritization of critical sub-catchments, and resilience study in an urban setting using PCSWMM: A case study. Water Policy, 24(8), 1247–1268. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.291.
Moustakis, Y., Papalexiou, S. M., Onof, C. J., and Paschalis, A. (2021). Seasonality, Intensity, and Duration of Rainfall Extremes Change in a Warmer Climate. Earth’s Future, 9(3), e2020EF001824. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001824.
Mukherjee, F., and Singh, D. (2020). Detecting flood prone areas in Harris County: A GIS based analysis. GeoJournal, 85(3), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-09984-2.
Omidi Arjenaki, M., Zarif Sanayei, H. R., and Heidarzadeh, H. (2020). Urban Surface Runoff Simulation and Prioritization of Critical Sub Catchments Using SWMM Model and TOPSIS Method (Case Study: Shahrekord City). Journal of Water and Wastewater; Ab va Fazilab (in Persian), 31(4), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2020.209846.2957.
Ouma, Y. O., and Tateishi, R. (2014). Urban Flood Vulnerability and Risk Mapping Using Integrated Multi-Parametric AHP and GIS: Methodological Overview and Case Study Assessment. Water, 6(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6061515.
Ozkan, S. P., and Tarhan, C. (2016). Detection of Flood Hazard in Urban Areas Using GIS: Izmir Case. Procedia Technology, 22, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.026.
Paprotny, D., Sebastian, A., Morales-Nápoles, O., and Jonkman, S. N. (2018). Trends in flood losses in Europe over the past 150 years. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04253-1.
Pathak, P., Kalra, A., and Ahmad, S. (2016). Analyzing Long-Term Changes in Precipitation and Temperature in the Midwest United States. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2016, 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479872.050.
Pathak, P., Kalra, A., and Ahmad, S. (2017). Temperature and precipitation changes in the Midwestern United States: Implications for water management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33(6), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2016.1238343.
Pathak, S., Liu, M., Jato-Espino, D., and Zevenbergen, C. (2020). Social, economic and environmental assessment of urban sub-catchment flood risks using a multi-criteria approach: A case study in Mumbai City, India. Journal of Hydrology, 591, 125216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125216.
Qi, W., Ma, C., Xu, H., Zhao, K., and Chen, Z. (2022). A comprehensive analysis method of spatial prioritization for urban flood management based on source tracking. Ecological Indicators, 135, 108565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108565.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
Shafapour Tehrany, M., Shabani, F., Neamah Jebur, M., Hong, H., Chen, W., and Xie, X. (2017). GIS-based spatial prediction of flood prone areas using standalone frequency ratio, logistic regression, weight of evidence and their ensemble techniques. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2), 1538–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1362038.
Shamsi, U. M. S., and Koran, J. (2017). Continuous Calibration. Journal of Water Management Modeling. https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.C414.
Sidek, L. M., Chua, L. H. C., Azizi, A. S. M., Basri, H., Jaafar, A. S., and Moon, W. C. (2021). Application of PCSWMM for the 1-D and 1-D–2-D Modeling of Urban Flooding in Damansara Catchment, Malaysia. Applied Sciences, 11(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199300.
Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., and Jebur, M. N. (2013). Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 504, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034.
Trenberth, K. E. (2011). Changes in precipitation with climate change. Climate Research, 47(1–2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953.
UNDRR, and CRED. (2020). The human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years (2000-2019). https://www.undrr.org/publication/human-cost-disasters-overview-last-20-years-2000-2019.
Villarini, G., Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., Marchok, T., and Vecchi, G. A. (2011). Characterization of rainfall distribution and flooding associated with U.S. landfalling tropical cyclones: Analyses of Hurricanes Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne (2004). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 116(D23). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016175.
Zhao, H., Yao, L., Mei, G., Liu, T., and Ning, Y. (2017). A Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method Based on AHP and Entropy for a Landslide Susceptibility Map. Entropy, 19(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19080396.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024
Pages: 57 - 70

History

Published online: May 16, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

1Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. Email: [email protected]
Utsav Parajuli [email protected]
2Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. Email: [email protected]
3Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. Email: [email protected]
Md. Sayeduzzaman Sarker [email protected]
4Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. Email: [email protected]
Abhiru Aryal [email protected]
5Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. Email: [email protected]
Bishal Poudel [email protected]
6Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Infrastructure Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$286.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$286.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share