Numerical Simulation of Post-Fire Debris Flow Hazards Using a Triggering-Propagation Model
Publication: Geo-Risk 2023
ABSTRACT
Due to a combination of mountainous terrain, Mediterranean climate, and frequent wildfire event, post-fire hazards are inevitable in Southern California. Quantifying the post-fire consequences of a burn event provides the foundation for risk analysis and hazard mitigation planning. This study aims to simulate the hazards after a fire in Montecito using a triggering-propagation model. The model considers varying surface material conditions and erosion effects, which can simulate the initiation and propagation processes of debris flows. The scheme and the parameters are evaluated by the debris-flow event in Montecito following the Thomas Fire. The simulated debris-flows depths basically coincide with the observed ones, which indicate that the model is reliable to be used to predict the post-fire debris flows. Bed erosion mainly occurs on the surface bed of burned areas, where the erosion depths are much larger than those on unburned areas. Wildfires increase the magnitude of erosion. The bed-erosion materials travelling down from hillsides enlarge the debris-flow intensity significantly. Surface-erosion runoff processes are by far the most predominant contributors to debris flows. Though the materials provided by slope failures are much smaller than that from erodible surface beds, the slope failure process still augments erosion entrainment. The entrainment from surface beds significantly increases when there is a sharp increase of slope failures. Once the materials are entrained by surface runoff, the flows gain mass quickly and descend along steep slopes and channels.
Get full access to this chapter
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
CDC (California Department of Conservation). (2018). Post-Fire Debris Flow Facts. https://www.conservation.ca.gov/index/Pages/Fact-sheets/Post-Fire-Debris-Flow-Facts.aspx California Natural Resources Agency, Government of California.
CAL-FIRE (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection). (2018). Thomas Fire - Watershed Emergency Response Team (WERT) Report. CA-VNC-103156, California Government, http://cdfdata.fire.ca.gov/incidents/incidents_details_info?incident_id=1922.
County of Santa Barbara Public Works. (2018). Available online: https://rain.cosbpw.net (accessed on June 2018).
Chen, H. X., and Zhang, L. M. (2015). EDDA: integrated simulation of debris flow erosion, deposition and property changes. Geoscientific Model Development 8:829–844.
County of Santa Barbara. (2018). Thomas Fire and 1/9 debris flow recovery strategic plan. available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/381185041/Santa-Barbara-County-Recovery-Strategic-Plan, last access: 8 June 2018.
Dietrich, W. E., Bellugi, D., and De Asua, R. R. (2001). Validation of the shallow landslide model, SHALSTAB, for forest management. Water science and Application 2:195–227.
Gao, L., Zhang, L. M., and Chen, H. X. (2015). Likely scenarios of natural terrain shallow slope failures on Hong Kong Island under extreme storms. Nat. Hazards Rev. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000207, B4015001.
Gao, L., Zhang, L. M., Chen, H. X., and Shen, P. (2016). Simulating debris flow mobility in urban settings. Engineering geology 214:67–78.
Jakob, M., and Hungr, O. (2005). Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena. Springer and Praxis Publishing Ltd, New York.
Jennings, C. W., Strand, R. G., and Rogers, T. H. (1977). Geologic map of California: California Division of Mines and Geology,.
Julien, P. Y., and Lan, Y. (1991). Rheology of hyperconcentrations. J. of Hydr. Eng. 117(3):346–353.
Kean, J. W., Staley, D. M., and Cannon, S. H. (2011). In situ measurements of post‐fire debris flows in southern California: Comparisons of the timing and magnitude of 24 debris‐flow events with rainfall and soil moisture conditions. J Geophys Res Earth Surface 116(F4).
NOAA‐USGS (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-United States Geological Survey) Debris Flow Task Force. (2005). NOAA‐USGS debris‐flow warning system-Final report, 47 pp.
Robichaud, P. R., Elliot, W. J., Pierson, F. B., Hall, D. E., Moffet, C. A., and Ashmun, L. E. (2007). Erosion Risk Management Tool (ERMiT) user manual (version 2006.01.18). Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Shen, P., Zhang, L. M., Chen, H. X., and Fan, R. (2018). EDDA 2.0: integrated simulation of debris flow initiation and dynamics considering two initiation mechanisms. Geoscientific Model Development, 11(7), 2841–2856.
Stancanelli, L. M., Peres, D. J., Cancelliere, A., and Foti, E. A. (2017). Combined triggering-propagation modeling approach for the assessment of rainfall induced debris flow susceptibility. J. hydrol. 550:130–143.
Staley, D. M., Kean, J. W., Cannon, S. H., Schmidt, K. M., and Laber, J. L. (2013). Objective definition of rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for the initiation of post-fire debris flows in southern California. Landslides, 10(5):547–562.
Takahashi, T. (2009). A review of Japanese debris flow research. Int. J. of Erosion Control Eng. 2(1):1–14.
USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers). (2000). Hydrologic Modeling System, HEC-HMS. US Army Corps of Engineers.
USGS. (2017). Thomas Fire (Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties, CA). https://landslides.usgs.gov/hazards/postfire_debrisflow/detail.php?objectid=178.
Yadegari, B. (2018). A House-by-House Damage Assessment of the Montecito Mudslides. https://www.independent.com/2018/01/14/house-by-house-damage-assessment-montecito-mudslides/ (29/Mar/2019) The Santa Barbara Independent.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Jul 20, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.