Chapter
Aug 28, 2019
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019

Correlation of Crime Rate with Transit Connectivity and Transit Demand at Census Block Group Level

Publication: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019: Innovation and Sustainability in Smart Mobility and Smart Cities

ABSTRACT

This study has developed an approach for evaluating existing transport network infrastructure in terms of connectivity, travel demand, and crime. An advantage of the methods described in this study is its relative simplicity and flexibility to generate resources to help inform decision-making and advocacy efforts with the goal of promoting equitable infrastructure investment that will help create healthy, dynamic, and livable communities for all. The analysis reveals that in some cases disparities exist with access to public transit infrastructure as Baltimore’s minority, low income, elderly, and youth populations have limited access to these facilities compared to others. As disparities may occur without intent, this approach may assist the city to evaluate their practices to ensure that inappropriate considerations do not affect their judgment. This study reveals that strategic investment in underserved neighborhoods hold promise for increasing access to jobs and opportunities, travel options, and an equitable distribution of infrastructure.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

Acevedo-Garcia, D., Lochner, K. A., Osypuk, T. L., and Subramanian, S. V. (2003). “Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach.” American journal of public health, 93 (2), 215-221.
Andres, L., Biller, D., and Dappe, M. H. (2016). “A Methodological Framework for Prioritising Infrastructure Investment.” Journal of Infrastructure Development, 8 (2), 111-127.
Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., and Omrani, H. (2011). “Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems.” Expert systems with Applications, 38 (10), 12270-12280.
Baltimore Metro Council. (2015). “The Transit Question: Baltimore Regional Transit Needs Assessment.”.
Brown, D., and Kiersz, A. (2018). “FBI data reveals some of the most violent cities in nearly every state.” Business Insider.
Chowdhury, K., Debsarkar, A., and Chakrabarty, S. (2015). “Novel methods for assessing urban air quality: Combined air and noise pollution approach.” J. Atmos. Pollut, 3 (1), 1-8.
Di, Wang. (2017). “The impact of mass transit on public security-a study of Bay Area Rapid Transit in San Francisco.” Transportation research procedia, 25, 3233-3252.
Edwards, R. (2018). “The 10 Safest and Most Dangerous Metro Cities in America of 2018.” Safewise Safety News.
Foth, N., Manaugh, K., and El-Geneidy, A. M. (2013). “Towards equitable transit: examining transit accessibility and social need in Toronto, Canada, 1996–2006.” Journal of transport geography, 29, 1-10.
Hananel, R., and Berechman, J. (2016). “Justice and transportation decision-making: The capabilities approach.” Transport Policy, 49, 78-85.
Jaffe, E. (2014). “The Myth That Mass Transit Attracts Crime Is Alive in Atlanta.” CityLab.
Kim, S., Ulfarsson, G. F., and Hennessy, J. T. (2007). “Analysis of light rail rider travel behavior: impacts of individual, built environment, and crime characteristics on transit access.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41 (6), 511-522.
Lambert, J. H., Wu, Y.-J., You, H., Clarens, A., and Smith, B. (2012). “Climate change influence on priority setting for transportation infrastructure assets.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 19 (1), 36-46.
Liggett, R., Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and Iseki, H. (2003). “Journeys to crime: Assessing the effects of a light rail line on crime in the neighborhoods.”
Litman, T. (2014). “Evaluating public transportation local funding options.” Journal of Public Transportation, 17 (1), 3.
Marcelo, D., Mandri-Perrott, C., House, S., and Schwartz, J. (2015). “Prioritization of infrastructure projects: A decision support framework.” World, 1.
McConville, M. (2013). “Creating equitable, healthy, and sustainable communities: Strategies for advancing smart growth, environmental justice, and equitable development.”
Neiss, M. (2015). “Does Public Transit Affect Crime? The Addition of a Bus Line in Cleveland.” The Journal of Economics and Politics, 22 (1), 3.
Park, J.-S., and Gang, S.-C. (2010). “A model for evaluating the connectivity of multimodal transit networks.” Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, 28 (3), 85-98.
Phillips, D. C., and Sandler, D. (2015). “Does public transit spread crime? Evidence from temporary rail station closures.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 52, 13-26.
Rector, K. (2018). “Baltimore has now had 343 homicides in 2017, sets record for killings per capita.” Baltimore Sun.
Šelih, J., Kne, A., Srdić, A., and Žura, M. (2008). “Multiple-criteria decision support system in highway infrastructure management.” Transport, 23 (4), 299-305.
Shelton, J., and Medina, M. (2010). “Integrated multiple-criteria decision-making method to prioritize transportation projects.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (2174), 51-57.
Sypion-Dutkowska, N., and Leitner, M. (2017). “Land use influencing the spatial distribution of urban crime: A case study of Szczecin, Poland.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6 (3), 74.
Thiel, T. (2006). “A proposal of defining participant preferences in a decision aiding process with the participant representing a collective body.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 12 (3), 257-262.
Twinam, T. (2017). “Danger zone: Land use and the geography of neighborhood crime.” Journal of Urban Economics, 100, 104-119.
Williams, D. R., and Collins, C. (2001). “Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health.” Public health reports, 116 (5), 404.
Willits, D., Broidy, L., Gonzales, A., and Denman, K. (2011). Place and neighborhood crime: Examining the relationship between schools, churches, and alcohol related establishments and crime, Citeseer.
Yi, D. (2018). “Crime and Transit: What’s the Real Story?” Central Maryland Transportation Alliance.
Zelalem, Y., Smith, J., Glas, M. M., Greenlee, A., Vanik, L., Bowman, K., Born, A., Kawamura, K., and Dieber, W. M. (2009). “Transit Equity Matters: An Equity Index and Regional Analysis of the Red Line and Two Other Proposed CTA Transit Extensions.”
Zukerman, B. (2013). “Criminal Activity and Access to Rail Transit: An Examination of the Relationship in Chicago.” Unpublished B. Sc. Thesis, University of Orego.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019
International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019: Innovation and Sustainability in Smart Mobility and Smart Cities
Pages: 158 - 170
Editor: David A. Noyce, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin–Madison
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8258-2

History

Published online: Aug 28, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Snehanshu Banerjee [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies, Morgan State Univ., 1700 E. Cold Spring Ln., Baltimore, MD 21214, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Istiak Bhuyan [email protected]
D.Eng. Student, Dept. of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies, Morgan State Univ., 1700 E. Cold Spring Ln., Baltimore, MD 21214, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$80.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share