Chapter
May 31, 2018
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018

Numerical Investigation of the Effect of River Modeling Parameters on Bed Shear Stress

Publication: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018: Hydraulics and Waterways, Water Distribution Systems Analysis, and Smart Water

ABSTRACT

In the design of stream restorations, boundary shear stress (shear stress) during high flow events is one of the key parameters in the assessment of the risk of morphological failure associated with channel bed and bank erosion and sediment transport. The use of two-dimensional hydrodynamic models (2D models) is becoming more common to estimate shear stress for stream restorations. These models can provide detailed distribution of shear stress over channels and floodplain surfaces. Obtaining accurate and reliable estimates of stress requires an accurate digital terrain model, estimates of input flows, and surface roughness coefficients. Impediments to the use of these models include the cost associated with extensively detailed terrain surveys, distributed information about the roughness coefficients, and the determination of appropriate flow conditions that must be modeled to identify erosion susceptible components. In the present research, the two-dimensional hydrodynamic model TUFLOW is employed to assess the sensitivity of shear stress to flow magnitude, upstream extent of the model, and roughness coefficients. Topography and hydraulic data obtained from monitoring efforts of the restored channel and floodplain of Slabcamp Creek located in Rowan County, Kentucky, was used to develop and calibrate the 2D model. Flow magnitude, the location of the upstream inflow boundary condition, and the roughness coefficients were varied to determine the sensitivity of the shear stress at a critical location in the restoration. The shear stress analysis was conducted along cross sections located in areas identified as being potentially at risk for high shear stress. The shear stress distribution was found to be relatively insensitive to the location of the upstream boundary condition and most sensitive to the flow and roughness coefficients of the floodplain. An interesting observation was that the shear stress in the channel decreased with the increased roughness of the floodplain.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCE

1.
O. E. Sala, F. Stuart Chapin, III, J. J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L. F. Huenneke, R. B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D. M. Lodge, H. A. Mooney, M.N. Oesterheld, N. L. Poff, M. T. Sykes, B. H. Walker, M. Walker, D. H. Wall, Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100, Science 287(5459) (2000) 1770–1774.
2.
J. B. Kauffman, R. L. Beschta, N. Otting, D. Lytjen, An Ecological Perspective of Riparian and Stream Restoration in the Western United States, Fisheries 22(5) (1997) 12–24.
3.
A. G. Brown, Learning from the past: palaeohydrology and palaeoecology, Freshwater Biology 47(4) (2002) 817–829.
4.
S. J. Bennett, A. Simon, J. M. Castro, J. F. Atkinson, C. E. Bronner, S. S. Blersch, A. J. Rabideau, The Evolving Science of Stream Restoration, Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems, American Geophysical Union 2013, pp. 1–8.
5.
M. A. Palmer, E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. N. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah, D. L. Galat, S. G. Loss, P. Goodwin, D. D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G. M. Kondolf, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T. K. O'Donnell, L. Pagano, E. Sudduth, Standards for ecologically successful river restoration, Journal of Applied Ecology 42(2) (2005) 208–217.
6.
E. S. Bernhardt, M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S. Katz, G. M. Kondolf, P. S. Lake, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T. K. O'Donnell, L. Pagano, B. Powell, E. Sudduth, Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts, Science 308(5722) (2005) 636–637.
7.
D. Dudgeon, A. H. Arthington, M. O. Gessner, Z. Kawabata, D. J. Knowler, C. Leveque, R. J. Naiman, A. H. Prieur-Richard, D. Soto, M. L. Stiassny, C. A. Sullivan, Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81(2) (2006) 163–82.
8.
G. M. Kondolf, Five Elements for Effective Evaluation of Stream Restoration, Restoration Ecology 3(2) (1995) 133–136.
9.
C. A. Frissell, R. K. Nawa, Incidence and Causes of Physical Failure of Artificial Habitat Structures in Streams of Western Oregon and Washington, North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12(1) (1992) 182–197.
10.
G. M. Kondolf, M. W. Smeltzer, S. F. Railsback, Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream, Environmental management 28(6) (2001) 761–76.
11.
D. Harper, Watershed Restoration: Principles and Practices. Edited by J. E. Williams, C. A. Wood and M. P. Dombeck, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9(1) (1999) 122–123.
12.
J. R. Miller, R. Craig Kochel, Assessment of channel dynamics, in-stream structures and post-project channel adjustments in North Carolina and its implications to effective stream restoration, Environmental Earth Sciences 59(8) (2010) 1681–1692.
13.
P. A. Johnson, E. R. Brown, INCORPORATING UNCERTAINTY IN THE DESIGN OF STREAM CHMNEL MODIFICATIONS1, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37(5) (2001) 1225–1236.
14.
B. P. Buchanan, M. T. Walter, G. N. Nagle, R. L. Schneider, Monitoring and assessment of a river restoration project in central New York, River Research and Applications 28(2) (2012) 216–233.
15.
L. B. Leopold, M. G. Wolman, J. P. Miller, Fluvial processes in geomorphology, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY, 1964.
16.
J. Arthur C. Parola, Michael A. Croasdaile, W. S. V. Ward Oberholtzer, Storing Sediment in a Coastal Plain Valley Plug: Obion Creek Stream Restoration, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 2008.
17.
G. S. Stelling, On the construction of computational methods for shallow water flow problems, Applied Sciences, Netherlands:, 1983.
18.
N. M. Hunter, P. D. Bates, M. S. Horritt, M. D. Wilson, Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review, Geomorphology 90(3) (2007) 208–225.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018: Hydraulics and Waterways, Water Distribution Systems Analysis, and Smart Water
Pages: 169 - 175
Editor: Sri Kamojjala, Las Vegas Valley Water District
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8142-4

History

Published online: May 31, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fereshteh Noorbakhsh [email protected]
Stream Institute, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292. E-mail: [email protected].
Arthur C. Parola [email protected]
P.E.
Stream Institute, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292. E-mail: [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$96.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$96.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share