Technical Papers
Mar 12, 2021

Development of a New Practical Formula for Pipe-Sizing Problems within the Framework of a Hybrid Computational Strategy

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 5

Abstract

A hybrid programming methodology was proposed to derive a simple empirical formulation for the estimation of the required pipe diameter in the sizing problems (Type 3) of pipe distribution systems. The model was derived based on multiple regression-based analysis using the Richardson’s extrapolation approach and the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm with double precision. The proposed formulation was developed using a total of 300,000 different data points within the framework of MATLAB and DataFit scientific software. The application of the model was explored for a wide range of five fundamental pipeline design variables [absolute roughness of the pipe wall (ε=09  mm), water temperature (T=5°C100°C), pipe length (L=5500  m), flow rate (Q=0.011  m3/s), and head loss (Δh=130  m)] and tested against a total of 10,000 additional computational scenarios and the available models reported in the literature. The uncertainty prediction of the proposed formula was quantified and compared with those of existing prediction models. For the new empirical equation, the mean prediction errors between the estimated and the theoretical diameter values (calculated from the numerical solution of the Colebrook–White equation) were significantly smaller than those of existing models. Moreover, the narrowest uncertainty bands, the lowest 95% confidence prediction error intervals, and the lowest amounts of expanded uncertainty (U95) were achieved for the proposed model. Other statistics (e.g., mean absolute relative error, absolute relative error, coefficient of variation of root mean squared error, determination coefficient) also corroborated that the proposed empirical model produced realistic estimations that were superior to those obtained from other well-known explicit models in the literature. The findings of this study concluded that the computational analysis yielded a simple mathematical structure to be easily and accurately used for educational and practical purposes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research has been financially supported by the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA) as a part of Prof. Dr. Kaan Yetilmezsoy’s 2018 “Outstanding Young Scientist Award (TÜBA-GEBİP).”

References

Apsley, D. 2013. “Topic T2: Flow in pipes and channels.” Accessed March 24, 2020. https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/david.d.Apsley/lectures/hydraulics2/t2.pdf.
ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers). 2002. Measurement of energy demand and savings. Atlanta: ASHRAE.
Babajimopoulos, C., and G. Terzidis. 2013. “Accurate explicit equations for the determination of pipe diameters.” Int. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2 (5): 115–120. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijhe.20130205.05.
Barry, J. D. 2008. “Eliminate iteration from flow problems. Fluids and solids handling.” Accessed March 22, 2020. https://www.asu.edu/courses/che331/elim_iteration.pdf.
Bombardelli, F. A., and M. H. García. 2003. “Hydraulic design of large-diameter pipes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 129 (11): 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:11(839).
Brkić, D. 2011. “New explicit correlations for turbulent flow friction factor.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 241 (9): 4055–4059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.07.042.
Çengel, Y. A., and J. M. Cimbala. 2014. Fluid mechanics fundamentals and applications. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Churchill, S. W. 1977. “Friction-factor equation spans all fluid-flow regimes.” Chem. Eng. 84 (24): 91–92.
Clamond, D. 2009. “Efficient resolution of the Colebrook equation.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48 (7): 3665–3671. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801626g.
Colebrook, C. F. 1939. “Turbulent flow in pipes, with particular reference to the transition region between the smooth and rough pipe laws.” J. Inst. Civ. Eng. 11 (4): 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijoti.1939.13150.
Colebrook, C. F., and C. M. White. 1937. “Experiments with fluid friction in roughened pipes.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 161 (904): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1937.0150.
Diniz, V. E. M. G., and P. A. Souza. 2009. “Four explicit formulae for friction factor calculations in pipe flow.” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 125: 369–380. https://doi.org/10.2495/WRM090331.
Elmazoghi, H. G. 2013. “Fuzzy algorithm for estimating average breach widths of embankment dams.” Nat. Hazards 68 (2): 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0350-y.
Ergil, M. 2020. “Frictional losses in completely developed pressurized pipe flowing full.” Accessed March 24, 2020. https://staff.emu.edu.tr/_layouts/download.aspx?SourceUrl=/mustafaergil/Documents/courses/CIVL332/2019-2020/LECTURE-2.pdf.
Fan, J., L. Wu, F. Zhang, H. Cai, W. Zeng, X. Wang, and H. Zou. 2019. “Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 100 (Feb): 186–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.018.
Fang, X., Y. Xu, and Z. Zhou. 2011. “New correlations of single-phase friction factor for turbulent pipe flow and evaluation of existing single-phase friction factor correlations.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 241 (3): 897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.12.019.
Ghabayen, S. M. S., and M. Abualtayef. 2012. “Water flow in pipes.” Accessed March 24, 2020. http://site.iugaza.edu.ps/sghabayen/files/2012/02/ch3-modified.pdf.
Giustolisi, O., L. Berardi, and T. M. Walski. 2011. “Some explicit formulations of Colebrook–White friction factor considering accuracy vs. computational speed.” J. Hydroinf. 13 (3): 401–418. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2010.098.
Giustolisi, O., and D. A. Savic. 2006. “A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression.” J. Hydroinf. 8 (3): 207–222. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2006.020b.
Haaland, S. E. 1983. “Simple and explicit formulas for the friction factor in turbulent pipe flow.” J. Fluids Eng. 105 (1): 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3240948.
Hewings, G. J. D., S. Changnon, and C. Dridi. 2002. Testing for the significance of extreme weather and climate event on the state economies. Urbana, IL: Regional Economics Application Laboratory.
Hoeft, C., et al. 2009. “Hydraulics.” Chap. 3 in Engineering field handbook, Part 650. Fort Worth, TX: National Resource Conservation Service.
Jain, A. K. 1976. “Accurate explicit equation for friction factor.” J. Hydraul. Div. 102 (5): 674–677. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0004544.
Javadian, H., M. Ghasemi, M. Ruiz, A. M. Sastre, S. M. H. Asl, and M. Masomi. 2018. “Fuzzy logic modeling of Pb (II) sorption onto mesoporous NiO/ZnCl2-Rosa Canina-L seeds activated carbon nanocomposite prepared by ultrasound-assisted co-precipitation technique.” Ultrason. Sonochem. 40 (Part A): 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.08.022.
Karbasi, M. 2016. “Estimation of classical hydraulic jump length using teaching–learning based optimization algorithm.” J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 7 (8): 2947–2954.
Li, P., J. E. Seem, and Y. Li. 2011. “A new explicit equation for accurate friction factor calculation of smooth pipes.” Int. J. Refrig. 34 (6): 1535–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2011.03.018.
Martinez, W. L., and A. R. Martinez. 2002. Computational statistics handbook with MATLAB®. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
Medina, Y. C., O. M. Fonticiella, and O. F. Morales. 2017. “Design and modelation of piping systems by means of use friction factor in the transition turbulent zone.” Math. Modell. Eng. Probl. 4 (4): 162–167. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.040404.
Moody, L. F. 1944. “Friction factors for pipe flow.” Trans ASME 66 (Nov): 671–684.
Moody, L. F. 1947. “An approximate formula for pipe friction factors.” Trans ASME 69 (12): 1005–1011.
Najafzadeh, M. 2019. “Evaluation of conjugate depths of hydraulic jump in circular pipes using evolutionary computing.” Soft Comput. 23 (24): 13375–13391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03877-9.
Najafzadeh, M., M. Rezaie Balf, and E. Rashedi. 2016. “Prediction of maximum scour depth around piers with debris accumulation using EPR, MT, and GEP models.” J. Hydroinf. 18 (5): 867–884. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2016.212.
Najafzadeh, M., J. Shiri, G. Sadeghi, and A. Ghaemi. 2018. “Prediction of the friction factor in pipes using model tree.” ISH J. Hydraul. Eng. 24 (1): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2017.1333926.
Nasr, M. S., M. A. Moustafa, H. A. Seif, and G. El Kobrosy. 2012. “Application of artificial neural network (ANN) for the prediction of EL-AGAMY wastewater treatment plant performance-EGYPT.” Alexandria Eng. J. 51 (1): 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.07.005.
Özger, M., and G. Yıldırım. 2009. “Determining turbulent flow friction coefficient using adaptive neuro-fuzzy computing technique.” Adv. Eng. Software 40 (4): 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.04.006.
Saberi-Movahed, F., M. Najafzadeh, and A. Mehrpooya. 2020. “Receiving more accurate predictions for longitudinal dispersion coefficients in water pipelines: Training group method of data handling using extreme learning machine conceptions.” Water Resour. Manage. 34 (2): 529–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02463-w.
Sakkas, J. G. 2014. “Generalized numerical and nomographic solutions of simple pipe flow problems.” Water Util. J. 7: 51–64.
Salmasi, F., R. Khatibi, and M. A. Ghorbani. 2012. “A study of friction factor formulation in pipes using artificial intelligence techniques and explicit equations.” Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 36 (2): 121–138. https://doi.org/10.3906/muh-1008-30.
Sattar, A. M., and B. Gharabaghi. 2015. “Gene expression models for prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficient in streams.” J. Hydrol. 524 (May): 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.016.
Schumack, M. 2004. “Solution of complex pipe flow problems using spreadsheets in an introductory fluid mechanics course.” In Proc., 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf.& Exposition, Session 3666, 1–13. Salt Lake City, UT: American Society for Engineering Education.
Senturk, A. 2009. “Hydraulics, pipe flow.” Accessed March 24, 2020. http://web.iku.edu.tr/∼asenturk/Pipe%20I.pdf.
Shamshirband, S., E. Jafari Nodoushan, J. E. Adolf, A. Abdul Manaf, A. Mosavi, and K. W. Chau. 2019. “Ensemble models with uncertainty analysis for multi-day ahead forecasting of chlorophyll a concentration in coastal waters.” Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 13 (1): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1553742.
Sharma, K., N. Derlon, S. Hu, and Z. Yuan. 2014. “Modeling the pH effect on sulfidogenesis in anaerobic sewer biofilm.” Water Res. 49 (Feb): 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.019.
Siddique, M. 2015. “Fluid mechanics, losses in pipes dynamics of viscous flows.” Accessed March 24, 2020. https://www.slideshare.net/yourmohsin/fluid-mechanicslosses-in-pipes-dynamics-of-viscous-flows.
Singh, K. P., N. Basant, A. Malik, and G. Jain. 2010. “Modeling the performance of ‘up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket’ reactor based wastewater treatment plant using linear and nonlinear approaches—A case study.” Anal. Chim. Acta 658 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.001.
Sonnad, J. R., and C. T. Goudar. 2006. “Turbulent flow friction factor calculation using a mathematically exact alternative to the Colebrook–White equation.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 132 (8): 863–867. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:8(863).
Subramanian, R. S. 2011. “Pipe flow calculations.” Accessed March 24, 2020. https://web2.clarkson.edu/projects/subramanian/ch301/index.html.
Swamee, P. K., and A. K. Jain. 1976. “Explicit equations for pipe-flow problems.” J. Hydraul. Div. 102 (5): 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0004542.
Swamee, P. K., and P. N. Rathie. 2007. “Exact equations for pipe-flow problems.” J. Hydraul. Res. 45 (1): 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521752.
Swamee, P. K., and N. Swamee. 2007. “Full-range pipe-flow equations.” J. Hydraul. Res. 45 (6): 841–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521821.
Valiantzas, J. D. 2008. “Explicit power formula for the Darcy–Weisbach pipe flow equation: Application in optimal pipeline design.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 134 (4): 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:4(454).
Yetilmezsoy, K. 2006. “Determination of optimum body diameter of air cyclones using a new empirical model and a neural network approach.” Environ. Eng. Sci. 23 (4): 680–690. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.23.680.
Yetilmezsoy, K. 2012. “Composite desirability function-based empirical modeling for packed tower design in physical ammonia absorption.” Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 7 (6): 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.635.
Yetilmezsoy, K. 2016. “A new simple model for the prediction of waste sludge flow rate in the steady-state completely mixed activated sludge process.” Environ. Eng. Manage. J. 15 (12): 2613–2630. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2016.288.
Yetilmezsoy, K. 2017a. “A benchmarking of competing bio-objective functions for multiresponse optimization of UASB system in pretreatment of poultry manure slurry.” Int. J. Multiscale Comput. Eng. 15 (6): 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2017021137.
Yetilmezsoy, K. 2017b. “IMECE—Implementation of mathematical, experimental, and computer-based education: A special application of fluid mechanics for civil and environmental engineering students.” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 25 (5): 833–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21871.
Yetilmezsoy, K. 2017c. “New explicit equations for estimation of aeration-related parameters in steady-state completely mixed activated sludge process.” Global Nest J. 19 (1): 140–159. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.002047.
Yetilmezsoy, K. 2020. “Introduction of explicit equations for the estimation of surface tension, specific weight, and kinematic viscosity of water as a function of temperature.” Fluid Mech. Res. Int. J. 4 (1): 7–13. https://doi.org/10.15406/fmrij.2020.04.00057.
Yetilmezsoy, K., and S. A. Abdul-Wahab. 2012. “A prognostic approach based on fuzzy-logic methodology to forecast PM10 levels in Khaldiya residential area, Kuwait.” Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 12 (6): 1217–1236. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.07.0163.
Yetilmezsoy, K., and S. A. Abdul-Wahab. 2014. “A composite desirability function-based modeling approach in predicting mass condensate flux of condenser in seawater greenhouse.” Desalination 344 (Jul): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.029.
Yetilmezsoy, K., S. Demirel, and R. J. Vanderbei. 2009. “Response surface modeling of Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution by Pistacia vera L.: Box–Behnken experimental design.” J. Hazard. Mater. 171 (1–3): 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.035.
Yetilmezsoy, K., F. Ilhan, E. Kocak, and H. M. Akbin. 2017. “Feasibility of struvite recovery process for fertilizer industry: A study of financial and economic analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 152 (May): 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.106.
Yıldırım, G., and M. Özger. 2009. “Neuro-fuzzy approach in estimating Hazen–Williams friction coefficient for small-diameter polyethylene pipes.” Adv. Eng. Software 40 (8): 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.11.001.
Yıldırım, G., and V. P. Singh. 2010. “A MathCAD procedure for commercial pipeline hydraulic design considering local energy losses.” Adv. Eng. Software 41 (3): 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.10.007.
Yoo, D. H., and V. P. Singh. 2005. “Two methods for the computation of commercial pipe friction factors.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 131 (8): 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:8(694).
Zeyu, Z., C. Junrui, L. Zhanbin, X. Zengguang, and L. Peng. 2020. “Approximations of the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor in a vertical pipe with full flow regime.” Water Supply 20 (4): 1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.048.
Zigrang, D. J., and N. D. Sylvester. 1982. “Explicit approximations to the solution of Colebrook’s friction factor equation.” AIChE J. 28 (3): 514–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690280323.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 147Issue 5May 2021

History

Received: Jun 19, 2020
Accepted: Dec 11, 2020
Published online: Mar 12, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 12, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical Univ., Davutpasa Campus, 34220 Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1478-9957. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Majid Bahramian [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical Univ., Davutpasa Campus, 34220 Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Emel Kıyan [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical Univ., Davutpasa Campus, 34220 Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Mojtaba Bahramian [email protected]
Technical Supervisor, Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade, Tabriz, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share