Free access
Corrections
Oct 23, 2020

Erratum for “National Municipal Solid Waste Energy and Global Warming Potential Inventory: India” by Ankur Choudhary, Ashish Kumar, and Sudhir Kumar

You are viewing the correction.
VIEW THE CORRECTED ARTICLE
Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 25, Issue 1
In this technical note, we used the data for municipal solid waste (MSW) for the year 2015–2016 but by mistake wrote it as 2005–2006. In view of that error, the following corrections should be noted:
In the column headings of Table 1:
1.
“MSW generation (2005−2006)” should be “MSW generation (2015−2016)”;
2.
“MSW generation (2030)” should be “MSW generation (2040)”;
3.
“Waste to energy potential in 2020 (MW)” should be “Waste to energy potential in 2030 (MW)”; and
4.
“Waste to energy potential in 2030 (MW)” should be “Waste to energy potential in 2040 (MW).”
In Table 2, the column headings 2020, 2025, and 2030 should be 2030, 2035, and 2040, respectively.
Throughout the technical note, year(s)/duration 2005–2030, 2020, 2025, and 2030 should be 2015–2040, 2030, 2035, and 2040, respectively.
Throughout the technical note, CPCB (2005) should be CPCB (2015).
The x-axis of Fig. 2 is modified by changing the scale of years. However, there is no change in the data and pattern.
Fig. 2. (a) Temporal distribution of methane emissions; and (b) GWP of India.
Table 1. State-wise municipal solid waste generation scenario and parameter used in various models
StatesMSW generation (2015–2016)aPer year growth in MSW (%)MSW generation (2040)No. of landfills in operation (2015–2016)aDOCMCFL0 (m3/Mg)k (year−1)Waste to energy potential in 2030 (MW)Waste to energy potential in 2040 (MW)
Andaman Nicobar7082100.40.1020.81.4
Andhra Pradesh6,44006,44020.1120.831.70.03815.421.7
Arunachal Pradesh1318.27200.1380.458.20.0970.20.5
Assam7,920−8.67,92000.1380.458.20.09660.872.4
Bihar1,67001,67000.1280.441.20.0455.88.1
Chandigarh370−2.137010.1180.831.30.0210.50.8
Chhattisgarh2,24512.99,25700.1500.461.60.05125.448.5
Daman Diu8521.45410.40.0741.52.9
Delhi9,6202.716,17340.1280.833.70.02118.531.4
Goa450−1.045060.1570.863.10.0983.84.5
Gujrat10,4805.023,60330.1300.837.70.04144.075.4
Haryana4,837109.98137,841100.80.021113.2288.0
Himachal Pradesh276−0.22760.1940.470.60.0321.31.9
Jharkhand3,57021.722,98500.40.04745.795.0
Jammu and Kashmir1,63401,63420.1240.848.00.0507.29.7
Karnataka8,8427.024,3761340.1370.846.00.03847.586.1
Kerala1,339−16.31,3390.1410.452.10.0959.110.9
Nagaland3448.71,0940.1380.458.20.0653.76.5
Lakshadweep210210.40.0650.10.2
Madhya Pradesh6,6782.510,9740.1520.444.40.03525.340.8
Maharashtra21,8677.965,22750.1470.841.50.037107.0198.0
Manipur17611.16660.1380.458.20.0662.13.9
Mizoram55217.65520.1380.458.20.1334.85.4
Meghalaya187−1.118700.138158.20.0961.41.7
Orissa2,5741.93,84400.1280.483.70.05323.535.1
Punjab4,4568.513,99300.1120.436.00.02514.628.2
Puducherry5136.01,28910.1810.895.50.0415.710.0
Rajasthan5,03705,0370.1330.440.90.02611.417.0
Sikkim494.01040.1380.458.20.0950.50.8
Tamilnadu2303.241600.1370.439.80.0410.91.5
Telangana6,6283.011,59910.136140.40.03623.738.8
Tripura4142.668410.1440.893.50.1166.89.2
Uttrakhand9176.92,50800.1360.497.70.05713.823.8
Uttar Pradesh15,19213.164,99090.1280.839.10.03074.3150.9
West Bengal9,500−6.19,5000.1390.444.20.06043.056.2
Total/average135,196+6.7447,8491790.1390.654.10.0587641,387
a
Source: Data from CPCB (2015).
Table 2. Economic and environmental benefits of methane produced from Indian MSW
Parameter203020352040
Methane potential (Gg)a1,0841,5111,969
GWP CO2 eq (Gg)a36,59950,98966,443
Revenue from carbon credit (million USD)b483673877
Equivalent electricity generation (GW h)c6,6929,32412,150
Equivalent electricity generation (MW)c,d305425554
Revenue from electricity sale (billion USD)e478666867
a
Estimated using LandGEMSSV.
b
USD 13.2/t of equivalent emission.
c
Based on the methane calorific value 55,530 kJ/kg.
d
Calculated assuming 40% efficiency of LFG.
e
Price of electricity 1 kW h/5 INR and assuming 1 USD = 70 INR.
The correct versions of Tables 1 and 2 and Fig. 2 are provided herein. The main discussion/conclusion regarding the quantity of waste generation, emissions, and global warming potential (GWP) remains unaffected.

References

CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board). 2005. Status report on municipal solid waste management. New Delhi, India: CPCB.
CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board). 2015. The national action plan for municipal solid waste management. New Delhi, India: CPCB.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 25Issue 1January 2021

History

Received: Jun 4, 2020
Accepted: Aug 3, 2020
Published online: Oct 23, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 23, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Jaypee Univ. of Information Technology, Waknaghat, Solan, Himachal Pradesh 173234, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6202-6714. Email: [email protected]
Ashish Kumar [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Jaypee Univ. of Information Technology, Waknaghat, Solan, Himachal Pradesh 173234, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Sudhir Kumar [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Jaypee Univ. of Information Technology, Waknaghat, Solan, Himachal Pradesh 173234, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share