Technical Papers
May 4, 2015

Comparing CPT and Vs Liquefaction Triggering Methods

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 9

Abstract

Significant developments have taken place over the past 20 years to evaluate the liquefaction potential of soils using in situ tests. The cone penetration test (CPT) is now commonly used to evaluate liquefaction potential in soils. There have also been significant developments to evaluate liquefaction potential based on in situ shear wave velocity (Vs) measurements. Liquefaction methods base on shear wave velocity have the advantage that they are essentially independent of soil characteristics, such as fines content, but often lack the stratigraphic detail obtained using the CPT. Liquefaction methods based on the CPT have the advantage of continuous, repeatable measurements but require corrections based on soil characteristics that can be significant in soils with high fines content. Comparing the most recent Vs-based method with a CPT-based method provides an independent evaluation of the associated corrections applied to the CPT-based method. This paper compares the current Vs-based method with a specific CPT-based method from the literature to evaluate the associated CPT-based corrections. The paper also examines the advantage of using both CPT and Vs measurements (e.g., using the seismic CPT) to evaluate liquefaction potential.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research could not have been carried out without the support, encouragement and input from John Gregg, Kelly Cabal and other staff at Gregg Drilling and Testing Inc. The author would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers that provide valuable comments and advice.

References

Andrus, R. D., Hayati, H., and Mohanan, N. P. (2009). “Correcting liquefaction resistance of aged sands using measured to estimated velocity ratio.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 735–744.
Andrus, R. D., Mohanan, N. P., Piratheepan, P., Ellis, B. S., and Holzer, T. L. (2007). “Predicting shear-wave velocity from cone penetration resistance.” Proc., Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering—Conf., K. D. Pitilakis, ed., Springer, Netherlands.
Andrus, R. D., Piratheepan, P., Ellis, B. S., Zhang, J., and Juang, C. H. (2004). “Comparing liquefaction evaluation methods using penetration-Vs relationships.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 24(9–10), 713–721.
Andrus, R. D., and Stokoe, K. H. I. I. (2000). “Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1015–1025.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2014). “CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures.”, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, 138.
Boulanger, R. W., Mejia, L. H., and Idriss, I. M. (1997). “Liquefaction at moss landing during Loma Prieta earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 453–467.
Cuccovillo, T., and Coop, M. R. (1997). “Yielding and pre-failure deformation of structured sands.” Geotechnique, 47(3), 491–508.
Dobry, R., Ladd, R. S., Yokel, F. Y., Chung, R. M., and Powell, D. (1982). “Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquake by the cyclic strain method.” National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD.
Dusseault, M. B., and Morgenstern, N. R. (1979). “Locked sands.” J. Eng. Geol., 12(2), 117–131.
Eslaamizaad, S., and Robertson, P. K. (1996). “Seismic cone penetration test to identify cemented sands.” Proc. 49th Canadian Geotechnical Conf., St John’s, Newfoundland, Canadian Geotechnical Society (CGS), 1, 352–360.
Fahey, M., Lehane, B. M., and Stewart, D. (2003). “Soil stiffness for shallow foundation design in Perth CBD.” Aust. Geomech. J., 38(3), 61–89.
Goto, S., Suzuki, Y., Nishio, S., and Ohoka, H. (1992). “Mechanical properties of undisturbed Tone-River gravel obtained by in-situ freezing method.” Soils Found., 32(3), 15–25.
Hatanaka, M., and Uchida, A. (1995). “Effects of test methods on the cyclic deformation characteristics of high quality undisturbed gravel samples.” Proc., ASCE, 136–151.
Hayati, H., and Andrus, R. D. (2009). “Updated liquefaction resistance correction factors for aged sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1683–1692.
Idriss, I. M., and Boulanger, R. W. (2008). “Soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 261.
Kayen, R., et al. (2013). “Shear-wave velocity-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 407–419.
Ku, C.-S., Juang, C. H., Chang, C.-W., and Ching, J. (2012). “Probabilistic version of the Robertson and Wride method for liquefaction evaluation: Development and application.” Can. Geotech. J., 49(1), 27–44.
Leroueil, S., and Hight, D. W. (2003). “Behavior and properties of natural soils and soft rocks.” Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils, Tan, et al., eds., Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, 229–253.
Maki, I. P., Boulanger, R. W., DeJong, M., and Jaeger, R. A. (2014). “State-based overburden normalization of cone penetration resistance in clean sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04013006.
Mayne, P. W. (2014). “Interpretation of geotechnical parameters from seismic piezocone tests.” 3rd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT14, Gregg Drilling & Testing, CA.
Moss, R. E. S., Seed, R. B., Kayen, R. E., Stewart, J. P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Cetin, K. O. (2006). “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1032–1051.
Rix, G. J., and Stokoe, K. H., II (1991). “Correlation of initial tangent modulus and cone penetration resistance.” Calibration chamber testing, Elsevier, New York, 351–361.
Robertson, P. K. (1990). “Soil classification using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J., 27(1), 151–158.
Robertson, P. K. (2009). “Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests—A unified approach.” Can. Geotech. J., 46(11), 1337–1355.
Robertson, P. K. (2010a). “Estimating in-situ state parameter and friction angle in sandy soils from CPT.” 2nd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, Gregg Drilling & Testing, CA.
Robertson, P. K. (2010b). “Evaluation of flow liquefaction and liquefied strength using the cone penetration test.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 842–853.
Robertson, P. K., Campanella, R. G., Gillespie, D., and Rice, A. (1986). “Seismic CPT to measure in-situ shear wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 791–803.
Robertson, P. K., Sasitharan, S., Cunning, J. C., and Sego, D. C. (1995). “Shear-wave velocity to evaluate in-situ state of Ottawa sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 262–273.
Robertson, P. K., Woeller, D. J., and Finn, W. D. L. (1992). “Seismic CPT for evaluating liquefaction potential.” Can. Geotech. J., 29(4), 686–695.
Robertson, P. K., and Wride, C. E. (1998). “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the CPT.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(3), 442–459.
Schmertmann, J. H. (1991). “The mechanical aging of soils.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1288–1330.
Schnaid, F., Lehane, B. M., and Fahey, M. (2004). “In situ characterization of unusual geomaterials.” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, Millpress, Rotterdam, 49–74.
Schneider, J. A., and Lehane, B. M. (2010). “Evaluation of cone penetration testing from a calcareous sand dune.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT’10, Gregg Drilling & Testing, CA.
Schneider, J. A., and Moss, R. E. S. (2011). “Linking cyclic stress and cyclic strain based methods for assessment of cyclic liquefaction triggering in sands.” Geotech. Lett., 1, 31–36.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1981). “Evaluation of liquefaction potential of sand deposits based on observations of performance in previous earthquakes.” Session on In Situ Testing to Evaluate Liquefaction Susceptibility, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Shibata, T., and Teparaksa, W. (1988). “Evaluation of liquefaction potentials of soils using cone penetration tests.” Soils Found., 28(2), 49–60.
Suzuki, Y., Tokimatsu, K., Taya, Y., and Kubota, Y. (1995). “Correlation between CPT data and dynamic properties of in situ frozen samples.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Vol. I, Univ. of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO.
Youd, T. L., et al. (2001). “Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 817–833.
Zhang, G., Robertson, P. K., and Brachman, R. W. I. (2002). “Estimating liquefaction induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground.” Can. Geotech. J., 39(5), 1168–1180.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 141Issue 9September 2015

History

Received: Jun 25, 2014
Accepted: Mar 20, 2015
Published online: May 4, 2015
Published in print: Sep 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Oct 4, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P. K. Robertson, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor Emeritus, Univ. of Alberta and Technical Advisor to Gregg Drilling and Testing, Inc., 2726 Walnut Ave., Signal Hill, CA 90755. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share