Case Studies
Jul 24, 2013

Method to Implement Delayed Product Differentiation in Construction of High-Rise Apartment Building Projects

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 10

Abstract

The customization of apartments can add value and increase clients’ satisfaction. However, companies offering such a strategy often face problems in managing the construction process. Delayed product differentiation—postponing the tasks that customize a product as much as possible—is a principle applied in manufacturing that enables companies to better cope with customization. Yet, it has not been widely explored in the building industry. This paper proposes a method to implement this principle in the construction of high-rise apartment building projects using the line-of-balance technique. First, the method is described, followed by its application in a project developed by a construction company. A comparison between the long-term plan devised using the proposed method and the initial plan shows a postponement of the decoupling point (namely, the first task that customizes an apartment) of approximately 42 weeks. At the end, the potential benefits and difficulties in creating such postponement and adopting the proposed method are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank C. Rolim Engenharia for supporting this study and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for sponsoring this research. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

References

Arditi, D., Tokdemir, O., and Kangsuk, S. (2002). “Challenges in line-of-balance scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(6), 545–556.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (2003). “Lean project management.” Build. Res. Inf., 31(2), 119–133.
Barlow, J., Childerhouse, P., Gann, D., Hong-Minh, S., Naim, M., and Ozaki, R. (2003). “Choice and delivery in housebuilding: Lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders.” Build. Res. Inf., 31(2), 134–145.
Barlow, J., and Ozaki, R. (2003). “Achieving ‘customer focus’ in private housebuilding: Current practice and lessons from other industries.” Hous. Stud., 18(1), 87–101.
Ernst, R., and Kamrad, B. (2000). “Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 124(3), 495–510.
Feitzinger, E., and Lee, H. L. (1997). “Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: The power of postponement.” Harv. Bus. Rev., 75(1), 116–121.
Frutos, J. D., and Borenstein, D. (2003). “Object-oriented model for customer-building company interaction in mass customization environment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(3), 302–313.
Hofman, E., Voordijk, H., and Halman, J. (2009). “Matching supply networks to a modular product architecture in the house-building industry.” Build. Res. Inf., 37(1), 31–42.
Jiao, M. M., and Tseng, J. (1996). “Design for mass customization.” CIRP Ann., 45(1), 153–156.
Kallantzis, A., Soldatos, J., and Lambropoulos, S. (2007). “Linear versus network scheduling: A critical path comparison.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(7), 483–491.
Koskela, L. (2000). An exploration towards production theory and its application to construction, Espoo 2000, Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT Publications 408.
Linner, T., and Bock, T. (2012). “Evolution of large-scale industrialisation and service innovation in Japanese prefabrication industry.” Constr. Innov. Inf. Process Manage., 12(2) 156–178.
Lumsden, P. (1968). The line of balance method, Pergamon Press, London.
Lutz, J. D., and Hijazi, A. (1993). “Planning repetitive construction: Current practice.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 11(2), 99–110.
Matilla, K. G., and Park, A. (2003). “Comparison of linear scheduling model and repetitive scheduling method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(1), 56–64.
Miranda, E., and Bourque, P. (2010). “Agile monitoring using the line of balance.” J. Syst. Softw., 83(7), 1205–1215.
Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., and Berry, D. (1999). “Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 62(1–2), 107–118.
Noguchi, M. (2003). “The effect of the quality-oriented production approach on the delivery of prefabricated homes in Japan.” J. Hous. Built Environ., 18(4), 353–364.
Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large scale production, Productivity Press, New York.
Olhager, J. (2003). “Strategic positioning of the order penetration point.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 85(3), 319–329.
Piller, F., and Kumar, A. (2006). “For each, their own: The strategic imperative of mass customization.” Ind. Eng., 38(9), 40–45.
Rocha, C. G. (2011). “A conceptual framework for defining customization strategies in the house-building sector.” Doctoral thesis, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Roy, R., Brown, J., and Gaze, C. (2003). “Re-engineering the construction process in the speculative house-building sector.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(2), 137–146.
Sacks, R., and Goldin, M. (2007). “Lean management model for construction of high-rise apartment buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(5), 374–384.
Sacks, R., Esquenazi, A., and Goldin, M. (2007). “LEAPCON: Simulation of lean construction of high-rise apartment buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(7), 529–539.
Veenstra, V. S., Halman, J. I. M., and Voordijk, J. T. (2006). “A methodology for developing product platforms in the specific setting of the housebuilding industry.” Res. Eng. Des., 17(3), 157–173.
Yang, B., and Burns, N. (2003). “Implications of postponement for the supply chain.” Int. J. Prod. Res., 41(9), 2075–2090.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 10October 2013

History

Received: Oct 22, 2012
Accepted: Jun 18, 2013
Published online: Jul 24, 2013
Published in print: Oct 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Dec 24, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cecília Gravina da Rocha [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering (DECIV), Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 99 Osvaldo Aranha Av., 3rd Floor, CEP 90035-190, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Sergio Luiz Kemmer
Ph.D. Candidate, School of the Built Environment, Univ. of Salford, The Crescent, Maxwell Building, 4th Floor, Salford M5 4WT, UK.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share