Abstract

The results of an experimental program comparing the responses of shear-critical rectangular columns tested under monotonic and reversed-cyclic loading are presented. These specimens had a constant compressive axial load and varying amounts of transverse reinforcement. Comparisons of the monotonic and reversed-cyclic loading responses are discussed. The reversed-cyclic peak shear strengths were about 11% and 17% lower, on average, than the monotonic peak strengths for the positive peak and the negative peak, respectively. Response predictions were made for columns from this experimental program, as well as for tests by other researchers, on rectangular shear-critical columns. Prediction methods included those based on current load and resistance factor design (LRFD) standards and seismic guidelines with and without an included strut, as well as nonlinear finite-element analysis. Methods based on official standards and guidelines gave similar conservative results for the shear strength. It was concluded that the addition of the horizontal components of inclined struts associated with the compressive axial loads to the sectional predictions improved the strength predictions by about 37% on average. In addition to providing accurate shear strength predictions, nonlinear finite-element analysis is capable of predicting the complete member response and accounts for the combined contributions of the concrete, transverse reinforcement, and inclined strut action from the applied axial compressive load.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors are grateful to Omar Shemy, M. Eng., for the immense contributions made by him during the construction and testing phase of this research program.

References

AASHTO. 2011. AASHTO guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ASTM. 2016. Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM A615/A615M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496/C496M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018a. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018b. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading). ASTM C78/C78M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bentz, E. C. 2005. “Explaining the riddle of tension stiffening models for shear panel experiments.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (9): 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1422).
Bentz, E. C., F. J. Vecchio, and M. P. Collins. 2006. “Simplified modified compression field theory for calculating shear strength of reinforced concrete elements.” ACI Struct. J. 103 (4): 614–624.
Berry, M., M. Parrish, and M. Eberhard. 2004. PEER structural performance database user’s manual, version 1.0. Berkeley, CA: PEER Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Bett, B. J., R. E. Klingner, and J. O. Jirsa. 1985. Behavior of strengthened and repaired reinforced concrete columns under cyclic deformations. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Collins, M. P., and D. Mitchell. 1991. Prestressed concrete structures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Collins, M. P., D. Mitchell, P. Adebar, and F. J. Vecchio. 1996. “A general shear design method.” ACI Struct. J. 93 (1): 36–45.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CAN/CSA S6:19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
FHWA-NHI (Federal Highway Administration-National Highway Institute). 2014. LRFD seismic analysis and design of bridges reference manual. Washington, DC: FHWA-NHI.
FIP (International Federation for Prestressing) Commission 3 on Practical Design. 1996. FIP recommendations 1996—Practical design of structural concrete. London: FIP.
Gerin, M., and P. Adebar. 2004. “Accounting for shear in seismic analysis of concrete structures.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC: 13WCEE Secretariat.
Khalifa, J. 1986. “Limit analysis of reinforced concrete shell elements.” Ph.D. thesis, Toronto, ON, Canada: Univ. of Toronto.
Kowalsky, M. J., and M. J. N. Priestley. 2000. “Improved analytical model for shear strength of circular reinforced concrete columns in seismic regions.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (2): 388–396.
Ledezma, C. 2013. “Lessons from the seismic performance of pile-supported bridges affected by liquefaction during the M8.8 2010 Maule Chile earthquake.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Case Histories in Geotechnical Eng. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Lynn, A. C., J. P. Moehle, S. A. Mahin, and W. T. Holmes. 1996. “Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete building columns.” Earthquake Spectra 12 (4): 715–739. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585907.
Mansour, M., and T. T. C. Hsu. 2005. “Behavior of reinforced concrete elements under cyclic shear. II: Theoretical model.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (1): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:1(54).
Massa, R. J., O. Shemy, W. D. Cook, and D. Mitchell. 2022. “Shear strength of short rectangular bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (2): 11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001824.
Mitchell, D., S. Huffman, R. Tremblay, M. Saatcioglu, D. Palermo, R. Tinawi, and D. Lau. 2013. “Damage to bridges due to the 27 February 2010 Chile earthquake.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40 (8): 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1139/l2012-045.
Palermo, D., and F. J. Vecchio. 2007. “Simulation of cyclically loaded concrete structures based on the finite-element method.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (5): 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:5(728).
Pan, Z., and B. Li. 2013. “Truss-arch model for shear strength of shear-critical reinforced concrete columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (4): 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000677.
Pang, X.-B., and T. T. C. Hsu. 1995. “Behavior of reinforced concrete membrane elements in shear.” ACI Struct. J. 92 (6): 665–677.
Paulay, T., and M. J. N. Priestley. 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2003. “PEER structural performance database (SPD).” PEER Univ. of California, Berkeley. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://nisee.berkeley.edu/spd/.
Priestley, M. J. N., R. Verma, and Y. Xiao. 1994. “Seismic shear strength of reinforced concrete columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (8): 2310–2329. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:8(2310).
Ruggiero, D. M. 2015. “The behaviour of reinforced concrete subjected to reversed cyclic loads.” Ph.D. thesis, Toronto, ON, Canada: Univ. of Toronto.
Ruggiero, D. M., E. C. Bentz, G. M. Calvi, and M. P. Collins. 2016. “Shear response under reversed cyclic loading.” ACI Struct. J. 113 (6): 1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689033.
Seckin, M. 1981. “Hysteretic behaviour of cast-in-place exterior beam–column–slab subassemblies.” Ph.D. thesis, Toronto, ON, Canada: Univ. of Toronto.
Stevens, N. J., S. Uzumeri, and M. P. Collins. 1991. “Reinforced concrete subjected to reversed cyclic shear—Experiments and constitutive model.” ACI Struct. J. 88 (2): 135–146.
Umehara, H., and J. O. Jirsa. 1982. Shear strength and deterioration of short reinforced concrete columns under cyclic deformations. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Vecchio, F. J. 2021. VecTor2. Toronto: VecTor Analysis Group. Accessed September 24, 2021. http://vectoranalysisgroup.com/software.html.
Vecchio, F. J. 1999. “Towards cyclic load modeling of reinforced concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 96 (2): 192–202.
Vecchio, F. J., and M. P. Collins. 1986. “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI Struct. J. 83 (2): 219–231.
Vecchio, F. J., M. P. Collins, and J. Aspiotis. 1994. “High-strength concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI Struct. J. 91 (4): 423–432.
Walraven, J. C., and H. W. Reinhardt. 1981. “Theory and experiments on the mechanical behaviour of cracks in plain and reinforced concrete subjected to shear loading.” Heron 26 (1A): 1–68.
Wight, J. K., and M. A. Sozen. 1973. Shear strength decay in reinforced concrete columns subjected to large deflection reversals. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Yen, W.-H. P., G. Chen, I. Buckle, T. Allen, D. Alzamora, J. Ger, and J. G. Arias. 2011. Post-earthquake reconnaissance report on transportation infrastructure: Impact of the February 27, 2010, offshore Maule earthquake in Chile. FHWA-HRT-11-030. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 8August 2022

History

Received: Nov 24, 2021
Accepted: Mar 16, 2022
Published online: May 30, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 0C3 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2486-0606. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 0C3. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-6523. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 0C3. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-2685. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share