Evaluation of Pretensioned Girders with Partial-Strand Debonding
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 8
Abstract
Pretensioned concrete girders—especially those having large prestress forces—are susceptible to flexural cracking at their top flanges near the girder end as a result of prestress transfer. One effective method to reduce such extreme-fiber stresses is to partially debond some of the strands. The 2017 edition of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications provides limits on the number of strands that can be debonded at a given location and in each row of strands. The limits are attributed to an experimental study in which the test specimens were designed under the previous AASHTO Standard Specifications. Some states have allowed the AASHTO limits to be exceeded, while others have adhered to the limits. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 12-91 Strand Debonding for Pretensioned Girders was initiated to develop a unified approach to the design of partially debonded strand details in prestressed concrete bridge girders. Detailed design case studies and synthesis of experimental data suggest that the debonding ratio is not a sufficient metric by itself to gauge the performance and capacity of prestressed concrete girders. Despite having a greater extent of debonding than the 2017 AASHTO limits, girders meeting the requirements for shear and longitudinal reinforcement in end regions are expected to perform adequately in terms of strength, deformability, stiffness, crack widths, and modes of failure.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The research presented in this paper was a part of NCHRP Project 12-91 Strand Debonding for Pretensioned Girders (Shahrooz et al. 2017). The authors wish to thank the NCHRP Project Panel and the Senior Program Officer, Dr. Waseem Dekelbab, for their project oversight and valuable insight and feedback throughout the project. James Thompson and Malory Gooding (both students at the Univ. of Cincinnati) were instrumental in the experimental phase of NCHRP 12-91, their contribution is gratefully acknowledged. The material presented in this paper is reproduced with permission of the Transportation Research Board.
References
AASHTO. 1989. Standard specifications for highway bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2000. LRFD bridge design specifications. 1st ed., with 2000 interim revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2016. LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th ed., with 2015 and 2016 interim revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Barnes, R., N. Burns, and M. Kreger. 1999. Development length of 0.6-inch prestressing strand in standard I-shaped pretensioned concrete beams. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-02/1388-1. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, Uni. of Texas at Austin.
Collins, M. P. 1997. “Shear behavior of full-scale prestressed concrete girders: Comparison between AASHTO specifications and LRFD code—Comments and authors’ closure.” PCI J. 42 (3): 72–93.
Ross, B. E. 2012. “Function and design of confinement reinforcement in pretensioned concrete I-girders.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Florida.
Russell, H. G., R. N. Bruce, and J. J. Roller. 2003. “Shear tests of high performance concrete bulb-tee girders.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on High Performance Concrete and PCI National Bridge Conf. Chicago, IL: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute. CD-ROM.
Shahawy, M., B. Robinson, and B. d. V. Batchelor. 1993. An investigation of shear strength of prestressed concrete AASHTO Type II girders. Research Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Dept. of Transportation, Structures Research Center.
Shahrooz, B. M., R. A. Miller, K. A. Harries, Q. Yu, and H. G. Russell. 2017. Strand debonding for pretensioned girders, transportation research board. NCHRP Rep. No. 849. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 31, 2019
Accepted: Mar 6, 2020
Published online: Jun 8, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 8, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.