Technical Papers
May 18, 2020

Stochastic Modeling and Reliability Analysis of Wing Flutter

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 5

Abstract

In this work, a physics-based first-order reliability method (FORM) algorithm is proposed for the flutter reliability analysis of an aircraft wing in the frequency domain. The limit state function, which is an implicit function of random variables, is defined in terms of the damping ratio of the aeroelastic system in a conditional sense on flow velocity. Two aeroelastic cases, namely, an airfoil section model and a cantilever wing model, are considered for carrying out the studies. These aeroelastic models have well separated mean bending and mean torsional modal frequencies. The geometric, structural, and aerodynamic parameters of airfoil and wing systems are modeled as independent Gaussian random variables. The effects of these on the statistics of frequency and damping ratio, and the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of flutter velocity are studied. In the case of the wing, the effects of modeling stiffness parameters as Gaussian random fields on the CDFs of flutter velocity are also studied. Here, spectral stochastic finite element method (SFEM) based on Karhunen–Loeve (K–L) expansion is used to discretize the random fields into random variables. From the study of an airfoil system, it is observed that parameters like torsional stiffness, elastic axis location, free stream density, and mass moment of inertia are more sensitive as compared with other parameters. However, in the case of the wing parameters such as torsional stiffness, free stream density, mass moment of inertia, and mass are observed to be more sensitive. The CDFs of flutter velocity obtained using the proposed algorithm are compared with Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) and found to be accurate. A comparative study of aeroelastic reliability for the wing is also carried out by treating stiffness parameters as random variables and random fields. It is observed that the CDFs of flutter velocity in the tail region are conservative when stiffness parameters are treated as random variables.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.
Restriction: All data may be provided on request but codes are proprietary or confidential in nature.

References

Argentini, T., A. Pagani, D. Rocchi, and A. Zasso. 2014. “Monte Carlo analysis of total damping and flutter speed of a long span bridge: Effects of structural and aerodynamic uncertainties.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 128 (May): 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.02.010.
Baldomir, A., I. Kusano, S. Hernandez, and J. A. Jurado. 2013. “A reliability study for the Messina bridge with respect to flutter phenomena considering uncertainties in experimental and numerical data.” Comput. Struct. 128 (Nov): 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.07.004.
Bisplinghoff, R. L., and H. Ashley. 2013. Principles of aeroelasticity. Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation.
Borello, F., E. Cestino, and G. Frulla. 2010. “Structural uncertainty effect on classical wing flutter characteristics.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 23 (4): 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000049.
Canor, T., L. Caracoglia, and V. Denoël. 2015. “Application of random eigenvalue analysis to assess bridge flutter probability.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 140 (May): 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.02.001.
Caracoglia, L. 2008. “Influence of uncertainty in selected aerodynamic and structural parameters on the buffeting response of long-span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (3): 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.08.001.
Castravete, S. C., and R. A. Ibrahim. 2008. “Effect of stiffness uncertainties on the flutter of a cantilever wing.” AIAA J. 46 (4): 925–935. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.31692.
Cheng, J., C. S. Cai, R.-C. Xiao, and S. Chen. 2005. “Flutter reliability analysis of suspension bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 93 (10): 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.08.003.
Cheng, J., and R.-C. Xiao. 2005. “Probabilistic free vibration and flutter analyses of suspension bridges.” Eng. Struct. 27 (10): 1509–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.016.
Fung, Y. C. 2008. An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications.
Ghanem, R. G., and P. D. Spanos. 2003. Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Goland, M., and N. Y. Buffalo. 1945. “The flutter of a uniform cantilever wing.” J. Appl. Mech. 12 (4): A197–A208.
Haldar, A., and S. Mahadevan. 2000a. Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. New York: Wiley.
Haldar, A., and S. Mahadevan. 2000b. Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis. New York: Wiley.
Hassig, H. J. 1971. “An approximate true damping solution of the flutter equation by determinant iteration.” J. Aircr. 8 (11): 885–889. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.44311.
Hodges, D. H., and G. A. Pierce. 2011. Introduction to structural dynamics and aeroelasticity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, S. P., S. T. Quek, and K. K. Phoon. 2001. “Convergence study of the truncated Karhunen–Loeve expansion for simulation of stochastic processes.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 52 (9): 1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.255.
Irani, S., and S. Sazesh. 2013. “A new flutter speed analysis method using stochastic approach.” J. Fluids Struct. 40 (Jul): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.03.018.
Irwin, C. A. K., and P. R. Guyett. 1965. The subcritical response and flutter of a swept-wing model. London, UK: HM Stationery Office.
Kumar, S., A. K. Onkar, and M. Maligappa. 2019. “Frequency domain approach for probabilistic flutter analysis using stochastic finite elements.” Meccanica 54 (14): 2207–2225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-01061-9.
Melchers, R. E., and A. T. Beck. 2018. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. New York: Wiley.
Murthy, D. V., and R. T. Haftka. 1988. “Derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a general complex matrix.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 26 (2): 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620260202.
Nelson, R. B. 1976. “Simplified calculation of eigenvector derivatives.” AIAA J. 14 (9): 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7211.
Nowak, A. S., and K. R. Collins. 2012. Reliability of structures. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Pettit, C. L. 2004. “Uncertainty quantification in aeroelasticity: Recent results and research challenges.” J. Aircr. 41 (5): 1217–1229. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.3961.
Pitt, D., D. Haudrich, M. Thomas, and K. Griffin. 2008. “Probabilistic aeroelastic analysis and its implications on flutter margin requirements.” In Proc., Collection of Technical Papers—AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Pourazarm, P., L. Caracoglia, M. Lackner, and Y. Modarres-Sadeghi. 2016. “Perturbation methods for the reliability analysis of wind-turbine blade failure due to flutter.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 156 (Sep): 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.07.011.
Pourzeynali, S., and T. K. Datta. 2002. “Reliability analysis of suspension bridges against flutter.” J. Sound Vibr. 254 (1): 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.4090.
Rackwitz, R., and B. Flessler. 1978. “Structural reliability under combined random load sequences.” Comput. Struct. 9 (5): 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9.
Seo, D.-W., and L. Caracoglia. 2011. “Estimation of torsional-flutter probability in flexible bridges considering randomness in flutter derivatives.” Eng. Struct. 33 (8): 2284–2296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.03.016.
Shufang, S., L. Zhenzhou, Z. Weiwei, and Y. Zhengyin. 2009. “Reliability and sensitivity analysis of transonic flutter using improved line sampling technique.” Chin. J Aeronaut. 22 (5): 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60134-X.
Spanos, P. D., and R. Ghanem. 1989. “Stochastic finite element expansion for random media.” J. Eng. Mech. 115 (5): 1035–1053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:5(1035).
Su, C., J. Luo, and C. Xiao. 2013. “Efficient approach for reliability assessments on aeroinstability of long-span bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (6): 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000447.
Theodorsen, T. 1935. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
Ueda, T. 2005. “Aeroelastic analysis considering structural uncertainty.” Aviation 9 (1): 3–7. https://doi.org/10.3846/16487788.2005.9635889.
Van Trees, H. L. 2004. Detection, estimation, and modulation theory. Part I: Detection, estimation, and linear modulation theory. New York: Wiley.
Verhoosel, C. V., T. P. Scholcz, S. J. Hulshoff, and M. A. Gutiérrez. 2009. “Uncertainty and reliability analysis of fluid-structure stability boundaries.” AIAA J. 47 (1): 91–104. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.35770.
Wang, L., Q. Ren, Y. Ma, and D. Wu. 2019. “Optimal maintenance design-oriented nonprobabilistic reliability methodology for existing structures under static and dynamic mixed uncertainties.” IEEE Trans. Reliab. 68 (2): 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2018.2868773.
Wang, L., C. Xiong, J. Hu, X. Wang, and Z. Qiu. 2018. “Sequential multidisciplinary design optimization and reliability analysis under interval uncertainty.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 80 (Sep): 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.029.
Wang, X., and Z. Qiu. 2009. “Nonprobabilistic interval reliability analysis of wing flutter.” AIAA J. 47 (3): 743–748. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39880.
Wright, J. R., and J. E. Cooper. 2008. Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and loads. New York: Wiley.
Yao, G., Y. Zhang, and C. Li. 2018. “Aeroelastic reliability and sensitivity analysis of a plate interacting with stochastic axial airflow.” Int. J. Dyn. Control 6 (2): 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-017-0338-2.
Yuting, D., and Y. Chao. 2014. “Methods and advances in the study of aeroelasticity with uncertainties.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 27 (3): 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2014.04.016.
Zheng, Y., and Z. Qiu. 2018. “Non-probabilistic stability reliability analysis of composite laminated panels in supersonic flow with uncertain-but-bounded parameters.” In Proc., AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 33Issue 5September 2020

History

Received: Sep 3, 2019
Accepted: Feb 5, 2020
Published online: May 18, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sandeep Kumar [email protected]
Ph.D. Scholar, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Aerospace Laboratories, Bengaluru 560017, India; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Aerospace Laboratories, Old Airport Rd., Bengaluru 560017, India. Email: [email protected]
Amit K. Onkar, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor and Principal Scientist, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Aerospace Laboratories, Bengaluru 560017, India; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Aerospace Laboratories, Old Airport Rd., Bengaluru 560017, India. Email: [email protected]
M. Manjuprasad, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor and Chief Scientist, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Aerospace Laboratories, Bengaluru 560017, India; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Aerospace Laboratories, Old Airport Rd., Bengaluru 560017, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share