TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 1, 2005

Analysis of a Large Database of GCL Internal Shear Strength Results

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 3

Abstract

A database of 414 large-scale direct shear test results was assembled to evaluate variables governing geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) internal shear strength. The tests were conducted by a single independent laboratory over 12 years using procedures consistent with current testing standards. A wide range of GCL types, normal stresses, and shear displacement rates allowed investigation of the effect of reinforcement, pore water pressure generation, and sources of shear strength variability. Reinforced GCLs showed higher strength than unreinforced GCLs, with needle-punched GCLs performing better than stitch-bonded GCLs. Thermal locking of needle-punched GCLs was found to be effective at high normal stress, but hydration using low hydration normal stress was found to decrease the effectiveness of thermal locking. Shear-induced pore water pressures were indirectly evaluated using shear strength results from tests conducted using normal stresses above and below that corresponding to the GCL swell pressure. The peak shear strength was found to increase with decreasing shear displacement rates for high normal stresses, while the opposite trend was observed for low normal stresses. Shear strength envelopes showed a bilinear response, with a break at normal stresses consistent with the GCL swell pressure. Good repeatability of test results was obtained using the same-manufacturing-lot GCL specimens, while comparatively high variability was obtained using different-lot specimens. Peak shear strength variability was found to increase linearly with normal stress, but to be insensitive to specimen conditioning procedures. Evaluation of reinforced and unreinforced GCL test results indicates that, in addition to reinforcement variability, bentonite variability contributes to the shear strength variability of reinforced GCLs. Peel strength was found not to be a good indicator of the contribution of fibers to the GCL peak shear strength.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank SGI Testing Services and GeoSyntec Consultants for making available the experimental results analyzed in this study. Review provided by Dr. Paul Sabatini and Dr. Neven Matasovic of GeoSyntec Consultants is appreciated. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the writers.

References

American Society of Testing and Materials. (1998). “Standard test method for determining the internal and interface shear resistance of geosynthetic clay liner by the direct shear method.” ASTM D6243, West Conshohocken, Pa.
American Society of Testing and Materials. (1999). “Standard test method for determining average bonding peel strength between the top and bottom layers of needle-punched geosynthetic clay liners.” ASTM D6496, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Eid, H. T., and Stark, T. D. (1997). “Shear behavior of an unreinforced geosynthetic clay liner.” Geosynthet. Int., 4(6), 645–659.
Eid, H. T., Stark, T. D., and Doerfler, C. K. (1999). “Effect of shear displacement rate on internal shear strength of a reinforced geosynthetic clay liner.” Geosynthet. Int., 6(3), 219–239.
Fox, P. J., Rowland, M. G., and Scheithe, J. R. (1998). “Internal shear strength of three geosynthetic clay liners.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(10), 933–944.
Heerten, G., Saathoff, F., Scheu, C., von Maubeuge, K. P. (1995) “On the long-term shear behavior of geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) in capping sealing systems.” Proc., Int. Symposium Geosynthetic Clay Liners, 141–150.
Helsel, D. R., and Hirsh, R. M. (1991). Statistical methods in water resources, United States Geologic Survey.
Gilbert, R. B., Fernandez, F. F., and Horsfield, D. (1996). “Shear strength of a reinforced. clay liner.” J. Geotech. Eng., 122(4), 259–266.
Gilbert, R. B., Scranton, H. B., and Daniel, D. E. (1997). “Shear strength testing for geosynthetic clay liners.” Testing and acceptance criteria for geosynthetic clay liners, ASTM STP 1308, L. W. Well, ed., ASTM, Philadelphia, 121–138.
Lake, C. G., and Rowe, R. K. (2000). “Swelling characteristics of needle-punched, thermal treated geosynthetic clay liners.” Geotext. Geomembr., 18, 77–101.
McCartney, J. S., Zornberg, J. G., and Swan, R. (2002). “Internal and interface shear strength of Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs).” Geotech. Research Rep., Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder.
McCartney, J. S., Zornberg, J. G., Swan, R. H., Jr., and Gilbert, R. B. (2004). “Reliability-based stability analysis considering GCL shear strength variability.” Geosynthet. Int.11(3), 212-232.
Mesri, G., and Olson, R. E. (1970). “Shear strength of montmorillonite.” Geotechnique, 20(3), 261–270.
Petrov, R. J., Rowe, R. K., and Quigley, R. M. (1997). “Selected factors influencing GCL hydraulic conductivity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 123(8), 683–695.
Richardson, G. N. (1997). “GCL internal shear strength requirements.” Geosynth. Fabric Rep., March, 20–25.
Stark, T. D. (1997). “Effect of swell pressure on GCL cover stability.” Testing and Acceptance Criteria for Geosynthetic Clay Liners, ASTM STP 1308, L. W. Well, ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 30–44.
Stark, T. D., and Eid, H. T. (1996). “Shear behavior of a reinforced geosynthetic clay liner.” Geosynthet. Int., 3(6), 771–785.
Stoewahse, C., Nixon, N., Jones, D. R. V., Blumel, W., and Kamugisha, P. (2002). “Geosynthetic interface shear behavior.” Ground Eng., February, 35–41.
Zornberg, J. G. (2002). “Discrete framework for limit equilibrium analysis of fiber-reinforced soil.” Geotechnique, 52(8), 593–604.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 131Issue 3March 2005
Pages: 367 - 380

History

Received: Oct 31, 2002
Accepted: Apr 23, 2004
Published online: Mar 1, 2005
Published in print: Mar 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jorge G. Zornberg, M.ASCE
Clyde E. Lee Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Stn., C1792, Austin TX 98712-0280.
John S. McCartney, S.M.ASCE
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Stn., C1792, Austin TX 98712-0280.
Robert H. Swan Jr.
President and CEO, SGI Testing Services, Atlanta, GA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share