Effect of Live Load Surcharge on Retaining Walls and Abutments
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 10
Abstract
In the conventional design of retaining walls and bridge abutments, the lateral earth pressure due to live load surcharge is estimated by replacing the actual highway loads with a 600 mm layer of backfill. This original recommendation was made several decades ago when the highway truck loads were much lighter. A number of researchers have shown that the pressure exerted on the wall due to live load surcharge is greater near the surface and is diminished nonlinearly throughout the height of the wall. The heavier highway loads and the demonstrated nonlinear earth pressure distribution require a need for a more rational method for obtaining the equivalent height of backfill. This paper discusses theoretical background, an analytical approach to estimation of actual earth pressure, a number of innovative approaches to obtain a simplified pressure distribution, an extensive parametric study, calibration procedures for the traditional method, and recommendations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO). (1994). LRFD specifications for highway bridges, 1st Ed., AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO). (1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 16th Ed., AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Boussinesq, M. J. (1876). “Theoretical essay on the equilibrium of elasticity of pulverulent masses and on the pressure of earths without cohesion.” Memoires Couronnes, Acad. R. Sci. Belg., 40(4).
Burmister, D. M. (1943). “The theory of stresses and displacements in layered systems and applications to the design of airport runways.” Proc., Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., 23, 127–148.
Gerber, E. (1929). Discussion of investigations of the distribution of pressure in locally loaded sand, A.-G. Gebr. Leemann, Zurich.
Holl, D. L. (1940). “Stress transmission in earths.” Proc., Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., 20, 709–721.
La Roche, M. (1992). “Cantilevered concrete retaining wall: ASD, LFD and LRFD comparison.” Rep. to State Bridge Office, Kansas Dept. of Transportation, Topeka, Kan., November 5.
Mindlin, R. D. (1936). “Discussion: Pressure distribution on retaining walls.” Proc., Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass., 155–156.
Peck, R. B., Hanson, W. E., and Thornburn, T. H. (1974). Foundation engineering, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Poulos, H. G., and Davis, E. H. (1974). Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics, Wiley, New York.
Seed, R. B., and Duncan, J. M. (1983). “Soil-structure interaction effects of compaction-induced stresses and deflections.” Rep. No. UCB/GT/83-06, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Spangler, M. G. (1936). “The distribution of normal pressure on a retaining wall due to a concentrated surface load.” Proc., Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass., 200–207.
Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., and Desri, G. (1996). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers). (1989). “Engineering and design retaining and flood walls.” Manual EM No. 1110-2-2502, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 25, 2001
Accepted: Mar 27, 2002
Published online: Sep 13, 2002
Published in print: Oct 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.