Training Artificial Neural Networks to Perform Rainfall Disaggregation
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 1
Abstract
Hydrologists and engineers need methods to disaggregate hourly rainfall data into subhourly increments for many hydrologic and hydraulic engineering applications. In the present engineering environment where time efficiency and cost effectiveness are paramount characteristics of engineering tools, disaggregation techniques must be practical and accurate. One particularly attractive technique for disaggregating long-term hourly rainfall records into subhourly increments involves the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs). A past investigation of ANN rainfall disaggregation models indicated that although ANNs can be applied effectively there are several considerations concerning the characteristics of the ANN model and the training methods employed. The research presented in this paper evaluated the influence on performance of several ANN model characteristics and training issues including data standardization, geographic location of training data, quantity of training data, number of training iterations, and the number of hidden neurons in the ANN. Results from this study suggest that data from rainfall-gauging stations within several hundred kilometers of the station to be disaggregated are adequate for training the ANN rainfall disaggregation model. Further, we found the number of training iterations, the limits of data standardization, the number of training data sets, and the number of hidden neurons in the ANN to exhibit varying degrees of influence over the ANN model performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burian, S. J., Durrans, S. R., Tomic, S., Pimmel, R. L., and Wai, C. N. (2000). “Rainfall disaggregation using artificial neural networks.”J. Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE, 5(3), 299–307.
2.
Connolly, R. D., Schirmer, J., and Dunn, P. K. ( 1998). “A daily rainfall disaggregation model.” Agric. and Forest Meteorology, 92, 105–117.
3.
Dowla, F. U., and Rogers, L. L. ( 1995). Solving problems in environmental engineering and geosciences with artificial neural networks, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
4.
Durrans, S. R., et al. ( 1999). “Polynomial-based disaggregation of hourly rainfall for continuous hydrologic simulation.” Am. Water Resour. Assn., 35(5), 1213–1221.
5.
Foufoula-Georgiou, E., and Krajewski, W. F. ( 1995). “Recent advances in rainfall modeling, estimation, and forecasting.” Review of geophysics, U.S. Nat. Rep. to Int. Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 991–1994, 1125–1137.
6.
Hagan, M. T., Demuth, H. B., and Beale, M. ( 1996). Neural network design, PWS/KENT Publishing Co., Boston.
7.
Hershenhorn, J., and Woolhiser, D. A. ( 1987). “Disaggregation of daily rainfall.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 95, 299–322.
8.
Koutsoyiannis, D., and Xanthopoulos, T. ( 1990). “A dynamic-model for short-scale rainfall disaggregation.” Hydrological Sci. J., Oxford, England, 35, 303–322.
9.
Liou, E. Y. ( 1970). “OPSET—Program for computerized selection of watershed parameter values of the Stanford Watershed Model.” Res. Rep. 34, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.
10.
Minns, A. W., and Hall, M. J. ( 1996). “Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models.” Hydrological Sci. J., Oxford, England, 41(3), 399–417.
11.
Ormsbee, L. E. (1989). “Rainfall disaggregation model for continuous hydrologic modeling.”J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 115(4), 507–525.
12.
Perica, S., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E. ( 1996). “Model for multiscale disaggregation of spatial rainfall based on coupling meteorological and scaling descriptions.” J. Geophys. Res., 101(D21), 26347–26361.
13.
Rumelhart, D. E., Hilton, G. E., and Williams, R. J. ( 1994). “The basic ideas in neural networks.” Communications of ACM, 37(3), 87–92.
14.
Smith, J., and Eli, R. N. (1995). “Neural-network models of rainfall-runoff process.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 121(6), 499–508.
15.
Thirumalaiah, K., and Deo, M. C. (1998). “River stage forecasting using artificial neural networks.”J. Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE, 3(1), 26–32.
16.
Tsintikidis, D., Haferman, J. L., Anagnostou, E. N., Krajewski, W. F., and Smith, T. F. ( 1997). “Neural network approach to estimating rainfall from spaceborne microwave data.” IEEE Trans. of Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 35(5), 1079–1093.
17.
Valiant, L. G. ( 1984). “A theory of the learnable.” Communications of ACM, 27(11), 1134–1142.
18.
Venugopal, V., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., and Sapozhnikov, V. ( 1999). “A space-time downscaling model for rainfall.” J. Geophys. Res., 104(D16), 19705–19721.
19.
Xiao, R., and Chandrasekar, V. ( 1997). “Development of a neural network based algorithm for rainfall estimation from radar observations.” IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35(1), 160–171.
20.
Zawadzki, I. ( 1987). “Fractal structure and exponential decorrelation in rain.” J. Geophys. Res., 92(D8), 9586–9590.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 6 • Issue 1 • January 2001
Pages: 43 - 51
History
Received: Jul 12, 1999
Published online: Jan 1, 2001
Published in print: Jan 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.