Practical Means for Energy-Based Analyses of Disproportionate Collapse Potential
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 20, Issue 4
Abstract
For several decades, the engineering profession has considered techniques to analyze the potential that structures could experience disproportionate collapse and to design them for greater resistance to such collapse. First interest in such design followed the partial collapse in 1968 of the Ronan Point building in London, a high rise residential structure that experienced full height collapse of a portion of the building following a relatively small kitchen-related gas explosion. Interest in collapse phenomena continued to build following the attack on the Alfred P. Murrah building in 1995 and has been at an apex since the collapses of the twin towers at the World Trade Center and the nearby World Trade Center 7 building in 2001. Presently researchers and engineers are studying structural performance during extreme deformations, systems to resist disproportionate collapse, and methods to analyze collapse potential. The goal is to develop techniques to accurately and cost efficiently assess collapse potential and to enhance robustness at appropriate cost. Analysis methods in common use include sophisticated dynamic, nonlinear modeling of structural systems with high-fidelity structural analysis computer software, and simplified approaches that are intended to capture the essential behaviors during collapse scenarios. Unfortunately, the sophisticated approaches require software not normally owned by design engineers, substantial experience in the modeling of collapse phenomena, and time and cost implications that cannot be supported by the present design fees and, indeed, are not warranted for many situations. Simplified analysis methods in common use are generally empirically based. Hence, they do not capture the essential behaviors of collapse mechanisms, and are of uncertain applicability for all but structural systems for which they have been calibrated. This paper presents two energy-based methods that capture the essential physics of collapse phenomena, and have potential to be developed into simplified procedures for collapse potential assessment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Burnett, E. F. P. (1975). “The avoidance of progressive collapse: Regulatory approaches to the problem.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Oct. 1975 NBS-GCR 75-48, Washington, D.C.
Corley, W. G., Mlakar, P. F., Sr., Sozen, M. A., and Thornton, C. H. (1998). “The Oklahoma City bombing: Summary and recommendations for multihazard mitigation.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 12(3), 100–112.
Dusenberry, D. O., and Juneja, G. (2002). “Review of existing guidelines and provisions relating to progressive collapse.” Proc., Multihazard Mitigation Council National Workshop on Prevention of Progressive Collapse, Chicago.
Ellingwood, B., and Leyendecker, E. V. (1978). “Approaches for design against progressive collapse.” J. Struct. Div., 104(ST3), 413–423.
General Services Administration (GSA). (2003). Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects, Washington, D.C.
Hamburger, R. O., and Whittaker, A. (2004). “Design of steel structures for blast-related progressive collapse resistance.” Proc., AISC Symp. on Blast and Progressive Collapse, New York City.
Hinman, E. E., and Hammond, D. J. (1997). “Lessons from the Oklahoma City bombing.” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va.
Leyendecker, E. V., and Ellingwood, B. R. (1977). Design methods for reducing the risk of progressive collapse in buildings, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
McGuire, W. (1974). “Prevention of progressive collapse.” Proc., Regional Conf. on Tall Buildings, Bangkok, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mlakar, P., Dusenberry, D. O., Harris, J. R., Haynes, G., Phan, L. T., and Sozen, M. A. (2002). The Pentagon Building Performance Rep., American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va.
National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST). (2005). Final Rep. on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers, Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Md.
National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST). (2006). Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings, Draft document for use during Fall 2006 NIST-SEI Workshop, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Md.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 18, 2006
Accepted: Apr 11, 2006
Published online: Nov 1, 2006
Published in print: Nov 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.