Effect of Sampling Variability on Hindcast and Measured Wave Heights
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 5
Abstract
Estimates of significant wave heights made from finite record lengths have a small but important statistical sampling variability. This variability leads to positive biases in the maximum significant wave height in a storm and in design wave heights estimated from extreme value distributions fitted to the data. Since wave hindcasts are often verified by comparing the maximum hindcast and measured significant wave heights in a storm, the bias due to sampling variability can make a correct hindcast appear to be too low. In this paper we show how the magnitude of the biases can be calculated from the sample length and the shape of the wave spectrum. These theoretical calculations agree very well with results from several sets of measurements in the North Sea. We recommend that new wave measurements be recorded continuously whenever possible, and that hindcast verifications and extreme wave calculations be made with smoothed versions of the measured time series of significant wave height.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Borgman, L. E.(1973). “Probabilities for highest wave in hurricane.”J. Wtrwy., Harb., and Coast. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 99(2), 185–207.
2.
Donelan, M., and Pierson, W. J. (1983). “The sampling variability of estimates of spectra of wind-generated waves.”J. Geophysical Res., 88(C7), 4381–4392.
3.
Earle, M. D., and Baer, L.(1982). “Effects of uncertainties on extreme wave heights.”J. Wtrwy., Port, Coast., and Oc. Div., ASCE, 108(4), 456–478.
4.
Goda, Y., et al. (1993). “Intercomparison of extremal wave analysis methods using numerically simulated data.”Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. Oc. Wave Measurement and Analysis, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
5.
Jonathan, P., Taylor, P. H., and Tromans, P. S. (1994). “Storm waves in the northern North Sea.”Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on the Behaviour of Offshore Struct. (BOSS), MIT, Boston, Mass.
6.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. (1986). Numerical recipies: The art of scientific computing . Cambridge University Press, London, U.K.
7.
Rayleigh, J. W. S. (1969). “On the resultant of a large number of vibrations of the same pitch and arbitrary phase.”Scientific Papers, Dover, New York, N.Y.
8.
Tromans, P. S., and Vanderschuren, L. (1995). “Response based design conditions in the North Sea: Application of a new method.”Proc., 27th Ann. Offshore Technol. Conf., OTC, Houston, Tex., p. 7683.
9.
Tucker, M. J. (1991). Waves in ocean engineering: Measurement, analysis, interpretation . Ellis Horwood, New York, N.Y.
10.
Tucker, M. J. (1992). “Recommended standard for wave data sampling and real-time processing.”Tech. Rep. 3.14/186, E&P Forum, London, U.K., 25–28.
11.
van Vledder, G., et al. (1993). “Case studies of extreme wave analysis: A comparative analysis.”Ocean Wave Measurement and Analysis, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
12.
Young, I. R.(1986). “Probability distribution of spectral integrals.”J. Wtrwy., Ports, Coast., and Oc. Engrg., ASCE, 112(4), 338–341.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 5 • September 1996
Pages: 216 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1996
Published in print: Sep 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.